Asee peer logo
Displaying results 2011 - 2040 of 8077 in total
Conference Session
Reviewing Emergent Topics and Theory in Engineering Education
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yi Cao, Virginia Tech; Qin Zhu, Virginia Tech; Jennifer M. Case, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
, interviews, self-reflection, and peer assessment [22] are common and valuable approaches to assessingindividuals' teamwork performance. Critical Team Behaviors Form (CTBF) measures teamworkskills in tactical decision-making teams, in which the critical skill dimensions and behaviorsmust be identified and presented in reports. Multiple raters strive for consistency in theirjudgments on assessment reports (David Kraus). Furthermore, the format for the measurementmethodology must be readily understandable and usable [20]. Teamwork assessment tools usedin engineering education have also been studied in the existing literature, for example, self-reflections [23], peer assessment [24], e-portfolio [25], online assessment tools [26].3.2 Methodological
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: Pedagogy I - Best Teaching Practices
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Patrick Alan Linford, U.S. Military Academy; James E. Bluman, U.S. Military Academy; Gregory Martin Freisinger, U.S. Military Academy; John R. Rogers, U.S. Military Academy; Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
, writing vsworked problems, etc.) has had mixed resulted in the literature[6], [7], [16], [17], [8]–[15]. Whenhomework has been used effectively, it typically required a grade[18], self or peer review[19] anduses metacognitive tools[1], [20]. Chickering and Gamson established seven principles for goodpractice in undergraduate education[21]. This study directly follows one (give prompt feedback)and indirectly supports three of the principles (develop cooperation among students, encouragesactive learning, and communicates high expectations).Homework facilitates learning and it can also be used to assess learning. Students can demonstratetheir mastery of concepts, while self-study allows them to apply knowledge in new ways onproblem sets. The
Conference Session
Online Programs and Program Assessment
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Audeen W. Fentiman, Purdue University; Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University; Rene Alexander Soto Perez, Purdue University; Ruth A. Streveler, Purdue University; Michael C. Loui, Purdue University; Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
design a curriculum and guides them through the process of developing a course in their field. • ENE 685 Engineering Education Methods (3 credit hours), provides students with a variety of techniques for teaching courses that are both engaging and effective. • ENE 687 Mentored Teaching in Engineering (1 credit hour), enables students to deepen their understanding of teaching and learning through feedback and reflection as they perform their regularly assigned teaching duties. • ENE 695 Succeeding as an Engineering Professor (3 credit hours), covers other skills valuable to faculty members such as writing proposals, selecting and mentoring graduate students, and managing projects.All four courses
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Technical Session 4: The Best of the All: FPD Best Papers
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christina H Paguyo, Colorado State University; Rebecca A Atadero, Colorado State University; Karen E Rambo-Hernandez, West Virginia University; Jennifer Francis, West Virginia University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Paper ID #12401Creating Inclusive Environments in First-Year Engineering Classes to Sup-port Student Retention and LearningDr. Christina H Paguyo, Colorado State University Christina H. Paguyo, PhD, is a postdoctoral fellow in the College of Engineering at Colorado State Uni- versity. Her research interests focus on mixed methods approaches for designing and examining educa- tional environments grounded in research, theory, and equity. She has co-authored peer-reviewed articles published in the Peabody Journal of Education and the Encyclopedia of Diversity in Education.Dr. Rebecca A Atadero, Colorado State University
Conference Session
Identity and Culture
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida; Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, University of Florida; David J. Therriault, University of Florida; Christine S. Lee, University of Florida; Nathan McNeill, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
top three I-statements. Next, we developed eachparticipant’s identities and associated characteristics based on the dominant motifs and I-statements found in the interviews. Finally, Discourses that influenced the identities that emergedfrom each participant’s interview were identified in order to draw connections to widerinfluences in the social and political landscape.From this analysis process, six Discourses were identified: pedagogical, economic,individualistic, peer collaboration, math, and research. Pedagogical Discourses were the mostfrequent in students’ interviews (excluding discourses directly related to solving the problems).Many of the Discourses highlighted the practices, expectations, and language uses associatedwith being a
Conference Session
Sustainability
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Justin L. Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sarah Aileen Brownell, Rochester Institute of Technology; Alexander T. Dale, Engineers for a Sustainable World
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Multidisciplinary Engineering
. Students were prompted to complete the activity with the following set ofinstructions: 1. Get a blank piece of paper, a writing instrument, and write and circle ‘Sustainability’ in the center of the paper. 2. The general form of your map should be a series of connected bubbles, with the ‘Sustainability’ bubble at the center. These bubbles do not have to be strictly hierarchical, and can include anything from words to phrases to images. They can be nested if that fits your understanding of concepts. Don’t try to put too much into any single bubble. You can label connecting lines (often with words describing the relationship) though you do not have to. You should not consult outside sources or others’ maps during
Conference Session
Mathematics and Material Science
Collection
ASEE Southeast Section Conference
Authors
Rebekah L Martin, Virginia Military Institute; Charles D Newhouse P.E., Virginia Military Institute; Matthew K Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute; Kacie Caple D'Alessandro, Virginia Military Institute
Tagged Topics
Professional Engineering Education Papers
and WestVirginia require students to complete three or four math courses, but those course selections canvary.KeywordsMath, College Preparation, High School Diploma, Civil Engineering, Tutoring, RetentionIntroductionCivil engineering is built upon a core set of mathematics, science, and humanities topics.Incoming students are expected to have a level of base knowledge acquired prior to matriculatinginto a civil engineering program. How they obtain this knowledge is unique to every student dueto the vast number of options to gain secondary education and prepare for college. In manycases, the depth of this knowledge varies greatly, especially in mathematics, science, and writing. © American Society for Engineering
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 8
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cecelia M. Wigal, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
not necessarily result in all students completing the required activities. Some students takeon little responsibility for the team activity and depend on their peers to complete the work.Since it is a team activity, these students benefit academically from their peers’ efforts thoughtheir new knowledge is limited. Thus, assessing the outcomes of team projects may noteffectively measure individual student learning.This study addresses one means to increase the responsibility, and thus learning, of individualteam members when completing a team-based project. It reports on an intervention the courseinstructor made to increase individual contribution to a team design project and theintervention’s result on student learning and contribution
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 6: Mentors & Teams
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ingrid Paredes, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Kaz Burns; Jack Bringardner, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Rui Li, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Ameya Palav; Elena Rose Hume; Victoria Bill, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Chris Woods, NYU
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
Teaching AssistantsAbstractThis complete experience-based practice paper describes the ongoing development of diversity,equity, and inclusion (DEI) training for undergraduate engineering teaching assistants in a first-year, team project-based design course. At a large private university, undergraduate teachingassistants play a key role in first-year student success and the mentorship of their cornerstonedesign project. As the first points of reference for students, they assist with content delivery,guide students through hands-on labs and projects, and deliver regular feedback on assignments.Effective teaching assistants are leaders, thus their training as educators is essential to our first-year students’ success. To support this endeavor, peer
Collection
2022 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Kathleen M. Hill, Pennsylvania State University; Somayeh Asadi, Penn State ; Matthew M Johnson, Pennsylvania State University; Tiffany M. Lewis
:  Practices1 – List and describe:  Practices1 – List and describe:                Assessment Strategies: Describe the ways in which students will express, clarify, justify, interpret, and represent (text, drawing, diagrams,  presentations, etc…) their ideas and respond to peer and teacher feedback.       Research Question 1.2 ‐  Approach 1.2.1 ‐   Approach 1.2.2 ‐  Approach 1.2.3 ‐          Materials:  Materials:  Materials
Conference Session
Assessing, Expanding, and Innovating Information Literacy
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Amber Janssen, California State University Maritime Academy; William W. Tsai, California State University Maritime Academy
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Libraries
completed by both a testand control group. They found the faceted taxonomy was useful for categorizing the sourcesused for the assignment, understanding the assignment was geared toward online sources and hadno requirement to use scholarly sources. For this pilot study, 30 bibliographies were scored.Rosenzweig, Thill, and Lambert [7] adapted the same faceted taxonomy to assess researchpapers in an English writing course. Their goal was to better understand the sources selected bystudents and how they determined authority. They chose to use only the facets for authoridentity, editorial process, and publication purpose. They did not use the numerical scores usedby Leeder, Markey, and Yakel [6] instead taking a more descriptive approach. They scored
Conference Session
Undergraduate Track - Technical Session V
Collection
2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
Authors
J. Sonnenberg-Klein, Georgia Institute of Technology; Edward J. Coyle, Georgia Institute of Technology; Randal T. Abler, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Undergraduate Education
education, wireless and sensor networks, and signal and information processing.Dr. Randal T Abler, Georgia Institute of Technology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Diversity and Student Persistence in the Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) Course SequenceAbstractWhile historically underserved students derive differentially greater benefits from participationin research with faculty, they engage in the activity at lower rates than their peers. In contrast tothe national trend, the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program at the Georgia Institute ofTechnology enrolls representative proportions of Black/African American students andHispanic/Latino students with
Collection
1996 Annual Conference
Authors
R. H. Parsons; S.J. Steiner; K C Dee; G. Judd
subject• show that they care about their students• make efforts to be available for extra help• review course material with the students before exams/finalsSome relevant quotes from the surveys: "He writes summaries of the material covered and then e-mails them to us. His summaries explain the material very well." "She explains what Professor ---- attempts to teach." "He gets to know all the students well. It makes for a comfortable atmosphere where questions are easy to ask." "She is the only reason I am passing the course."The "worst" TAs:• were not approachable• were short-tempered• ran recitations which the students considered "not helpful"• were not prepared for class• got "annoyed" when
Conference Session
Pre-college: Summer Experiences for Students and Teachers (1)
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sharnnia Artis, University of California, Irvine; Gregory N. Washington, University of California, Irvine
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
/coding, computer aided design, laser cutting, and 3D printing. Through ASPIRE,students are able to engage with their peers, form networks, and gain a sense of community. Inthe past two summers, 41 students have participated in the program. This paper provides detailson the design and evaluation of the ASPIRE program.IntroductionThe STEM “pipeline” that is imagined to guide Science Technology Engineering and Math(STEM) students from middle school into successful STEM careers has sprung leaks atessentially every junction. In its most common configuration, it implies a single path that oftenrequires students to develop an interest in STEM by middle school, choose particular math andscience courses in middle- and high-school, and gain experience and
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William J. Palm IV, Roger Williams University; Nicole Martino, Roger Williams University; Benjamin D McPheron, Roger Williams University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
Construction Management, and offers a B.S.in Engineering with specializations in Mechanical, Civil, Electrical, and Computer Engineering.Students may also define a custom specialization. In 2012, when the STILAS grant was awarded,women constituted 12% of the graduating engineering class, while underrepresented minoritystudents constituted 4%. As of this writing, approximately 18% of engineering students arewomen, and 8% are underrepresented minorities.Description of the STILAS ProgramThe original intent of the STILAS program was to build on the university’s existing InterculturalLeadership Ambassadors (ILA) program to support more STEM students. Started in 2007, the ILAprogram works to recruit and retain underrepresented and first-generation students
Conference Session
Student Success III: Affect and Attitudes
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Paul M. Yanik, Western Carolina University; Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University; Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University; Chip W. Ferguson, Western Carolina University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
debt and finding a job. As a cohort, the studentsparticipated in periodic vertically-integrated discussion groups with faculty mentors and theirpeers at multiple levels of seniority, and were introduced to university resources designed toaddress specific student needs. Results of a follow-on survey suggested that peer-to-peerdiscussions can be useful in alleviating anxiety on particular topics. It was also observed that theinteractions facilitated by these group discussions are helpful in developing a sense ofcommunity and shared enthusiasm among the cohort.Keywords: Engineering student anxiety, Remediation1. IntroductionSources of anxiety among engineering and engineering technology students may stem from bothacademic and non-academic demands
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Entrepreneurship Education in New Contexts
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mark M. Budnik, Valparaiso University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
there is no consensus at this stage, it is agreed that innovation isthe key and engineering is essential to this task….”Of the identified soft skills, engineering students are often most challenged to develop and honetheir skills in creativity and innovation. For engineers, creativity may be defined as developingnovel and original ideas with emphasis on their applicability to solving problems2, 3. This Page 26.748.2definition of creativity is more specific for engineering students than for students in other majors(i.e. art, music, creative writing, theater, etc.). For engineers to exercise creativity within theirdiscipline, they must emphasize
Conference Session
Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 1: Instructional
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Scott R. Bartholomew, Purdue University; Patrick E. Connolly, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Design Graphics
techniques in academic areassuch as writing/composition, science education, and geography instruction. The areas of designand technology have proven to be especially effective topics for ACJ assessment, and are ofspecial interest to the authors.This introductory paper examines the fundamental principles of comparative judging andadaptive comparative judging, and discusses some of the most recent and relevant research onthis topic. Key web-based ACJ tools and products are briefly reviewed—especially as they relateto academic settings. Applications in the areas of portfolio evaluation, graphics assessment, andpeer critiquing are also explored.Adaptive comparative judging has proven to be a method or assessment tool that is relativelystraightforward to
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Paul Stanfield, North Carolina A&T State University; Caroline Moineau, North Carolina A&T State University; Shona Morgan, North Carolina A&T State University; Silvanus Udoka, North Carolina A&T State University
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
business. ALIVE provides a practical and consistentmeans of developing realistic problem solving skills in engineering and business studentsreaching a variety of learning styles.Student assessment within the ALIVE system is achieved through an authentic assessmentprocess. The process uses instructor, industry, and student/peer feedback according to the sixlevels of authentic assessment: Basic Knowledge, Inquiry, Explanation, Problem-solving,Representation of Knowledge, and Metacognition. Rubrics are developed for each evaluationsource to encourage development of skills relevant to practice throughout the curriculum. Ascoring mechanism is described to alleviate the tension in student peer assessment betweenloyalty and honesty. Though this paper
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Douglas Coffin; Catherine Almquist; Amit Shukla; Michael Bailey-Van Kuren; James Kiper; Christine Noble
intellectual standards andenrich campus intellectual and cultural life for first-year Miami students. To do this, studentsmust be challenged to deepen learning in their courses, in their professions, and in all facets oftheir lives. The resulting student goals to meet this mission are: Invest considerable time in your own and your peers’ academic learning. Identify your educational goals, and make purposeful choices about your major, courses Page 9.769.2 and extracurricular experiences to advance those goals. “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Conference Session
Pedagogical Issues in Computing
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Perry Samson, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
.," Laptops in psychology: Conducting flexible in-class research and writing laboratories", New directions for teaching and learning Vol. 2005, No. 101, 2005, pp. 15-26.16 Fitch, J.," Student feedback in the college classroom: A technology solution", Educational Technology Research and Development Vol. 52, No. 1, 2004, pp. 71-77.17 Mazur, E., Peer Instruction: a user’s manual, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.18 Crouch, C.H., and E. Mazur," Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results", A merican Journal of Physics Vol. 69, 2001, pp. 970-977.19 Hake, R.R., "Design-Based Research in Physics Education Research: A Review", Handbook of Design Research Methods in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education: Erlbaum
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division - Integration of Engineering and/or Technical Rigor with Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Justice (DEIJ)
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Manish Roy, University of Connecticut; Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut; Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut
thantheir peers without ADHD [15].1.2 Strengths-based approachThe work of the project is anchored by a strengths-based approach toward teaching and learningin general, and neurodiversity in particular. The literature related to strengths-based educationsuggests that incorporation of student strengths into the learning environment may enhancestudent engagement and motivation [16], [17]. For neurodivergent students, such as those withADHD, who may struggle to maintain interest and motivation within the traditional classroom, astrengths-based approach may be particularly impactful. Schreiner [18] writes that “strengths-oriented teaching recognizes the talents students bring to the learning environment and usesthose talents as the foundation for
Conference Session
Energy Conversion, Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE) Technical Session 2
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University; Dylan Brady Wolter, Northeastern University ; Julia Ariano; Gabriella Marie Green
Tagged Divisions
Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE), Energy Conversion
, such as the final project,were vital to our learning as engineering students. Specifically, the way our professor taught thecourse was rated either on par or higher than the department and university mean in theeffectiveness of instruction. Along with the 5-point scale, students were also able to leaveanonymous feedback about their opinions of the course. A response from one of our peers sumsup our views on the course by saying, “If you devote the time and energy to [our professor’s]class[,] it is extremely rewarding as you will come out with coding experience, 3D modeling, aswell as tangible products and technical writing.”The course also helped us with our time management skills. One of our peers said, “He [ourprofessor] has a strong focus
Conference Session
FPD6 - First Year Curricula Development
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gregory Wight, Norwich University; R. Danner Friend, Norwich University; Jacques Beneat, Norwich University; William Barry, Norwich University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
design process Page 13.1009.2through project-based instruction with a blend of technical skills and non-technical or so-called“soft” skills. At the time of the writing of this paper, the first semester course, EG109, had beencompleted, and EG110 had just begun. The objective of this paper is to describe thedevelopment, design, and first year implementation of the course.After six years of discipline-specific freshman engineering courses for Civil Engineering,Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Engineering majors, it was decided that all Engineeringand Construction Management majors would share the same curriculum during their freshmanyear. The
Conference Session
ET Pedagogy I
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mohammad Moin Uddin P.E., East Tennessee State University; Peter D. Rogers, Georgia Southern University; Christopher David Leblanc, University of New Hampshire; Keith V. Johnson, East Tennessee State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
various pedagogical techniques that a facultymember employs to connect and teach students. The traditional teacher-centered pedagogy isassociated with top down, hierarchal pedagogy that reinforces passive learning, rolememorization, and hinders the development of higher level cognitive skills ( (Duckworth, 2009;Cristillo, 2010). On the other hand, student-centered pedagogical strategies which promotekeeping students actively thinking, writing, comparing, and applying new knowledge result indeep learning and better student performance (Weimer, 2002; Wohlfarth, et al., 2008). In ameta-analysis of 119 studies, across grades K-20, Cornelius-White, found that learner-centeredvariables such as non-directive verbal interactions, incorporation of higher
Conference Session
Reimagining Engineering Information Literacy: Novel Perspectives on Integration, Assessment, Competencies & Information Use
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Farshid Zabihian, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Mary L. Strife, West Virginia University; Marian G. Armour-Gemmen, West Virginia University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Libraries
Paper ID #12574Integration of Information Literacy Skills to Mechanical Engineering Cap-stone ProjectsDr. Farshid Zabihian, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Farshid Zabihian, Ph.D., P.Eng. Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering West Virginia University Institute of Technology Education: Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering,Ryerson University, 2011 M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, 1998 B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Amir Kabir University of Technology, 1996 Authored or coauthored more than 70 papers in Journals and peer-reviewed conferences.Ms. Mary L
Collection
2000 Annual Conference
Authors
Rhett J. Allain; Jeff Saul; Duane L. Deardorff; David S. Abbott; Robert J. Beichner
peers 88% of the time.During the spring semester, the SCALE-UP students had higher scores 69% of the time. Ingeneral, when the traditional students did better, the problems tended to be one-step problemslike simple unit conversions and the performance differences were smaller.In addition, the students in both the first and second semester SCALE-UP classes performed wellon qualitative and complex quantitative problems. The students learned to reason qualitativelyand to write short essays using physics concepts without calculations. In general, theydemonstrated a high level of understanding. The SCALE-UP students’ performance on all threetypes of exam problems suggests a better understanding of the main concepts
Conference Session
Capstone Projects and Experiential Learning
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chad M. Laux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Abram Walton, Ph.D., Purdue University; Amy S. Van Epps, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kimberly Marie Deranek, Nova Southeastern University; Darrel L. Sandall, Purdue University; Rick L. Homkes, Purdue University; Sarah E. Leach, Purdue University, Statewide Technology
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
. Page 22.735.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 In addition to his client focused efforts, Darrel has authored numerous peer refereed publications, scien- tific and technical reports, and white papers. Darrel holds a Ph.D. from Texas A&M University in Human Resource Development, a M.S. from the University of Illinois in Human Resource Development, and B.S. in Agricultural Leadership and Education from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Rick L. Homkes, Purdue UniversitySarah E. Leach, Purdue University, Statewide Technology Sarah Leach is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology. She is a registered pro- fessional engineer with over 15 years of
Conference Session
Pre-College: Fundamental Research in Engineering Education (1)
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Jill Marshall, University of Texas, Austin; Ara Winter, University of New Mexico, Department of Biology; Yang Liu, University of New Mexico, Department of Organization, Information, and Learning Sciences
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
approach to teaching engineering inother commonly taught K-12 disciplines [18-20]. Another common argument is that engineeringskills should now be considered for all students, much as reading, writing and mathematics [21,22], and this is sometimes positioned as an early recruitment tool, with the idea that studentsmust be recruited prior to losing interest in STEM.Figure 1. A synthesis of common high level motivations for, desired outcomes of, barriers to,strategies for, and measures of K-12 engineering education.This paper synthesizes literature on formal and informal engineering education in K-12 settings.Specifically, we focus on outcomes related to (1) developing interest and/or identities inengineering, including in (2) engineering careers
Conference Session
Software Engineering Division (SWED) Technical Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa Milkowki, Seattle University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Software Engineering Division (SWED)
and presentations,with the possibility of incorporating peer evaluations in the future. The course's inclusivity,accessibility, and ability to support diverse learners were evaluated by analyzing the courseevaluations. Figure 2 presents the course evaluation responses from students. Course completionrates and enrollment trends will be examined once enough students have participated. Figure 2: Course evaluation responses of the studentsConclusionAt the time of writing, the number of students surveyed was limited, and observations are noteduntil more data is collected from a larger sample size.1) The course's ability to motivate students and foster interest in robotics programming wasevident.2) The real-life examples presented during the