(under 1%),only changing from 117 doctorate degree recipients in 2010 to 120 in 2019 [3].NASA Historical Efforts with Tribal Colleges and UniversitiesAccording to Maynard [3], NASA has supported an effort called “Tribal Colleges andUniversities Project (TCUP)” since 2010, as one of various STEM education and outreach grantprograms specifically targeted to support Tribal Colleges and Universities-related initiatives.“The overall goal of the project is to expand opportunities for the nation’s STEM workforcethrough capacity building, infrastructure development, research and engineering experience,outreach, and information exchange” [4]. In 2008, Congress directed NASA to establish a projectthat was focused on climate change education. The Global
the intercultural competence of the students. We also plan to conductfuture studies to assess the long-term impact of intercultural development on the students and thelevel of autonomy students acquire through this course.References[1] M. Handford, J. Van Maele, P. Matous, and Y. Maemura, “Which ‘culture’? A critical analysis of intercultural communication in engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 161–177, 2019.[2] C. Demetry and R. Vaz, “Influence of an Education Abroad Program on the Intercultural Sensitivity of STEM Undergraduates: A Mixed Methods Study.,” Adv. Eng. Educ., no. Query date: 2022-06-02 08:39:17, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1138841[3] D. Rock, H. Grant, and J. Grey
in 2019. She has written curricula and published a number of works in engineering education in both higher education, P12 and international spaces. She is a co-founder and the Director of Innovation Programs and Operations for the non-profit research group, Ad- vancing Engineering Excellence in P-12 Engineering Education and has successfully launched PROMISE Engineering Institute Global, for international future faculty development. Dr. Gurganus teaches several first and second year Engineering classes along with the Mechanical and Multidisciplinary Engineering Senior Capstone design courses and Global Engineering at UMBC. As an active member of American Society of Engineering Education, She is currently serving
] G. Tipker, G. Golub, M. Dube, C. Tejesh and J. Zhang, Jing, “Integration of 3-D PrintedDrone Project in General Engineering Curriculum”, American Society of Engineering Education,126th Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019, Paper ID # 27759.[4] B. Hur, D. Malawey, J. Morgan and C. Ma, “3-D Printed Metal and Plastic Propeller Designand Manufacturing for Smallscale, Underwater Thrusters”, American Society of EngineeringEducation, 126th Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019, Paper ID #26855[5] O. Rios “Teaching Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing Concepts Using 3-D ComputerModels and 3-D Printed Parts”, American Society of Engineering Education, 125th AnnualConference and Exposition, 2018, Paper ID # 21827.[6] Eslahi, A., Chadeesingh, D.R
, Laura Hill, Kristen Andrews,John Lens, and others in the Contemplative Practices Learning Community, graduate studentMaddy Pimental and along with all the undergraduate student focus group leaders: SachiSakaniwa, Zoe Schlosser, Maja Paulk, River Bond, and student participants of the StructuralSteel Design course.References:[1] T. Estrada and E. Dalton, "Impact of Student Mindfulness Facets on Engineering Education Outcomes: An Initial Exploration," ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, June 15, 2019.[2] B. Rieken, M. Schar, S. Shapiro, S. Gilmartin, and S. Sheppard, "Exploring the relationship between mindfulness and innovation in engineering students," in Proceedings of the American Society for
learning.References:[1] P.D. Rogers and C.C. Martin, C.D. (2019). “Using an inverted classroom approach to promote active learning in construction management and engineering courses,” 55th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings. 2019, Associated Schools of Construction 2019.[2] M.J. Lage, G.J. Platt, and M. Treglia, M., “Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment,” The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. 2000.[3] S. McCallum, J. Schultz, K. Sellke, and J. Spartz, “An examination of the flipped classroom approach on college academic involvement
, “Chemical Engineering Major Selection Throughout the First Year: A Mixed-Methods Approach,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[8] X. Chen, C. E. Brawner, M. W. Ohland, and M. K. Orr, “A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.[9] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and R. A. Long, “Engineering Matriculation Paths: Outcomes of Direct Matriculation, First-Year Engineering, and Post-General Education Models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2012.[10] C. E. Brawner, M. M. Camacho, R. A. Long, S. M. Lord, M. W
, W.F. Denetclaw, C.G. Gutiérrez, S. Hurtado, G.H. John, J. Matsui, R. McGee, C.M. Okpodu, T.J. Robinson, M.F. Summers, M. Werner-Washburne, & M. Zavala. “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM.” CBE Life Sciences Education, vol. 15(3), pp. 1-10, 2016.[5] L.V. Garcia-Felix. “Latinos not engaging in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) careers.” Journal of Academic Perspectives. Vol 4, pp. 1-21, 2019.[6] D. Hernandez, S. Rana, A. Rao, & M. Usselman. “Dismantling stereotypes about Latinos in STEM.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 39(4), pp 436-451, 2017.[7] C. Peralta, M. Caspary, & D. Boothe. “Success factors impacting Latina/o
diversity-focused nature that promotesresearch collaboration across different types of institutions. ICTAS expects the partnerships toresult in research proposals and the hope is that collaborative partners at Virginia Tech andHBCUs/MSIs maintain their working relationships beyond the duration of funded partnership.During the last three years (2016-2019), 50 awards of $10k were made to help build and fostercollaborative efforts between Virginia Tech faculty and HBCUs/MSIs partners. As a result,twenty-three different HBCUs/MSIs and at a minimum of 38 distinct collaborative pairs wereinvolved in the program. Within Virginia Tech, six colleges and four centers/institutes wereinvolved with the ICTAS D&I Investment, with most of the awards
on that enthusiasm to others.Miss Rachel Lee Tilly, North Carolina State University Rachel will be receiving my B.S. in Chemical Engineering from NC State come May 2019. She is heavily involved with the Goodnight Scholars program as well as the engineering education outreach efforts by the Engineering Place and its partners. She believes it is important to get future generations excited about STEM in any way, shape or form. Developing a passion for something at a young age can be a powerful tool for success in the future. Teaching kids helps remind Rachel why she fell in love with engineering in the first place.Dr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Dr. Laura Bottomley, Teaching Associate Professor
the Diploma in EE from the National Technical University in Athens, his MS degree and Ph.D. degree in EE from the University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, in 1981, 1983 and 1986, respectively. He is currently a Professor in the Department of EECS at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, FL. From September 2011 to June 2012 he served as the Interim Assistant Vice President of Research at the Office of Research and Commercialization. Since July 2013 he is serving as the Dean of the College of Engineering and Computer Science. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27760
the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, and a B.S. in Nuclear Engineering Technology, from the Batten College of Engineering and Technology at Old Dominion University. Additionally, Dr. Dean received an MBA from the College of William and Mary. Prior to is academic career Dr. Dean was Director of Operations and Business Development for Clark-Smith Associates, P.C., and served as an Electrician in the US Navy aboard the USS South Carolina and the USS Enterprise. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Impact of Bioinspired Robots on Veterans Pursuing STEM DegreesAbstractThe gap in the area of advanced manufacturing skilled workforce and the efforts in
PreferencesSurvey (PPS). The most important criteria used in this team forming approach are the students’project interests and relevant skills. Prior to completing the survey, students had access todetailed information about each project, and could attend sponsor presentations. Usinginformation from the survey, the course coordinator has the task of balancing the factors ofstudent skillsets, desired projects, team compatibility, and scheduling to create the teams.In January 2019, teams were formed by the course coordinator using this traditional faculty-formed method. The PPS consisted of two pages: On the first page (Figure 1), students statetheir level of interest in each proposed project. On the second page (Figure 2), students providesupplemental
. McConnell, J. Steinbrenner and D. Knight, “Push and Pull: Integrating Industry Acrossthe Student Experience”, in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019. oulder, CO: University of[6] Office of Data Analytics, Fall enrollment summary by major, BColorado Boulder, 2018.[7] "Underrepresented Minorities in STEM", National Action Council for Minorities inEngineering [Online]. Available: www.nacme.org/underrepresented-minorities.[8] T. Both and D. Baggereor, "Design Thinking Bootcamp Bootleg", Stanford d.school.[Online]. Available: dschool.stanford.edu/resources/the-bootcamp-bootleg.[9] R. Dam and T. Siang, "Stage 2 in the Design Thinking Process: Define the Problem
. Amabile, R. Conti, H. Coon, J. Lazenby, and M. Herron, "Assessing the work environment for creativity," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1154– 1184, 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995[5] National Academy of Engineering, "The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century," Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.17226/10999.[6] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, "Environmental Engineering for the 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges," Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17226/25121.[7] E. Sola, R. Hoekstra, S. D. Fiore, and P. McCauley, "An investigation of the state of creativity and
University(NMSU), all of its students, e3 Initiative staff & personnel, e3 Initiative participants, and allmentors interviewed. This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant (IUSE: HSI Award #1953466).References[1] Excelencia in Education, “Hispanic-Serving Insitutions (HSIs): 2019-20 Fact Sheet,” [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED614622.pdf. [Accessed April 26, 2024].[2] G. A. Garcia, "Hispanic serving institutions (hsis) in practice: defining 'servingness' at hsis," Information Age Publishing, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk& AN=2376781. [Accessed: Jan. 23
demands (assignment, projects, internships, etc.), and the social pressures of engaging withpeers, and faculty. The microcosm of the college campus can be challenging for students, where some areleaving the familiarity of home and family to join spaces where they can be isolated. Prior researchsuggests that being socially connected can help to alleviate stress (Achat et al., 1998). Research alsoshows that minoritized student populations experience more barriers to persistence in STEM highereducation compared to white students and certain Asian populations due to the added stress of racismfaced by these populations (Harper, 2010; Pawley, 2019). Racial stress can manifest due to phenomenalike isolation, stereotype threat and microaggressions at
. L. Navarro et al., “Social cognitive predictors of engineering students’ academic persistence intentions, satisfaction, and engagement.,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 66, no. 2, p. 170, 2019.[6] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, 2014.[7] V. Tinto, “Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence,” J. High. Educ., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 599–623, 1997.[8] S. L. Dika and J. H. Lim, “Critical review of research on the role of social engagement,” presented at the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012, pp. 25–368.[9] N. Yaghoubisharif, S. A. Brown, and A
. 792-798.[11] J. Luo and M. Hou, "Innovation of the Higher Education Grassroots Statistical Reports System based on Low-Code Development," in 2023 7th International Conference on Management Engineering, Software Engineering and Service Sciences (ICMSS), January 2023, pp. 36-40.[12] Lang, D., Handley, M., Erdman, A. M., Park, J. J., and Tsakalerou, M. (2019, June). "Intercultural competency differences between US and Central Asian students in an engineering across cultures and nations graduate course." In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[13] Cao, Q., Seow, C. K., Lim, L. H. I., Keoh, S. L., Dale, V., Honeychurch, S., Tasler, N. and Bremner, D. (2023). Learners’ differences in blended learner-centric approach for a
Institute of Technology. She is currently perusing her doctorate degree in Education from Drexel University with a concentration in innovation and creativity. She is currently the Division Chair - Elect for ASEE Entrepreneurship and Innovation Division. She also holds a Professional Engineering license in NJ. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023How to make engineering programs worse for women: A reversebrainstorming session with SWE studentsAbstractFemale engineering students have unique insights for improving engineering programs and yetthey often do not feel empowered to suggest changes. This paper will describe the creation andexecution of a pilot brainstorming workshop titled, “How to make
students at RutgersUniversity (Riley, 2022), and health equity-focused machine learning algorithms introduced intointroductory biomedical engineering courses at John’s Hopkins University (Storm et al., 2022).Further, systems approaches to health equity are critical components of human factors andsystems engineering (Roscoe et al., 2019). To date, however, the investigation into globalself-awareness, perspective-taking, understanding, and application of global systems and contexthave not been investigated in these implementations.Global mindsets and intercultural awareness are critical to understanding and designing for,diversity and equitable technology outcomes (Lee et al., 2012). While they are most associatedwith study abroad opportunities
. Master and A. N. Meltzoff, “Cultural Stereotypes and Sense of Belonging Contribute to Gender Gaps in STEM,” Int. J. Gend. Sci. Technol., vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2020.[5] E. Litzler and C. Samuelson, “How Underrepresented Minority Engineering Students Derive a Sense of Belonging from Engineering,” presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2013, p. 23.674.1-23.674.20.[6] E. A. Canning, K. Muenks, D. J. Green, and M. C. Murphy, “STEM Faculty Who Believe Ability Is Fixed Have Larger Racial Achievement Gaps and Inspire Less Student Motivation in Their Classes,” Sci. Adv., vol. 5, no. 2, p. eaau4734, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4734.[7] M. Wei, T.-Y. Ku, and K. Y.-H. Liao, “Minority Stress and
webpage for department chairs.This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation underGrant HRD-1409472.References[1] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, “Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019,” Special Report. NSF 19-304, Alexandria VA, 2019.[2] National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), “The Condition of Education 2020 (NCES 2020-144), Characteristics of Postsecondary Faculty.” U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2020.[3] A. Aguirre, “Women and Minority Faculty in the Academic Workplace: Recruitment, Retention, and Academic Culture,” ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report
La Guajira Contenido,” Rev. Espac., vol. 40, 2019.[5] M. Oliveros, E. Cabrera, B. Valdez, and M. Schorr, “La motivación de las mujeres por las carreras de ingeniería y tecnología,” Entreciencias Diálogos en la Soc. del Conoc., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 89–96, 2016, doi: 10.21933/j.edsc.2016.09.157.[6] C. Zapata and M. Elena Truyol, “Factors identifying commitment to gender equality in a School of Engineering,” 2022 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., p. 17, Aug. 2022.[7] T. RAbAzAs RomeRo, A. Resa Ocio, and T. Rabazas Romero, “Organizaciones y políticas supranacionales: una mirada desde la educación superior y la igualdad de género Supranational organizations and policies: perspectives from higher education and gender
approach towards broaderparticipation. The engineering education community needs to recognize the often-neglectedstakeholder group of school counselors and the pivotal role counselors play in students’ careerpathways.Introduction There are several Interventions aimed at counselors in supporting STEM broaderparticipation (Falco & Summers, 2019; reference redacted; Shillingford et al. 2017). Such effortsare complemented by studies that document the need to broaden participation and identify arole for or place an emphasis on school counselor interactions with students in shaping theirfuture decisions within STEM, particularly a desire to persist within STEM (Aschbacher et al.2010; Grossman & Porsche, 2014). A five-week, online
pedagogical strategies translate acrosscultural contexts (Mtika & Gates, 2010; Smith-Keiling, 2019). We know that both learners’engagement and educators’ pedagogical beliefs are shaped by their social, historical, and culturalknowledge (Schweisfurth, 2015); however, currently, there is a limited understanding aboutwhich aspects of AL are replicable across contexts and which aspects may be highly context-dependent. While much exploration remains, current research suggests that factors such aslanguage, cultural context, teacher beliefs, student learner, teacher-learner relations, andcurricular structure influence the implementation of active learning strategies (Ramnarain &Hlatswayo, 2018; Mtitu, 2014). Therefore, to support educators and
power,privilege, oppression and ruling relations within engineering education. A forthcoming scopingreview will include more in-depth analysis and discussion of the full 372-paper dataset andimplications and recommendations for equity-focused engineering education researchers andscholars.AcknowledgementsI am supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. I would liketo thank Dr. Kristen Moore, Dr. Subini Ancy Annamma, Neida Ahmad, Dr. Sheri Sheppard, andthe Designing Education Lab for their valuable discussions. In addition, I would like to thank theanonymous reviewers and ASEE ECSJ Program Chair Dr. Robin Fowler for their insightfulcomments on the draft during the review process.References[1] K. Crenshaw
“gene pool” from which creativity springs” (Wulf 2001).MethodologyClass descriptionWe collected data by direct observation of the instructor in eight chemical engineering coursesfor the period of spring 2019 to fall 2021. One course is for junior students (Reactive processengineering) and two courses are capstone courses for senior students (System Engineering I:Dynamics and Modeling, and Systems Engineering II: Process Design). These are three out ofthe six “Pillar” courses that provide the backbone for the chemical engineering curriculum at theUniversity of Pittsburgh (McCarthy and Parker 2011). They are all five credit courses each withsix hours/week of lecturing and a two hours/week recitation. The first two courses arecomplemented with a
Exercises for Enhancing Engineering Students' Creative Self Identity,” 2019 ASEE Zone I Conference & Workshop, Niagara Falls, NY, USA, April 2019, https://peer.asee.org/33791.