ethical (i.e. authenticity of the material) as well as quality ofthe textbook. It also allows teachers to keep ownership of their work and make changes whennecessary. In two semesters of our trial study, we found that 100% of our students purchased thetextbook. In conclusion, we feel that self-publishing high quality textbooks have the potential tochange education for the better and we plan to continue using them in our classrooms in thesemesters ahead. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
investigation and artistic exploration. The resulting images have inspired, and in somecases themselves become appreciated as, art. A sophomore-level seminar in The Art and Scienceof Flow Visualization exposes students to these techniques and the science of fluid mechanics,and to the photographic methods needed to create effective images that are successful bothscientifically and artistically. Unlike other courses in flow visualization, this course assumes noa priori familiarity with fluid flow or with photography. The fundamentals of both are taughtand practiced in a studio setting. Students are engaged in an interdisciplinary discourse aboutfluids and physics, photography, scientific ethics, and historical societal responses to science andart. The
, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice” The plan was
Reference Handbook. The knowledge areas for the concepts in the Mechanical Engineering exam include Mathematics; Probability and Statistics; Computational Tools; Ethics and Professional Practice; Engineering Economics; Electricity and Magnetism; Statics; Dynamics, Kinematics and Vibrations; Mechanics of Materials; Material Properties and Processing; Fluid Mechanics; Thermodynamics; Heat Transfer; Measurements, Instrumentation and Controls; and Mechanical Design and Analysis. (2) Live/recorded review sessions with students' questions & answers (~70 minutes). The recorded sessions covered the most important concepts tested in the FE exam and were posted online for students. (3) FE-style
3-4 member teams withprojects sponsored by industry, faculty, and institutions (like the AIChE design challenge) orbased on textbook or other literature source [1]. An essential component of those projects is theuse of process simulation software (mainly Aspen), with additional support from some othermathematical software (EXCEL, MATLAB) [1]. The use of textbooks is very diverse, but someare very popular like Turton et al. [2]. The dominant technical content of the course (processdesign, simulation, economics, heuristics, synthesis, plant design, energy integration,optimization) has been increasingly enriched with professional skills (i.e., teamwork, projectmanagement, organizational skills, conflict resolution), ethics, and a broad
a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity
October 1998. This initial version ofthe policy stated that the Society “supports the concept of the master’s degree as the FirstProfessional Degree for the practice of civil engineering at the professional level.”1 Chargedwith implementing Policy Statement 465, the ASCE Committee on Academic Prerequisites forProfessional Practice (CAP3) began by analyzing the three fundamental characteristics of aprofession—an ethic of service, a professional organization, and a specialized body ofknowledge.2 The committee’s analysis of the civil engineering profession suggested that onlythe first two of these three characteristics had been adequately defined. Thus began a broad-based effort to define the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge.In January 2004 this
programs.This first-phase research found that involvement in the EWB organization yielded the followingnotable outcomes: over 80% of respondents reported that they developed a greater appreciationfor other cultures, nearly 80% indicated it taught them a stronger appreciation for teamwork, andover 75% attested to an increased awareness of the role of ethics and personal responsibility inengineering. In the second phase of this project, a more extensive web-based survey instrumentwas then developed building on these results and extending the inquiry to a more nationaldemographic. This work also yielded encouraging results in terms of further quantifying (1)individual benefits for volunteer participants and (2) identifying areas for academic programs
Paper ID #19511Liberation in Education: What Role Do Liberatory Praxis and Theory Playin Fostering Critical Thinking?Yousef Jalali, Virginia Tech Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include ethics, critical thinking, and process design and training.Dr. Christian Matheis, Virginia Tech I serve as a Visiting Assistant Professor of Government and International Affairs in the School of Public and International Affairs at Virginia Tech. Concurrently, I serve as a Teaching
-year course activities Based upon results from the faculty workshop6, active learning activities were developed for thefirst-year course at KLE Technological University (Table 1). At the workshop, Virginia Tech researchersshared experiences in integrating active learning activities into first-year courses at Virginia Tech, whichincluded activities such as straw towers, balloon drops, a sustainable energy design project, mechatronics,ethics, and watershed monitoring. During the workshop, faculty at KLE Technological University adaptedthe activities to fit their local-context and educational needs. The overarching goal of these activities wasto engage the students in active learning that would improve student learning and motivation of
Confucianphilosophical influence on organizational culture; this affects how Chinese leaders operatebusinesses and view business ethics. Chen [17] concluded that understanding specific leadershipand followership skills led to better techniques that were specific to China and that make for asuccessful investment for those business leaders who established an operation in China. Similarawareness is useful when operating in MENA context. Global Organizations: Since the 2008 financial crisis of the United States, economicrecovery in the MENA region helped companies to expand business activities. The total valuefrom disclosed business agreements or transactions domestically rose to 54% of all deals at acombined value of $2.2 billion, whereas Qatar reached 21
and curriculum to provide students with opportunitiesto conceive, design, and implement engineering solutions to complex global issues. This paper describes the development and assessment of a redesigned first yearcornerstone course called Engineering Opportunities. The motivation for the courseredesign was to both be a pathway into the engineering community and to equip studentsfor success in both the classroom and the engineering profession. The course is built on alearner-centered platform that is intended to create an inclusive environment for first yearstudents to successfully transition from high school to college. The course content covershuman-centered design, systems thinking, professionalism and ethics. The intention ofthis
ABET Criteria Traditional AerosPACE ICED Capstone (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve
design and conduct experiments, as engineering, science, and mathematics well as to analyze, and interpret data 2) an ability to apply engineering design to producec) an ability to design a system, component, or process solutions that meet specified needs with to meet desired needs within realistic constraints consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, such as economic, environmental, social, political, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and and economic factors sustainability 3) an ability to communicate effectively with a ranged) an ability to function on
; VII. Assume ethical leadership roles that contribute to the success of their organization or community; and VIII. Advance in the profession.The MET outcomes defined for MET graduates states that “The MET program seeks to producegraduates with a good foundation in engineering fundamentals as well as one strong inapplications, design, problem recognition and resolution, project management, communication,and professional and ethical responsibility. MET graduates will:8 1. Fundamentals: Demonstrate math, basic science and engineering science skills necessary for proficiency in MET careers. (contributes to abet criteria a, b, f) 2. Applications: Demonstrate an ability to integrate basic theoretical, experimental
Page 11.888.2students were getting adequate preparation using computer software such as Microsoft Office inhigh school anyway prompting them to eliminate their freshman computer course. A newtextbook10 focusing on student success was adopted along with material on ethics, workplacediversity, quality, and lifelong learning. Ethics is introduced in the course text but material fromthe free, web based American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Professional PracticeCurriculum (PPC) was predominantly used. Workplace diversity came from the same source.Both topics have a quiz on the ASME PPC web site11 that students can take for practice. Amultiple choice test was prepared over the material, modifying some of the web questions andadding
and covers topics including History ofEngineering, Engineering fields of specializations, the engineering profession, engineeringcommunications, engineering ethics and societal obligations. It also focuses on teaching studentsthe engineering approach to problem solving and includes a course project. Community BasedLearning was introduced into the ENGR 101 course via the term project which is a requiredcomponent of the course. The project was to design toys for children ages 7 to 14 years at aschool in a disadvantaged squatter community in Old Cairo, Egypt, where infrastructure is poorand education and social mobility can be very limited. The project was carried out in partnershipwith a non-government organization (NGO) named ―Sohbit Khayr
the engineer as an appliedscientist/mathematician working outside of society is outdated.Over the last several decades engineering leaders have emphasized the role of the engineer insociety through documents such as the National Academy of Engineering’s Engineer of 20201,the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Body of Knowledge2, and ABET’s EngineeringChange report on the effects of the EC2000 accreditation criteria3. Further, increasing concernsabout sustainability, as evidenced by these documents as well as recent changes to engineeringcodes of ethics, require engineers to understand themselves and their work as existing within thesocial, environmental, and economic context of the present and the future.However, as we hear these calls for
(GD&T),sketching, animation, descriptive geometry, desktop publishing, website development, ethics,and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM). Questions related to ethics and on-line anddistance education courses were added to the current survey at the suggestion of themembership of EDGD.The second major category examined student populations, especially in regards to gender andthe majors of students taking courses related to engineering/technical graphics. This categorywas unmodified from the previous study.The third category concerned the backgrounds of faculty teaching engineering/technicalgraphics, professional activities and development as well as major concerns in the professionand future trends. New areas added to this category were
at three time points: the first week ofthe first semester, the end of the first semester, and the end of the second semester.Despite considerable within-group differences, analyses showed areas of stability andchange in students’ conceptual understanding. Over time, the expert-novice gap closed intwo areas: the design process and motivation for the design. Students made consistentlyfewer references to ethics and marketing than did experts, but did not differ from expertsin the areas of interpersonal skills and technical skills. In addition to their implications fordesign educators, these findings offer an important avenue for understanding the natureof expertise. That is, they suggest that experts have a more developed understanding ofthe
students usetheir knowledge from all previous courses and creative improvisation. Additionally, socio-economic and ethical issues are addressed as part of the design paradigm. Team work isemphasized. Problem recognition and statements, definition of the problem, constraints,alternative solutions and their evaluation, considerations of economics and manufacturing,scheduling, and meeting deadlines of the project are stressed. The distinctiveness of this programis the integration of students from the School of Business and the 'end-user' into the design team.The design project further hones oral and written communication skills of the team. This paperdiscusses the learning objectives and outcomes, structure of the class, organization of the
graduates ofundergraduate programs.Of the thirteen learning outcomes established by the ES15, eleven are the ABET Criterion 3 (a-k)program outcomes and the other two were added by the school. Then the thirteen learningoutcomes that were evaluated in this research are: 1. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering. 2. An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data 3. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 4. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams 5. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. 6. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 7. An ability to communicate effectively
development in 1996 in its Code of Ethics,stating in Fundamental Cannon 1: “Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health and welfareof the public and shall strive to comply with the principles of sustainable development in theperformance of their professional duties” (http://content.asce.org/Sustainability.html).5 Morerecently, the ASCE adopted Policy Statement 418 to define “The Role of the Civil Engineer inSustainable Development.”6 The ASCE Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge 2nd Edition(BOK2) articulates the role of civil engineers “entrusted by society to create a sustainable worldand enhance the global quality of life....”7 The BOK2 lists sustainability as one of the requiredtechnical learning outcomes. Individuals with a Bachelor’s degree
. Emphasis has also been placed on group projects or in-class group work to preparestudents to work effectively on teams.One particular example is Bucknell University’s Institute for Leadership in Technology andManagement (ILTM). ILTM offers an intensive two-summer program for twenty students fromengineering, management, and accounting that combines theory and real-life experience. Thefirst portion of the program is a six-week on-campus session during the summer after studentscomplete their sophomore year. During this session, students are introduced to issues such asglobalization, ethics, communication skills, critical thinking, teamwork, and leadership throughin-classroom case studies and discussions, field trips, and a group project. The second
throughout the semester to plan their contribution tothe installation, which included fabricating art objects (including a representative circuit andcapacitor) and producing a GIS map of materials flows in capacitor production. Each class hadits own set of conventional deliverables including term papers, ethnographic research projects,ethics essays, and formal project reports.The collaboration process is discussed, including how such projects are generated, how twodistinct cultures of students can be brought to work productively together, and how to work wellwith off-site collaborators, which include a Sprague engineer as well as the art collective. Finally,reflections are offered about the impact of this collaborative project on students, the
EducationThe Program Educational Objectives (PEO) of the Electrical Engineering (EE) programare:1 To provide the student with the knowledge of natural sciences, mathematics, engineering and computer science so that the student has the ability to systematically delineate and solve electrical and related engineering problems.2 To provide the student with a broad-based background in electrical engineering with experiences in the design, development and analysis of electrical and computer systems, subsystems and components.3 To provide the students with an engineering education to function as educated members of a global society, with awareness of contemporary issues, professional responsibility, ethics, impact of technology on
achievement are not only a part of theimprovement process, but also expected of any program desiring accreditation.Without a doubt, a course housing the major design experience carries a greater responsibility inensuring that students achieve specified program educational outcomes. According to EC2000’s[3] Criterion 4, Professional Component, “the curriculum must prepare students forengineering practice culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge and skillsacquired in earlier coursework, and incorporating engineering standards and realistic constraintsthat include most of the following considerations: economic, environmental, sustainability,manufacturability, ethical, health and safety, social, and political.” The literature [4-8
Paper ID #39845A Literature Review to Explore a Relationship: Empathy and Mindfulness inDesign EducationMs. Rubaina Khan, University of TorontoDr. Adetoun Yeaman, Northeastern University Adetoun Yeaman is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the First Year Engineering Program at Northeastern University. Her research interests include empathy, design education, ethics education and community engagement in engineering. She currently teaches Cornerstone of Engineering, a first-year two-semester course series that integrates computer programming, computer aided design, ethics and the engineering design process within a project
. Such historical thinking is critical to develop engineers capable ofresisting “the tyranny of the urgent”, submit to “the democracy of the dead”, and resist the anti-historical influence of social media and neo-marxist indoctrination [21], [22].Case studies in civil engineering education are often based on large scale projects that wereground-breaking in design or resulted in major failure. Commonly seen examples include thecollapses of the walkway in Kansas City Hyatt Regency or the Tacoma Narrows Bridge [23],[24]. A variety of assignment and assessment models exist in literature to direct students to focuson technical or ethical content [16], [23]–[28]. There are several notable engineers who havemade a career documenting the history of
Paper ID #9949The Discourse of Design: Examining students’ perceptions of design in mul-tidisciplinary project teamsMegan Kenny Feister, Purdue University, West Lafayette Megan K. Feister is a doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research focuses on organizational identity and socialization, team communication, ethical reasoning development and assessment, and innovation and design. Megan holds a B.A. in communica- tion from Saint Louis University and a M.A. in Organizational Communication from the University of Cincinnati.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West