Paper ID #43071Sustainability-focused Digital Case Studies: Enhancing Engineering EducationDeepika Ganesh, University of Michigan Deepika is a second year Ph.D. student at the University of Michigan, School for the Environment and Sustainability. She specializes in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and is curious about informal education spaces, especially outdoor and digital spaces, and their role in contextual learning environments. Her most recent projects include program evaluation for the Next-Gen Scholars program aimed at first generation and underrepresented masters students in her department, and studying
developing creative data visualizations, it is important to keep in mind bestpractices in accessible design such as using high contrast colors and alt text for digital works.This paper is just a starting point for exploring more compelling data visualizations. More workneeds to be done to develop these for a variety of potential audiences.ConclusionThe presented case studies explore the critical role of creative data visualization in enhancing theunderstanding and impact of various aspects of engineering education. It is important andbeneficial to look beyond traditional data representation methods and towards more innovative,visually appealing, and creative approaches. The first case study addressed the issue of genderdisparity in engineering. Use
was provided. Second, student groups exchanged final papers with at least two other groups to gain feedback on their projects. Furthermore, students began their projects by reviewing current research and focusing on what had been done in research related to their chosen problem, defining the limitations of current products, identifying current products on the market, understanding user needs, and designing with the needs of the end user in mind. Students consulted with © American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
Reflection in Engineering Design: Student Perceptions on Usefulness Libby (Elizabeth) Osgood, Faculty of Sustainable Design Engineering Christopher Power, School of Mathematical and Computational Sciences University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEIAbstractReflection in engineering design promotes the development of personal and professional skills,helping students to document the steps they took, examine the outcomes, and looking ahead tothe following weeks. This reflective practice contributes to adopting a growth mindset andbecoming life-long learners. In a study of 1,278 reflections of 83 second-year engineeringstudents over two years, this paper is an exploratory examination of
women,encouraging women to persist, and mentoring. With the many factors in mind, it is important toidentify the problem under investigations.Problem Statement Page 12.1614.3Stated simply, the problem is a lack of engineers to fill an increasing number of positions. Morespecifically, the problem is that the number of women engineers continues to fall short incomparison to the gender ratio of women to men in the population in the U.S.1 and worldwide 2.More women engineers are needed in general and in proportion to male engineers. The obvioussolution is to attract more women into engineering programs, and this task has been undertakenadmirably by
. R., and Tarule, J. M. (1997). Women's ways of knowing: Thedevelopment of self, voice and mind. Tenth anniversary edition. New York: Basic Books18. Asa, E. “Engineering Education of Minorities: an Overview” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 2006.19. Jeffers, A, Safferman, A, and Safferman, S, “Understanding K – 12 Engineering Outreach Programs,” Journalof Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, April 2004.20. Manning, A., Cox, M., Booth-Gleghorn, V. “Development of an Academic Program that Increases Multi-EthnicStudent Retention in Engineering.” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 2006.21. Found at: http://www.nsbe.org/precollege/pci.asp on January 9, 2007.22. Gribble, Joanne R., Ed., “What it Takes: Pre-K – 12
AC 2011-985: REFORMING ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAB-ORATORIES FOR SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING: INCORPORATINGPROBLEM BASED LEARNING AND CASE STUDIES INTO AN ENVI-RONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAB COURSEStephanie Luster-Teasley, North Carolina A&T State University Stephanie Luster-Teasley is a tenure-track assistant professor with a joint appointment between the De- partments of Civil, Architectural, Agricultural and Environmental Engineering and the Department of Chemical Engineering. She has a BS in chemical engineering from North Carolina A&T State University, a MS in chemical engineering from Michigan State University, and a PhD in environmental engineer- ing from Michigan State University. She specializes in physical
/Strongly Agreed with thestatement “Mind Dumps make me complete my readings” one third was neutral and one thirdDisagreed/Strongly Disagreed with that statement. A new method, Classroom PreparationAssignment (CPA) was adopted in Fall 2016 for the third cohort (N3= 94). The students answeredguided reading questions for the CPA and brought two copies to the class where one was collectedat the beginning of the class, and the second was kept to take notes on during class. The CPAbecomes a study guide for course assessments. This study compared CPAs against Mind Dumpsin their effectiveness to encourage the first year Civil and Environmental Engineering students toread assigned material prior to the lecture. Class Preparation Assignments (CPAs) was the
Paper ID #39415Conceptualizing Program Quality in Engineering Education Ph.D. ProgramsDr. Le Shorn Benjamin, University of Houston Dr. Le Shorn Benjamin has amassed over a decade of experience in the field of education. Her career spans local and international borders and have included roles in educational research, program administra- tion, higher education accreditation and K-12 teaching. She is the recipient of the Robert Newby Award for Diversity Efforts, the Central Michigan University College of Graduate Studies 2019 Outstanding Dissertation Award, a Central Michigan University Department of Educational Leadership
leverage theories that speak to the gender-basedracialized experiences of Black students and the racialized nature of institutions. We aim to provideinsight into the institution's role in facilitating thriving for Black engineering students at PWIs.IntroductionThe experience of Black students in engineering programs at predominantly White institutions (PWIs) isrife with inequities in participation and racial stereotypes about ability and competence [1-4]. WhileBlack students navigate their way to success in engineering programs not created with them in mind,they often survive rather than thrive [5-6]. A literature review examining engineering student successfound that success is often defined as a collection of academic competencies that
Paper ID #38272Cultivating a Culture to Foster Engineering IdentityYen-lin Han (Associate Professor) Yen-Lin Han is an Associate Professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Seattle University. Dr. Han received her BS degree in Material Science and Engineering from National Tsing-Hua University in Hsinchu, Taiwan, her MS degree in Electrical Engineering and her PhD degree in Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering from the University of Southern California. Her research interests include micro-scale molecular gas dynamics, micro fluidics, and heat transfer applications in Microelectromechanical Systems
the authors, only.REFERENCES[1] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2004.[2] K. Robinson, Out of Our Minds: The Power of Being Creative, 3rd ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2017.[3] “‘engineer,’” Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary. www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary (accessed Jan. 21, 2021).[4] L. E. Grinter, “Report on evaluation of engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 25–63, 1955.[5] National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying, “Model Law,” no. September. NCEES, p. 41, 2021.[6] ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission
Paper ID #36943Adapting Chaos Theory for Undergraduate ElectricalEngineersBenjamin C. Flores (Professor)Hector A. Ochoa (Assistant Professor) Dr. Hector Ochoa is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Stephen F. Austin State University, where he develops curriculum and laboratories in engineering physics. Dr. Ochoa graduated with his doctorate and M.S. from the University of Texas at El Paso, and a Bachelor’s degree from The University of Guadalajara, Mexico. His current research interests include Radar Image Processing, Compressive Radar, and Engineering Education.Chandra S. Pappu (Assistant Professor
Paper ID #36946The accuracy of self-assessment in engineering mechanicsAmie Baisley (Faculty) I have a Ph.D. in engineering education from Utah State University and a M.S. in structural engineering from Arizona State University. My teaching and research interests are centered around the second year mechanics courses and how changes in those courses can impact student learning and persistence.Keith D. Hjelmstad (Chair) Keith D. Hjelmstad is President's Professor of Engineering at Arizona State University and chair of the civil engineering program. He is founder and architect of The Mechanics Project, an effort
solutions to identified problems.5. Research DesignThis 3-year project involving high school and middle school science teachers was hosted at theUniversity of Louisville. The project was themed energy, unifying the science and engineeringfields. During the six-week research experience, 10 new teachers each year were assigned anengineering faculty member on one of five energy-themed research topics, with two teachers perproject. Teachers also received support for developing curricula for the upcoming school year thatincorporated their research experience, in addition to engineering design integration, into theirteaching practices, with the NGSS standards in mind. This study was approved by the InstitutionalReview Board.Our primary objectives were
. Because best practices suggestlimiting course outcomes to six or under [7], [8] it is unrealistic to think that faculty canadequately assess all thirteen learning outcomes for engineering laboratories described in Table3. This report based on responses from faculty supports the notion that not all lab learningoutcomes are equally important and points towards candidates for a focused set of outcomes thatshould be more thoroughly assessed. Departments should be mindful when determining whichlearning outcomes are best-suited for the ChE laboratory courses, with consideration of whichoutcomes translate to ABET criteria as well as which outcomes can be taught and assessed inother courses. While this paper focuses on understanding how faculty perceive
themajority of caregivers shared how this engineering design program afforded them time to spendwith their child(ren), as well as make connections with their child(ren). As one caregiver stated,it allowed her a space to enter into her son’s domain. “…having to do it as a family brought mecloser to Zac, and to his mind, and to his world.” This was dedicated time and space that wasoften spent on the chaotic day-to-day tasks. As stated by another caregiver, “I guess the mostthing that I got out of the program is that it gave me a chance to do something with my kidsbecause there wasn't a lot of time that was put in to doing things with them. Between me going towork, them at school, coming home and running over here, running over here, trying to
the parent of one student participant and knows theother two children. The children may have felt compelled to give answers that they thought theauthor wanted to hear during the interviews and the sessions themselves.Because this was a one-time limited experience of three children during extraordinary times, theresults may not be broadly applicable. The research questions should be further addressed withstudies on a larger number of children and in different settings.References[1] L. Vygotsky, "Biographical Note," in Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA, London, England, Harvard Univresity Press, 1978, pp. 15-16.[2] C. M. Cunningham and C. P. Lachapelle, "Designing engineering experiences to engage
Paper ID #30045The Modalities of Governance in Engineering EducationDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair of the International Network for
. Prelli Ed., Rhetorics of Display. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 2006.14. J. Dunne and S. Pendlebury, “ Practical Reason,” in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education, N. Blake, et al., Eds. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2003, pp. 194-213.15. A. Johri et al., “The Role of Representations in Engineering Practice: Taking a Turn towards Inscriptions,” J. of Eng. Educ. 102, 1, pp. 2-19, Jan., 2013.16. J. Juhl and H. Lindegaard, “Representations and Visual Synthesis in Engineering Design,” J. of Eng. Educ. 102, 1, pp. 20-50, Jan., 2013.17. L. Suchman “Embodied Practices of Engineering Work,” Mind, Culture, & Activity, 7, 1- 2, pp. 4-18, 2000.18. K. Henderson, On Line and on Paper: Visual
AC 2008-2230: A PRACTICE-INTEGRATED UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUMIN MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGMark Yim, University of Pennsylvania Mark Yim is the Gabel Family Term Junior Professor in Mechanical Engineering and MEAM Undergraduate Curriculum Chair. His research interests include: Modular reconfigurable robots and locomotion, PolyBot; flying robotic mechanisms and haptic devices.Katherine Kuchenbecker, University of Pennsylvania Katherine J. Kuchenbecker is the Skirkanich Assistant Professor of Innovation in Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics at the University of Pennsylvania. Her primary research interest is the design and control of haptic interfaces for virtual environments and teleoperation
traditional textbooks sometimes are only opened by the students in the assignedhomework sections. This behavior is particularly the case for non-EE major students,who wish to spend the least amount of time for an electrical engineering class. With thatin mind, the author prefers to assign textbooks that have a companion website where Page 14.313.7students can have assess to online chapter summary, multiple choice and true or falseproblems, fill in the blank sentences on the chapter material, and exercises based onsoftware tools such as MultiSim®, Cadence Design Systems' PSpice®, and NationalInstrument’s LabVIEW®. Cadence Design Systems' PSpice (Personal
2006-1150: INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING THROUGH REAL-WORLDCASE STUDIESChetan Sankar, Auburn UniversityP.K. Raju, Auburn University Page 11.842.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Introduction to Engineering through Real-World Case StudiesIntroduction By the year 2020, the world population will approach 8 billion people, and muchof that increase will be among groups that today are outside of developed nationsi. Themarketplace for engineering services will be worldwide, and jobs will move freely.Information sharing allowed by the Internet, broadband communication links, and highspeed computers has the effect of tying cultures, knowledge
: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 18. Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207. 19. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of capital, 241-258. New York: Greenwood Press. 20. Evans, C., & Kozhevnikova, M. (2011). Styles of Practice: How Learning is Affected by Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions and Beliefs, Conceptions, and Approaches to Learning. Research Papers in Education, 26(2), 133
courses have the professor serve as the faculty/academic advisor for thestudents[14]. Each course has been developed with the university’s context in mind, so a specificIntroduction to Engineering course model may not easily transfer to another institution. Thecurriculum model that is explored in this paper uses a team-based semester-long design projectcombined with a few supplementary labs where the professor serves as the students’ facultyadvisor.3. Context, Studies and ParticipantsContextThe project took place at a private university serving ~3800 undergraduate students on the westcoast of the USA. Of the 3800 students, about 700 major in engineering or computer scienceacross all cohorts. The student population is mostly traditional, with most
.: Consulting Psychologist Press, pp.181-20621. Lent, R. W., Schmidt, L., Schmidt, J., and Pertmer, G.,(2002), “Exploration of Collective Efficacy Beliefs in Student Project Teams: Implications for Student and Team Outcomes,” Proc.,, ASEE Conf.& Exhibition.22. de Graaf, E., and Kolmos, A.,(2003), “ Characteristics of Problem- Based Learning,” International Journal of Eng. Education, Vol.19, No.5, pp.657-662.23. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R.,(1999), “How People Learn: Brain, Mind , Experience and School,” Wash. .D.C.: National Academy Press.24. Wessel, D., “Building a Better Engineer,” Wall Street Journal, December 20, 2003, p.B1.25. Saddler, P.M., Coyle, H., and Schwartz, M.,(2000), “Engineering Competitions in the
international example to follow.U.S. higher education has had a long history of pursuing engineering expansion. “Every studyof engineering education in this century, beginning with the Wickenden report in the 1920s,directed attention to broadening the engineering curriculum [3, p. 120].” The broadeningincluded the humanities. The president of the National Academy of Engineering wrote, “Don’tbe tempered to crowd the humanities, arts, and social sciences out of the curriculum. Theintegral role of these subjects in U.S. engineering education differentiates us from much of therest of the world. I believe the humanities, arts, and social sciences are essential to the creative,explorative, open-minded environment and spirit necessary to educate the engineer
students presented their rehabilitation devicesand gave them to their clients.The course modules that were intentionally designed to help students engage with their clientsincluded empathic design, disability etiquette, and the ecological model of disability. Thelearning objectives of each module is described below, and authors of this paper will gladly sharespecific module curriculum upon request.Empathic Design Discuss empathy and how it relates to engineering design. Compare and contrast emotional and cognitive empathy. Describe the consequences of only using an analytical state of mind when facing today’s complex design problems.Disability Etiquette Provide examples of using first person disability language. Explain to a
it was definitelystrange to change my mind.” But in her new major, “I really, really like what I am in now andsince I started my new major it’s been doing a lot more science and less computers which wasnever my favorite. …I decided I’m going to law school…” She stated that via environmentallaw she “can make a bigger impact.” She also discussed the she would be graduating a semesterearly (after 3.5 years of college), since her new major required fewer credits. She noted that shewas looking forward to getting to pick her classes in the final semester.Persisting in Original Engineering DisciplinesA large contributor to Tanya’s persistence in EnvE may have been her early mentoringrelationship with an environmental engineering faculty member. The
Paper ID #23558Assessment of a Global Engineering Outreach CourseDr. Randy S. Lewis, Brigham Young University Dr. Randy S. Lewis is professor at Brigham Young University (BYU). He received his B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from BYU and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, respectively. He currently serves as chair of the Education and Accreditation Committee of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and as an ABET commissioner for accrediting engineering programs. He previously served in several national positions of AIChE. His research interests include biomaterials development, engineering