and requirements provided. The teams were required to follow and documentthe entire design process, culminating with team presentations of their products to the“customer” and a formal product test with real children was conducted at the museum. Theproject was concluded with a team report and class discussion that provided a forum toexchange ideas and lessons learned during the project. The planning, implementation, andthe results of five semesters of this service learning project are reviewed and analyzed inview of ABET accreditation criteria. Conclusions and suggestions are presented to helpmore schools start using a service learning component in their Introduction to Engineeringcourses.Project GoalsThe primary goal of this project was to
skills set as primary outcomes. Human values, socialaspects of engineering design, and engineering ethics are also discussed within the context of thecourse projects. STEPS is a student’s first exposure to engineering design, occurring in theSophomore year for most. The specific course of this study, STEPS 251 PGEG, is a project-based design course for sophomore level students studying Petroleum Engineering andPetroleum Geosciences. Its purpose is to provide students with an experiential overview of thepetroleum industry through the planning of exploration and development of a local concessionarea. The course is team taught, with 1 Geosciences, 1 Petroleum Engineering, and 1Communication faculty all serving as facilitators and providing input at
ishappening. Page 22.136.5The professor teaching the education students found that it was advisable to run the simulationtwice with different input values. On the first pass, the students focus on learning the conceptsbeing presented and on the second pass they focus on how they could incorporate the game intotheir own syllabi. The education students found the simulation confusing during the first pass,but were more comfortable with it on the second.Based on the results so far, we plan to continue to use this game in course for both majors andnon-majors. It is an activity that students enjoy and that achieves its educational goals.AcknowledgementsThe
statement of its significance, that is, what problem or opportunity the action would address) 3. Background (summarizes what has been done to date that has led to the proposed course of action) 4. Solution or Plan (what would be done? how? where?, methods and procedures, expected outcomes) 5. Qualifications (brief bios of the primary team, establishing their competence to carry out the proposed action) 6. Conclusion or SummaryAppendices: i) Budget (realistic, as complete and detailed as possible, including overhead costs, but also economical, bearing in mind that a proposal may be in competition for funds from other proposals) ii) Schedule (anticipated dates for each stage of the process and its
just a simple connection of capacitor or inductor-capacitor combination.Future assessment activity is planned the next time the lab course is offered to assess and henceverify whether the lab experiment meets the objective of increasing students’ understanding ofpower factor correction circuits, along with their advantages and drawbacks.References1. M.H.L. Chow and C.K. Tse, “Theoretical study of performance of continuous-mode boost converters for power-factor-correction applications,” Proc. 1997 International Conference Power Electronics and Drive Systems, Vol. 2, pp. 590 – 595, 26-29 May 1997.2. C.S. Lin, T.M. Chen, and C.L. Chen, “Analysis of low frequency
, includingimplementations of both the basic lean and supply chain simulations in engineering andmanagement courses. Of these universities, 11 were supported in their first implementation by alean trainer from the management consultant (or in one case, one of the PIs). The remaining 6preferred to implement without additional support; generally, this occurred at universities wheremore than one faculty member attended the workshop and there was ‘built-in’ support. Fourremaining schools are planning implementations in 2009/2010, while we will continue to focuson schools that have already implemented to ensure materials continue to be used and to examinesustainability.Assessing Learning and Evaluating Innovations. To support evaluation of the project, wedeveloped a
learningexperiences. The K-12 students learn to work on teams, acquire the skills to communicatewith team members, lead teams, and work across teams. The students have theopportunity to explore the different career paths and options for higher education inengineering.The Engineering Day is planned to be a regular event for the different engineeringdisciplines at Gannon University to showcase their laboratory facilities and pre-eminentfaculty to students at all levels of the K-12 curriculum. In addition, discipline-specificinteraction between the K-12 STEM students and the engineering faculty are also plannedfor each academic year. Through these events, the partnership between the ABET-accredited engineering programs at Gannon University and the K-12 schools
to Knovel’s success was application of this experience in the development of information products for applied scientists and engineers. Page 15.916.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 New Knovel InterfaceAbstractIn the past year Knovel interface has undergone several facelifts and some more seriouschanges. This paper discusses user centric approach to design and implementation of newgraphic user interface. New features, including Knovel Lab, Data Search, autocomplete,spell checker, browse interface, My Knovel and Knovel Math are discussed. Currentwork and plans for the future
graduated in December 2008, and began work on his master’s degree in January 2009. During the summer of 2009 Josh took an internship with Oak Ridge National Laboratories. Josh joined the Dakota Venture Group in the fall of 2008 and currently holds the position of Vice President of Finance. Josh plans to finish his Master’s of Electrical Engineering in August of 2010.Tessa Haagenson, University of North Dakota Tessa Haagenson is from Leeds, North Dakota. She was awarded a B.S. degree in Environmental Studies from Bemidji State University in 2007, after which she spent a semester abroad as a guest graduate student in an energy studies program in Aalborg, Denmark. Tessa’s additional international
CurriculumThe CIS program required many labs that involved disassembling computers, packet-sniffing,OS installations, drive scanning, and malware behavior testing that our Information TechnologyServices (ITS) department could not support. So, in desperation, we set up what has now evolvedinto our CIS multi-purpose lab supporting ten courses, four to six each semester. In addition, thestudent Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) club wanted to have network game nights,so the CIS lab also fulfills that role. This lab is administered by a faculty member with assistancefrom one or two students. There was a plan to hire an outside part-time administrator, but thiswas not realized due to budget cuts.Hardware ArchitectureThis section describes the
process. The EiE curricula integrateengineering and technology concepts and skills with elementary science lessons. EiE materialsengage students in hands-on, real world engineering experiences that can enliven science lessonsand motivate students to learn concepts by illustrating relevant applications.By the end of the first year of the PISA program, teachers had received in-depth, contentspecific, pedagogical support, 124 hours of continuous professional development, and frequent(monthly) on-site support (coaching, modeling, curriculum alignment, planning) by projectpartners. The production of a STEM Learning Module through collaboration and in-depth/topic-oriented professional development promoted teachers’ pedagogical content
center and its constituent institutions, areauniversities and colleges, non-profit organizations, economic development groups andgovernmental agencies. The University’s College of Technology took the lead to function as acatalyst among cluster stakeholders for the purpose of planning and affecting a visiblecontinuum of education, training and research opportunities. Although the Center was to behoused in the College of Technology its work was to be interdisciplinary involving severalUniversity’s Colleges as well as regional community colleges, other universities, local industry,local agencies, and not-for-profit organizations.There are numerous centers for learning and teaching at universities and colleges around thenation. However very few
laboratories, curriculumchanges to design, engineering and manufacturing classes and in particular the existingapproaches to capstone using antiquated CAx tools couched in single-user architectures.IntroductionThe Boeing model for design and manufacture of a new airplane program is among the mostadvanced aircraft programs in existence. The approach includes a complex database of physicaland functional characteristics, sub-system design/build plans, and other shared information thatsupports the broader project. In the same way that a new design criterion affects the mechanical Page 17.6.4Richey, French, McPherson, Symmonds, Jensen, Winn, Schrage, Cortese
• Emerging Demands of the Profession • Professional Ethics and Human Values • Social and Societal Responsibility • Sustainable Development • Environmental and Ecological Responsibility • Resource Conservation 34 Page 17.7.35 RATIONALE FOR RE-DESIGN OF THE ENGINEERING EDUCATION SYSTEM Perspective Planning: • Manpower Development • Discipline-wise distribution • Regional distribution • Level-wise distribution : Degree / Diploma • Ph.D and P.G. programs • Emerging Thrust Areas 35 Page 17.7.36
Innovations 3 Page 17.29.4 THE EVOLUTION OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC COLLABORATION IN INDIA It is now one of the most significant ingredients ofthe strategic plan of a University and of theUniversity President‟s Agenda . The earlier perceptions or paradigms ofinternational academic collaboration were in terms ofaid, assistance, direct support, grant, donation ofequipment, and secondment of faculty andtechnicians. It was normally valid for a specified duration,sometimes extended for a further period 4 Page 17.29.5Most
in the time allotted, we will discuss anddemonstrate a car with a 3:1 gear ratio and explain that they will need more torque to climb theincline. Once participants have a prototype to test, they will sketch their model on a design sheetand proceed to the ramp for testing. At the ramp, torque will be measured prior to the hill climb.Throughout our presentation, numerous scientific concepts will be discussed including force,friction, torque, simple machines, and gears. Participants will also utilize several math standardsincluding the concept of ratio, ratio language and proportional relationships.Participants will receive a ten-day unit plan with all resources and necessary information indetail. They will also receive all student worksheets
theengineering design process to find a solution to the challenge. The goal is to time the stuntperfectly so that the free falling object nearly misses the CO2 car. Videos of students’ success andfailure will be shown at the end as well as student testimonials of the project. The testimonialswill show a higher level of student engagement and a deeper understanding of quadraticfunctions as a result of the challenge. The engineering design process is stressed during thechallenge to show students a proven method that is used by professionals to tackle challenges orsocietal issues. Students are encouraged at the end of the project to use the process to solve otherreal life problems. Hard copies of lesson plans will be provided to attendees.Authentic
will graduate from The University of Texas at Austin with a Master of Arts inSTEM Education with a special focus on Engineering. WORKSHOP INFORMATIONProposed Title:Hands-On Standards: Using an Engineering Mini-Challenge to “Bundle” StandardsAbstract: Please provide a concise description that includes the workshop’s learning objectives(maximum 750 characters). The abstract is used on the ASEE website, program materials, andother K-12 Workshop promotional activities.Participants of this workshop will engage in activities from a project-based engineeringcurriculum by discussing how a class can plan and carry out an experiment to identify optimalsolutions to a stated engineering problem, analyzing a provided data set
Page 18.24.6learn to share and listen to ideas in a respectful way. Furthermore, the development ofcommunication skills is essential to effective collaboration and group planning.2015-ASEE-K12Workshop-Proposal-RehashYour Trash Page 5 of 7 WORKSHOP PROPOSAL FORM 2015 Annual ASEE K-12 Workshop on Engineering Education “Authentic Engineering: Representing & Emphasizing the E in STEM” Presented by Dassault Systems Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:00 A.M. – 5:00 P.M. Sheraton Seattle | Seattle | WA Finally, ethical
Scratch programming as a central tools, this workshop promotes the use of technology, electrical circuits and programming to develop a sense of creativity and design thinking in kids. In a collaborative effort between the University of Arizona’s Colleges of Education and Engineering and local school districts, a middle school workshop with accompanying lesson plans were designed to help teachers develop the skills and ability Page 18.6.3 necessary to teach innovative engineering and programming inside or outside the classroom. Through hands-on activities, this workshop aims to improve teacher’s abilityCreative
thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, communication, and attention to ethicalconsiderations. This demonstration addresses systems thinking through the need to pre-plan a Page 18.31.5house design based on aesthetic appeal, critical in structural engineering, as well as waterinfrastructure efficiency, critical in civil and environmental engineering, to ensure that the twodo not impede, but rather enhance each other. This demonstration addresses creativity because2015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-Form Page 4 of 7 WORKSHOP PROPOSAL FORM 2015 Annual ASEE K-12 Workshop on Engineering Education
the planned implementation ofnew training programs for the engineering staff, and started to develop is the necessary training andmethodological materials.Prepared are the proposals for the development of similar regional program in the Republic ofTatarstan for the participation of enterprises and organizations in the petrochemical cluster.In the process of implementation of the program some problems were revealed:1. Although the competition was held in March, and financial resources for the implementation ofthe Program were received in a timely manner, the particularity of the operational mode of aneducational institution with its summer vacation period allows enterprises to starting training onlyin September. Accordingly, the internships
. She currently serves as the President of the Purdue Student Chapter of ASEE. Her research interests include engineering thinking, motivation and vocational choice in engineering, and sustainability policy.Russell Long, Purdue University Russell A. Long is Associate Director of MIDFIELD and Director of Project Assessment in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has twenty years experience in institutional research, assessment, strategic planning, and higher education policy. He is a SAS expert and manages the MIDFIELD database.Matthew Ohland, Purdue University Matthew W. Ohland is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University
several NSF grantsaddressing this issue.PERRY DEESS, Ph.D.Perry Deess is the Director of Institutional research and Planning at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. Hisresearch interests include higher education program assessment, evaluating university performance, and the role ofinstitutions in civic engagement. He is currently collaborating with researchers at the University of Washington andthe University of Colorado on an NSF funded, nationwide study of civic engagement.RAYMOND CALLUORI, Ph.D.Dr. Calluori is a Senior Systems Manager for the Office of Institutional Research at the New Jersey Institute ofTechnology, where he conducts survey research and manages the course evaluation program. He has published inthe social sciences as well as
according to the student created plan. He/sheassigns individual tasks and decides what has to be done. He/she is also a liaison to the facultyand staff. The Record Keeper has the responsibility of recording results during the experiment,creates a timetable for the assignment and sets the various deadlines, group meetings and keepstrack of elapsed time during the experiment. The Experimentalist is responsible for executingthe experimental protocol. Although all members will participate in the experiment, theExperimentalist is primarily responsible for ensuring that all necessary equipment and suppliesare available and working. He/she is also required to make sure that all equipment and suppliesare cleaned and put away at the end of the experiment. A
. OurElectrical and Computer Engineering Technology (ECET) program offers five areas ofspecialization and a general plan of study in both AS and BS degree. We decided to have theAssessment Test for the graduating AS degree students. The test incorporates one hundredquestions from the required ECET courses at associate level only. The students are tested in the areas of 1) electrical circuit theory, 2) digital fundamentals, 3)electronic circuit fundamentals, and 4) microprocessor fundamentals. The questions selectedwere based on the learning objectives that are used in each course area. The test is a multiplechoice format so that a Scantron type analysis could be made and gathers statistical informationon students’ performance. Critical thinking and
• Standards, quality assurance and accreditation • Development of curricula, learning and teaching materials and methods • Distance and interactive learning (including virtual universities and libraries) • Development of engineering codes of practice for the international community • Promotion and public understanding of engineering and technology • Development of indicators, information and communication systems for engineering • Addressing gender issues in engineering, science and technology • Inter-university and institutional cooperation • Development of policy and planning to support the aboveThe above items comprise the primary elements of the “Engineering for a Better World
our study (since if we ignored the control, wewould draw the same conclusion). It is also possible that content played a role. For example,engineering ethics taught in the context of the student’s discipline could have a larger impactthan a general engineering ethics course. Since Self and Ellison did not describe the contentof their course, this is speculation on our part.Based on experiences from performing this study, we feel that there are multiple importantcomponents in developing effective engineering ethics curriculum. First, the material shouldinclude discipline-specific content. For example, in Industrial Engineering, coverage ofproduction planning could include the ethical issues around layoffs and outsourcing.Although this may or
Class being taught in theElectrical Engineering Technology Program at the University of Maine. Students learn basicProject Management skills, from Gantt Charts and Critical Path Diagrams to Earned ValueAnalysis and the Plan-Monitor-Control cycle. Intermingled with these, though, are such things aseffective negotiating, team-building methodologies, personnel feedback and face-to-face peerevaluation. Textbook material and traditional classroom lectures are interspersed with off-beatdiscussions, role-playing exercises, team-building games, and analysis of human behavior invarious situations.One key element to teaching these concepts is to set the tone early. During one of the firstclasses, students are told that it is necessary for the professor
planning the physicalarrangement of the classroom, organizing effective groupings, modeling acceptance, fosteringlistening and communication, and encouraging student-to-student interaction. From the firstmeeting with the students, the faculty must create a setting in which it is safe and acceptable todiscuss sensitive issues and to disagree with one another. Positioning the standards andexpectations of respect in the beginning of the term fosters good discussion, both in theclassroom and online. Many courses include group projects or group activities; faculty shouldthink about the arrangement of the room as well as the individual group participants. Bymanipulating group membership to include students who are in several different Kohlbergstages