Technology noted in its 2012 report5 that less than40% of the undergraduates planned to major in STEM. While attracting students into STEM is oneaspect of the problem, retaining those who indicate interest in STEM is the other end of thechallenge. The six-year graduation data for the 2003-09 cohort published in 2014 by the NationalCenter of Education Statistics6 reported that 48% of those who entered college as STEM studentseither changed their major to a non-STEM major or left college without obtaining a degree. In 2016,only 4% of African-Americans received an engineering degree7. The six-year degree completion ratein STEM was less than 40%, and persistence of females, and racial and ethnic minorities Proceedings of the 2020
. Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright © 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 7In future work, we plan to look at this and additional data across gender and other diversity lineswhen possible (i.e. when data can remain anonymous). Additionally, as we construct newquestions and update existing questions, we will work to ensure the questions are accurately statedto ensure we get the most useful data from our students. We will also consider comparison studiesbetween students that have taken UTDesign EPICS and those that have not when participating inthe UTDesign
their parents’ permission to work, aswell as their marriage plans. Because women are not expected to travel alone, female studentsmiss out on internships, additional training, and job interviews. In other words, gender remains aviable factor in female students’ lives. ConclusionsSince India’s independence in 1947, Indian women have been getting education, which was seenas a means to learn social and home skills; it was not seen as a means to have a job unless therewere economic needs. Women were expected to pursue medical and teaching career paths;engineering was seen as suited for men. Of all career options open to women in India, IT hasbecome more popular than medical and teaching. This is mostly
isimportant or convenient, implementing 1756 DHRIO and the CAT #756-EN2T will be veryimportant to allow.3. Hardware DocumentationHardware Documentation is the most crucial part of migration procedure. The first step indocumentation is setting up diagrams of the current control system, confirming every singleconnection. This is the base for the project and if it is incorrect, the rest of the project will beincorrect; any CAD software will suffice. The CAD drawings should have multiple different parts:I/O connections, high-level topology, and communication connections. After the current systemdrawings are configured correctly, the user can begin planning for the updated hardware. High-level topology is the first part that will be updated. It is
institutional planning, decision-making and reporting.Dr. Ashwin Satyanarayana, New York City College of Technology Dr. Ashwin Satyanarayana is currently the Chair and Associate Professor with the Department of Com- puter Systems Technology, New York City College of Technology (CUNY). Prior to this, Dr. Satya- narayana was a Research Scientist at Microsoft in Seattle from 2006 to 2012, where he worked on several Big Data problems including Query Reformulation on Microsoft’s search engine Bing. He holds a PhD in Computer Science from SUNY, with particular emphasis on Data Mining and Big data analytics. He is an author or co-author of over 25 peer reviewed journal and conference publications and co-authored a text- book
Housekeeping feature ”50 over 50: Women Who Are Changing the World.” She has extensive publishing credits, both independently and with established publishers including in TIME, Variety, Ms.Magazine.com, Rebecca Minkoff Superwoman and HuffPost. Other published works include Stat! An Action Plan for Replacing the Broken System of Recruitment and Retention of Underrepre- sented Minorities in Medicine with a New Paradigm, published by the National Academy of Medicine; the unique biographical essay books Against All Odds: Black Women in Medicine and Master Builders of the Modern World: Reimagining the Face of STEM; and the first two volumes of her Little Man children’s book series. Her body of work covers a broad range of
retreats. During thesummer, we learned about each other through stories, examined many different typesof stories and storytelling, and learned about active learning and how this pedagogycan be used to enhance engagement in an engineering classroom. In addition toattending trainings, students had to complete assignments designed to help themcraft their personal stories as well as lesson plans for Phase 2. In Phase 2 (Fall2020), RE3 Student Trainers taught a storytelling module to over 300 first-yearengineering students enrolled in a course called ENGR 102: Freshman Academy. Inthis storytelling module, Student Trainers taught first-year students about storytelling,shared their personal stories, and guided first-year students in storytelling
actively works to dissect product. May include following directions from active observer Student assists in dissection process by retrieving necessary tools, helping to hold parts, making Active Observation suggestions for what dissector should do, etc. May include following directions from other students Passive Observation Student observes dissection but does not assist, interact with the product, or make suggestions Student takes leadership of the group. This can include delegating tasks to others, making plans on Emergent Leadership behalf of the group, giving instructions, and making organizational moves Investigation through
successful training and consistent participation of theconstruction workforce to minimize accidents on jobsites. While traditional safety training hasfeatured classroom lectures and quick toolbox talks, the emerging technology of AugmentedReality/Virtual Reality (AR/VR) has recently been utilized by several different groups to attemptto improve construction safety training programs. This paper is presenting the current state of awork-in-progress project to investigate both the acceptance and efficacy of existing AR/VRconstruction safety programs and develop an improved AR/VR construction safety game. Thecurrent stage is the baseline measurement of efficacy using traditional classroom lectures as wellas early planning/creation of the improved AR/VR
Orange County’s Medical Innovation Instituteon August 3rd, 2020, two months prior to the first day of fall instruction. Our full-day virtualevent tackled current pediatric healthcare topics related to the COVID-19 pandemic, such asmentioned below. The 12-hour event began with an introductory lecture regarding the BioDesignprocess [10], then grouped students and healthcare workers into multidisciplinary teams based ontheir healthcare topic of interest. The teams then identified the problem, generated a solution, andgenerated a business and engineering plan to execute their solution. Teams were categorized intofive topics related to the COVID-19 pandemic: school reintegration, pediatric mental health,telemedicine/remote care, ensuring families
will remain a mainstay after their acceleratedadoption during the COVID-19 pandemic. We have undertaken a why-what-how approach tocall for needs-driven innovation in education, like why there is a need for change (the need),what is the recommendation (the solution) and how those could be implemented (the plan). Weintroduce a strategic framework for how engineering institutions, faculty, and students must startconsidering their options, experimenting with alternatives, and start planning now. A shift in themindset, leverage digital technologies, and change in the structure are taken as the central ideasleading to solutions to the identified problems themselves and affecting the long-term goals ofaccessible access to affordable, relevant, and
Ideation Preferences Differences in how individuals • Ideation Medium and Styles prefer to develop, share, and • Individual vs. Collaborative collaborate on ideas • Planning and Organization • Building On Other Designs Limited Information Restricted exposure to the • Lack of familiarity of Design Context design space, which results in a • Running out of ideas plateau of idea throughput Feasibility and Students’ inability to ignore • Feasibility Improvised self-imposed constraints and • Making Early Judgments Constraints the premature
provide thefoundation for further studies. “The value of experimental skills related to quantum technologies can be equally, or even more,important for entering the workforce than courses designed purely based on complex quantumtheory topics” [1]. The hands-on component of the course requires facility and resources whichare not normally offered in engineering departments. One of the goals of this paper is to introducethe “remote quantum experiments” which not only addresses the equipment and space limitchallenges but also developing some strategic plans for sharing the facility with other users andinstructors outside of the institute. It should be noted that engineering faculty members alsonormally do not have the quantum mechanics background
. Even if the program is strong, there is no substitute for experience, knowledge, and sound preparation. In the preparation period, it is necessary to carefully plan and coordinate all accreditation- and assessment-related issues. Among the eight accreditation criteria, an awareness of common problem areas, mostly Criteria 2 and 3, is useful. A list of possible questions that can be asked by a program evaluator is provided for the campus visit phase of the process. For the post-visit period, a program should be aware of how ABET resolves consistency issues across institutions and across programs within a single institution. Finally, proper perspective is needed if ABET finds one or more weaknesses or deficiencies. Based on what we have seen
questionstargeted by our study are more focused toward learning where and when students move out oftheir originally planned major.A third study at Frostburg State University (Soysal, et al., 2003) looks at the enrollment profile oftheir first year classes from 1997 through 2002. [3] From this they were able to determinemigration out of either electrical or mechanical engineering programs. The work, however,measures a relatively small sample (about 40 students per year) and does not track the otherengineering majors.As such, a research gap exists that this study aims to fill. The scope of this paper is to observe,not necessarily analyze. To be clear, at the time of this writing we are not looking to answerquestions regarding students underlying motives for
Test, P≤0.05). The first two factors have obvious connections to experimental work.The last 2 factors indicate that experimentation requires a high level planning and creativity. Question/Factor? Low High Experimental Experimental Ability to troubleshoot problems with 3.23 4.62 experimental hardware and setup Hands-on ability 3.40 4.38 Ability to break work into smaller parts 3.93 4.52 Creativity 4.20
(is that bad)? Are these categories, steps, or orientations(I currently use all of these labels interchangeably)? Do I have the necessary disciplinarybackground to develop this (who should help me)? How does this relate to engineering andengineering education? This paper is a work in progress, and I plan to have open discussion inthe presentation sessions.IntroductionSo many of us are working in the area of diversity, especially over the last several years. Myacademic home, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly), is at apredominately white state university. The caring and “woke” individuals at the university arespending increasingly more time and resources on initiatives that will make the university morewelcoming
concepts of user convenience and effectiveness; when originally planning for this project, we thought that it would be possible to create a system for the whole hand, so that every finger would be actuated. Given that our design is supposed to be as noninvasive as possible, we decided to take an “exoskeleton” approach to designing the product. We designed the CAD of the joints Figure 1: 3D Solidworks models of as configurations in Solidworks, so that if primary design the sizes needed to be modified, it could be done without needing to make a whole new product from scratch, with only one dimension changed. Each joint works the same way, so the only modifications between this and the other fingers are the sizes of the
about contextsinto which their solutions will be delivered and assess the human, social and security impacts ofsolutions being explored. Systems engineering provides a framework and method forassimilating the multitude of interacting factors and dynamics in human, economic, social,natural and engineering systems into target design requirements.The plan of study for the M.S.degree was developed with input from over 30 faculty members from Drexel’s College of Artsand Science, College of Computing and Informatics, College of Engineering, College of MediaArts and Design, School of Education, and School of Public Health and is detailed below: 1. Core Peace Engineering Competencies (12 credits) – Introduction to Peacebuilding for Engineers
. College students as a future workforce need to be prepared in these autonomous vehicle fields. Electric golf carts, with much simpler systems than a real car, are a perfect choice for education. The purpose of this project is to convert an electric Club Car golf cart into a test platform for deep learning algorithms. The deep learning algorithms for path planning/searching and self-driving will eventually lead to an autonomous golf cart (AGC) that can navigate the campus of Eastern Michigan University. We will integrate peripheral sensors such as Lidar, GPS, IMUs, and control systems to the golf cart. The original golf cart’s mechanical chassis is the control system’s foundation. Sensors and control systems used to automate this golf cart
contexts. Recognize the ongoing need to acquire new knowledge, to choose appropriate slo 6 6 3.67 0.52 learning strategies, and to apply this knowledge Function effectively as a member or leader of a team that establishes goals, slo 7 plans tasks, meets deadlines, and creates a collaborative and inclusive 5 3.80 0.45 environment.Gathering Feedback from StudentsIn addition to outside faculty and professional observation for assessment, we wanted to examine students’direct feedback from their experience in this engineering service form of senior design. Students in
approaches that you develop for your bootcamp.Third, the evaluation needs to be designed to assess the intended program outcomes, which are ofcourse dependent on the students selected. Less experienced Scholars may be hypothesized toexperience different benefits than more experienced Scholars. The evaluation plan is another aspectthat can benefit from on-campus partnerships outside of your research unit. For example, is there aneducation training program on campus through which you could recruit an evaluator? We have hadpositive experiences working with trainees in educational psychology, STEM education, etc. insupport of our evaluation efforts, e.g.,5-7.In conclusion, while balancing the goals of stakeholders can be challenging, ultimately
-basedElectromagnetic Fields (EMF) course. Projects provided an opportunity for the students to evaluateEMF theories with hands-on experiments. Students’ feedback showed that more than 80% ofstudents had positive learning experiences with projects. Overall, students enjoyed the coursestructure that adopted active learning techniques with projects. From the instructor point of view,managing projects in a theory-based course require early planning and continuous communicationwith students.References:[1] Y. Xu, K. Meehan and C. V. Martin, "Visualizing Concepts in Electromagnetic Fields: Hands- On Experiments," in American Society for Engineering Education, Vancouver, British Columbia, 2011.[2] R. M. Fedler, "Meet Your Students: 1. Stan and Nathan," Chemical
the last graded assignment prior to the exam available for pickup any time on theday before the exam. This is done voluntarily, so not all students decide to make the effort to pickup the assignment. This work aims to investigate the differences in grade performance of studentswho did pick up their last homework assignment with those who did not pick up their lasthomework assignment prior to taking a midterm exam.MethodologyData were collected for this study across two sections of dynamics implemented during the samesemester. Students in this course are typically sophomore students planning on majoring inmechanical engineering, aerospace engineering, or civil engineering. The names of students whodid not pick up their homework assignment
AestheticsThe CSM will be explored in the workshop through planned Electrical Efficiencyactivity sessions, including application of the guiding Environmental Ergonomicquestions, evaluation of student responses, and application of Manufacturability Healtha proposed expansion of the framework regarding relative Mechanical Learnabilityimportance of various attributes. The activity sessions will be Physical Maintainabilityfollowed by facilitated discussion sessions. Workshop Precision
College and are offered networking andCollege of Engineering. This plan involves partnerships training opportunities.with the Office of Multicultural Affairs, the College of Renaissance Engineer ProfessionalEngineering Advisory Board members, and the Admissions Development Series, where speakers fromOffice. the community, who are often industry partners and/or alumni, offer hour-longII. Retention seminars on
program has not met our expectations as we still included more time in class, include sophomores, plannedhave had low participation. At the end of each fall semester out events, more suggested meeting times and screening outwe conducted a 15 question survey on the mentorship students that don’t want to participate. Others stated needsprogram as part of the final exam in the Introduction to to be more of a requirement, more time in class with eachEnvironmental Engineering course. Students were given other, more planned events.extra points for taking the survey. Every year we had over We are evaluating the suggestions from both the first-90% survey participation with 55 EVEN students
, Testing, Building/ the timing and spikes in certain categories of the project. WithConstructing, CAD, and Other. These timesheets served as a substantial data in future years, trends can be computed thattalking point for faculty during regular progress meetings will be helpful when planning the course for subsequentwith the teams to discuss the distribution of work. Some of years. Figure 3 is useful when meeting with teams to discussthe trends faculty are interested in include how gender factors distribution of work from a category perspective. If Studentinto the distribution of work, how the workload relates to A is spending most of his/her time on documentation butcredit hours and learning
creating thin interfaces in analogue as well as digital media and about using design as a catalyst for the empowerment of women. Currently he is working on projects related to: micro financing with an NGO in India; the use of cell phones for creating a more efficient process in maintaining immunization records for developing countries; and developing a foot measurement system with jaipur foot. He is also working on a new methodology for easier learning of 3D modeling applications for design students. He divides his time between the United States and India.He obtained his BArch from the School of Planning and Architecture in New Delhi and his Master of Science in Design from Arizona State University. Professor Sharma is
Figure 1: This is a caption for the first figure 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 6-7, 2018 – University of the District of ColumbiaConclusions and Future WorkWe believe that online programming practice tools have a positive impact on student’s learning.We also believe based on our preliminary data that it helps them in their exam grades, as theyhave more opportunities to practice and get immediate feedback. Also they can easily review theproblems where they struggle and reinforce those skills. We plan to expand this work bystudying the effect in multiple sections of the course, as well as including data from otherprogramming courses.References1. Bergin, S. & Reilly, R. The influence of motivation and comfort-level on