and retention13,14,15,16.Ethics education may improve if multiple methods of disseminating ethics, including activelearning, are used throughout the civil engineering curriculum.To improve understanding of the many ethical issues students may face as practicing engineers,we developed ethics modules in four civil engineering classes at the University of Portland (UP).Some modules involved active learning, whereas others were traditional writing assignments. As 1 a result, students receive some sort of ethics instruction at least one time per year throughout their four years at UP. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of integrating ethics across the civil engineering curriculum at UP
Skills. Best practices are highlighted with descriptionsof the technologies and techniques that were found most promising.IntroductionThe past 20 years were dominated by technological advances, but many modern classrooms arerun the same as they were in the 1990s. An overarching goal of educational institutions is tomaximize the quantity, quality, and accessibility of education for their students [1], [2]. There iscurrently a gap between the technologies available and the ways they are implemented toimprove education accessibility [3]. This “tech-lag” is an opportunity and necessity for collegeseverywhere to close the gap and create classrooms with diverse access points to learning,increasing each student’s chance for academic and professional
communities where students take a commoncourse(s), participate in extracurricular activities with one another, and live in the same residencehall. This literature review examined relevant published work on 1) What impacts do LLCs havefor all students who live in an LLC; 2) What are the impacts on first-year engineering collegestudents living in an LLC, and 3) What theoretical frameworks are used in literature whenexamining the impacts an LLC has on first-year engineering college students.IntroductionTwo of every three students in Singapore, and one out of every two students in China obtaindegrees in science or engineering. In the United States, that statistic is less than one in sevenstudents who earn degrees in science or engineering [1]. Given the
learningbehavior and patterns unique to computer programming [1-4]. Within the context of anintroductory programming course, choosing the most effective teaching method can bechallenging. The analogy of learning a new language is sometimes used to describe the types ofskills that are needed to communicate with a computer. Language pedagogy may provevaluable in introductory programming courses. Current practices in language instruction advisedeductive teaching for simple rules and less skilled learners, versus inductive teaching forcomplex rules and more skilled learners [5]. Deductive teaching begins with a general rule oftheory presented by the instructor, followed by specific examples and practice problems.Inductive teaching begins with specific
Engineering course. Her profes-sional interests include modeling the transport and fate of contaminants in groundwater and surface watersystems, as well as engineering education reform. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing the Growth in Entrepreneurial Mindset Acquired through Curricular and Extracurricular ComponentsIntroductionToday’s engineering work environment demands much more from employees than solelytechnical engineering knowledge and skills [1-2]. An entrepreneurial mindset and knowledge ofbusiness concepts are highly desired by industry. Many engineering schools are trying to developan entrepreneurial mindset in students. A variety of approaches are being
machine learning, the creation of content at the overlapof these two areas offers several opportunities for education and research. Machine learning [1]promises to solve several problems in solar energy generation including a) fault detection [2,3,4,5],b) shading prediction [6], and c) topology optimization [7,8,9]. Preparing students early in their plansof study to tackle these problems requires: a) training in machine learning, b) exposition to solarenergy systems simulation [10], c) skill building in terms of developing or using software to integratemachine learning to obtain solar system analytics and control the overall system [11]. In this paper, we describe an educational program developed to bring to undergraduate classes[12,13] select
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WORK IN PROGRESS: Understanding pre-service teacher beliefs aboutvaccination using and modifying group-based computational simulationsIntroductionThe Texas Department of State Health Services reported 56,738 kindergarten through 12thgrade students entered the 2017-2018 school year having been unvaccinated for non-medicalreasons [1]. These children have parents who file for a conscientious exemption to vaccines orare more colloquially known “anti-vaxxers.” [2]. While this figure only represents 1.07% of thestudent body of Texas, a closer analysis shows the heterogenous composition of unvaccinatedstudents in schools. Austin, Texas presents an interesting case where schools range invaccination rates
graduate student in Educational Psychology and Research Methodology at Purdue University at West Lafayette, Indiana. Her concentration is on educational measurement and statistics. Her main research topic is (1) comparing research methodologies and (2) testing measurement invariance.Utkuhan Genc, Purdue University, West Lafayette Utkuhan Genc is a Junior at the school of Industrial Engineering at Purdue University. He is an under- graduate research assistant at UPRISE program in Purdue Engineering Education Department under the supervision of Muhsin Menekse. He has an incredible passion for solving cross-cultural problems using data-driven analytical thinking and intercultural communication skills. He is also pursuing a
need for greater emphasis on leadership in engineeringeducation, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET),through its Engineering Accreditation Commission, updated its accreditationcriteria for student outcomes in 2017 [1]. ABET shifted from simply stating theneed for engineers to “function on multidisciplinary teams” to a more detailedcriterion, which identifies specific aspects of leadership, including “an ability tofunction effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, createa collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meetobjectives” [1]. The importance of including leadership as a focus in anengineering curriculum has long been confirmed by the National Academy
, and iden- tifying desirable processing routes for its manufacture. To this end, the research group employs a blend of experimental, theoretical, and numerical approaches, focusing on several areas, including: 1. Processing-Microstructure-Property-Performance Relationships: thermal barrier coating, solid oxide fuel cell, hydrogen transport membrane, lithium-ion battery 2. Physics-based Multi-scale Models: ab ini- tio, molecular dynamics (MD), discrete element models (DEM), finite element models (FEM) 3. Coupled Phenomena: diffusion-thermomechanical properties 4. Additve Manufacturing (AM) or 3D Printing: AM materials characterization, AM process (laser metal powder bed fusion, ceramic slurry extrusion) design
teams that exist inworkplaces within the United States and abroad. As such, the purpose of this paper is to describethe process of creating and subsequent plans for implementation of an interdisciplinary capstonecourse at a large research-intensive institution in the Southeast US. The challenges associatedwith developing a course that meets the need of each disciplinary capstone experience and spansthe boundary of different approaches to pedagogy, knowledge structure and learning will beexplored as well.Background and ObjectivesOne of the most common complaints among recruiters of engineering graduates is a failure ofuniversities to properly prepare their students to collaborate within a diverse workplaceenvironment [1], [2]. Students typically
documented various aspects of the program over its first 9 years. The purpose of thispaper is to describe the current state of the integrated teaching and learning strategies that theprogram uses to facilitate engineering design learning with an entrepreneurial mindset in a PBLmodel.Awareness of the IRE program has increased recently with the program being recognized as theABET 2017 Innovation award winner and in the top ten emerging leaders in engineeringeducation in the “Global state of the art in engineering education” report by Dr. Ruth Grahamreleased in 2018 [1].Purpose of researchThe purpose of this paper is to describe how the Iron Range Engineering (IRE) program leadsstudent engineers to ”become the engineer they want to be” by working with
recognized that all their communication skills were a work inprogress mirroring the initial course message that engineers need to be lifelong learners. Withthis understanding, we hope that they would pursue other opportunities to sharpen theircommunication skills.IntroductionThe three pillars of communication are considered to be one of the important professional skillsin engineering practice [1]. They are reported to be even more important than technical skills [2].Graphical communication, one of the pillars that is unique to the engineering practice, coverstechnical requirements of drawing and visual skills. Most students have shown to struggle inpresenting and understanding, graphically, ideas that require high visualization skills [3