variety of sustainability assessments, ranging from indirect todirect measures of student learning, are available but a comprehensive review of the field isneeded to make the assessments more accessible and implementable by educators from acrossengineering disciplines.A systematic review of ASEE conference proceedings was conducted to identify and discuss thequality of available methods for assessing student knowledge of and interest in sustainability.First, a search of the ASEE PEER database for the terms “sustainability + assessment” yielded1001 results. Records with relevance indexes above 1.0 were screened based on their abstractsand appraised by their full texts according to four inclusion criteria: (1) The study was publishedduring 2011 to
argue educational institutions should develop and assess students’competencies based on these professional demands.This research systematically reviews literature related to this topic. This review seeks to answertwo questions: 1) What are the competencies engineering students must have to be successful inthe world of practice? 2) How can engineering education help students to develop thesecompetencies? A total of 30 articles were identified as relevant and reviewed. Two themes wereapplied: 1) Identification of engineering competencies 2) Approaches to address competencyshortfalls. Review of the literature suggests that while educational institutions are mostly alignedwith engineering competencies hailed as important to ABET, there is still
Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distin- guished Award for Excellence in the category Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 8 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 59 journal articles, and 133 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 21 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 38 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 400 K-12 teachers and 100 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows
studied three groups: 1)students deemed prepared for the first semester general chemistry course and not required to takea remedial course, 2) students who were deemed unprepared and who took the remedial course butdid not serve as mentors, and 3) students who were deemed unprepared, took the remedial course,and then served as mentors. The results are striking. Students who came into the program lessprepared but then served as mentors went on to have higher grades in the general chemistry courseand the subsequent chemistry course than either of the groups- even the students who were deemedmore prepared at the onset. In addition, these students went on to take more chemistry courses thaneither group.In the Amaral and Vala study (2009) it is
in the following way: 1. High level understanding (e.g., experimenting with Jenga-like tower: before, during and after its collapse) 2. Bounded Input Bounded Output (e.g., hearing screeching noise from speakers using an animation and an experiment; story-telling: adjusting water temperature while taking a shower) 3. Qualitative understanding of pole location and effects on stability (e.g., in class building and flying a paper airplane with varying locations of its center of mass) 4. Connection to the s-plane (e.g., visually relating poles locations to paper and actual airplanes) 5. Connection to open loop and closed loop (e.g., performing in class broom balancing acts and imitating a slow reaction of a
-related current research areas in IoT geared towardsgreen manufacturing and energy efficiency. The details of the workshop is given below.Workshop topic 1: Green logistics (Environmentally responsible logistics)This workshop assignment aims to introduce logisticians to green logistics and encourage them tothink in "green" terms, to highlight the challenges and to indicate some advantages of thinking"green." Organizations have to face changing circumstances for several years. In addition toincreasing diversity and dynamics, environmental issues become more important. Social, politicaland economic demands for sustainable development force organizations to reduce the impact onthe environment of their supply chains and to develop sustainable
course capable ofnurturing student-faculty teams, educating future generations of innovators and entrepreneurs, andleveraging the billions of dollars invested in cutting-edge academic research to help bringtechnologies out of the lab and into the real world to benefit human health.B. IntroductionInnovation in Academia. The U.S. invests billions of dollars in research at institutions across thecountry with the goal of benefitting society [1]. However, even the most promising technologiesoften fail to reach patients due to the high-risk path biomedical technologies face moving from thelab to the market [2]. In addition, faculty and graduate students have unique educational andprofessional needs and priorities. Faculty traditionally focus their
acquisition methods in ourstudents are needed. This task of developing judgment is made more critical given the rapidadvance of computer-based design, where failure to recognize bad outputs due to errors burieddeep in the assumptions and inputs could have tragic consequences.In an effort to address this need, and as part of a thorough revision of the mechanics curriculum 1,a series of hands-on learning activities were designed and implemented in the first mechanicscourse taken by students in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the USMilitary Academy. These activities enabled and encouraged knowledge acquisition throughpersonal effort which inspires deeper inquiry and were expected to help accelerate thedevelopment of students
. Specifically, our analysis focused on the following aspects: (1) ASEEdivision; (2) paper type (i.e., research, practice or theory); (3) study rationale; (4) demographic ofinterest; (5) organizational status of demographic of interest; (6) data source; (7) framework ortheory; (8) research questions; and (9) implications & recommendations. While some categoriesinclude child codes, through our initial refinement of the codebook we found that not all parentcodes could be sub-coded into specific codes. Therefore, we coded the phrase in the publicationsthat addressed the component we were looking for and subsequently summarized the generalfindings. Table 1. Codebook Category Operationalization
Environmental Engineering Undergraduate StudentsIntroduction and ObjectivesProblem-based and active learning in the classroom are increasingly important in developing thenecessary critical thinking skills of an engineer [1-3]. In this project, active learning exercises arebased on a problem-based learning framework called Environments For Fostering EffectiveCritical Thinking (EFFECTs), which was developed at the University of South Carolina (USC)through NSF funding [4-6]. The EFFECTs approach helps students progressively learn complexmaterial, like nanotechnology, in a educational setting that stimulates independent thought aswell as intellectual dialogue with peers and instructors. The work described in this paper is partof a larger NSF project to
this school. This study will compare those predictors for the entire enrollment (14sections) of the course against those of the three sections of students subjected to the alternativegrading scheme. The alternative scheme was applied to five in-class exams unique to the threesections; the final exam was common to all sections and was graded using standard partial-creditmethods. Discussion of the particular implementation of the mastery grading scheme as well asstudent feedback will also be included.IntroductionInitially discussed by Bloom 1 in 1968, mastery learning is an instructional strategy designed tominimize achievement gaps and have all students learn well. In Bloom’s formulation, coursematerial is broken into discrete units, and
model is oftencalled the knowledge model, and, since the users are students, the user model is often called thestudent model. The critical considerations for any creator or consumer of adaptive systems, then,are: what is being modeled; how it is modeled; and how the models are maintained. Whilevarious methods for modeling exist, the most used method today is overlay modeling. The coreprinciple behind overlay modeling is simply that there is some underlying model of a domainand that the model of some user is a subset of that domain model. The objective of adaptivesystems operating in this paradigm is two-fold: (1) to adapt what the user encounters such thateventually the user's overlaying subset matches the system's underlying whole and (2) to
computing, problem-solving, and logicalthinking skills.As established in the literature, hands-on engineering projects have a positive impact on bothstudent engagement and student learning.1-2 Several programs have introduced hands-on projectsfor first and second year engineering students. At the Colorado School of Mines, mechanicalengineering sophomores (about 150 split into three sections), have two group projects interfacingsoftware and hardware using the SparkFun RedBoards and MATLAB®.3 Northern EssexCommunity College has a first year course offered to a small group of engineering students.4Several interesting software/hardware experiments such as control of a stepper motor areperformed in a well-equipped lab with oscilloscopes, spectrometers
anddiagnostic aids, prosthetic development, medically related products, tissue engineeringetc;Integrated 3D scanning and 3D printing lab experiments1-17.The overall objectives of the course include but not limited to:1. Review of product design, CAD, basic principles and development of additive manufacturing.2. Explain the various processes of additive manufacturing.3. Design for additive manufacturing.4. Process selection and software issues.5. Direct digital manufacturing and medical application6. Explain post-processing and use of multiple materials.7. Explain business opportunities and future directions.8. Integrated 3D scanning and 3D printing lab experiments.This course alsoprovides hands-on training to students in addition to theoretical lessons
provide abalanced summer educational experience. The goal of the program is to promote higher levelthinking skills, problem solving, and innovation and learning the engineering design process.Subject matter experts present on topics such as microgrids, solar farms, electric vehicles, batterystorage, and careers. Students work with Arduinos and 1/10 scale model electric vehicles todesign a solar charging station to charge the vehicle enforcing knowledge of batterytechnologies. Students also work with wind turbines to calculate energy consumption, and learnintroductory coding and programming. During the program, students select a research project,which they work on developing a demonstration project. In addition to the project, studentslearn how to
sustainable concrete materials. Theproject was first incorporated in the fall semester of 2015 and it was again used with slightmodifications in the fall semester of 2016. Along with these slight modifications, a student surveywas introduced in the Fall 2016 semester to assess the success of the project. The results of thesurvey indicate that the project was effective. Additionally the course instructors have decided toreuse the project in future semesters with several additional modifications.IntroductionVarious types of concrete Frisbee competitions have been used at colleges and universities acrossthe country and world such as ACI Malaysia chapter [1] and PSWE/ASCE [2] as a fun and creativeway for students to learn about concrete design. These
have been introduced. Therefore user needs and the growing makerculture has further increased the usage of 3D printers. The usage of 3D printers has not onlyincreased among technologically inclined users but also from lay users who want to learn moreabout 3D printers.Agarwala and Chin 1, 2 developed a 3D printer selection engine that can be accessed by any userglobally and making it a true “anywhere-anyplace” model. To the best of their knowledge, thistool and technology is first of its kind introduced ever in the marketplace. The authors havepreviously reported the system model, codes, and technologies that were used to design theselection engine. Links are provided to access resources such as selection engine, user feedbackand to educate
skill 1 .Specifically, the construction of free-body diagrams that are helpful and accurate takes time andpractice, and for that reason the need for computer-based drawing tools is of utmost importance.Roselli et al. 11 developed an online free body diagram assistant that allows students to constructthese drawings by inserting forces and moments using the mouse, and the ability to receiveimmediate feedback. Commercial online systems such as McGraw-Hill Connect 6 and PearsonMasteringEngineering 8 have also developed graphing questions in which students need to drawgraphs, such as a free-body diagram, using the mouse to insert objects. Unfortunately, thesesystems do not provide much feedback on the drawing features. Moreover, they mostly have
outlines an introduction to the modulation theoryalong with an overview of the necessary circuits and concepts. Additionally, suggested studentactivities, project assignment alternatives, along with detailed mathematical solutions areprovided.Keywords: Engineering communications, Circuit Projects, PSpice software.BACKGROUNDCourse projects are one of the seven high impact practices discussed by Koh in [1]. Additionally,hands on activities are noted to improve learning motivation and retention. For example, it isnoted by Zhan in [2] that the use of real world examples in the classroom improves studentinvolvement and enhances the learning experience. In that regard, the electrical engineeringcurriculum has used simulations to assist student learning
throughout their careersand that all approaches were useful, in particular the use of Learning Assistants. Future long-term retention statistics will shed light on the possible effectiveness of this approach, which arecurrently unavailable.IntroductionColorado State University has a total student enrollment in excess of 33,000. As a land grantuniversity, the historic mission of the institution is to provide students with an education inpractical fields such as agriculture and engineering. The College of Engineering has a growingstudent cohort, with an increase from ~450 first-year students Fall 2010 to ~600 students Fall2015 [1]. However, persistence and graduation rates have remained fairly steady over the lastfifteen years. The current six year
of the social high-speeddevelopment. In the same sense, the curriculum arrangement of engineering majors inundergraduate level practical teaching mainly consists of cognition practice, productivepractice, graduation practice, curriculum design and graduation project, among others.1 Beingthe significant component of practical teaching process carried out by engineeringuniversities, productive practice is recognized as the effective measure for consolidating anddeepening the professional basic theory, boosting engineering students’ abilities to linktheory with practice and to deal with practical problems, as well as optimizing the students’engineering practical abilities.Productive practice is a course which closely integrates classroom
miss important points in a traditionallecture setting, which is an instructor-centered, relatively passive method of learning. Whilelecturing still remains an effective and important way of conveying knowledge, it is critical toget students engaged in active learning through activities such as solving problems, working witheach other, asking questions and getting feedback.To enhance student learning in Statics, researchers at various institutions have explored othermethods for teaching Statics, such as developing concept map and quantifying students’conceptual understanding[1, 2], developing on-line homework or learning modules[3, 4], peer-led-team-learning[5], project-based learning[6], emporium-based course delivery[7]. Among them
Alex Edgcomb1,2, Frank Vahid2,1, Roman Lysecky2, and Susan Lysecky1 1 zyBooks, Los Gatos, California 2 Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside 3 Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of ArizonaABSTRACTSmall auto-graded coding exercises with immediate feedback are widely recognized as helpingstudents in introductory programming courses. We analyzed usage of a particular codingexercise tool, at 11 courses at different universities. Instructors awarded differing amounts ofcourse points (including zero) for the exercises. We investigated how awarding points
their proposed extension of work in this area, which posits that leadership development is anidentity transition process focused on self change using a process of separation, transition andincorporation (Ibarra et al., 2010). For the purposes of this work, our interest rests in the identitytransition of college students, not working professionals. As such, the model of EngineeringLeadership Identity Development in this work leverages the Leadership Identity Development(LID) model (Komives et al., 2005), summarized in Figure 1. For a more complete discussion ofthe LID model and its relationship to Engineering Leadership, see our earlier work describinginitial development of the Engineering Leadership Identify model (Schell & Hughes, 2016
Netherlands, Brazil, Austria, Morocco and Colombia.The multi-pronged approach consists of 1) collaborating with existing programs within the NSFand other federal agencies, 2) working collaboratively with a core of mentors/faculty who haveinternational collaborations, 3) working closely with Departments, Institutes and Centers atCUNY who have international agreements, significant international research focus, and 4)working collaboratively with other Alliances, all of which have some developed programactivities in international research.By targeting participants of the LSAMP program in CUNY and nationally, the reported modelwill allow the United States to benefit from the local CUNY and national networks of over 350colleges and universities that
engineering courses covera variety of learning objectives. An important and common component of first-year courses inengineering programs is introducing students to engineering concepts, practices, and theengineering profession as well as motivating the students towards engineering.1 According to aDelphi study by Reid and colleagues,2 these courses cover four main areas: engineering skills(e.g., design process, programming), professional skills (e.g., teamwork, technicalcommunication), orientation to the engineering program (e.g., discipline selection), andorientation to the engineering profession (e.g., professional societies). Hence, these coursesaddress both technical and professional outcomes outlined by ABET as well as orientations toengineering
studentunderstanding. Overall, the simulation and experimental package provide an excellent foundationfor understanding reaction rates and chemical processes with first order dynamics. Examples willbe given of laboratory exercises that can be performed with the setup. Additionally, there is adiscussion of process feedback control opportunities that could be available for advancedundergraduate courses.1. IntroductionIn a standard chemical engineering education, a gap exists between the differential equationsgoverning chemical reaction dynamics learned in class and how chemical plants operate inindustry. Improved student understanding of the time-domain evolution of chemical reactionscan help fill this gap. Thus, there is a need for a safe and affordable
was a Chief Engineer and Head of System Design and Optimization. Currently Dr. Khafizov is a Sr. Lecturer at the University of Texas at Dallas. His research interests include system de- sign, resource management algorithms, self-organizing systems, statistical learning, predictive modeling, and massive data analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 1 An Electrical Engineering Graduate Course Sequence in Integrated Circuits Targeted to Real-World Problems in Industry, Defense, and SecurityAbstractThis
manufactures electro- mechanical and software products used for environmental sensing, cable handling and on cell towers. 2KR also provides mechanical engineering services including, Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Design for Manufacturing (DFM) and training. Clients include Klein Marine Sys- tems, Bluefin Robotics and WindSwept Designs, USA. Prior to founding 2KR Systems, Mr. Dundorf was responsible for mechanical design at L-3 Klein Associates in Salem, NH. Web: www.2KRsystems.com Phone: 1-603-397-3330 Email: chris.dundorf@2KRsystems.com c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 An Engineering Technology Capstone Project: The Snow Load Network
, 2014, p.24.1321.4). The initial pilot of the rubric was run in 2010 and was laterrevised in 2011. The rubric houses 14 elements of the engineering design process, all identifiedby a team through their collective engineering design experience and expertise in performance-based assessment. Each element within the EDPPSR is evaluated at one of six scoring levels: 0(no evidence), 1 (novice), 2 (developing), 3 (proficient), 4 (advanced), and 5 (exemplary) allscoring levels are further described at length for more consistent evaluation(See Appendix A).The process of validating this rubric for engineering design education purposes was ongoing asof 2014 (Groves, Abts, Goldberg, 2014). Through the use of workshops funded by the NationalScience