Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nagash Antoine Clarke, University of Michigan; Joi-Lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

that theparticipants of the larger study are from a privileged group (white men). The results also suggestthat white men’s allyship can increase due to interrogation of other white men, as well asmentoring by a PI of color. Thus, in this autoethnographic study, we will provide insights on theimpact of equity research within the context of collaborative efforts between researchers fromracially marginalized and privileged groups.IntroductionRacialized minoritized populations have been historically barred from participation in highereducation [1]. In recent decades there has been increased access due to interventions likeaffirmative action and other policies. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) higher education

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Division Technical Session 1: Mechanical and CAD Track

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nina T. Jones, University of Florida; Sean R. Niemi, University of Florida; Matthew J. Traum, Engineer Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

, 2021 A Hands-On Learning Module Pipe Flow Velocity Profile Interrogator Laboratory Kit For Remote Online Fluid Mechanics InstructionIntroductionNearly all undergraduate engineering courses, including laboratories, were moved online in thefall of 2020 due to COVID-19. As no fully-online ABET-accredited mechanical engineeringbachelor’s degree programs exist, a key challenge was porting applied hands-on laboratoryexperiences to the remote learning environment while providing students with experiences aspragmatic and engaging as those found in standard brick-and-mortar laboratories [1]. Oneapproach engineering faculty employed to maintain experiential learning was sending kits by mailto

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 1: Best Practices in Engineering Math Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

JaCoya Thompson, Northwestern University ; Sally P.W. Wu, Northwestern University; Jacob Mills, Evanston Township High School

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

calculations [15, 24] and providing students theopportunity to explore various questions such as “what happens if...?” [5]. In this study, we investigate the effects of integrating a technology used by professionalsin an Advanced Placement (AP) Statistics course, which is designed to provide students withcollege-level work while still in high school [10]. Technologies in AP Statistics course typicallyinvolve (1) spreadsheets for analyzing data and constructing visual representations of data; (2)multimedia materials to teach, tutor, and/or test students’ statistical knowledge and skills; (3) webor computer-based tools/simulations to demonstrate and visualize statistical content; and (4)graphing calculators for computation, graphing, or

Conference Session

Developing Better Engineering Managers - Curricular Ideas from Year 1 Through Graduate School

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peilin Fu, National University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

four weeks) gives students unprecedented focus andflexibility, and lets the students earn their degree on their own schedule. But on the other hand,this accelerated course format, where the students need to complete one course in four weeks,make the courses especially challenging to students.Under the one-course-per-month framework, the Operations Management course contents weredivided into four major topics, each for one week as shown in Table 1. Each week's lesson willconsist of reading from the text, online Blackboard Collaborate sessions, question and answer viadiscussion board, homework assignments, quizzes/exam and a simulation game design project. Table 1: Course Topics and Class Activities Date

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John W. Blake P.E., Austin Peay State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

in courses; this paper will report on progress to dateand lay out plans for future work.IntroductionTechnological and engineering literacy (TEL) has been recognized as a critical need [1-3], andmuch work has gone into efforts to define and teach these subjects [4-9]. While much of thiseffort at colleges and universities has been focused on non-majors, people graduating fromengineering and engineering technology degree programs cannot just be assumed to have thisliteracy. TEL needs to be incorporated in the engineering curriculum as well [10-14].Classes for majors focus on specific subjects in engineering and technology. The material mustbe covered, and students are to be evaluated based on their ability to demonstrate the use of thespecified

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 1: Methods Refresh: Approaches to Data Analysis in Engineering Education Research

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Aaron Robert Hamilton Thielmeyer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Dina Verdin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brianna Benedict McIntyre, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Rachel Ann Baker; Jacqueline Doyle, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

high variability among engineering studentswere used in the TDA to map students’ latent diversity. The results of this map indicate six distinctdata progressions as well as a sparse group of students whose responses were not similar to themajority of the dataset. This work illustrates the opportunities for using TDA and provides adiscussion of the different researcher decisions that are involved in this statistical technique.IntroductionRecent quantitative research in social science and engineering education has begun to focus notjust on a single aspect of participants’ experiences or psycho-socio processes but rather aconstellation of aspects that are important for particular outcomes like retention or academicsuccess [1]-[4]. For example

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 1: Methods Refresh: Approaches to Data Analysis in Engineering Education Research

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Manoj Malviya, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University; Natascha Trellinger Buswell, University of California, Irvine

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

interraterreliability (IRR) and compares them with statistical methods for calculating IRR. Across fields,establishing quality in the qualitative data analysis process involves calculating a measure ofagreement between the human researchers interpreting the data: If researchers cannot agree to anacceptable level, then a coding schema cannot be considered sound and results cannot beconsidered meaningful, transferrable, or conclusive. The extent to which the classification patternsof two or more coders coincide represents the interrater reliability, sometimes known as interrateragreement. Methods for calculating IRR have been established across the social sciences, such asthose documented by Eckes [1], Zhao [2], Krippendorff [3], and Carletta [4], typically

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 1: Methods Refresh: Approaches to Data Analysis in Engineering Education Research

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Dayoung Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alison J. Kerr, University of Tulsa; Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Michael C. Loui, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

quality. Although qualitativeresearchers often conduct phenomenography collaboratively, most often a single individual leadsthe data collection and analysis; others primarily serve as critical reviewers. However, qualitymay be enhanced by involving collaborators as data analysts in “sustained cycles of scrutiny, de-bate and testing against the data” [1, p. 88], thus interweaving unique perspectives and insightsthroughout the analysis process. Nonetheless, collaborating in this intensive data analysis processalso presents unique challenges. In this paper, we (1) describe the processes we are applying inan integrated team-based phenomenographic study, (2) identify how the team approach affectsresearch quality, and (3) reflect on the challenges

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Describing the Engineering Student Learning Experience Based on CAEE Findings: Part 1

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia Atman, University of Washington; Lorraine Fleming, Howard University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Ronald Miller, Colorado School of Mines; Karl Smith, University of Minnesota; Reed Stevens, University of Washington; Ruth Streveler, Purdue University; Christine Loucks-Jaret, University of Washington; Dennis Lund, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

engineering education programs. The Academic Pathways Study is providing a rich set of Page 13.908.13insights and tools to support these changes and ultimately to strengthen effective teaching of ourfuture engineers.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.ESI-0227558, which funds the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE).CAEE is a collaboration of five partner universities.End Notes:a The Longitudinal Cohort (Fall 2003—Spring 2007) was initially called Cohort 1; the twoBroader Sampling Cohorts using the APPLE Surveys were referred to as Cohorts 3 and 4.; andthe

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Describing the Engineering Student Learning Experience Based on CAEE Findings: Part 1

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mia Clark, Stanford University; Lorraine Fleming, Howard University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Cynthia Atman, University of Washington; Ronald Miller, Colorado School of Mines; Ruth Streveler, Purdue University; Reed Stevens, University of Washington; Karl Smith, University of Minnesota

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

(STEM) students with the skillsand knowledge needed to tackle the technological challenges of the 21st century, the NationalScience Foundation granted funding in 2003 to the Center for the Advancement of EngineeringEducation (CAEE), dedicated to advancing the scholarship of engineering learning and teaching.The largest element of the CAEE is the Academic Pathways Study (APS), an in-depth, mixedmethods exploration of the undergraduate student experience and the graduate’s transition intoprofessional practice. The APS addresses the following research questions: 1. How do students' engineering skills and knowledge develop and/or change over time? 2. How does one's identity as an engineer evolve? 3. What elements of engineering education

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Describing the Engineering Student Learning Experience Based on CAEE Findings: Part 1

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Krista Donaldson, Stanford University; Gary Lichtenstein, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

have a high degree of certainty oftheir parents’ levels of education). This method of measure is used, for example, on the NationalSurvey of Student Engagement (NSSE), which is distributed each year to nearly 20 percent ofuniversity freshmen and seniors in the U.S. and Canada. Similar to the NSSE subjects, ourstudents are asked the highest level of education reached by both parents with each level is givena numerical value on a 0 to 1 scale as shown in Table 1. Respondents also have the option ofchoosing “I prefer not to answer.” Table 1. Values for each parent’s education level in determination of SES. The APPLES prompt was “What is the highest level of education that your mother

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Describing the Engineering Student Learning Experience Based on CAEE Findings: Part 1

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Helen Chen, Stanford University; Krista Donaldson, Stanford University; Ozgur Eris, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Gary Lichtenstein, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; George Toye, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

futureAPPLES deployments and analyses.Introduction/BackgroundThe Academic Pathways Study (APS) of the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement ofEngineering Education (CAEE) is a cross-university study that systematically examines howengineering students navigate their education, and how engineering skills and identity developduring their undergraduate careers1,2. APS research falls under the umbrella of the Center for theAdvancement of Engineering Education (CAEE) whose goals are to: 1. Identify ways to boost the numbers of students who complete engineering degrees (including increasing the numbers of women and traditionally underrepresented groups) 2. Better support those enrolled in engineering programs 3. Encourage greater numbers of

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Describing the Engineering Student Learning Experience Based on CAEE Findings: Part 1

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lorraine Fleming, Howard University; Sislena Ledbetter, Howard University; Dawn Williams, Howard University; Janice McCain, Howard University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education at Howard University. Dr. McCain's areas of interest include persistence and motivation, retention of minority students in higher education, and international economic development, particularly as it relates to women in Africa. Page 13.524.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008Engineering Students Define Diversity: An Uncommon Thread Page 13.524.2 1 Engineering Students Define Diversity: An Uncommon

Conference Session

Graduate Education Model, Industry and Practitioner Experience - Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alex Jordan Hanson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Peter Lindahl, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Samantha Dale Strasser, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Alison F. Takemura, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Dirk R. Englund, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Jaime Goldstein, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

, pedagogically advantageous, and an efficient use of student time.With appropriate modifications, it may even supply some of the advantages that the communicationcourse offered, namely explicit communication frameworks and peer feedback.1 Importance of communication skills for engineersThe core emphasis of most degree programs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) is to develop “hard technical skills,” often at the neglect of “soft skills” that are alsoessential.This division is misaligned with the reality that engineering graduates report spending roughly64 % of their time on communication-intensive tasks [1]. Accreditation agencies recognize thisimportance, and both British [2] and US (Accreditation Board for Engineering and

Conference Session

Pre-College: Perceptions and Attitudes on the Pathway to Engineering (1)

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Osman Yasar, State University of New York, Brockport; Jose Maliekal, State University of New York, Brockport; Peter Veronesi, State University of New York, Brockport; Leigh J. Little, State University of New York, Brockport

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

practices and crosscutting concepts todeepen understanding of content as well as cognitive processes that permeate the fields ofboth science and engineering. These recommended practices are listed below.27 1. Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering) 2. Developing and using models 3. Planning and carrying out investigations 4. Analyzing and interpreting data 5. Using mathematics and computational thinking 6. Constructing explanations (for science) and designing solutions (for engineering) 7. Engaging in argument from evidence 8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating informationClearly, one of the principals of science and engineering education is to cultivate

Conference Session

Graduate Education Model, Industry and Practitioner Experience - Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jaclyn K. Murray, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan; Diane L. Peters, Kettering University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

encompass threeessential components of creative performance (CoCP): 1) domain-relevant skills, 2) creativity-relevant processes, and 3) task motivation, embedded within an individual’s social environment.The level of proficiency with the three components of creative performance affects the outcomeof the creative process. Robust domain-relevant skills and knowledge, as defined by adiscipline’s community of practice, includes facts, routine procedures, and special techniquesunique to the discipline. For example, a knowledge of Newton’s laws, an ability to solve routinestatics and deformable bodies problems, and skill for computer-aided design software arenecessary for designing a cantilever beam to support a 600 square-foot flag flying from the top

Conference Session

Pre-College: Perceptions and Attitudes on the Pathway to Engineering (1)

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tony McClary, New Mexico State University, College of Engineering; Patricia A. Sullivan, New Mexico State University; Steven J. Stochaj, New Mexico State University; Luis Antonio Vazquez Ph.D., New Mexico State University; Karen Trujillo, New Mexico State University ; John Kulpa, New Mexico State University; Germain Degardin, New Mexico State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

program for high school students— NM PREP Academy—had a measurable effecton student confidence (a subcomponent of self-efficacy) and content knowledge. We also aimedto gain a greater understanding of how similar short-term intervention programs could be used toincrease interest, participation, and persistence in STEM-related careers, as well as to understandwhich specific portions of the program were most closely related to the students’ gains in eitherknowledge or confidence. Our research questions were as follows:1. Did the confidence and/or content knowledge of the students change as a result of engagement in the pre-engineering program?2. Was there a relation between changes in student confidence and knowledge?3. Was there a relation

Conference Session

Pre-College: Perceptions and Attitudes on the Pathway to Engineering (1)

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

Paper ID #17782Scientists for Tomorrow - A Self-Sustained Initiative to Promote STEM inOut-of-School Time Frameworks in Under-served Community-Based Orga-nizations: Evaluation and Lessons LearnedMr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Chicago Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the outreach programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for To- morrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM

Conference Session

Construction 1: Special Topics in Construction Education: BIM, Simulation, Sustainability, and Safety

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saeed Rokooei, University of Nebraska, Lincoln at Omaha; James D. Goedert Ph.D., P.E., University of Nebraska, Durham; Asregedew Kassa Woldesenbet, University of Nebraska, Lincoln at Omaha

Tagged Divisions

Construction

. Thus, Group A, whichhad prior knowledge, included senior and junior construction students while Group B mostlyconsisted of freshman students. The majority of both groups were male students (93%).Previous Virtual Learning Experience:Previous encounters with virtual learning or educational simulation applications can influencestudents’ perceptions about the impact and capabilities of simulations and help them to embracethese tools rapidly. Although a majority of both groups did not have previous experience withsimulation applications, Group B indicated more unfamiliarity, as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Previous virtual learning experience Previous Experience with Virtual Learning and Simulation

Conference Session

Construction 1: Special Topics in Construction Education: BIM, Simulation, Sustainability, and Safety

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eddie Rivera Olivencia, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez; Carla Lopez Del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez; Jose L. Perdomo, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez; Antonio A. Gonzalez-Quevedo P.E., University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez

Tagged Divisions

Construction

Implementation Survey Development Figure 1: Research Methodology Phases(Rivera Olivencia and Lopez del Puerto 2016)professionals. Once the interviews phase was completed and the data gathered was analyzed theauthors went on the field and conducted a survey to construction workers in different sitesaround the island. These results assisted the authors on the development of the training module.For the first phase the authors targeted safety managers, safety directors, supervisors andcoordinators for this phase. Health and Safety Specialists from Puerto Rico OSHA were alsocontacted to participate in the interviews. The participants were divided in two groups;Construction Company Managers (CCMs) and PR

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 1: IE-ing a Broader Perspective

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan O. Schall, SOS Consulting, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

)composed of academic and industry leaders, leaders from ABET and the EngineeringAccreditation Commission (EAC) was chartered to advise on how to increase flexibility in theengineering accreditation criteria while maintaining a strong emphasis on educational qualityand to recommend ways to facilitate recruitment of outstanding engineers from industry andeducation to lead the ABET accreditation process. The committee identified three major barriersto change: 1) excessively long, prescriptive and detailed accreditation criteria, 2) a complicatedand user-unfriendly evaluation system, and 3) difficulty attracting technically active mid-careerprofessionals. ABET with support from the National Science Foundation convened consensus-building workshops

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 1: IE-ing a Broader Perspective

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Faisal Aqlan, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); Yuan-Han Huang, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); E. George Walters III P.E., Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); Osama T. Al Meanazel, The Hashemite University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

involves gathering of customer requirements, identifying productspecifications, generating design concepts, evaluating the designs, and selecting the best design.Results show that students’ design skills can be greatly enhanced by integrating the two courses.1. IntroductionInterdisciplinarity is becoming a critical issue for teaching design skills1. Integrating EngineeringDesign courses with Manufacturing and Ergonomic courses can effectively enhance students’design skills. Aligning product design and manufacturing education with market needs isimportant to overcome the skills gap and other challenges faced by students2. Moreover,ergonomic consideration is crucial for product design and development in today’s global market.Ergonomics, which is the

Conference Session

Graduate Education Model, Industry and Practitioner Experience - Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diane L. Peters, Kettering University; Molly H. Goldstein, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Joanne Lax, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

: Returners, writing transfer, industry, graduate programs, academic writingIntroductionAlthough the majority of new engineering graduate students are recent university graduates,there is a small contingent that comes from several years in industry. Some want or needadditional education in their field, and others may be pursuing new interests. In recent years,there have been several studies on “returners” in engineering graduate programs, defined byPeters & Daly as those graduate students who, after receiving their bachelor’s degree, work forfive years or more before pursuing a graduate degree.1 In fact, one study suggested that returningto pursue a graduate degree after about five years in industry is optimal timing.2In another study, ten

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 1: IE-ing a Broader Perspective

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alejandro Salado, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

decide for an alternative that is notaligned with those ethical principles and values.A formal justification for the need to incorporate ethics in engineering curricula can be made byreferencing ABET, which requires “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility,broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global andsocietal context” (ABET, 2007, p. 1). Informally, two examples can set the ground.Example 1: Challenger. In 1986, the Space Shuttle Challenger disintegrated during launch,instantly killing its crew. Assessment of failure root cause, led to concluding that launch wasapproved despite the predicted operating temperature for one of its components (the O-ring) wasgoing to be -3 degree C

Conference Session

Construction 1: Special Topics in Construction Education: BIM, Simulation, Sustainability, and Safety

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie R. Metzinger, Purdue University; Jessica Anderson Cabral, Purdue University; Bradley Louis Benhart, Purdue University; Patti Morgan, Purdue University; Scott Douglas Santon, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Construction

thinking skills in order to apply construction knowledge in a holistic, sustainable manner. Summarizing and expanding upon the UN’s learning outcomes, Lozano, Ceulemans, &Scarff Seatter, (2015) developed four learning outcomes for SDE specifically related to corporateorganizations: 1. Understand organizations, their elements, and their attitudes, and how they influence and contribute to sustainability; 2. Understand the different types of change and how they can be managed in the corporate sustainability context; 3. Be able to recognize drivers, barriers to change, and strategies to overcome the barriers in a sustainability context within the organization; and 4. Critically reflect on

Conference Session

Construction 1: Special Topics in Construction Education: BIM, Simulation, Sustainability, and Safety

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yilei Huang, South Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction

project to demonstrate the use of BIM in various CM subjects11, 12.The CM program at Arizona State University offered Introduction to BIM as a 1-credit computerapplication course to teach the concept of BIM process and applications of BIM software6. Theprogram further offered a 1-credit BIM lab to accompany the CM capstone course ProjectManagement. The BIM lab covered a range of BIM-related CM topics including site logisticsvisualization, model-based estimating, 4D scheduling, and clash detection using a variety ofcommercial packages such as Revit, Navisworks, SketchUp, Bluebeam Revu, and DESTINIProfiler. The capstone course itself also incorporated BIM contents on developing a BIMExecution Plan7.The CM program at University of Texas at San

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Estridge Schneider, Colorado School of Mines; Amy Charlotte Martin P.E., Colorado School of Mines; Terri S. Hogue, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Evaluation of Research Experience for Teachers (RET) Program Effectiveness asSTEM Professional DevelopmentAbstractThe Colorado School of Mines (CSM) hosts a National Science Foundation funded ResearchExperience for Teachers (RET) program that focuses on STEM content surrounding the water-energy nexus (WE2NG: Water-Energy Nexus for the Next Generation). The objectives of thisprogram are to: 1) impact teacher participants by increasing their knowledge of the water-energynexus and by expanding their perspectives on science, engineering and research, 2) to indirectlyimpact K-12 student’s learning, motivation and engagement by increasing teacher passion andawareness and by providing mentors for

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 1: Retention and Student Success Strategies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremy C. Helm, Arizona State University; Tami Coronella, Arizona State University; Tim Rooney, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

successful academic advising and an increase in student retentionand graduation rates. Through the requirement of mandatory advising for freshmen, advisorsand students can collaboratively develop strategies for engagement with resources that willpromote academic success. Theories and research focusing on academic advising approachesand student engagement guide advising discussions.Alexander Astin [1], [2] developed the Theory of Student Involvement (TSI) model. Withrespect to academic advising effectiveness, Astin suggests “...that a particular curriculum, toachieve the effects intended, must elicit sufficient student effort and investment of energy tobring about the desired learning and development [1]”. From TSI emerged the “I-E-O Model”,which

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 1: Retention and Student Success Strategies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qudsia Tahmina, Ohio State University at Marion

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

pleasant for the students. Several learning pedagogies have been implemented by instructorssuch as active learning, flipped classroom and interactive discussion groups. In-class activitiesand forming teams are part of the active learning techniques that help students overcome the fearand anxiety and allow them to openly discuss and share ideas. However, there is still a need toexplore strategies to further enhance students’ performance and overall success. Mentoring hasbeen described in the prior studies as a process in which a more-experienced individual (mentor)guides a less-experienced individual (mentee) in a professional and academic setting [1, 2]. It isevident through research that the peer mentoring helps mentees in transitioning into post

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

universityeducation and hopefully develop some professional identity as students. In this work, students’reflections about learning and critical evaluation of systems will be evaluated. Variations in thetexture of the students’ reflection over the course of the semester will be described.IntroductionDeveloping a sense of purpose, belonging, and a personal identity are all parts of anundergraduate student’s college experience [1]. In fact, under many circumstances, students formlifelong connections and with the right teams, many important technological and socialdevelopments occur right through one’s college years. An integral contributing factor behindthese is the environment and the team of learners with whom the student can think, grow, andlearn. More