there islittle attention being given at the level recommended in 1986. Considered along with the resultsof this study, below are the key areas that should be prioritized within future work related toDDEPs: 1. Exploration of students’ experiences at HBCUs before and after attending PWIs 2. Increased understanding of students’ decision-making linked to the DDEP (to enroll versus staying at HBCU for an alternative 4-year degree) 3. Increased research using quantitative data related to DDEPs.The findings highlighted in the themes above emphasize the importance of further studying theexperiences of Black students who participate in DDEPs housed at HBCUs given the uniquecomponents of their journey that are not covered by studying
involved biology. The biology professor is particularly knowledgeable andpleasant person to work with. Also, their sponsor interactions included interactions with abiologist. During the second project, the students were disinterested in performinginterdisciplinary work, yet they functioned on an interdisciplinary team of faculty and students,that included both biologists and chemists. Some of the interactions of that interdisciplinaryteam were strained however. The mechanical engineering students did not communicate wellwith the chemistry student. The communication was so bad that mechanical engineeringstudents believed that they could have completed the same tasks better without that student andwith the chemistry professor’s guidance. Since the
thoseadvisors to follow-up on the students. This appeared to be consistent with my interview withher. She seemed to believe that if students want to make a choice to change their major that itmay be a personal or internal motivation. Maybe they are not happy with the courses, or thecourses are not what they expected.It seemed that she was willing to help the students transition to a new career field more quicklythan her co-worker Angela. Angela’s notes conveyed the impression that students needed to findout if this next major was in fact the best fit. She repeatedly reinforced that students should notmake a decision before doing some career exploration through the use of career services andinterviewing professionals in the chosen field. Both
enrolled in at least threeundergraduate courses each semester during the 2022/2023 academic year. Each of the studentswere part of a privately funded program that allowed them to participate in undergraduateresearch in collaboration with faculty members of the department of Mechanical and MaterialsEngineering. The students were paid for 10 hours of research per week throughout the academicyear. Due to budget constraint, the program is only able to fund 16 students in an academic yearafter a competitive selection process, of which 12 of these students consented to participate inthis study. The goal of the undergraduate research program is to enhance student outcomes,including retention, academic success, and the likelihood of pursuing graduate
probably intheir career. In partnership with the Faculty Innovations in Teaching and Learning Center (FITL),the Dibner Library built an interactive multimedia library online module that was integrated into aportion of the school’s new student orientation that was hosted online in the university LearningManagement System.The process unfolded in multiple stages. It began with the conception of the module in thelibrary and evolved into a partnership with the department of Undergraduate and GraduateAcademics to design and implement it (FITL and First-year Students & Academic Initiatives,which hosted the module, are under this department). The module represents thetransformation of library content and delivery format in an effort to increase the
helped students explore what it might be like to work on aglobal engineering team. Students were placed in small groups, and each person was assigned acountry from a different region of the world (e.g., one team had members assigned Egypt, SouthKorea, the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, Colombia, and Indonesia). The students assumed therole of managers of an international team of engineers from their assigned countries and had todetermine how to lead the team effectively. In the first part of the project, each group identifiedquestions they could ask to learn about the cultural and business practices in their countries.Each student then located and communicated with an engineer from their assigned country todiscuss those questions. Students wrote
volunteerstudents using a list of 18 semi-structured questions with the following themes: 1) influentialexperiences during FERL that had an impact on students selecting civil engineering as a careerchoice while in the Air Force, 2) perceptions about how their faculty and tradesperson mentorsinfluenced their engagement, learning, personal and professional development during FERL and3) their perceptions of the climate during FERL that contributed to their experiences of inclusion,community and sense of belonging. From the responses to the questions, insights were drawnthat were deemed applicable to the development of the new first-year course. Nine students wereinterviewed, three of whom identified as female and five were non-white.FindingsOne question asked
, an estimated 40% of women who earn engineering degrees either quit early in theircareers or never enter the engineering profession altogether [5]. Among underrepresentedminorities (URMs), leaks in the pipeline are equally dismal. In STEM, an estimated 37% ofLatinx and 40% of Black students switch majors as undergraduates, compared with 29% of whitestudents. Latinx and Black STEM students also drop out of college altogether far more often thanwhite STEM students; while only 13% of white students majoring in STEM disciplines drop out,20% and 26% of Latinx and Black students do so respectively [6].At the time in their career trajectory when women and URMs are enrolled in engineeringprograms in college, faculty and other instructors have a
2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research
mechanics and bioprocess engineering. She began her position as Director of Community Programs and Diversity Outreach at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences in 2003. In partnership with faculty, postdoctoral fellows, and graduate students, she develops and implements programs for K-12 students, teachers, un- dergraduates, and families that are designed to increase scientific and engineering literacy, and to inspire people with diverse backgrounds to pursue science and engineering careers. At the undergraduate level, she directs a Research Experiences for Undergraduates program that brings students to Harvard for 10 weeks to work in research laboratories. This program hosts between 45-70
-based learning and the associated advice, based onboth their Capstone and subsequence post-graduation experience, that alumni provided toincoming students for overcoming those challenges.IntroductionThe purpose of this paper is to share feedback Brigham Young University (BYU) Capstonealumni provided concerning the challenges faced when beginning project-based learningexperiences and suggestions they recommended to new students for being successful. The BYUCapstone program started in 1990 as a two-semester senior design experience. The program wasdeveloped by BYU faculty members and industry leaders to answer the needs for improvedengineering education.1 From its small beginnings in 1990 of just four projects, the Capstoneprogram has steadily
. Figure 1. Logic Model of the NSF HSI ProgramFirst Year ImplementationThe project started on Oct. 1, 2021. During over one year of implementation, we put the focus onestablishing three main components of the program, namely the Engineering Success Center, theSummer Research Internship Program, and the Summer Faculty Teaching Workshop. In thefollowing, a brief introduction to these components is provided, followed by a summary of theevaluation results.Engineering Success Center (ESC): Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, an ESC was established toprovide academic support and career development services to students. The center is aimed atincreasing student retention, graduation rates, and career development. At SFSU, there was still asignificant
(7) 5. Manage Interpersonal Relationships (6) 6. Think Critically (4) 7. Manage and Administer (6), (11) 8. Apply Values: Appreciate the contributions of art, literature, science and (2), (5) technology to contemporary society 9. Develop a Successful Career and Personal Life: Develop ongoing motivational (9) growth and life-long learning goalsCourse assessment. The assessment components of this course are linked to the hybrid nature ofthe course, including lecture and laboratory sessions. As students
Paper ID #42078Leveraging Familia: Equipando Padres Program Pilot for Hispanic Parentsand Caregivers of First-Generation-to-College Engineering StudentsDr. Dayna Lee Mart´ınez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Dayna is a Senior Director of Research & Impact at the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE), where she leads a team of professionals who specialize in data-driven design and implementation of programs and services to empower pre-college students, parents, graduate students, and faculty members in STEM fields, with a particular focus on advancing Hispanic representation and success. With
Science Foundation, his research was highlighted the American Society of Engineering Education’s Prism Magazine. He received a CAREER Award in 2016 to study the significance of neurodiversity in developing a creative engineering workforce.Miss Alexandra Hain, University of Connecticut Alexandra Hain is a PhD student at the University of Connecticut studying structural engineering. She received her Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering in 2015 from the University of Connecticut. She has an interest in engineering education and served as the program manager for the REU Site: Research Experience in Cyber and Civil Infrastructure Security for Students with ADHD: Fostering Innovation during summer 2016
and experience to make these decisions. Thoseconsidering pursuing a Ph.D. often do not know what their future will look like if they pursue acareer in academia. Engineering students, who can experience industry careers through internships,have no avenue to explore if a faculty position is right for them. As such, students frequently viewthe Ph.D. profession as just being a teacher and do not consider it due to this impression. Being afaculty member encompasses much more than students see through their university experience,from teaching requirements to scholarship and service.This paper posits the need for a shadowing program mimicking the structure of job shadowingprograms found in industry or commonly experienced in medical domains. A job
3position two see things as "us versus them", right versus wrong and good versus bad. Everythingthat is right, is determined absolutely by authority, and faculty members are seen as examples ofthis absolute authority. Thus there is no need for evidence beyond simply quoting an authoritywho knows what is "right". Freshman, who are often at this level, do recognize that multiplepoints of view regarding an issue may exist (even from authorities) but generally chalk this up asa short coming in the authority. Freshman at this level who are working on an open–endeddesign project may be disturbed or shocked that neither the client nor the professor has a definiteanswer to the problem at hand.Position four, called multiplicity, is represented by students
language data. Experimentation Understand principles of design for social science experiments. Hypothesis Design theoretical experiments for making causal inferences. Independence Develop an independent research program. Coding Apply coding skills in execution of research. Mentorship Build mentor/mentee relationships with graduate collaborators.hands-on experience developing an independent research program in preparation for researchfellowships, graduate school, and STEM research careers.4 Program RecruitmentMisinformation is an emergent electronic threat to national security, personal, and public health.Online misinformation regarding COVID-19, and its causative agent the SARS-CoV
curriculumwhich brought the hardware and software together. This paper presents a study on the feasibilityand accessibility of this program and its effectiveness in engaging students and exposing themto key robotics concepts while helping them make suitable career decisions. The pre- and post-program surveys indicated that the students’ interest in a STEM field increased as a result of thiscamp, helped them understand that robotics is much more than just programming, and taughtthem mechanical design, practical electronics, and microcontroller programming in a flipped andexperiential learning format. Moreover, survey results also indicated an attitudinal shift in theirdecision making based on the knowledge, skills, and capabilities that they acquired in
Paper ID #6639”Learning from small numbers” of underrepresented students’ stories: Dis-cussing a method to learn about institutional structure through narrativeDr. Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alice L. Pawley is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program and the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in chemical engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in industrial and systems engineering with a Ph.D. minor in women’s studies from the Uni- versity
, Engineering, Technology, andScience (COMETS) program. Funded by NASA through the Curriculum ImprovementsPartnership Award for the Integration of Research (CIPAIR) program, the COMETS programinvolves collaboration among math and engineering faculty of a community college andengineering faculty of the closest neighboring four-year institution that has an establishedrelationship with a NASA Ames Research Center. This paper summarizes the results of the firstyear of implementation of the COMETS program.2. COMETS Program Objectives and ActivitiesOne of the main goals of the project is to improve student engagement in foundational math,science and engineering courses by introducing NASA-themed content in classroom activities anddemonstrations, laboratory
to choose from. Students who have yet to decide on a major areadvised to complete the “major exploration” project where they meet faculty, connect with peermentors, and interview an industry member (often an alumni). On the other hand, studentswishing to learn more about the connection of social justice to engineering are encouraged tojoin a discussion group focused on a book or podcast (examples of past book selections includeInvisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado Perez and ToxicCommunities: Environmental Racism, Industrial Pollution, and Residential Mobility by DorcetaTaylor).Table 2: ENGR 101 Course Assignment Categories Course Assignment Categories Examples Reflections/Discussions
). For the fall 2009 cohort, the mean physics GPA was 2.50 (number of courses =10). It should be noted that two students in this cohort received “F’s” in PHYS 1100, and onestudent enrolled in the PHYS 2102 course, earned an “A”.Engineering Residential College (ERC)Ten of the 22 freshmen 2008 S-STEM scholars were housed in the ERC, a residence hall forfreshmen engineering students. ERC students are required to take three of the designated ERCcourses in math, physics, chemistry or English. Several faculty members instructing thesedesignated courses have participated in the NSF STEP supported Faculty DevelopmentWorkshops and Learning Communities. Several of the designated ERC courses included onsitetutoring and review sessions, academic advising
experiments for testing these parameters and cast and cured concrete cylinders to testthe compressive strength of hardened concrete at the end of 1, 7 and 28 days, and the resultswere presented using tables and bar charts that compared the properties of fresh and hardenedconcrete in the five tests. The mini-project enabled student groups to learn about the experimental design process,explore different types of pozzolans, apply the knowledge gained from lectures and previous labsto conduct the experiments, use the collected data to develop visual representations, makeinformed decisions based on engineering judgment and develop a good team spirit. A survey wasconducted to gather information on the effect of the mini-project on different factors
previously felt encouraged topursue STEM. Summer of Innovation (SoI) was designed to give students an opportunity toengage in OST learning at an early age and during a critical period in the education cycle:summer. While professionals in STEM may attribute their decision to pursue STEM careers toan out-of-school experience, many formal and informal educators do not feel they have the skillsand knowledge to successfully engage youth in programs to positively impact STEM learning.In 2009, President Obama announced the “Educate to Innovate” campaign to foster a renewedcommitment to strengthen Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) education. InJanuary 2010, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) launched theSummer of
. Historically, amajor deterrent for women considering STEM has been lower levels of math self-assessment [8],though recent studies suggest that this is becoming less important for persistence [12], [13]. Forinstance, researchers found that students’ have broadened their perception of the skills required inCS [13] with more awareness of the non-technical or “soft” skills, such as reliability and teamwork,that are sought by employers [29]. This shift suggests a need to explore how students perceive thefield of ML/AI and highlights the importance of studying other factors contributing to persistence.Professional role confidence, comprised of expertise confidence and career-fit confidence, is thedegree to which a person feels confident in their competence
it by race: Young adults decisions to pursue an it career. Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation, pages 55–88, 02 2006.[11] S. Katz, J. Aronis, D. Allbritton, C. Wilson, and M. L. Soffa. Gender and race in predicting achievement in computer science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 22(3):20–27, Fall 2003. ISSN 0278-0097. doi: 10.1109/MTAS.2003.1237468.[12] Susan Haller and Sylvia Beyer. Gender differences and intragender differences in computer science students: are female cs majors more similar to male cs majors or female nonmajors? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12:337–365, 01 2006.[13] Jun He and Lee Freeman. Are men more technology-oriented than women? the
backgrounds. It is hoped that these students will then rise to the highesteducational standards, pursue studies and careers in mathematics, science, and engineering fields, andmake a difference in the world by creating opportunities to further advance science and technology intheir countries and communities and to promote sustainable development.This collaboration initiated in 2009, following a request from the Director of COSOLA. In the summer of2009, two members of the faculty of TEE, Dr. Ron Terry and Dr. Steve Shumway, visited the DR andspent three days training the teachers and observing the conditions. They presented several classes intechnology and engineering to teachers and students. Despite language limitations, their work
activate the “To remember” disposition outcome in the engineering literacyrecommendation of Reference 13, and to align with the videos of Engineerguy by Bill Hammackof Reference 10. The inclusion of “interaction with students” and the reading and application ofEducation Science materials in a programming skill-learning project would further enhanceaffection deliverables to enforce engineering literacy, summarized in Reference 13. In ouropinion, programming skills are useful in the third and fourth years in any engineering programs,and that the undergraduate research activities in the third and fourth years are more productiveand realistic regarding employments, graduate school decisions, and career plans. In otherwords, since time is finite, the
described above… capitalize on what currently exists and integrate those experiences. 3) Provide a progression of leadership responsibility. Practicing following and practicing leading go hand-in-hand. Good leaders are good followers first. 4) Early leadership experiences provide a personal readiness for leadership development. Provide those experiences early in the developmental process, prior to rigorous leadership coursework. 5) Create a cycle for challenges, support, and assessment. Leadership development is not a spectator sport. Students must wrestle with challenges to build their leader identity. 6) Encourage or force students to develop a mentor relationship with a faculty member or seasoned engineer. A