Paper ID #33934A Low-cost Materials Laboratory Sequence for Remote Instruction thatSupports Student AgencyDr. Matthew J. Ford, Cornell University Matthew Ford received his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering and materials science from the University of California, Berkeley, and went on to complete his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at North- western University. After completing an internship in quantitative methods for education research with the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), he joined the Cornell Active Learning Initiative as a postdoctoral associate. His teaching
on the disconnect between lectureand lab, which were taught by different instructors before 2010. To address this issues the sameinstructor started teaching both the lecture and laboratory sections in Spring 2010 and somelaboratory time was allocated to guided inquiry using PhET simulations3 and materials modifiedfrom those developed at the University of Colorado at Boulder4.To address goals 2 and 3, the redeveloped course and laboratory have a materials science focus.The properties of single atoms and collections of atoms are studied with an eye towardunderstanding real-world applications. Labs closely tie in to what is being discussed in lectureand introduce students to computational modeling using MATLAB. We chose this particular high
technologies across protocol layers. The evolution of wireless communication andnetworking presents such a need and a unique opportunity to integrate undergraduate educationacross the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science curricula, which trains future engineerswith a deeper and holistic understanding of and skills for current and emerging wirelesscommunication and networking technologies.In this paper, we report the development of an easily replicable model of evolvable, low cost,software defined radio (SDR)-based wireless communication and networking laboratories aswell as associated teaching and learning materials that can be adopted or adapted to impactnational engineering education practices. The SDR-based laboratories are tailored to the
include interdisciplinary engineering, asset management, decision-making, GASB#34, economic development, performance assessment, policy, performance-assessment, organizational assessment, and public relations. Dr. Orndoff’s research incorporates economics, public administration, public policy, political science, public finance, planning, and sociology aspects Page 12.1618.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 “Making Statics Dynamic!” -Combining Lecture and Laboratory into an Interdisciplinary, Problem-based, Active Learning Environment.AbstractThe new U.A
separate laboratory and lectureallows. We have recently been developing some laboratory kits, designed to be used in astandard classroom.In this paper we review the conceptual basis of using classroom laboratory kits and examples ofour recent developments and experience with these kits. We are developing this approach forteaching process control and for teaching simple RLC circuits to Chemical Engineering students.In process control we are developing kits using the LEGO® RCX® brick and quick disconnectpiping that allow students to experience a full design, build and test sequence. In electricalcircuits we have simple snap together circuit kits that allow students to gain hands on experiencewith simple electrical principles in the classroom.Using
details of each laboratory exercise with several learning objectives.Micr oelectr onics Teaching Factor y: Backgr ound, Rationale, and BenefitsArizona continues to rank as one of the leading states in the number of workers employedin the semiconductor manufacturing industry. To meet these demands, semiconductorcompanies (both nationally and locally) have launched an aggressive campaign to attractstudents into programs that prepare them for the future workforce. As a result, localsemiconductor companies have sought to collaborate with neighboring higher educationinstitutions to implement this workforce initiative. The College of Technology andApplied Sciences (CTAS) at ASU East is leading the way by developing a state-of-the-artteaching factory in
Education and Practice, University of Toronto.3 Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University. *Corresponding Author.Abstract As outlined in the Paris Agreement, the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by2050 necessitates a multifaceted approach encompassing clean energy initiatives and carbon taxation.Higher education institutions, recognizing their role as key contributors to sustainability, are increasinglyfocusing on reducing their carbon footprint. The teaching laboratories, essential for various disciplines,contribute significantly to the university's carbon footprint. In this study, we applied the common practicesof Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) in the industry to the Unit Operations Laboratory, which resembles
Paper ID #34773Re-inventing a Mechanical Properties of Materials Laboratory Course forOnline LearningDr. Susan P. Gentry, University of California, Davis Dr. Susan P. Gentry is an Associate Professor of Teaching Materials Science and Engineering at the Uni- versity of California, Davis. In her current position at UC Davis, she is integrating computational modules into the undergraduate and graduate materials curriculum. She is specifically interested in students’ com- putational literacy and life-long learning of computational materials science tools.Gianmarco Sahragard-Monfared, University of California, Davis Gianmarco
Paper ID #33080Implementation of Hands-on, Home-based Laboratory for Two ElectricalEngineering Courses (A Pilot Study)Dr. James Kretzschmar, University of Wyoming Colonel, USAF (ret) Amateur Radio (FCC license: AE7AX) Member: IEEE, ASEE, ARRLDr. Robert F. Kubichek, University of Wyoming Robert Kubichek received his Ph.D. from the University of Wyoming in 1985. He has held positions at Boeing, the BDM Corporation, and the Institute for Telecommunication Sciences (NTIA). He taught at the University of Wyoming for 29 years and retired in 2020. His research and teaching focus has been communications and digital signal
Paper ID #18723Interactive Digital Logic Laboratory for K-12 Students (Work in Progress)Dr. Rohit Dua, Missouri University of Science & Technology ROHIT DUA, Ph.D is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology and Missouri State University’s Coopera- tive Engineering Program. His research interests include engineering education. (http://web.mst.edu/˜rdua/) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Interactive Digital Logic Laboratory for K-12 Students (Work in
CURRICULUM AND LABORATORY DEVELOPMENT Prof R Natarajan Former Chairman, All India Council for Technical Education Former Director, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India prof.rnatarajan@gmail.comAbstract:International collaboration in Higher and Engineering Education has beenreceiving increasing attention of national governments, international agencies andinstitutions of higher education during the past few decades, particularly since thegeneral acceptance of globalization worldwide. Among the goals of internationalcollaboration is the addition of an international dimension to the course contentsand teaching programs. The formalization of collaboration is
courseAbstractRecent years have shown increased success in the use of undergraduate students as teachingassistants or supplemental instructors in core chemical engineering courses. While typicallyutilized in traditional lecture-based courses, there is significant promise in utilizingundergraduate students as a peer resource in a lab-based course. This paper summarizes howundergraduate teaching assistants, referred to at Louisiana State University as coaches, wereintegrated into a junior level lecture/laboratory course. The course is designed to teachexperimental statistics in the lecture component (two days a week) with the students performingexperiments on three different unit operations (one day a week) for 3 four-week experimentalcycles. The main
of finite element analysis.Dr. Samuel D. Daniels P.E., University of New Haven Dr. Daniels is an associate professor of mechanical engineering with more than 20 years of experience teaching laboratory classes. He also teaches in the multidisciplinary engineering foundation spiral cur- riculum at the University of New Haven. Research interests are in engineering education and renewable energy systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Three-course Laboratory Sequence in Mechanical Engineering as a Framework for Writing in the DisciplineAbstractThe ability to communicate effectively is very critical to engineering graduates to prepare themfor the workplace
Active Learning by Lecture and Laboratory Integration in an Emerging Engineering Program A. Ieta1, R. Manseur1, and M. Hromalik1Abstract – The development of a new Electrical and Computer Engineering program provides an opportunity fordesigning and implementing an innovative curriculum. In terms of teaching methods, a combination of lecturing andhands-on learning is selected. Studio-style teaching is reported to enhance student learning, compared to theclassical lecture and lab formats. However, course organization is different and requires adaptation and innovation incourse design, content, and delivery. A studio lab was organized and new equipment was acquired for laboratorystations that
Trenton State College,in the Department of Engineering, these concepts are being introduced andtaught most effectively via the hands-on approach. The department believesthat by placing a strong commitment on practical learning experiences, itis better able to teach and reinforce theoretical concepts. An example of this belief is the engineering department’s sophomorelevel production Systems and Methods course. Numerous course concepts aretaught in conjunction wit~aboratory activities which require students todevelop and present manufacturing processes, organizational and productionsystems solutions utilizing the department’s CNC, CAD, plus the polymer andmetallic manufacturing facilities. A few of the laboratory enhanced Production
Polytechnic Institute and State Universityhas been using, for several years now, a problem-solving approach to teach undergraduatelaboratories4. At Central Connecticut State University, the problem-solving approach wasapplied5 in order to develop and improve important skills in the students through laboratory Page 14.133.3experiments. The students were given limited guidance to develop a projectile device. Theexperience was aimed at giving students the possibility of guided practice without clearlydefined boundaries. The author reported positive outcomes in terms of intra-teamcommunications and organizing.According to another study6, supplementing
Paper ID #19397Incorporating the Raspberry Pi into laboratory experiments in an introduc-tory MATLAB courseDr. Naji S Husseini, Biomedical Engineering at NCSU and UNC-CH Naji Husseini is a lecturer in the Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University. He received his B.S. and M.Eng. in En- gineering Physics from Cornell University and his M.S. in Electrical Engineering and Ph.D. in Applied Physics from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. He teaches classes in materials science, biomate- rials, MATLAB programming, and biomechanics for
opportunities for exploration and discovery, whichalign closely with the learning process of the scientists and inventors who have driven innovationover the past two centuries [3]. As a result, laboratory activities are one of the most essentialcomponents of an engineering education at the undergraduate level. However, traditionallaboratory activities tend to involve the teaching assistants performing demonstrations while thestudents either passively observe or repeat the tasks performed by the TAs. Due to the ever-increasing enrolment levels at universities [4] and the limited resources, equipment, and lab times,there is unfortunately little opportunity to explore “what if” scenarios and to understand theimportance/consequences of certain steps in the
infrastructure. Figure 1: Utility Involvement in microgrids2Although the power industry adopts the advanced technology of microgrids into theirinfrastructure, universities have fallen behind. Universities primarily teach electric machines andpower system analysis with the assumption that the grid remains largely electro-mechanicallycontrolled. This results from a lack of modern power systems equipment and accompanyinglaboratory material to teach its use. The protective relays in laboratories typically don’t utilizemicroprocessors, making modern control and protection schemes hard to teach. While theindustry has adopted new technologies to address problems associated with centralizedgeneration, a new wave of electrical engineers
,synchronous video conferencing between California Polytechnic State University (PrimarilyUndergraduate Institution) and Auburn University (Research-1 University) have been conducted.In addition, video productions have been assigned and completed by students in lieu ofconventional written laboratory reports. These activities are conducted to develop new teachingmethodologies and to investigate the pedagogical benefits of incorporating unconventionallearning styles into teaching of geotechnical engineering laboratory courses. New experimentsfor the undergraduate laboratory have been developed as part of this project. Role-playing bystudents was included. Geotechnical competitions have been held between the universitiesincorporating synchronous video
division’s newslet- ter editor. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum, and professional ethics. Page 24.1236.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The Paperless Lab – Streamlining a Modern Unit Operations Laboratory Course to Reduce Faculty Time Commitment1. IntroductionUnit Operations (UO) laboratory courses are important, required offerings in chemicalengineering curricula due to the similarities of required laboratory tasks to those relevant inindustry
44.243 0.000 0.52321 0.52593 0.25185 0.79457 Distraction -2.130 70 0.037 -0.18096 0.35701 -0.35043 -0.01149*Means are assumed not to have a statistical difference only when the significance is more than0.05 (p > 0.05)For Study II, the mean scores for students’ responses for the three teaching modes (remote, mixed,and in-person) are calculated for each construct of the Hydraulic Laboratory course as shown inboth Table 6 and Figure 2. When comparing the average scores, in-person mode received thehighest mean scores for each of the constructs. Additionally, the remote mode scored the lowestmeans for interactive, passive, value, positivity, and participation; while the mixed
AC 2012-3742: FACILITATING GROUP WORK: TO ENHANCE LEARN-ING IN LABORATORY BASED COURSES OF ENGINEERING EDUCA-TION IN INDIADr. Sujatha J., Mission10X, Wipro Technologies Sujatha J. is academically qualified with a Ph.D. in signal processing, from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, and has more than 24 years of academic and industry experience. Over the years, Sujatha has participated in not only academic teaching and research but also in academic counseling for students, professional development programs, curriculum development, industry-institution relationship activities, and prototype development and team building. Currently, Sujatha is a core member of Research Center, Mission10X, Wipro Technologies
(TIMS), throughout a sequence of fourcourses at the junior and senior levels. The four courses are in the systems area with an emphasison communications systems. This laboratory and the associated study are funded by a Course,Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI), Adaptation and Implementation (A&I) track,grant from the Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) of the National Science Foundation(NSF). An essential component of this grant is a formal study of the effects of this laboratoryexperience on student learning and teaching efficacy. This paper discusses the philosophybehind the laboratory and the design of the study and presents results from the first semesterstudy.We begin with a description of the four courses that will use
Advanced Product De- sign and Manufacturing at Fairfield University. His curriculum development and lab modernization pre- pare students for Industrial challenges. Additionally, he excels in teaching four lab courses, each having two sections, providing hands-on education to future engineers. His scholarly contributions, featured in several peer-reviewed journals specializing in manufacturing processes, reflect his dedication to research and knowledge dissemination. Dr. Haghbin possesses hands-on experience in controlled micro-milling and 3D printing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Transformative Mechanical Engineering One-Credit Laboratory Courses: A Project
of Science and Technology in 2002. Mr. Yaseen joined Central State University on August 2013. He is currently an Assistant Professor who enjoys teaching computer science classes. As for his research areas, Mr. Yaseen is interested in Computational Biology, Bioinformatics and High Performance Computing. Page 24.1090.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Software Defined Radio Laboratory Platform for Enhancing Undergraduate Communication and Networking CurriculaAbstract: The advances of communication and networking have changed the worldfundamentally
, applied electronics for measurement and instrumentation, and development of technology enhanced teaching tools and pedagogical framework for improved engineering education. Dr. Das has published more than 30 research articles in international journals and conference proceedings. He has designed and developed various hands-on teaching and learning tools for electrical engineering students. Dr. Das has lead several research projects as a Principal Investigator and has been funded by the Office of Undergraduate Research, Office of the Vice President for Research at KSU, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. He has also led two projects for the development of open access laboratory instructional resources for
be modified to address someof the topics that the students scored poorly on in the final exam. This study builds on the results of previous studies and provides additional evidence thatfavorable outcomes occur when implementing active learning concepts into a lecture-basedcircuits course. The lessons learned from this pilot study will be used to improve the hands-on segment of the ENGR 2431 course in future semesters. Due to the initial successes of thisstudy, we also plan to introduce parts of this project into a circuits course for ECE majors inthe near future. We trust our study could be beneficial to instructors who are teaching anelectrical circuits course and are interested in bringing the laboratory to a large classroom.IX
faculty beliefs about teaching and learning must be challenged in order for them toconsider how to move students to value higher order thinking and professional collaboration.20-21This situation exists in part from simple lack of awareness of advances in cognitive science andeducational theory6, 22-26, lack of confidence or encouragement in trying new pedagogies27-29, andthe sheer logistical hurdles involved in reforming a General Chemistry course that often hashundreds of enrolled students.The idea of a laboratory-driven curriculum is not new. In the FIPSE (Department of EducationFund for the Improvement of Post-secondary Education) Lectures on Chemical Educationdelivered at the 10th Biennial Conference on Chemical Education in 1988, John W
Paper ID #16776Work in Progress: Reviving a Transport Phenomena Course by Incorporat-ing Simulation and Laboratory ExperiencesDr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Lecturer in bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In her career, Marcia has been active in improving undergraduate education through developing problem-based laboratories to enhance experimental design skills; developing a preliminary design course focused on problem identification and market space (based on an industry partner’s protocol); and mentoring and guiding student teams through the