took four years to grow to its full size. We have recently submitted a new S-STEM proposal that, if funded, will initiate a design and development project that will include quantitative and qualitative assessment of the achievement of the programs ultimate goals, which include shifting the demographics of graduates at our institution and observing continued employment of CS/M Scholars in their field.1 Program Description1.1 RecruitmentWith the aid of staff in the Office of Admissions, we invite high-achievingfemale applicants with leadership potential to submit a short application. Indeciding whom to invite, we consider several broad measures of academic andpersonal achievement and don’t require that applicants
groupsof three, they took pictures of their whiteboards, and all pictures were stored in a repository for all(students, instructors and researchers) to review. When students worked individually, instructorsassessed their learning based on their written solutions. The analysis of the whiteboards confirmedthat at the beginning of the semester students used few representations, whereas by the end of itthey were incorporating congruently more than ten different representations, making their modelsmore robust.1. IntroductionIn the past four years, a special course has been taught in a private university in northern Mexico.While this is not the first course that has attempted to integrate two different subjects, even withinthe same university where this
solution is a new cloud service known as HPC-as-a-Service.In this paper, we present an HPCaaS platform called ASETS which uses Software DefinedNetworking (SDN) technologies to smooth the execution of parallel tasks in the cloud. Further,we provide application examples that could be used in a typical introductory parallel programingcourse. We argue that HPCaaS platform like ASETS can significantly benefit the users of HPCin the cloud as if their program is running on a dedicated hardware in their own laboratory. Thisis especially advantageous for students and educators who need not to deal with the underlyingcomplexities of the cloud.1. IntroductionCloud Computing according to NIST1 is a shared pool of configurable resources offeringservices with
to adopt the term anddeliberately problematize it, teaching notions of critical citizenship that delink the word fromnationalist and xenophobic notions, reclaiming it for a broader notion of personhood. 22-24Course DescriptionIn order to obtain approval for the course to meet requirements for the Curriculum on LiberalEducation, the wording of our learning objectives matched the requirements for the CLE. It wassomething of a surprise to us that the course was not considered appropriate to meet either thescience or social science areas but was instead considered appropriate for art and design becauseof its focus on the latter. Thus the learning objectives for the course were finalized as follows: 1. Explore the interaction of engineering
beimplemented for Summer 2016.The FDA has increasingly emphasized the importance of identifying user needs, usability andergonomics in medical device design, in response to safety issues related to engineering design,failure, and poor user interface, as well as to reduce the time to market by a more efficientproduct development process [1]. FDA Guidance Document “Do It By Design” [2] stresses thevalue of obtaining first-hand feedback from physicians, nurses and lay-users in the earlieststages of product conception and design. In addition, extended exposure to the clinicalenvironment, where medical devices are used, help provide context to how behaviors, opinionsand environment inform the user experience. Primary ethnographic research, including
needs are met is through the “Race to the Case”competition.The Swanson School of Engineering at Pitt also recognizes the critical need to provide studentswith experienced-based learning opportunities. The instructor for the engineering economycourse (housed in the department of industrial engineering (IE)) has incorporated numerousactive learning pedagogies, including case studies and model-eliciting activities, within thecourse over many years. The instructor saw the “Race to the Case” competition as an additionalopportunity to provide IE students with an opportunity to apply engineering economy and otherindustrial engineering skills to a real world problem.The Race to the Case, represented by Figure 1, is an annual case competition, sponsored
three wheeled ground robot with an ultrasonic sensor tied in front of it as shown in Fig 1. Its compactness, robustness, user friendliness, the synchronization (both Android and EV3) in terms of programming paradigm and necessarily its cost effectiveness Fig 1: Structure of the robot have made it the ideal robotic platform for the implementation of this project.iii. Android platformAndroid is an innovative as well as a noble and open development platform launched in 2007 byGoogle, based on the Linux carnal. Besides enhancing the flexibility in using mobile devices andpromoting user experience, it has
current systems. (1, 2, 3, 4)The higher education arena interacts in a complex way with a variety of external partners whoserole, participation, and expertise must be harnessed to help overcome some of the challenges thathave beset engineering education in the Region. Perhaps the most notable partner in thisendeavor is the industrial sector whose role and participation in shaping engineering educationhas, unfortunately, been extremely modest by best estimates. Establishing a beneficial workingrelationship between colleges of engineering in the Region and industries at large, has proven tobe difficult, often short-lived, and appears at the outset, not to be rewarding to either side.Among the many factors contributing to this failure, is the
negatively affect the overall learning ofthe students as measured by their performance on a common, cumulative final exam. Studentsgenerally liked the opportunity to apply their knowledge to real world problems that werethematically centered on the biomedical industry and to be able to work in teams.IntroductionThe Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) supported by the Kern FamilyFoundation was created in 2005 to “champion the entrepreneurial mindset in undergraduateengineering students.”1-3 In an effort to achieve this goal, the Kern Family Foundation created anetwork made up of mostly private engineering schools that are committed to developing theentrepreneurial mindset in their undergraduate engineering students through the network
their faculty research advisors received $100.AssessmentDemographicsThe pilot Spring Break for Research program attracted 25 applications for the pilot program. Fromthese applications, a diverse group of 20 undergraduates and 20 graduate mentors were selected asseen in Table 1. 60% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 25.0% 24.3% 25% 20% 11.5% 10% 6.2% 0% URM Female Undergraduates in College of Engineering SB4R Undergraduates Graduates in College of Engineering SB4R GraduatesTable 1. Demographics
study was an interpretativephenomenology analysis (IPA)7; nine sophomore and junior biomedical engineering (BME) andmechanical engineering (ME) students at a southeastern land grant institution were interviewedabout their experiences in terms of connecting their future goals to their actions in the present.The themes that emerged from these interviews focused on the range of possible future selvesthat students described. These themes were then described graphically as being cone-shaped (seeFigure 1), where the three axes represent time-orientation, instrumentality, time attitude axis7.The second study was a phenomenography, focusing on the different ways in which students areperceiving the future5–7. This study was a continuation of the first
the mountains “join” up). After mapping out the mountain, we can then lookto see if, for example, trees on different mountains have any systematic differences, such as theirgenus, average height, longevity, etc. The analogy of studying the location of trees on themountain is represented schematically in Figure 1 as a companion to the illustrative exampledescribed in this paragraph.Figure 1: Schematic representation of the illustrative example of use Topological Data Analysis. Here elevation profiles of mountains are examine to understand the different tree populations found in different elevation zones.In this same way, we use the Mapper algorithm to search the quantitative student response datafor patterns in the
of the traditional four-year baccalaureate degree.”The National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES), is the nationalorganization that represents the state licensing boards for professional engineering and surveyingacross the U.S. In 2015, NCEES approved Position Statement 35 – Future EducationalRequirements for Engineering Licensure4 by a nearly 2:1 ratio. The preamble of the statementsays: “One of the goals of NCEES is to advance licensure standards for all professional engineers. Those standards describe the technical and professional competencies needed to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of the public. The council recognizes that the future demands for increasing technical and
1prestige and conceptual hurdles . The POD community represents a young field with many new practitioners who have been or still are faculty in various disciplines and who have 2journeyed into faculty development later in their careers . Both communities intersect in the realm of engineering faculty development. All three of us work within that intersection; we are engineers who journeyed into education research during our time in graduate school and who now focus aspects of our education research and outreach on engineering faculty development. The purpose of this paper is to share what we have learned about the challenges and opportunities that arose while working to
-communitypartnership.1 COEUR presents best practices that “support and sustain highly effectiveundergraduate research environments.” As described in COEUR, these practices focus on (1)Campus mission and culture; (2) Administrative support; (3) Research infrastructure; (4)Professional Development opportunities; (5) Recognition; (6) External funding; (7)Dissemination; (8) Student-centered issues; (9) Curriculum; (10) Summer Research Program;(11) Assessment Activities; and (12) Strategic Planning. This paper focuses on the summerresearch program and student benefits and student outcomes with the use of the seven benefitcategories2 described by Seymour et al. in 2003 are: (i) Personal/professional; (2) Thinking andworking like a scientist; (3) Skills; (4
analysispresented here is part of a larger study of the “impact trajectories” (contributions, influences,challenges, successes) of pioneers in the field of engineering education. For the purposes of thisproject, “engineering education pioneers” are defined as those who (1) are/were active (throughresearch, practice, and/or service) in the area of engineering education; and (2) are recognized bymembers of the engineering education community as significant contributors to or shapers of thefield of engineering education.In this paper, we seek to explore in greater depth the nature of engineering education pioneers’perceived contributions and impacts in engineering education, and what these contributions andimpacts mean for the engineering education community
avoidenvironmental restrictions and tax obligations. Specifically, this paper examines the CostaConcordia incident as an illustration for the information to follow: questionable registrationpractices; pollution issues; and integration in technical classes, specifically, the field ofenvironmental engineering.BackgroundInterest in the environmental effects of the cruise ship industry is relatively a recent, dating backabout 20 years, which corresponds to the physical growth of the ships and the explosion ofconsumers in search of exotic vacations. Between 1980 and 2013, the number of passengersincreased from 1.4 million to 21.5 million,1, 2 with an estimated 24 million to sail in 2016.1Consequently, the size of ships has increased to accommodate higher
Circuit Tutor system hasnow been used by over 2300 students in 54 class sections at eight different colleges anduniversities, with generally very favorable ratings.1. IntroductionLinear circuit analysis is a foundational topic for electrical engineering students and frequentlycomprises the exposure to electrical topics for non-electrical engineers. Optimizing studentsuccess in this course is therefore of critical importance. The development of a computer-basedtutoring system based on the idea of step-based tutoring has therefore been undertaken, whereeach individual step in a student’s work on a problem is accepted and evaluated for correctnessbefore they proceed to the next step of the solution. Such a system requires the creation ofspecial
starting fall 2015.Inworks Space We considered it critical to the success of the Inworks that it be housed in space thatsupports communication, collaboration, and experimentation. This is because that physical spacerepresents one of the tools used to bring people from different backgrounds together. Our spacehad to be warm, inviting, and supportive. People should want to spend time there, and it shouldbe possible to spend large amounts of time there comfortably. There needed to be a place toprepare a light meal, and to relax. Our space did not have to be modern or upscale. Power andconnectivity are essential; carpet and acoustic ceiling tile are not. Figure 1 shows a view of theInworks workshop area.Figure 1: The Inworks Workshop
designsoftware that seamlessly transitioned between them as well.Background and IntroductionFor the last twenty-one years in each spring term, The Ohio State University FEH Program hasincorporated an autonomous robot design project in which college freshman honors engineeringstudents design, build, and program autonomous vehicles to perform certain well-defined taskswithin a two-minute time limit1. The tasks the robots must complete revolve around a centraltheme developed each year by the teaching assistants and faculty of the Honors engineeringclasses. The theme for spring 2015 was “Arctic Storm”, and the robot competition course isshown as a CAD model in Figure 1. Figure 1. Diagram of 2015 Robot Competition CourseThe project uses
National Science Foundation (NSF) funded grants: Designing Teaching: Scaling up the SIMPLE Design Framework for Interactive Teaching Development and a research initiation grant: Student-directed differ- entiated learning in college-level engineering education. Her research centers on facilitating and studying her role in faculty development self-study collaboratives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 SIMPLE Design Framework for Teaching Development Across STEMIntroductionExtensive research has shown the benefits of interactive teaching for student learning andretention 1. However, significant barriers exist to broadening the use of interactivetechniques in college classrooms, particularly
, general, or mechanicalengineering 1.As mentioned in the abstract, this paper is organized as if it were a patent, containing claimsand subclaims. As the paper will describe “patenting” an engineering librarian at anAmerican university, the patent will follow the patents issued by the United States Patent andTrademark Office (USPTO). The three types of patents issued by the USPTO are utility,design, and plant. The patent described for this paper is similar to a design patent, as anengineering librarian is not a new job title. More specifically, the paper is organized intoclaims that are essential components of patents issued by the United States. According to theUSPTO, “The claim or claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought
rating of five implied significantproficiency or expert knowledge of the application. The collective results from theclasses are summarized in Table 1:Table 1: Student Self-Assessment With Regard to Software Proficiency Average Standard Average Standard (2014) Deviation (2015) Deviation Word 4.32 0.53 4.39 0.64 Excel 2.90 1.02 2.98 1.03 Powerpoint 4.03 0.77 3.92 1.06These results indicate that the assumed level of proficiency of these three applicationsvary. The average
mathematicsco-requisite course to college algebra, in order to reach more students. We have alsoimplemented a mandatory peer mentor led workshop for all students. Peer mentors provide thestudents with an upper classman peer who can provide support inside and outside of theclassroom. In our paper we will continue to discuss specifics regarding the ENGR 100 course,peer mentoring, intervention strategies, and FYE components.Literature ReviewAccording to Kuh (2008)1 freshman year experience programs are highly influential inimproving student success and create positive impact on their pathway to a degree. Keycomponents of successful FYE programs are utilizing learning communities. In addition Kuh(2008) recommends writing intensive curriculums that focus on
environmental engineering and conducted an independent study on anaerobic digestion. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The Nexus of Science and Engineering: Structuring Individual Studies to Inform Senior Design Projects(1) Introduction Engineering can be described as the application of science to identify and solve problems.1An engineering student spends years learning about how the universe works then builds uponthis knowledge constructing a mental framework of engineering principles. Ideally, uponcompletion of an accredited engineering program, the student’s mental framework will be robustand flexible enough to process and respond to any problem within their specialized
peers andgained the knowledge and skills to be applied in future Challenge-It sessions. Learning Blockswere broken down into sections with specific expectations as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1: Learning blocks used to guide camp activitiesThe learning blocks were divided into different categories, subjects and sections. Learn-Itsections were 10-minutes in duration and consisted of brief explanations of the theory,introduction and purpose of the activity, and expectations with facilitators providing fun andengaging presentations using videos and live examples. The emphasis here was to provide asummary of the key terms, topics and strategies without elaborating in regards to specificsolutions or challenges. This gave campers a basis for
participants moved closer to fullparticipation in the community of practice over the course of the robotics competition. Bycombining quantitative measurement of interest with longitudinal qualitative analysis ofparticipant interactions, this research contributes to our empirical and theoretical understandingof the emergence, development, and maintenance of interest in after-school settings, withimplications for how to best design such programs in order to broaden participation andengagement in engineering.1.0 IntroductionWithin the last decade the number of out-of-school STEM learning programs available to schoolage youth has drastically increased 1. Many of these programs were developed with the intent toaddress the well-documented need for increased
languages,and communicating with people from marketing and finance will be just as fundamental to thepractice of engineering as physics and calculus”.1 Bordogna similarly asserts that “[d]emands areincreasing for a holistic breed of engineers–graduates with the skill to work across intellectual,social, and cultural boundaries”,2 while Duderstadt has advocated for “fluency across boundaries”and “integration of knowledge across an increasingly broad intellectual span” (p. 45).3A growing body of scholarship adds further weight to such assertions. Studies by Lynn andSalzman, for instance, lead them to conclude that engineers urgently need “cross-boundary skills”to enable working “across disciplinary, organizational, cultural, and time/distance
their University Innovation Fellows initiative and mentored faculty teamsrepresenting 50 institutions through the Pathways to Innovation program (personalcommunication, VentureWell). While the NSF I-Corps program was specifically created to helpNSF funded scientists and engineers explore opportunities for their innovations beyond the lab, asecondary effect of the program has been the growth of university faculty exposed toentrepreneurship education, Lean Launch, who then incorporate these methods and pedagogiesinto their own classrooms and institutions. Currently, there are 18 research 1 (R-1) universitiesthat are involved in teaching the Lean Launch curriculum to NSF funded engineers and scientistsand 36 I-Corps sites8. The rapid rise
addressing itsproblems of social inequality.1-4 Riley, Slaton, and Pawley5 argue that we have framed theproblem poorly and failed to examine structural forces at work that maintain color lines andgender gaps in engineering. There is a need to look beyond the discipline of engineering (orengineering education) to develop a deeper understanding of these structural forces and effectivestrategies for resisting or dismantling them.On the occasion of ASEE’s meeting in New Orleans, where long term social inequalities wereexacerbated in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, it seems appropriate to examine the efforts torebuild New Orleans and what it can tell us about engineering and engineering education. Wechose to focus on the case of rebuilding the public