, pp. 14–29, 2023.[4] E. O. McGee, P. K. Botchway, D. E. Naphan-Kingery, A. J. Brockman, S. Houston, and D. T. White, “Racism camouflaged as impostorism and the impact on Black STEM doctoral students,” Race Ethn. Educ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 487–507, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13613324.2021.1924137.[5] M. L. Miles, A. J. Brockman, and D. E. Naphan-Kingery, “Invalidated identities: The disconfirming effects of racial microaggressions on Black doctoral students in STEM,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1608–1631, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1002/TEA.21646.[6] M. Bahnson et al., “Students’ experiences of discrimination in engineering doctoral education,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Aug. 2022, pp. 1–13.[7] D. R. Jones
, “Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 23, pp. 5964–5969, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613117114.[5] T. Boyd and D. Mitchell, “Black Male Persistence in Spite of Facing Stereotypes in College: A Phenomenological Exploration,” TQR, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3124.[6] K. C. Margot and T. Kettler, “Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review,” IJ STEM Ed, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 2, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2.[7] B. Smith et al., “Faculty Characteristics that Influence Student
. Cooney, L. Russell, and E. Schott, “Engineering Technology Undergraduate Students a Survey of Demographics and Mentoring,” in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019.[35] A. M. Lucietto, and L. A. Russell, “STEM Educators: What They Believe,” Journal of STEM Educators, no. Summer 2018, 2018.[36] J. Y. Yoon, and M. R. Riley, “Grand Challenges for Biological Engineering,” Journal of Biological Engineering, 2009.[37] L. G. Huettel, M. Gustafson, J. C. Nadeau, D. E. Schaad, M. M. Barger, and L. Linnenbrink‐Garcia, “A Grand Challenge-Based Framework for Contextual Learning in Engineering: Impact on Student Outcomes and Motivation.”[38] K. Larsen, and J. Gärdebo, “Retooling Engineering for Social Justice
classroom environments.However, while research trends indicate interest in studying faculty development, there is limitedresearch on faculty motivations specifically, as indicated by a 2019 search that identified 579publications for ‘faculty + development’ but only 87 publications for ‘faculty + motivation’ [24].Understanding faculty motivations for engaging in faculty development programs is essential fordesigning effective faculty development programs that align with faculty interests andinstitutional goals.Despite the recognized importance of CRP, there is limited research on the specific motivationsof engineering faculty to participate in faculty development programs focused on these inclusiveand equitable pedagogical approaches. This paper
] W. C. Lee, D. B.,Knight, A. Godwin, J. L. Hall, and D. Verdín, “Eager: Measuring student support in STEM: Insights from year two,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, June, 2019.[23] L. N. Fleming, S. E. Burris, K. C. Smith, L. B. Bliss, I. N. Moor, and F. Bornmann, Beyond persistence: Graduate school aspirations of Hispanic engineering students at HSIs, in 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN., June, 2014.[24] G. B. Willis, Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Sage Publications., 2004.AppendixBelow are the three main blocks of the survey.BLOCK 1: Undergraduate ExperienceLikert Items (7-Point; Strongly Agree to Strongly
that various forms of technology play in terms of student learning in physics and in engineering. She has been an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) for over 35 years. Dr. Larkin served on the Board of Directors for ASEE from 1997-1999 as Chair of Professional Interest Council (PIC) III and as Vice President of PICs. She has received numerous national and international awards including the ASEE Fellow Award in 2016 and the Distinguished Educator and Service Award from the Physics and Engineer- ing Physics Division in 1998. In January 2014 the Center for Teaching, Research and Learning at AU presented Dr. Larkin with the
fellow, a Sandia Campus Exec- utive fellow, and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research fellow. She was a Churchill Scholar at University of Cambridge where she received an MPhil in engineering, and she has a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. In 2018, ASEE named Dr. LeBlanc one of its ”20 Under 40 High-achieving Researchers and Educators,” and she received the National Science Foundation CAREER award in 2020.Dr. Erica Cusi Wortham, George Washington University Inspired by decades of work alongside Indigenous artists and activists, Dr. Wortham brings a concern for diverse, complex cultural and social contexts to her work at the Innovation Center, SEAS, George Wash- ington
, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)fields despite an increase in the number of women in graduate and professional schools and theundergraduate women population exceeding 50% [15, 47]. For electrical engineering (EE)degree attainment, the numbers are more dismal. In 2017-2018, 14.2% of all bachelor’s degrees;23.5% of master’s degrees; and 17.3% of doctoral degrees were awarded to women in electricalengineering [36]. Percentages for women faculty members in tenure positions parallelpercentages for degree recipients. In a report for the American Society for EngineeringEducation (ASEE), Yoder (2017) found the mean percentage of women tenured/tenure-trackfaculty in all engineering disciplines was 16.9%. That same year, only 14.2% of women facultymembers
where and if there is a problem hinderingtheir enrollment in such programs. Finally, the GEA office also relayed that based on theundergraduate graduating student survey for academic year 2018-2019, 25% of the studentsindicated their intention to apply for graduate studies post their undergraduate, and from thesurvey respondents 58% students maintained a GPA between 3.0-4.0, which reflects theirreadiness and possible eligibility to apply for the 4+1 program during their undergraduatestudies.The research attempts to identify the reasons why students aren’t applying during theirundergraduate career using a mixed research method design to evaluate student’s perception ofthe 4+1 programs. Student’s attitudinal feedback was collected through the
Paper ID #26300Negotiating Identity as a Response to Shame: A Study of Shame within anExperience as a Woman in EngineeringMs. Mackenzie Claire Beckmon, Harding University I am an undergraduate psychology major anticipating graduation in December of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in psychology through attending a graduate program for school or child psychology. It is my hope that these processes can lead to a career as both a researcher and practitioner.Dr. James L. Huff, Harding University Dr
. McDermott, "Assessing the Effectiveness of the GradTrack Virtual Mentoring Program," in Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2023. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--42681[2] K. Atkins, B.M. Dougan, M.S. Dromgold-Sermen, H. Potter, V. Sathy, and A.T. Panter, "“Looking at Myself in the Future”: how mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented groups," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 42, August 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00242-3[3] A. Carpi, D.M. Ronan, H.M. Falconer, and N.H. Lents, “Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students
%202030. (accessed Feb. 26, 2023).[2] D. White, et al. “An innovative hybrid electric drivetrain concept and student project” in Association for Engineering Education - Engineering Library Division Papers, American Society for Engineering Education-ASEE, Honolulu, HI, June 2007, p. 12.212.1–.[3] K. Blair, D. W. Miller, D. Darmofal, C. P. W. Young, & D. Brodeur. Problem Based Learning In Aerospace Engineering Education Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, June 2002, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2—10974[4] “Velis Electro”. Pipistrel Velis Electro. https://www.pipistrel- aircraft.com/products/general-aviation/velis-electro/ (accessed Feb. 6, 2023).[5] “Joby completes second of four system reviews
] Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning: Summary of a Forum. doi: 10.17226/18254.[4] A. Wittig, “Implementing Problem Based Learning through Engineers without Borders Student Projects,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 4, 2013, Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076104[5] S. M. Kusano and A. Johri, “Developing Global Engineering Competency Through Participation in ‘Engineers Without Borders,’” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.500.1-26.500.14. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/developing-global-engineering-competency- through-participation-in
, and R. L. Matz, “Supporting Equitable Team Experiences Using Tandem, an Online Assessment and Learning Tool,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2021, https://peer.asee.org/377872. P. Braveman, “Defining Equity in Health”, Health Policy and Development Journal, col. 2, no. 3, pp. 180-185, December 2004, https://www.jstor.org/stable/255699793. W. J. Jordan, “Defining Equity, Multiple Perspectives to Analyzing the Performance of Diverse Learners”, Review of Research in Education, vol. 34, pp. 142-178, March 2010, http://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X093528984. S. Marginson, “Equity, status and freedom: a note on higher education”, Cambridge Journal of Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 23-36, March 2011, http://doi.org
, "Information technology, its impact on society and its future," in Advances in Computing 4.1, 2014, pp. 25–29.[2] M.J. Quinn, “On teaching computer ethics within a computer science department,” in SCI ENG ETHICS 12, 2006, pp. 335–343, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0032-9.[3] E. Milonas, “How Do We "Raise" Ethically Minded Computer Students?” In Proc. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020, https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-- 34730.[4] C. Lau, "A step forward: Ethics education matters!" In Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 2010, pp. 565–584.[5] A. Barnard, C. de Ridder, L. Pretorius, and E. Cohen, “Integrating computer ethics into the computing curriculum: A framework for implementation,” In Proc
building, and macroethics in science education. She received her PhD in physics at the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2019, where she focused on mastery-style online learning for engineers in a large preparatory physics course. In her postdoctoral work at Texas State University, she co-developed and implemented curricula to engage students in conversations about ethics, science and society, with a research interest in how to best support students and instructors in these conversations. She recently finished a AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellowship at the National Science Foundation, supporting and working with the Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI) Program. She is also an organizer for the
University of Michi- gan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineer, and she has served as Deputy Editor of the Journal for Engineer- ing Education, Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education, and Chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of ASEE. She founded the Center for Research on Learning and Teach- ing in Engineering at U-M in 2003 and served as its Director for 12 years. Prior to joining U-M, Dr. Finelli was the Richard L. Terrell Professor of Excellence in Teaching, founding director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, and Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at
, McCain Boonma, Rachel Fox, Kat Francis, Matt Goffin, and Bala Maheswaran, ASEE-NE Virtual Conference Proceeding 2020 [5] Agnihotri, Nikhil. "Designing an Arduino-based EMG Monitor." Engineers Garage, 7 June 2021, www.engineersgarage.com/arduino-based-emg-monitor-ad8226/. [6] "Just a Moment..." Just a Moment.., www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636220300795. [7] "Physicians: Determining Patient Mobility Needs." Official Hoveround Website | Mobility Solutions from Hoveround, www.hoveround.com/health- professionals/determining-mobility-needs. [8] "Sparkfun/SparkFun_MMA8452Q_Arduino_Library." GitHub, github.com/sparkfun
Profession,” in Proc. Summit on the Future of Civil Engineering, August 2009, doi: 10.1061/9780784478868.002.[2] ASCE, Code of Ethics, 2020. Accessed: July 7th 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.asce.org/career-growth/ethics/code-of-ethics[3] D. E. Armanios et al., “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Civil and Environmental Engineering Education: Social Justice in a Changing Climate,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. Jul. 2021. https://peer.asee.org/36988[4] A.-K. Winkens and C. Leicht-Scholten, “Does engineering education research address resilience and if so, how? – a systematic literature review,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–19, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1080
working on technical training and engineering projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Countries where he has worked include Armenia, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, and Thailand. In addition, he has taught undergraduate and graduate courses in engineering education for the department. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Influence of Role Models on Students’ Interest in STEM (Work-in-Progress)IntroductionSTEM fields drive our nation’s economic growth and competitiveness with new innovativetechnologies [1]. In a projection, it was estimated that from 2019 to 2029 STEM
. He is an author of numerous research papers and presentations in these areas. He has worked on undergrad- uate education research projects sponsored by Northrop Grumman, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin. Dr. Aliyazicioglu is a member of the IEEE, Eta Kappa Nu, Tau Beta Pi, and ASEE. Aliyazicioglu is faculty advisor for the student chapter of the IEEE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Sensor Fusion Algorithms and Tracking for Autonomous Systems Abstract This paper discusses the results and experiences of an undergraduate senior project sponsored by an industry. The project focused on applying sensor fusion and localization algorithms to generate highly reliable and accurate
andOrganizational Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1-17, Mar. 2014.[12] B. French, J. Immekus, and W. Oakes, “An Examination of Indicators of EngineeringStudents’ Success and Persistence,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 419-425, Jan. 2013. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00869.x[13] R.K. Hackett, G.R. Martin, and D.P. Rosselli, “Factors Related to Performance Ratings ofEngineering Students in Cooperative Education Placements,” Journal of Engineering Education,vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 455-458, Jan. 2013. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00379.x[14] E. Marquez and S. Garcia Jr., “Finding Balance: Examining the Impact of Grades onEngineering Students Well-Being,” 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2020.Paper ID: 29969.[15] E
’ Funds of Knowledge Related to Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 278–311, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20117[6] Winchester, III, WW, "Engaging the Black Ethos: Afrofuturism as a Design Lens for Inclusive Technological Innovation" Journal of Futures Studies, 24(2), 55–62, 2019.[7] L. K. Murray, J. Ekong, S. A. Niknam, and M. J. Rust, “A Framework for ImplementingDesign for Additive Manufacturing Methods in First-Year Engineering Curriculum:Investigating the effects of specialized training on engineering design and student self-efficacy,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2022.Appendix 1 Metric 4 3 2
of theprogram that can be enhanced, but overall the program is meeting goals and objectives.references[1] L. Calian, R. M. Marra, L. R. Lattuca, K. L. Piacentini, and D. B. Knight, “Programs andPractices Making a Difference: A Cross-Case Analysis Identifying Programs and Factors thatInfluence Recruitment and Retention of Women Engineering Students,” 2011 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/18954[2] L. C. Trautvetter, “Institutional Practices and Policies for Recruiting and SupportingUndergraduate Women in Engineering Across Four-Year Institutions,” New Directions forInstitutional Research 2018 (179), pp. 91-114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20277[3] Darling-Hammond, Linda, Molly B. Zielezinski, and Shelley
Unleashed website:https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/2403 [6]. The card provided the instructional materialmentioned within the paper including the full assignment write ups, examples of student work,instructor notes, rubrics, and an hour-long video presentation of the materials. All of thesematerials can be freely downloaded, modified, and used.Resources[1] “KEEN - Home,” KEEN - Home. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/.[Accessed: 06-Mar-2021].[2] KEEN - The Framework. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/framework.[Accessed: 08-Mar-2021].[3] J. B. Hylton, D. Mikesell, J.-D. Yoder, and H. LeBlanc. (2019) “Working to Instill theEntrepreneurial Mindset Across the Curriculum,” Entrepreneurship Education and
Virtual Instrumentation (REV) and served as a special session committee member for the Experiment@ International Conference Series (exp.at). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021BYOE: Creating the STAND: Sensors and Transducers Active eNgineering Design-bench. ASEE 2021 – DELROS Division – BYOE SessionAuthor Information: Mark Trudgen, PhD Dominik May, PhD Robert Oliver Zanone Lecturer, School of Electrical Assistant Professor, Student, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Engineering Education and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering Transformations
Paper ID #34082Engineering Virtual Design Competition – A Solution for High SchoolSummer Outreach During the Pandemic and Beyond (Evaluation)Ms. J. Jill Rogers, The University of Arizona J. Jill Rogers is the assistant director for ENGR 102 HS at the University of Arizona. ENGR 102 HS is an AP-type, dual credit college level, introductory engineering course offered to high school students. In 2014, the ENGR 102 HS program won the ASEE best practices in K-12 and University partnerships award. Over the years Rogers has developed K-12 science summer camps, conducted K-12 educational re- search, developed engineering