objectives. This newassessment lens provides a fertile ground to amplify students’ rewarding experiences, minimizetheir unproductive struggle, and preserve healthy challenges that effectively contribute to thestudents’ learning process. In our work, we apply the CARE methodology in studying apopulation of 42 students enrolled in the introductory ECE course, ENGR 40M: An Intro toMaking: What is EE, offered at our educational institution, Stanford University. This course waschosen for this study as it emphasizes the importance of integrating theoretical and laboratoryexposure to introductory ECE concepts via immersive project-based learning opportunities.Our main contributions begin with the development of the CARE methodology, its application
Kelso Farrell is an Associate Professor at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. She has a PhD in English Literature (Science Fiction) from Louisiana State University (2007), an MA in English from Montana State University, and a BA in Creative Writing from the University of Montana. At LSU, Jennifer was part of the Communication Across the Curriculum (CxC) and worked in the Engineering Communication Studio. Jennifer has published articles in The Leading Edge, Carbon, The Journal of Popular Culture, and Foundation.Dr. Alicia Domack, Milwaukee School of Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Impact of Experiential Learning on
particular andengineering as a whole. Besides required courses, students are also encouraged to register forelectives in management and technical areas that most effectively satisfy their personal andprofessional careers. NTU students are assigned an academic advisor from the faculty. Advisors assiststudents in selection of the academic programs, planning their curriculum, registration, and otherpertinent information. Students are responsible for interfacing with their advisors and addressingtheir academic problems and issues.US ARMY ENGINEERING SCHOOL AND OTHER PROGRAMS The US Army Engineering School at Ft. Leonard Wood (USAES) is located to the southof Rolla, Missouri. USAES is a training school for the Army’s Engineering Officer
Page 12.982.2introduce students to the protocol. Second, we discuss selection of ZigBee-compliant hardware.Third, we present a sample lab structure designed to assist students in understanding ZigBeenetworking fundamentals. Adding content to an already-busy curriculum is always challenginghowever it is possible to make students aware of the concepts and possibilities of this emergingtechnology with a single lab experience, combined with some background instruction. This laband background experience also addresses several basic networking concepts, and can thus beused to replace part of the existing curriculum.BackgroundThe IEEE 802.15.44 standard, which defines the physical (PHY) and media access control(MAC) layers of the network stack, is
has been integrating innovative and novel educational paradigms in STEM education to support student engagement, retention, and diversity.Prof. Omar Youssef, University of Arizona Dr. Omar Youssef is a Lecturer at University of Arizona (UofA), College of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Architecture, and the School of Sustainable Built Environments. A Building Scientist in the Institute on Place and Wellbeing Performance. An Architecture Designer in Practice focusing on Environmental Application within the Industry. Dr. Youssef has extensive industry experience of constructed large-scale projects. Omar’s interdisciplinary background combines between Architecture Practice, Environmental Sciences, Health and
, Worcester Polytechnic Institute David Spanagel is an Associate Professor of History in the Department of Humanities and Arts at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass. He has been active as an innovator in curriculum and instructional approaches. He co-developed the Power the World course (one of the first Great Problems Seminar themes offered as part of WPI’s First Year Experience) back in 2007. He has pioneered col- laborative learning approaches in the history capstone projects that he advises for students completing the Humanities and Arts requirement. He worked with colleagues to overhaul and update WPI’s history of science and technology course offerings in 2009, and again in 2017. Prior to acquiring
related to market analysis, technology commercialization, business communication, orinternships within start-up companies.15 Another study found that participating in an engineeringentrepreneurship program had a positive impact on retention, GPAs, and entrepreneurial activity.Data collected from alumni found that, relative to a control group, graduates of the program were73% more likely to have started a new company, 23% more likely to have created new productsor services, and 59% more likely to have high confidence in leading a start-up.17Approaches to Teaching InnovationResearch related to developing curriculum for and assessing innovation education mirrors that ofentrepreneurship, which has been characterized as relatively new and fragmented
. Page 23.412.2Therefore, the objectives of this project are to: (1) develop a Fundamentals of EnvironmentalEngineering Concept Inventory (FEECI) that quantifies students’ conceptual understanding ofkey FEE concepts, (2) administer the FEECI at 10 US universities with required undergraduateFEE courses, and (3) refine and disseminate the FEECI following its initial administration. Theexpected outcome of this work is a validated, reliable instrument for assessing conceptualunderstanding in a core curriculum course for Civil and/or Environmental engineering. Such aninstrument will play an important role in assessment for programmatic accreditation under theABET standards, and provide a needed technique for formative assessment of
their careersas project leaders so they can better produce efficient integrated designs and collaborateeffectively with their structural engineering consultants and therefore lead more successfulprojects. Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2011, American Society for Engineering Education 206 The benefits of understanding structural principles apply to both ARCH and CM students.Architects typically take a lead role in building design and so an understanding of structuralprinciples can enhance their ability to produce design concepts that are coordinated with
mechatronics creates specific teaching challenges. The disciplineis an integrative one rather than a narrowly defined specialty. Students tend to come into theclass from different disciplines with strong backgrounds in one of computing, electronics ormechanisms but may be quite ignorant of the other disciplines. At BYU we have chosen to usethe development of an autonomous miniature robot as the medium for teaching this diverse field.Students are strongly motivated by the experience of building a working unit and thus rapidlylearn those sub-disciplines in which they are lacking. Since students must define their ownsolution to the problem they will similarly define their own course of study.The pedagogical approach is to ensure that the class covers the
) Taxonomy Working Group.Rick Steiner, The University of Arizona ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Leveraging Active Learning Techniques to Teach Model-Based Systems EngineeringAbstractTo be successful, Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) requires the coordinatedapplication of an appropriate modeling language and methodology within a suitable tool. Thelanguage, methodology and tool chosen to support MBSE depends on the specific aims of theengineers. Teaching MBSE, therefore, presents the challenge of simultaneously instructingstudents in three distinct but interdependent concepts: the application of the systems engineeringprocess, the expression of systems
advancements come at the right time: the amounts of knowledgeexpected at the baccalaureate and master’s levels show drastic increase. The system ofengineering education is especially vulnerable to the effects of Internet, global communicationsystems, computers, etc. However, there is one area in engineering education that is stilldominated by classical teaching/learning methodology: the laboratory. This could be easilyexplained: the purpose of an engineering laboratory course is to teach future engineers to interactwith the “real hardware” in all its imperfection. Any attempt to replace the “real hardware” in astudent laboratory with the most elaborate simulation software can result in the loss of realismand prevents students from gaining important
stages, rather than designing an entire product first andthen building it. Since Rube machines are typically dynamic artistic creations that undergo manychanges during their cycle of development due to practical realizations, this model lends itselfnicely to the Rube environment.Second, the mantra “if it doesn’t work, fix it or cut it” was used in order to guide the team andbring them back to the reality that the machine needed to work in the end. This often led tomultiple iterations of step designs and implementations, but as the contest time grew closerseveral steps were cut due to both space constraints and reliability concerns.Finally, testing played an integral role to improving reliability. The mantra “test until it works,and then test
Mechanical Engineering curriculum at a mid-sized midwestern university in the United States. The Linear Axis RDS has a graphical userinterface with three main modes: simulate, emulate, and implement. The objective of thisevaluation was to test the overall effectiveness of the Linear Axis RDS. A combination ofqualitative and quantitative research methods were applied in the evaluation of thirty-fourparticipants from the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at Missouri Universityof Science and Tech. The Technology Acceptance Model, a model that has been usedextensively to study acceptance of technology was used to guide the study. Learning Styles andLearning Outcomes were added to study the learning effects of the system. Eye tracking
integrated within the IPS.I. IntroductionThe most appropriate method of presenting material in an engineering course depends on manyfactors, but two of the main considerations are the intellectual maturity level of the students andthe desired objectives or outcomes of the course. Although students in entry-level mechanicalengineering courses have been through the Calculus and Physics sequence, they are oftenunprepared for the “new thinking” required to solve engineering analysis problems. The processof reading a description of a physical situation, deciding which analytical theory applies,converting the physical situation into a solvable mathematical model, solving the model, andfinally visualizing the forces and motions to evaluate the physical
intercultural education and training, includingpartially unique traditions and approaches in different fields and disciplines [20, Ch. 15-23]. Anumber of papers and reports have also surveyed and described approaches to developing globalcompetency and related outcomes among engineering students and professionals [21-24].While the extant literature on global engineering education has placed considerable emphasis onlearning experiences that involve international travel (e.g., research, work, service, and studyabroad), authors such as Downey et al. describe the “integrated class experience” as a “an at-home effort to initiate students on the path to global competency in ways that fit their standardcurricula” [21, p. 112]. Nonetheless, Grandin &
things – (1) their programsare already filled to the brim with manufacturing topics and (2) that they are not equipped toteach the new enabling technologies of Industry 4.0. Speaking to the first point, two-yearcommunity colleges are under pressure from governing agencies and accreditation bodies toreduce two-year associate degree programs to a uniform sixty-credits [12]. Talk to any facultythat teaches technology and they will tell you that the curriculum of their programs is alreadyeliminating important topics and that the field is evolving in such a manner that there is a distinctneed to add additional topics. Obviously, these two positions are at odds with one another. Butthis has been an ongoing issue for as long as we have been teaching
at engineering schools of the time. Under the WPIPlan, all students are required to complete three projects as degree requirements: a HumanitiesSufficiency, an Interactive Qualifying Project (IQP), and a Major Qualifying Project (MQP).After thirty years, these project-based activities remain the core of the undergraduate curriculum atWPI. The Major Qualifying Project allows students work in teams on real-life projects in thestudents’ major areas of study. The students solve problems typical of those that will beencountered as entry-level professionals. These projects allow students to demonstrate most if not Page 6.364.1
working within the NASA community.The program requires that each team member earn academic credit toward graduation andaccommodates a variety of design sequences taught in institutions of higher learning across theState of Texas: one-semester design, two-semester design, and design and build programs.Team progress is driven by a series of required milestones, called “Levels” and “Option Areas.”By satisfying milestones, a team earns program funding increments to support their project. Theguidelines and rewards attached to each deliverable provide structure to the semester; andmotivation, instruction and funding to the team as projects grow and develop from a preliminaryidea-stage to an acceptable design solution. Peer reviews provided by graduate
); as an upper-division andgraduate level course (primarily to engineers); as an intensive “Intersession” class (8 day and 10day format); and as a short course for faculty. The class is based on a “creative system”,developed by the author, which codifies the techniques she developed over a 30-year managementcareer. The class builds on the NASA Systems Engineering process, which was developed by ateam, led by the author in the early 1990’s1. Many references (see Bibliography for a sample)were used to support the experienced-based course design. While there are numerous coursesavailable in elements of this class (e.g. senior design classes), to the author’s knowledge there areno other classes which integrate all the pieces into an overall process
Paper ID #30571Student Perception of Mathematical Modeling Before and After Completinga Two Joint Robot Computer Simulation Task (RTP)Mrs. Laurel Johnston, Boise State University Laurel Johnston is a master’s student in the STEM Education program at Boise State University. She has over eight years of teaching experience in high school science and mathematics. She enjoys integrating engineering concepts in the classroom to help increase student engagement and understanding.Dr. Noah Salzman, Boise State University Noah Salzman is an Assistant Professor at Boise State University, where he is a member of the Electrical and
the FFT. Because of the placement of the course in the Page 7.58.4 "Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education"curriculum, most of the students have not been formally introduced to the mathematical basis ofeither the Fourier series or the Fourier transform. Therefore, the experiment is performed usingstandard mathematical software and test cases to insure the students are using the softwareappropriately. Therefore, the first part of each semester's experiment involves plotting an knownsinusoidal
Paper ID #12643Renewable Energy Technician Education: Lessons from the German En-ergiewendeMary Slowinski, M.Ed., CREATE NSF-ATE Center Mary Slowinski received her M.Ed. in Learning Science from the University of Washington where she will complete her PhD in the same. She has worked extensively with the National Science Foundation’s Advanced Technological Education program in a variety of consulting capacities including serving as learning coordinator for two international faculty learning projects, participating as an Innovation Coach for a ”scaling-up innovations” project, developing curriculum and learning materials
process was conducted by C#, aprograming language supported in Visual Studio 2019. This platform allows for the deployment of thevirtual app to the HoloLens 2, as shown in Figure 3.6) Preliminary testing results from surveyPreliminary survey testing was completed before implementing the XR labs into an advanced fluid powercourse. Future implementations of the labs will take place during the regular scheduled laboratories in theacademic semester. Two laboratory experiences will be integrated into the course and assessed by obtainingthe students’ perceptions of the XR technology. The overall goal of this research is to improve studentunderstanding of fluid power components and systems by developing immersive visualization tools
Management Review, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 212-218, doi: 10.1109/EMR.2020.2990115. 2020.[12] Axios Events, "The future of transportation in the era of COVID-19," Aug. 28, 2020.Online. Available: https://www.axios.com/axios-event-future-transportation-f12e504d-09da- 4ba9-8f27-b7bbbcd2bce3.html [Accessed March 6, 2021].[13] M. Besterfield-Sacre, J. Gerchak, M. Lyons, L. Shuman, and H. Wolfe, "Scoring concept maps: An integrated rubric for assessing engineering education," J. Engineering Education, 93 (2), 105–115. 2004.[14] R. Valdes-Vasquez, and L. Klotz, "Incorporating the social dimension of sustainability into civil engineering education," J. Prof. Issues in Eng. Educ. Pract., 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943
State-wide multi-college faculty and administration workgroup, with the Arkansas Center for Data Science as the Education & Workforce Development Research Theme for an NSF EPSCoR grant, to develop a consistent and collaborative interdisciplinary multi-college B.S. and Associate degree, and certificate program in Data Science, and leading a team developing a State-wide High School path for Data Science for the Arkansas Department of Education, and he is developing an interdisciplinary multi-college Innovation Curriculum. Dr. Schubert is also a member of the NAMEPA Board of Directors and represents NAMEPA on The Carpentries Equity Council. Before his appointment at the University, in senior-level corporate roles
students enrolled in fall 2015. The followingexamples show how peer review of oral presentations can be adapted to various situations and besubmitted in written, oral, or electronic form. In addition, each instructor asked her students toprovide some feedback on the peer review process, and this information is presented as well.Table 1 provides an overview of the types of peer review used in each context.Table 1: Comparison of Peer Review in Three Engineering Contexts Dedicated Communications Integrated Course Workshop Assignment Feedback written online written/oral Channel Anonymity single-blind single-blind
forward by the formation ofnumerous NSF sponsored Educational Coalitions the Freshman Engineering Design programshave become an integral part of the curriculum. The New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT),as part of the NSF sponsored Gateway Coalition, a consortium of ten engineering institutions,has instituted such a program and developed numerous discipline and interdisciplinary courses.The basic intent of these programs is to move the traditional exposure to design concepts fromsenior year capstone courses into the entire undergraduate curriculum, beginning with enteringfreshmen. The overall objective is to introduce freshmen to the open-ended nature of designproblems, to give students “hands-on” experience, to expose students to teamwork
photochemicaloxidants, sampling only during the summer may be all that is needed. The availability of ahistorical air quality record within the urban area may allow another season to be utilized withdata correlation providing the worst-case conditions. If the objective is to collect data to validatea microscale pollution dispersion model, then conducting a very extensive monitoringinvestigation but having duration of only one week might accomplish this task.5. Choosing an Air Sampling Method: In choosing an air sampling method, one may consider acontinuous air monitoring, integrated grab sampling, intermittent sequential sampling, or acombination of these. The air sampling method chosen depends on the air pollutant to bemeasured, the available utilities at the
-developed an orientation course for first-semester students in the major. She continually looks for ways to enhance student learning, development and career preparedness.Kathryn Kirsch, Pennsylvania State University Kathryn is a post-doctoral researcher in the Steady Thermal Aero Research Turbine (START) Laboratory at Penn State University. In addition to her technical research, Kathryn has been active in the Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate Department, working as the undergraduate curriculum advisor and developing content for undergraduate advising courses.Dr. Eric R Marsh, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Associate Head for Undergraduate Programs and Arthur L Glenn Professor of Engineering EducationDr