preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning, and faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published papers at several engineering education research conferences and journals. Particularly, his work is published in the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Computer Applications in Engineering Education (CAEE), International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET), and IEEE Transactions on Education. He is also serving as a reviewer for a number of conferences and journals focused on engineering education research
Joanna Wright is an M.Ed. student in Learning Sciences and Human Development at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her education research interests span early childhood through higher education, with a focus on the impact of pedagogical practices and contexts on learning and development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 After #MeToo: What’s Next for Women in the Engineering Workplace?AbstractThis paper (and corresponding panel session at ASEE 2019) seeks to provide researchers whohave an interest or potential interest in studying women engineers in the workplace (academic,corporate, government, nonprofit) with tools to support that
learned during the introduction ofthe new labs will be discussed.IntroductionThis work is a continuation of a work in progress paper submitted to the 2021 ASEE conference[1]. The original paper discussed the details of the redesign of a measurements and analysis labcourse in order to allow for at home experimentation for students who were not able to be oncampus due to the COVID pandemic. This lab was run in a hybrid format where every lab teamhad both online and on campus students. Kits were sent to all students to allow them to performtheir part of the experiment at home if necessary. Lab analysis questions could only be answeredby combining at home and on campus data to promote positive interdependency betweenstudents. The course in question
, 2005.[7] S. R. Jones and M. K. McEwen, “A conceptual model of multiple dimensions of identity,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 405–414, 2000.[8] C. Mobley, J. B. Main, S. M. Lord, C. E. Brawner, and M. M. Camacho, “Institutional Agents’ Roles in Serving Student Veterans and Implications for Student Veterans in Engineering,” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[9] A. Minichiello and H. Wilkinson. "CAREER: ‘Support our Troops’: Re-storying student veteran and service member deficit in engineering through professional formation and community advocacy: YEAR 1." Proceedings of the 129th Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[10] H. Wilkinson and A
., and Elder, L., 2019, The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools, Rowman & Littlefield.[30] Guzmán Silva, S., and Sánchez Escobedo, P., 2006, “Efectos de Un Programa de Capacitación de Profesores En El Desarrollo de Habilidades de Pensamiento Crítico En Estudiantes Universitarios En El Sureste de México,” Rev. Electrónica Investig. Educ., 8(2), pp. 1–17.[31] Acosta, J., and Guerra, M. A., 2022, “Validating Guerra’s Blended Flexible Learning Framework for Engineering Courses,” 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[32] Ji, M., 2015, “Exploiting Activity Traces and Learners’ Reports to Support Self- Regulation in Project-Based Learning,” PhD Thesis, Lyon, INSA.[33] Granja, N., Guerra, M. A
, M., "Improving Accuracy of Self-and-Peer Assessment in Engineering Technology Capstone," in IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 174-187, April 2023, doi: 10.1109/TE.2022.3208219.11. Beigpourian, B., Ferguson, D., Berry, F., Ohland, M., Wei, Si., “Using CATME to Document and Improve the Effectiveness of Teamwork in Capstone Courses,” Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper 25751.12. Mahmood, A., Choudhary, M.A., and Qurashi, A.H., “Redesigning the way teams work smarter using comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness (CATME),” 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Honolulu, HI, USA, 2016, pp
first year and were selected based on financial need, academic ability, andletters of recommendation. All participants participated in a first-year general engineering courseduring their first semester before taking discipline-specific classes. Data collection for cohort 1started in the Fall of 2019 and for cohort 2 in the Fall of 2020; for this study, cohort 1 had justfinished their second year, and cohort 2 had just finished their first year. Table 1 listsparticipants’ pseudonyms, self-reported demographic information, and major at the time of thelast interview. This sample’s composition supports the transferability of the findings to similarpopulations enrolled in undergraduate engineering programs but cannot speak to theexperiences of
Engineering program administered the onlinesurveys during ENGR 101 and 201 within the first three weeks of class. Class of 2022completed the surveys in fall 2018 and fall 2019, and the class of 2023 completed the surveys infall 2019 and fall 2020.Analysis 6 Descriptive and inferential statistics demonstrated minimal differences between the twocohorts on the data collection tools used in the study, except for persistence. Analysis betweencohorts 2022 and 2023 revealed a significant association between cohort and persistence, 2 (1) =χ2 p = 0.02(1) = 5.438, p = 0.02. Program faculty attributed the difference in persistencebetween the cohorts to the
[NSF, 2023]. These findings fuel the potential for new innovations byleveraging individuals’ different backgrounds, experiences, and points of view [NSF, 2023]. Inresponse to a call from engineering education leaders [Leydens & Lucena, 2017; Baillie &Pawley, 2012; Riley, 2008], peers have adopted asset-based instructional strategies and makecontinuing strides to transform engineering education in the 21st Century [Budinoff & Subbian,2021; Gravel et al., 2021; Mejia et al., 2019]. As engineering educators continue to modernizeinstructional practices and engineering curricula across the nation, we find ourselvesencountering and challenging deep-seated systemic inequities entrenched in engineeringcurricula and in our own instructional
engineering faculty found problem-solving, akin to criticalthinking, to be the single most important competency for engineers [39]. Critical thinking isassociated with many aspects of ABET Student Outcomes. Not only does it address problemsolving and analysis, but the process of argumentation cultivates communication skills that areessential to collaboration. Being self-critical keeps one open-minded to learn and solve problemsboth alone and in groups. Lastly, the process and spirit of inquiry is a necessary driver in self-directed, lifelong learning [19]. Despite its accepted importance, engineering graduatesconsistently fall short in critical thinking skills according to employers [29], [39], [40].According to a 2019 literature review, established
Paper ID #37629Industry Hubs: Integrating Industry Perspectives in DesignEducationChristopher Rennick (Engineering Educational Developer) Christopher Rennick received his B.ASc. and M.ASc. in electrical engineering from the University of Windsor, in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Chris is currently a Ph.D. candidate in Management Sciences at the University of Waterloo studying students’ design skill development. Chris was awarded the Canadian Engineering Education Association Engineering Education Graduate Student Award in 2019 for his contributions to the field. Since 2010, Chris has been a member of the
- Robo: Empowering Gifted High School Students with Robotics," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2019.[16] J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick and A. Farhadi, "You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection," in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, 2016.[17] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, "YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger," in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, 2017.[18] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, "YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement," 2018. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 26-29, 2022 Wang
physical laboratories,” J. Engr. Educ., vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 540-573, July 2011.[3] W.R. Penney and E.C. Clausen, editors, Fluid mechanics and heat transfer: inexpensive demonstrations and laboratory exercises, Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2018.[4] C.E. Baukal and W.R. Bussman, “Discharge coefficient experiment,” Proc. ASEE 126th Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[5] D. Savage, T. Porterfield, W.R. Penney and E.C. Clausen, “The draining of a tank: a lab experiment in fluid mechanics,” Proc. ASEE Midwest Regional Conference, 2021.[6] Magnetrol, Eclipse705 guided wave radar transmitter, https://www.magnetrol.com/en/products/eclipse-705-guided-wave-radar-transmitter, accessed June 2
libraries of focus: Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 22.1 TaichiTaichi is a high-performance programming language embedded in Python for computer graphicsapplications. The design goals are:● Productivity and portability: easy to learn, to write, and to share● Performance: data-oriented, parallel, mega-kernels● Spatially sparse programming: save computation and storage on empty regions● Decouple data structures from
Delivered Course”, in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017 [8]. Devanshi Shah, Elisabeth Kames, et. All, “Examining the Differences in Student Motivation for Industry Projects and Non-Industry Projects in Senior Capstone Design”, in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019 [9]. Savage, Nick, et al. “Motivation of Engineering Students in Higher Education.” Engineering Education, Vol. 6, 2011 [10]. Gero, Aharon, and Gershon Abraham. “Engineering Preparatory Programs: Students’ Academic Motivation.” In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), Queen’s University Library, Nov. 2018. [11]. Malek Mohammadi, A., & Hajrasouliha, A., & Cleary
. While beneficial because they arerequired courses, lab and design course instructors generally have limited time to get in depth,instead focusing on lower order thinking skills [9] such as remembering and understanding. Thisis one of the major issues with current process safety resources, according to a presentation byCarter et al at the 2019 ASEE National Conference [10]. Additionally, other process safetyresources, such as the SAChE Certificate Program, have historically been a large timecommitment for students and, while focusing on a lot of different topics, have mostly focused oneducating students to Bloom's “understanding” level of thinking rather than encouraging studentsto integrate or apply the knowledge to higher-level pedagogical
development.Details for each of these steps are included in this paper, as well as key lessons learned by theevaluation team. A second paper (Jordan et al., 2022) will explore the findings and the lessonslearned on the evaluation from the perspectives of the members of The Center.Initial conversation, scoping, and goals for the evaluationInitial conversations with The Center on the evaluation began in 2019. The evaluation team wasfirst approached at the 2019 ASEE Conference. The team then visited The Center in the fall of2019 to generate a more specific plan for the evaluation. The time spent during the meeting wasused to generate guiding evaluation questions, identify stakeholders, and possible data sources. Inaddition, further opportunities for
: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education. E. Seymour, A. B. Hunter, Eds. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2019.[24] B. N. Geisinger, and D. R. Raman, “Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914-925. [Online]. Available: http://www.rise.hs.iastate.edu/projects/CBiRC/IJEE- WhyTheyLeave.pdf[25] A. Godwin, D. Verdín, B. B. McIntyre, R. A. Baker, and T. J. Milton, J. T. Yeggy, “Board 51: CAREER: Actualizing latent diversity: Building innovation through engineering students’ identity development” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. Jun. 2018. [Online
Online https://www.mathworks.com/help/ © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference supportpkg/raspberrypiio/ug/connect-to-raspberry-pi-hardware-board-in-MATLAB-online.html retrieved 11/14/2022.12 Raspberry Pi 4 Model B 2019 Quad Core 64 Bit WiFi Bluetooth ( 4GB) https://www.amazon.com /Raspberry-Model-2019-Quad-Blue- tooth/dp/B07TC2BK1X/ref=asc_df_B07TC2BK1X/?tag=&linkCode=df0&hvadid=3801 45854123&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=7479973512482872947&hvpone=&hvptwo=& hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9009666&hvtargid=pla- 818643320764&ref=&
Paper ID #39818Board 215: Applying Research Results in Instructor Development to ReduceStudent Resistance to Active Learning: Project UpdateMs. Lea K. Marlor, University of Michigan Lea Marlor is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Michigan, studying Engineering Education Research. She joined the University of Michigan in Sept 2019. Previously, she was the Associate Director for Education for the Center for Energy Efficient ElecDr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for
thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. We appreciateall faculty and student focus group and interview participants who helped us understand theirexperiences managing and engaging in IRES programs around the world.References[1] K. Davis, Y. Jalali, V. Lohani, D. Knight, and R. Müller, “Student learning in international research programs: A comparison across cultural contexts,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference proceedings, 2018.[2] K. A. Davis and D. B. Knight, “Becoming a researcher: A narrative analysis of US students’ experiences in Australia,” presented at the Proceedings of the 8th Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 2019.[3] L. M. Hatfield, C. T. Amelink, N. P. Sanderlin
", Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 58, pp. 58-74, 2019. Available: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.006 [Accessed 2020].[6] J.K. Flake, "Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy value theory,” Masters Theses., Dept. Psychology, James Madison Univ., Harrisonburg, VA, 2012.[7] J.F. Mirabelli, A.J. Barlow, M. Ko, K.J. Cross, and K. Jensen, (2020, June), Work inProgress: A Qualitative Study of Mentorship, Training Needs, and Community for NewEngineering Education Researchers Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual ConferenceContent Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--35601
, and Michelle Daniel Beach. “Introducing data mining techniques and software engineering to high school science students.” In 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. F2D-1. IEEE, 2008. [4] Fayyad, Usama, and Ramasamy Uthurusamy. “Evolving data into mining solutions for insights.” Communications of the ACM 45, no. 8 (2002): 28-31. [5] Wu, Huanmei. “Systematic study of big data science and analytics programs.” In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2017. 2017. [6] Sanati-Mehrizy, Reza, Parkinson, Kailee, Vaziripour, Elham , and Afsaneh Minaie, “data mining course in undergraduate computer science curriculum ASEE”, In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
thepercentage of women earning bachelor’s degrees in engineering. This paper, based on theAmerican Society for Engineering Education’s 2019 “Engineering by the Numbers,” uses datafrom the 115 universities with 400 or more bachelor’s graduates in engineering in the UnitedStates. It describes a simple linear regression to predict the percentage of women engineeringgraduates based on the percentage of Asian-American tenured/tenure track faculty. For eachpercentage point increase in Asian-American faculty at a university, the percentage of womengraduates goes down by .236 percent. Using data from the top 20 engineering disciplines rankedby total number of graduates, for each percentage point increase in Asian American faculty in anengineering discipline
the co-director of the Institute for Leadership in Technology and Management. Off campus, he is an ASEE Fellow, National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Fellow, Senior Fellow of IEEE, NSF Pathways to Innovation Faculty Fellow, past chair of the ASEE Biomedical Engineering Division, current chair of the ASEE Interdivisional Committee, past co-editor of the Morgan and Claypool Biomedical Engineering Book Series, Media Director for BigBeacon and serves on several national and international boards. He has been recognized with several awards including two National Biomedical Engineering Teaching Awards, The national KEEN outstanding faculty award, and has been nominated twice for the CASE US
Electrical & Electronic Engineers, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, American College of Clinical Engineering, American Society for Engineering Education, and an inducted Fellow within both the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering, and the American College of Clinical Engineering.Prof. Paul Licato c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work-In-Progress: Improving Student Views of Medical Device Standards Through Implementation in a First-Term Biomedical Engineering CourseAs undergraduate engineering students develop technical skills and an inclination to base designdecisions on technical constraints, the
is an Associate Professor in the Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Adjunct Associate Professor in the Departments of Microbiology and Immunology, and the Eshelman School of Pharmacy.George T. Ligler, UNC Chapel Hill/NC State Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering George T. Ligler is the Dean’s Eminent Professor of the Practice in the UNC Chapel Hill/NC State Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Proprietor of GTL Associates, a computer system engineering consulting firm, and an elected member of the National Academy of Engineering. He joined the Joint Department in August 2018 after 41 years in industry and led the academic year 2018-2019 Strategic Planning Core Group for the Department’s
. Schott, “Engineering Technology Undergraduate Students a Survey of Demographics and Mentoring,” in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019.[3] A. M. Lucietto, “Identity of an Engineering Technology Graduate,,” in 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[4] C. A. Malgwi, M. A. Howe, and P. A. Burnaby, “Influences on students' choice of college major,” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 275-282, 2005.[5] J. S. Rolston, and E. Cox, "Engineering for the real world: Diversity, innovation and hands-on learning," International perspectives on engineering education, pp. 261-278: Springer, 2015.[6] A. Lucietto, M. Taleyarkhan, and E. Schott, “Engineering
Georgia Tech’s Center for the En- hancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) and three years as a faculty member at Olin College of En- gineering in Massachusetts. Alexandra’s research aims to improve the design of educational experiences for students by critically examining the work and learning environments of practitioners. Specifically, she focuses on (1) how to design and change educational and work systems through studies of practicing engineers and educators and (2) how to help students transition into, through and out of educational and work systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
in a collaborative, student-centered approach to research, education, academic administration and leadership. She currently chairs the ASEE Engineer- ing Deans Council Diversity Committee, and serves on the ABET Academic Affairs Council, the TMS Accreditation Committee, and the National Board of Directors for the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers. Dr. Allen earned her BS in metallurgy and materials science from Columbia University, and her MS and PhD in materials science and engineering from Stanford University. She previously served as faculty, chair and Associate Dean at San Jose State University’s College of Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education