Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Bijan Sepahpour

acertain quantity. This requirement is carefully matched with the theoretical content of the twointerdependent courses.In this process, the coordinator will be able to discover groups/students with high level of interestand enthusiasm. Some of these proposed experiments may be expanded/fine tuned intomeaningful and affordable entities. Alternatively, the coordinator may discover the need for acertain experiment, define the problem for a group of interested students/class and collaboratewith them in the brainstorming, prototyping, testing and conceiving the final unit. This trendmay continue through the second, third and the final laboratory course. In exceptional cases, thecontinued efforts of the student(s) may be justifiable for credits towards

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Hy Tran; Catherine Clewett

Scientific Attitudes A 31.2 8.9 33.9 5.7 2.8 Career Interest in Science C 26.4 9.7 27.6 6.7 1.2 Enjoyment of Science Lessons E 27.4 9.8 28.6 7.0 1.2 Attitude toward Scientific Inquiry I 33.2 6.7 35.8 5.2 2.7 Leisure Interest in Science L 24.4 10.3 25.7 8.0 1.3 Normality of Scientists N 32.1 6.1 32.4 5.5 0.3 Social Implications of Science S 34.0 8.6 34.1 6.5 0.1 Mean of Seven Scales 29.8 8.6 31.2 6.4 1.4While the students showed some improvement in their attitudes towards science andengineering

Conference Session

Teaching Teaming Skills Through Design

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Leah Jamieson; Lynne Slivovsky; William Oakes

for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationEach EPICS project involves a team of eight to twenty undergraduates, a not-for-profitcommunity partner – for example, a community service agency, museum or school, orgovernment agency and a faculty or industry advisor. A pool of graduate teaching assistantsfrom seven departments provides technical guidance and administrative assistance.Each EPICS team is vertically integrated, consisting of a mix of freshmen, sophomores, juniors,and senior and is constituted for several years, from initial project definition through finaldeployment. Once the initial project(s) is completed and deployed, new projects

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Patricia Secola; Bettie Smiley; Dale Baker; Mary Anderson-Rowland

ifthe interest in engineering and related fields is to be increased among entering college freshmen.Through our collaboration with OUE, WI continues to enhance its efforts in training pre-collegeeducators in engineering and gender equity.References1. Webb, D.L., Metha, A., & Jordan, K.F. Foundations of American Education, 308-318. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.(1996).2. Ibid.3. Blaisdell, S. (1996). WISE (Women in Science and Engineering) Investments. Request for Proposal to theNational Science Foundation.4. Sadker, M.P., & Sadker, D. M. Teachers, Schools, and Society, 438-474. NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc. (1997).5. Ibid.6. Brush, L. Cognitive and Affective Determinants of Course Preferences and Plans. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush&

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Theodore F. Smith; Sharif Rahman; P. Barry Butler

the following items. Please do not hesitate to add additional comments.Please return the completed survey to 2201 SC by May 10, 1999. We seek 100 percent return.Thank you for your cooperation in attempting to enhance the 1999-2000 PEDE.Rate the following aspects of the 1998-99 PEDE on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the highest?Please add written comments.• Jump-Start Week• Working relationship with lead engineers• Working relationship with engineering educators• Learning about the various aspects of engineering design• Use of engineering design tools (Pro/E, Pro/Mechanica, NASTRAN, etc)• Adequacy of academic credit of 6 s. h.• Gaining experience with team work• Overall experienceAdditional comments

Conference Session

Multi-disciplinary Design

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert B. Stone; Nancy Hubing

the second semester course is shown in Fig. 4. This course begins to lookmore like a traditional capstone design course with the notable exception that the projects areinterdisciplinary. We begin the semester by revisiting the outcome of the second project fromthe design methods course. Here the students spend a considerable amount of time visiting withtheir customer to ensure that the selected concept meets their needs. Three presentations are heldwhere the design teams present key parts of the embodiment design process: a proof of conceptof the critical component(s), a design review of the alpha (or first) prototype and a final designreview/demonstration of the beta (or working) prototype. Students are assessed on individualdesign notebooks

Conference Session

Trends in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Sheldon Jeter

recognizing the idea ofdirect and indirect measurements. An indirect measurement is merely a calculation based on oneor more direct measurements. Assume that m independent direct measurements, identified as aset of wi s, contribute to an indirect measurement, z. The measurement formula is then merely thecalculation formula, z = z (w1 , w2 ,× × × wm ) (15)The operational concepts of EPA are essentially incorporated in two equations. The first of thesetwo basic equations of EPA concerns how uncertainty in some dependent variable or indirectmeasurement z is caused by the uncertainty in some independent or directly measured variable,w. Call this uncertainty uz,w

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Anna Phillips; Paul Palazolo; Scott Yost

Session____ What’s in it for me? Engineering Educators Respond to Criteria-Based Evaluation Methods A. Phillips, S. Yost, P. Palazolo University of Memphis/ University of Kentucky/ University of MemphisAbstractThis study describes the response of two undergraduate engineering professors at differentuniversities to a new criteria-based system of evaluation for their written lab reports. Bothprofessors have worked with the same writing consultant in designing the criteria for evaluationin each assignment, and after only one semester, both have noted both negative and

Conference Session

Assessment of Biomedical Engineering Programs

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Paul King; Joan Walker

influences, safety andinstitutional matters such as FDA approval.Although Pair 2’s density and validity scores did not change between Time 1 and 2, thecoherency of their maps differed considerably. At Time 1, this pair created a map withtwo central propositions: “purpose guides engineering” and “engineering creates design.”They characterized the structure of this map as an “explosion” focused on the motivationfor design (e.g., “client needs”). Further, in the early map, the node labeled as “design”was linked only to surface features such as “physical appearance” and “ease ofoperation.” The majority of links emanated from the node labeled “engineering.” At Time2, this pair constructed a non-hierarchical, iterative map focused on differentiating

Conference Session

Assessment in Engineering Graphics

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi M. Steinhauer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

, J.S., Integration of engineering drawing and descriptive geometry. Journal of Engineering Drawing, 1948. 12(3): p. 16-17; 30.7. Svensen, C.L., Drawing in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Drawing, 1948. 12(3): p. 6-7; 20-21.8. Olkun, S., Making connections: Improving spatial abilities with engineering drawing activities. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 2003. April.9. Contreras, M.J., et al., Sex differences in dynamic spatial ability: The unsolved question of performance factors. Memory and Cognition, 2007. 35(2): p. 7.10. Voyer, D., M.A. Rodgers, and P.A. McCormick, Timing conditions and the magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Memory and

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaobin Le, Wentworth Institute of Technology ; Anthony William Duva, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Richard L. Roberts, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Ali R. Moazed, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

observations and opinions about how toinstruct senior mechanical design projects based on our Capstone design course - MECH690-Mechanical Design will also be presented and shared throughout this paper. We recommend thatmechanical engineering program provide every student the virtual factory when they graduate.1. IntroductionOne of the main activities of engineers is to design and to construct products that satisfycustomers‟ and society‟s needs. One of the primary outcomes for engineering education is totrain students for conducting engineering design. In ancient time, engineering students wereapprentices to their Masters to learn engineering designs through real practices in realenvironments. Nowadays, engineering students are effectively training

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregg M. Warnick, Brigham Young University; Robert H. Todd, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Students are provided theopportunity to work on real projects with real consequences and also learn the value thatcompanies place on IP and are better prepared for the normal practices concerning IP that areused in industry.Bibliography1 Todd, R. H., C. D. Sorensen, and S. P. Magleby, Designing a senior capstone course to satisfy industrial customers, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, No. 2, 1993, pp. 92-100.2 WIPO, What is intellectual property? http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/3 Gorka, S., J. R. Miller, B. J. Howe, Developing realistic capstone projects in conjunction with industry, SIGHTE 2007 Annual Conference, Destin, Florida.4 Radack, D. H., Intellectual property: yours or your employer’s, Getting Results…For the

Conference Session

Engineering Design in Pedagogy

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew D. Lammi, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

, Characterizing design learning: A mixed- methods study of engineering designers' use of language. Journal of Engineering Education, 2008. 97(2): p. 309-326.2. Hirsch, P., et al. Enriching freshman design through collaboration with professional designers. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 2002. Montreal, Canada.3. Purzer, S.Y. Learning engineering in teams: Perspectives from two different learning theories. in Research in Engineering Education Symposium. 2009. Palm Cove, Australia.4. Sheppard, S., et al. Studying the engineering student experience: Design of a longitudinal study. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 2004. Salt Lake City, UT.5

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Technical Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara A. Masi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Shanette A. Go; E. Hosoi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

ed g as a studies aspect s major rclass er ts ts t major discip

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Technical Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karinna M. Vernaza, Gannon University; Theresa Vitolo, Gannon University; Scott Steinbrink, Gannon University; Barry J. Brinkman, Gannon University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

initiated itsfirst cohort of 20 students in fall 2009. Funded through an NSF S-STEM grant, theinterdisciplinary, multi-year, mixed academic-level offering awards scholarships to studentsbased on academic merit and financial need. SEECS is an opportunity for students in certainSTEM majors at Gannon University, Erie, PA, in the School of Engineering and ComputerScience. The goals of the scholarship program are (1) to increase the number of academicallytalented, but financially disadvantaged students in the stated majors, (2) to assist students to besuccessful in their undergraduate education, and (3) to foster professional development forcareers or graduate education. These goals are realized through the students shared interactionswithin the SEECS

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University; Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University; John H. Bailey, Eastern Arizona College; Anita Grierson, Arizona State University; Rakesh Pangasa, Arizona Western College; Clark Vangilder, Central Arizona College; Phil Blake McBride, Eastern Arizona College; Richard A. Hall Jr., Cochise College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

- neers. He’s the PI on two NSF S-STEM grants providing academic and career guidance to students in CSEM fields. He js a Professor of Electrical Engineering within the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at ASU. Prior to joining ASU, he worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has authored over 190 technical papers and three engineering texts. He has given more than 60 invited presentations - including 13 plenaries. Since 1994, he has directed an extensive engineering mentoring-research program that has served over 300 students. He’s an AT&T Bell Labs Fellow, Boe- ing A.D

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jack L. Beuth, Carnegie Mellon University; Rohit Kumar, Carnegie Mellon University; Carolyn Penstein Rose, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

of California, SantaBarbara, and John Stuart of PTC. Page 22.1597.13References 1. Kumar, R., Beuth, J., Rosé, C. P. (2011). Conversational Strategies that Support Idea Generation Productivity in Groups, Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. 2. Howley, I., Chaudhuri, S., Kumar, R., Rosé, C. P. (2009). Motivation and Collaboration On-Line, submitted to Artificial Intelligence in Education. 3. Kumar, R., Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Joshi, M., Robinson, A. (2007). Tutorial Dialogue as Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support, Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education, July 9-13, Los

Conference Session

The Teacher as Manager: Best Practices for Culminating Design Experiences

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William P. Manion, University of Maine; Judith A. Hakola, University of Maine

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

. The amount of background information available to begin the project. 4. The commitment of the client to the project. 5. The uniqueness and overall excitement of the project. Team-related criteria 6. The relationship(s) between team member(s) and the client. 7. The number and qualifications of team members with respect to the scope of work. 8. The apparent level of team commitment to the project.The fifth one, uniqueness and overall excitement, attempts to give weight to projects that aredifferent, potentially interesting to a wider public audience, or are particularly challenging. Forexample, one team did a project at Fenway Park in Boston, home of Red Sox baseball. With noprior contact, they approached the

Conference Session

Hey You: Effectively Engaging Students in the Classroom

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey A. Laman, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Irene B. Mena, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

the College of EngineeringLeonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering. Page 25.314.10Bibliography 1. Blicblau, Aaron S. and Joseph M. Steiner (1998). Fostering Creativity Through Engineering Projects. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 55-65. 2. Stouffer W. B., Jeffrey S. Russell, and Michael G. Oliva (2004). Making The Strange Familiar: Creativity and the Future of Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 3. NAE (National Academy of Engineering) (2005). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Javernick-Will, University of Colorado, Boulder; Jessica Kaminsky, University of Colorado, Boulder; Cathy Leslie P.E., Engineers Without Borders - USA ; Kaitlin Litchfield, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

: 8thNational Conference of the Canadian Coalition of Women in Engineering, Science and Technology.; 2000:6–8.17. Roberts P, Ayre M. Did she Jump or was she Pushed? A Study of Women’s Retention in the EngineeringWorkforce. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2002;18(4):415–421.18. Walsh WB, Osipow SH. Career counseling for women. Psychology Press; 1994.19. Ceci S, Williams W, Barnett S. Women’s Underrepresentation in Science: Sociocultural and BiologicalConsiderations. Psychological Bulletin. 2009;135(2):218-261.20. Robinson L. Beyond flex time: Retaining female scientists and engineers. Journal of the Minerals, Metals andMaterials Society. 2009;61(1):96–96.21. Sheu HB, Lent RW, Brown SD, et al. Testing the choice model of social cognitive

Conference Session

Service as an Element of Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Pamela Dexter, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jane Hunter, University of Arizona; James C. Baygents, University of Arizona; Michael Gerard Thompson

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Conference Session

Ethical Cases and Curricula

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Russell Capelli, Virginia Tech; Estela Patron Moen, Virginia Tech; William N. Collins, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

25.491.14experience, resolve unique ethical challenges, and develop interdisciplinary skills. Moreimportantly, as the organization expands its footprint on campus and internationally, a refinedand enduring definition of international engineering responsibility is found through an evolvingconsensus that represents a growing group of eclectic individuals and stakeholders.References Cited:[1] Barakat, N. “Issues and Challenges of Teaching Engineering Ethics,” Proceedings of the CSME 2004 Forum,University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, June 2004.[2] Cuello, J. L. “Designing a Global Ethic for Engineers,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Nashville, TN., June 2003.[3] Luegenbiehl, H. S. “Teaching Engineering Ethics Across

Conference Session

Study Abroad, International Exchange Programs, and Student Engagements

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron G. Ball, Brigham Young University; Alan R. Parkinson, Brigham Young University; Spencer P. Magleby, Brigham Young University; Randall Davies, Brigham Young Univeristy; C. Greg Jensen, Brigham Young University; Holt Zaugg, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

International

-161, 1982.[2] M. G. Grudzinski-Hall, K. L. Jellison, H. W. Stewart-Gambino, and R. N. Weisman, “Engineering Students in a Global World: Lehigh University’s Global Citizenship,” Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2007.[3] J. R. Lohmann, H. A. Rollins, and J. J. Hoey, “Defining, developing and assessing global competence in engineers,” European journal of engineering education, vol. 31, no. 1, p. 119131, 2006.[4] A. Parkinson, “The Rationale for Developing Global Competence,” Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 2, 2009.[5] A. Parkinson, J. Harb, and S. Magleby, “Developing Global Competence In Engineers: What Does It Mean? What Is Most

Conference Session

Techniques in Improving Mathematics Education in STEM Curricula

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Vandenbussche, Southern Polytechnic State University; Christina R. Scherrer, Southern Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(7), 843-855. 9. Fernandez, E., Kazimir, J., Vendemeulebroeke, L., Burgos, C. (2002). Experimenting with Classroom Formats to Encourage Problem Solv ing. Pri mus, 12(3), 247-61. 10. Frederickson, E. (1998). Minority Students and the Learning Co mmun ity Experience: A Cluster Experiment. U.S.: Texas 1998-0400, ED423533. 11. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Smith, K. (1998a). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom 2 nd ed. Interaction Book Co, Edina, MN. 12. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Smith, K. (1998b). Cooperative Learning Return s to College: What Evidence is there that it Works? Change, 30(4), 26-35

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen W. Laguette, University of California, Santa Barbara

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 4. Laguette, Stephen W. Progress Report -The Development of High Performance Capstone Project Teams and the Selection Process. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 5. Dieter, George E. and Linda C. Schmidt. Engineering Design. Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill. 6. Davis, Denny and S. Beyerlein, P. Thompson, K. Gentili, L. McKenzie. How Universal are Capstone Design Course Outcomes?. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 7. Beyerlein, Steven and D. Davis, M. Trevisan, P. Thompson, O. Harrison. Assessment Framework for Capstone Design Courses. Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference &

Conference Session

Broadening Participation

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary B. Phelps, HEDGE Co.

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

, J.S. (1992). A longitudinal study of predictors of spatial ability in adolescent females. Child Development, 63.1: 37-46.21. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. Why Aren't More Women in Science?: Top Researchers Debate the Evidence. Ed. S. J. Ceci and W. M. Williams. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 47-57.22. Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindsets and math/science achievement. Prepared for Carnegie-IAS Commission on Mathematics and Science Education. New York, NY.23. Heilbronner, N.N. (2009). Nurturing talented girls in the science classroom. Gifted Child Today. 32.1: 46- 54.24. Linn, M. C. and Petersen, A.C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences

Conference Session

Reflections on the “Raise the Bar” Initiative (Part I) - Using a Decade of Experience to Chart the Future

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monte L. Phillips P.E., American Society of Civil Engineers; Forrest M. Holly Jr. P.E., University of Iowa

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

environments include design offices, facilitymanagement, academe, regulatory agencies, etc. While opportunities for attaining outcomes suchas Outcomes 20 to 24 in Figure 1 may be relatively common across all work environments,opportunities for attaining others such as 9 (Design) and 13 (Project Management) maybe quitedifferent from one environment to another. Nonetheless, it is the expectation of the civilengineering profession that the EI will demonstrate attainment of all of the outcomes prior toentry into the practice of civil engineering at a professional level, whatever their workenvironment(s) may have been during the early stages of their career. The Guidelines attempt torecognize these differences in offering multiple example pathways for

Conference Session

Retention of Women Students

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University; Kaitlyn J. Bunker; Nilufer Onder, Michigan Technological University; Raven Rachaun Rebb; Laura E. Brown, Michigan Technological University; Leonard J. Bohmann, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

-persisters. The gender-based analysis showed that non-persisting femalestudents have higher mathematics scores compared to persisters. Moreover, female leavers didnot have the same low grades as male leavers. These results suggest that female students havethe academic ability to complete an engineering degree, but not the interest7.Mendez et al.'s research showed that gender is not an important factor in persistence. Theiranalysis showed that rates of persistence are similar within subgroups of the data defined bycumulative GPA and number of STEM courses taken. In other words, once women decide tomajor in a STEM field, they persist at the same rate as men14.II.b. Internalization and Perceptions of Major and CareerStudents are affected in varying

Conference Session

Using Applications and Projects in Teaching Mathematics

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hassan Moore, University of Alabama, Birmingham

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

challenge students to apply the information taught through modeling a system, analyzingit, and presenting a solution(s) complete with units and an interpretation of the physicalphenomena examined. Given that time is a premium in the academy and project creation is atime consumer, three original projects, which may be injected into any Calculus III, DifferentialEquations, or Engineering Mathematics course, have been created. The aim is to increase the useof projects in courses where the intent is there but creation time is the mitigating factor. Thispaper includes projects that tackle first-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs), second-order ODEs, and multivariable calculus.IntroductionIn some mathematics courses, students are asked to

Conference Session

Accreditation and Outcomes-based Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jens Kabo, Chalmers University of Technology; Xiaofeng Tang, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; John Currie, University of Sydney; Hu Wenlong, Beihang University; Caroline Baillie, University of Western Australia

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society