Paper ID #7674Student Engagement Strategies in One Online Engineering and TechnologyCourseDr. Julie M Little-Wiles, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI Dr. Julie Little-Wiles is a Visiting Lecturer in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communi- cation in the School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) where she teaches courses in Leadership Philosophy, Leadership Theory, Ethics and International Management.Prof. Patricia Fox, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Patricia Fox is Associate Chair of the Department of Technology
context that requires the learner to document notonly the solution to the problem, but also their process for solving it (Frank & Kaupp, 2012; Page 23.1364.4Shuman, Besterfield-Sacre, Bursic, Vidic, & Sieworiek, 2012). The situations described in theMEAs require students to create and use a mathematical model of a physical system usingMATLAB, and deal with professional issues including ethical dilemmas, conflicting information,and incorrect/missing information (Frank, Strong, Sellens, & Clapham, 2012).The module learning outcomes are such that open-text responses are desirable; the learningoutcomes are: 1. Apply a prescribed process
wider social issues including US immigrationpolicy, climate change, personal privacy, and military contracts. Companies including Microsoft,IBM, Tableau, Salesforce, Facebook, Google and Amazon have exhibited a variety of responsesto manage this growth in social justice related petitions, walk-outs, and protests from theiremployees. Responses have ranged from firing individuals to meeting demands at least in part.Study of these activities in the engineering writing classroom has multiple benefits in terms ofdeveloping student’s sense of deliberate purpose, persuasive communication skills andunderstanding of ethical limits within the field of engineering. This paper reports on the potentialvalue of using a case study depicting Amazon’s “cubicle
: Work in Progress Postcard Session, T527·First-Year Programs: Work in Progress Postcard Session, 2019, https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/140/papers/26713/download[10] E.C. Clausen and J.T. McAllister III, “Connecting with Students in Large Classrooms,” Transactions on Techniques in STEM Education, 5(1), 18-29, 2019. https://www.asee.org/documents/sections/2018/paper_5.pdf[11] Adams, D. J. Annual Meeting of the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, "Be Social. Do Good. Shifting the Goals of Ethics Education," APPE - Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, Sheraton Hotel Atlanta, Atlanta, GA. (February 22, 2020).Biographical InformationRobert F. SaundersRobert Saunders currently serves as
humanitarian engineering program at Villanova is presented with anemphasis on lessons learned during the provision of technical support to international non-governmentorganizations. A qualitative review of success and failure is discussed based on program partner feedback,discussions with faculty, students, and communities. Conclusions from this paper raise some importantethical questions about the role of academic institutions when engaging with community partners. Inaddition, program design that employs the ethical engagement framework is described wherein, theimportance of contextual awareness and humility is highlighted. Next steps associated with this paperinclude the need to formally establish research-services with partner organizations
spreadthroughout the semester and weekly lectures which focused for five weeks on areas ofbiomedical engineering with the remaining lectures being divided between professionalism,ethics, and curriculum information. A final design project was included but it was entirelytheoretical with minimal instruction provided on the design process. The 2016 class included 51students who attending lecture together but were divided across 3 sections for workshops.In the fall of 2017, the course was restructured. The lectures were mostly recreated to focus on asemester-long design project, but a handful were maintained to cover professionalism, ethics,and curriculum information. Students attended weekly two-hour workshops instead of 3 persemester which were used to
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He received his B.S. in Computer Engineering from Sharif University of Technology in 2008 and his M.B.A. from University of Tehran in 2011. He has presented his research in past years at multiple conferences including American Evaluation Association, International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, and Academy of Human Resource Development. In His dissertation, he focused on ethical decision making processes among computer majors. His research interests include ethics educa- tion, computer ethics, talent development, online learning, and evaluation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
experimental result can be used to improve a process, and (iv) draw appropriate or reasonable conclusions.Performance Criteria for Outcome Group 3Outcome group 3 consists of (1) EAC Criterion 3, outcome c, “an ability to design a system,component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”,(2) TAC Criterion 3, outcome d, “ an ability to apply creativity in the design of systems,components or processes appropriate to program educational objectives, and (3) CAC Criterion 3c, “an ability to design, implement, and evaluate a computer-based system, process, component,or program to meet desired needs. Five performance
motivated efforts to expand the definition of student outcomes across countries. By the mid-1990s, ABET anticipated this need by shifting the accreditation basis toward outcomes ratherthan inputs, affecting engineering programs’ practices in the U.S. and in other countries, includedAustralia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom2. These criteria, widelyknown as EC2000, specified 11 learning outcomes (see Appendix 3)16: a) Five technical skills: Related to the development of students’ mathematical, scientific, and technical knowledge. b) Six professional skills: Those that emphasize communicating and working effectively on teams, besides the awareness of ethical and contextual
III. This course is a one lecture hour,three lab hour class and was taught for the first time during the Fall 2019 semester. The lecturecontains topics designed to complement the second engineering physics course onelectromagnetics such as electric fields, magnetic fields, and electric DC and AC circuits as wellas the application of these concepts to real-world engineering problems. In addition, a number ofother topics are addressed including data acquisition, microcontrollers, project management,engineering ethics and art in engineering. The laboratory component is conceptually innovativeand uses a newly developed three-axis positioning and data acquisition system that allowsstudents to automate the sensing and data analysis of electric and
Paper ID #21686Environmental Considerations in Engineering: Students’ Goals and JourneysDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, En- vironmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She is a licensed PE and has served as the ABET assessment coordinator in her department since 2008. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines Greg
engineering education.Dr. Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines Qin Zhu is Research Assistant Professor in the Ethics Across Campus Program and the Division of Hu- manities, Arts & Social Sciences at Colorado School of Mines, where he is also helping with managing the Daniels Fund Faculty Fellows Program that provides scholarly and grant support for faculty to explore ways to integrate ethics into their applied science and engineering curricula. Qin is also completing his second PhD degree in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Qin holds a bachelor’s degree in Materials Engineering and a PhD in Philosophy (concentration in Ethics of Technology and Engineering) from Dalian University of Technology (DUT
distinction between technical and professional is often blurred.Initially the committee attempted to classify all 21 proposed outcomes using both the cognitiveand affective domains. However, it proved difficult to distinguish the difference betweenTable 4. Example of Actions Demonstrating Affective Attainment. Level Example Receiving Individual reads a book passage and recognizes the relationship to ethical behavior. Responding Individual participates in a discussion about the book, reads another book by the same author or another book about ethical behavior, etc. Valuing The individual demonstrates this by voluntarily attending a
professional and ethical development activities. A course brick is a course structurewith ABET student outcomes embedded in it. In the second dimension, the communitycreation, students pursue a diverse set of opportunities unique to their personal interests andgoals such as clinical, research, and entrepreneurial experiences to be realized in partnershipwith other academic divisions including the medical school, business school, college ofveterinary medicine, college of design, or college of arts and sciences. In the third dimension,professional development, students assimilate a rich set of professional skills. The pedagogicaltheory behind the 3D Undergraduate Experience is competency-based learning (CBL). CBL isespecially effective in
) Industry with topics in career fairstrategies, networking, information literacy, and corporate skills with a simulated industryinternship to create artificial membrane for kidney dialysis, ii) Healthcare professions with topicsin healthcare operations, emergency medicine, inpatient care, and electronic medical recordswith a clinical shadowing experience, and iii) Research with topics in experimental design,ethics, scientific literature, and translating technologies with a research laboratory shadowingexperience. Students self-selected into the three sections during an advising session and wereasked to provide information before classes started to help facilitate setting up the shadowingexperiences. Each section had the same number of lecture and
the Industrial Engineering (IE) program cover the knowledge, skills,and abilities required for Icesi’s students to achieve the program’s PEOs within a few years aftergraduation. These outcomes are based on ABET definitions for student outcomes. The studentoutcomes for the IE program are: a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c) an ability to design a system, component, or processes to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams
-project so students can apply EM knowledge to a real(istic) scenario and the resulting consequences. Students focus on technical aspects and analyze social and technical consequences. • Redesign classroom assessment rubrics to incorporate engineering habits of mind. Include sections for systems thinking (technical aspects), innovation (design aspects), adaptations and improvements (iterative processes), socio-cultural and ethical considerations (social aspects), communication (understanding the problem and considering multiple perspectives), collaboration (teamwork and fostering new strategies), and finally sociotechnical integration (understanding emergent factors).The Projects course taught at
student volunteers to respond to their individualrequests. Structured programming that promotes undergraduate peer-mentors in the Faculty ofEngineering can benefit WINONE as the facilitator of these types of requests as well as thestudent mentors, ensuring that students are properly screened through application process andreceive official recognition of their service within the faculty.Iron Pin Ceremony: Despite first- and fourth-year courses that address topics like ethics and professionalism in engineering, the consensus amongst administration was that additional programming should be introduced to address academic dishonesty within the faculty. With this intention, the first
features to promoteactive learning, including (1) hands-on activities and demonstrations, (2) the integrated use ofwireless laptops through an in-house developed web-based learning tool to promotemetacognition and assessment of student learning, and (3) a capstone ethics project wherestudents complete a risk assessment of the impact of nanotechnology on society. Additionally,this course will focus on synthesizing fundamental concepts in science and engineering towardsapplications in nanotechnology. The other new sophomore course, Material and Energy Balancesin Nanotechnology (ChE 214), is a ChE specific laboratory-based course, emphasizing how thefundamental skills students have just learned couple to nanotechnology. For ChE students, theapproach
, management skills, gender issues, and professional ethics. Since 1975, Dr. Pappas has consulted on a wide variety of topics including management skills, technical and scientific writing, public speaking, interpersonal communications, sexual harassment prevention, employee relations, creative thinking, diversity, and conflict negotiation. Address: Department of Integrated Science and Technology ISAT 117 / MSC 4102 James Madison University Harrisonburg, VA 22807 PappasEC@jmu.edu 540-568-1694Ronald Kander, James Madison University Professor Kander is Director of the School of Engineering at James Madison University (JMU) where he teaches and does research in the area of polymer
processes, d. an ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate to program objectives, e. an ability to function effectively on teams, f. an ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems, g. an ability to communicate effectively, h. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning, i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities, j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, and k. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.As part of the accreditation process, programs must demonstrate that their graduates possessthese skills and
Paper ID #9142Adopting the BOK2 Student Outcomes: A Six-Year RetrospectiveDr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter is an accredited green design professional (LEED AP) and practicing professional engineer (PE) whose expertise includes Low Impact Development (LID), innovative stormwater best management practices (BMPs), hydrologic and stormwater modeling and design, and field data collection for performance monitoring. His University appointments
Page 23.478.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013Embedding Information Literacy within Undergraduate Research Page 23.478.2 Embedding Information Literacy within Undergraduate ResearchIntroductionEngineering curricula have witnessed an expansion of its subject areas to include an appreciation of“realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability” (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET), 2011-2012) [1]. More than half of eleven ABET student outcomes focus on students’abilities to view engineering within a broader
Case StudyThis study focuses on the effectiveness of incorporating the Laboratory for InnovativeTechnology and Engineering Education (LITEE) Lorn Manufacturing case into a seniorlevel chemical engineering unit operations course at Manhattan College. The purpose ofusing the case study is to demonstrate the relevance of ethics to chemical engineeringstudents by addressing real-life ethical problems found in the workplace.The selected LITEE case study, which involves a maintenance worker who experiencesan accident during a routine procedure, helps transfer the theory behind ethics intopractice, highlights the importance of team work, and prepares the students to evaluateand present an assigned position in the case to a panel of two attorneys. The
, computerprogramming, engineering graphics, the visualization and modeling of real-world systems, andthe history and ethics of the engineering profession. The course also equips the students incomputer aided design tools, solid modeling and simulation software, and mathematics softwareapplications. Though the subject matter is somewhat traditional, innovative ways have beenintroduced of structuring the class and engaging the first-year engineering students. The primaryfocus of the course is on five major team design projects during the year, in which the studentsutilize all of their gained knowledge and training, and apply the various engineering designmethodologies and skills/tools. The design projects are presented in a variety of communicationforms
Participation The School of Engineering introduces students to the world of engineering through thecompletion of the freshman year course of study. The students are exposed to a freshmanengineering design course, problem solving course, and a course in ethics, in addition to thetraditional courses of calculus, physics, and chemistry. Students who wished to participate in theIFE were exposed to the world of professional career development by participating in resumeand communication workshops provided by Career Services. All entering freshman engineering students are eligible to participate in the IFE uponcompletion of their first year in the School of Engineering with at least a 2.0 GPA. Theycompleted two workshops provided by Career
semester is focused on engineeringmeasurements, introductory engineering principles, and transitioning to the universityenvironment. Common lecture topics include: unit conversion, note taking, problem solving,engineering judgment, and ethics. Laboratory components in the fall semester expose students tothe four major engineering disciplines offered at Rowan University. Ideally, students in eachsection perform three laboratory activities in each discipline, although each individual instructormay select experiments in alternate proportions. Examples of laboratory activities that Freshman Page 25.1467.4Engineering Clinic I students have completed
AC 2012-3050: STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF THE CIVIL ENGINEER-ING BODY OF KNOWLEDGEDr. Brock E. Barry P.E., U.S. Military Academy Brock Barry is a faculty member in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy. His primary teaching responsibilities are in the areas of engineering mechanics and soil mechanics. Barry holds a Ph.D. in engineering education from Purdue University. He is a licensed Professional Engineer and has 10-years of professional experience. Barry’s areas of research include applied professional ethics, identity development, non-verbal communication, and education policy.Major Scott M. Katalenich, U.S. Military Academy Scott Katalenich is an instructor in the Department
implementedby most manufacturers is the environmental management standards (ISO 14000 standards).Design for the Environment (DFE) and affiliated tools offer an excellent approach to achievingthe environmental portion of the ISO 14000 standards. These standards are a series of voluntarymanagement or process standards developed by ISO, an international organization responsiblefor standardization. They are aimed at establishing organizational environmental ethics, andenhancing an organization’s ability to measure and attain standards of environmentalperformance. Presently, an organization chooses how much of the standards it would commit toand measure its performance against its commitment. They provide an EnvironmentalManagement System (EMS) that
category of engineering as conflict in courses we teach. Our backgroundsin different scholarly traditions inform the ways in which we approach engineering education,which we find are often in conflict, leading to a productive tension which we hope to unpack inthis piece.Jenna Tonn: I am a historian of science and technology and I co-designed and co-teach Makingthe Modern World: Design, Ethics, and Engineering (MMW) with an industrial systemsengineer. MMW is a 6-credit course for first-year students that integrates the modern history oftechnology and engineering as it relates to equity and justice with an introduction to engineeringfundamentals and engineering design. MMW fulfills a number of requirements for engineers andnon-engineers. For all