]. Lloyd [19] also demonstrated that local knowledge (i.e., water quality, ruralpractices), parental employment skills, and community knowledge can make science learningmore relevant to rural children. Although this study did not specifically address rural children'sfunds of knowledge, Wilson-Lopez et al.’s [20] examined engineering-related funds ofknowledge. Their research highlighted how everyday skills and expertise, acquired throughfamilial, community, and recreational practices, facilitated the development of teamwork,systems thinking, ethical reasoning, and scientific and mathematical knowledge, which areessential for engaging in the engineering design process. While a growing body of literaturesuggests that funds of knowledge gained from
Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah: ASEE Conferences, 2018, p. 29935.[6] L. Malcom-Piqueux, "Transformation in the U.S. Higher Education System: Implications for Racial Equity," 2020.[7] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998.[8] S. U. Smith, S. Hayes, and P. Shea, "A Critical Review of the Use of Wenger’s Community of Practice (CoP) Theoretical Framework in Online and Blended Learning Research, 2000-2014," Online Learning Journal (OLJ), vol. 21, no. 1, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.963.[9] S. R. Rosas, "Group concept mapping methodology: toward an epistemology of group conceptualization, complexity, and emergence
watch out for with respect to accuracy, assumptions, and extrapolation) 3.6 Transport: Describe and give examples of the three modes of transport 3.5 Thermo: Calculate changes in thermodynamic properties using the first and second laws of thermodynamics in conjunction with equations of state or departure functions 3.5 Math Methods: Apply parametric (t statistics) and nonparametric (U statistic; K-S statistic) tests to determine when significant differences exist between two or more sets of data. 3.4 Safety: Assess the safety of a laboratory operation.3.3 Survey analysis of non-core learning objectivesWe created and
) whether the students andfaculty perceived the teaching methods of the courses to be the same, and 2) which method(s) thestudents preferred in each course and across all courses.Surveys to compare teaching methods have been widely published, but this study compared thesame cohort subjected to three different methods in the same semester. For an example of theliterature, in a survey of students and faculty of science courses, the faculty averaged across thecollege thought they used active learning more than the students did [1]. When the data werebroken down by department, the students and faculty agreed about the amount of active learningincluded except for geology courses. Students in that study listed problem-solving as their mostpreferred
approved bythe IRB under protocol IRB0148096 Table 1: Participant list and their genders for the semi-structured interviews. Pseudonym Gender Zahir Man Vanessa Woman Jonathan Man Emma Nonbinary Grace Woman Penelope WomanPositionality StatementsAuthor 1 has an undergraduate and master’s degree in chemical engineering. He was notinvolved with the course until the data analysis began after the course’s conclusion. This wasAuthor 1’s first experience with course redesign
they advance through the curriculum.References[1] Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE), AASHECampus Sustainability Hub, https://hub.aashe.org/browse/types/academicprogram/#charts-panel,2023, accessed 9 January 2025.[2] Crofton, Fiona S. “Educating for sustainability: opportunities in undergraduate engineering.”Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 397-405, 2000.[3] AIChE. “The Global Home of Chemical Engineers.” https://www.aiche.org/. Accessed 4January 2025.[4] AIChE Institute for Sustainability. https://www.aiche.org/ifs/. Accessed 5 January 2025.[5] AIChE Sustainable Engineering Forum. https://www.aiche.org/community/sites/divisions-forums/sustainable-engineering-forum-sef. Accessed 4
(2004),” Oct. 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026240727851.[11]“Understanding Technology Development - Lall - 1993 - Development and Change - Wiley Online Library.” Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1993.tb00502.x[12]J. B. Powers, “Commercializing Academic Research: Resource Effects on Performance of University Technology Transfer,” J. High. Educ., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 26–50, 2003.[13]S. Slaughter and L. L. Leslie, Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2715 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218-4319 ($39, 1997.[14]NSF, “Invention, Knowledge Transfer, and Innovation
Intelligence”, Journal ofTransformative Learning, 10(2), 92-103.[4] C. Ka Yuk Chan, W. Hu. (2023).” Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits,and challenges in higher education.” International Journal of Educational Technology in HigherEducation. Cham: Springer International Publishing.[5] R. E. Cummings, S. M. Monroe, & M. Watkins (2024). Generative AI in first-year writing:An early analysis of affordances, limitations, and a framework for the future. Computers andComposition, 71, 102827.[6] A. Hill Duin, et al., (2023). “Stronger Relationships, Stronger Programs: Asserting Expertisefor a Generative AI Landscape.” Council of Professional, Technical, and ScientificCommunication, Annual Conference. Charleston, SC (September 23).[7] A
, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Penguin Books Limited, 2017.[2] C. Ferreira, B. Gabriel, R. Valente, and C. Figueiredo, "Engineering education challenges andstrengths: Reflecting on key-stakeholder's perspectives," Frontiers in Education, vol. 9, p. 1297267, Jun.2024.[3] E. Sazonov and M. R. Neuman, Wearable Sensors: Fundamentals, Implementation and Applications.San Diego, CA: Elsevier, 2014.[4] K. Hartman, Make: Wearable Electronics. Design, Prototype, and Wear Your Own InteractiveGarments. Sebastopol, CA: MakerMedia, 2014.[5] M. Nasir, E. G. Meyer, “Entrepreneurship in Small Doses,” presented at the VentureWell OpenConference, Washington, DC, 2015.[6] K. T. Ulrich and S. D. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, 5th ed. New York
, 2017. [9] Tony Wright and Susan Hamilton. Assessing student understanding in the molecular life sciences using a concept inventory. ATN Assessment, 2008.[10] Margherita Bernabei, Silvia Colabianchi, Andrea Falegnami, and Francesco Costantino. Students’ use of large language models in engineering education: A case study on technology acceptance, perceptions, efficacy, and detection chances. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5:100172, 2023.[11] Vassilka D Kirova, Cyril S Ku, Joseph R Laracy, and Thomas J Marlowe. Software engineering education must adapt and evolve for an llm environment. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, pages 666–672, 2024.[12] Marian Daun
psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry," Frontiers Psychology, vol. 15, 2024.[2] L. H. Malinin, "How radical is embodied creativity? Implications of 4E approaches for creativity research and teaching.," Frontiers in Psychology, p. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02372, 2019.[3] R. M. Brooks and S. Shinde, "Unlocking the Creativity Potential," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020, June.[4] M. Rhodes, An analysis of creativity, Phi Delta Kappan, 1961.[5] J. C. Kaufman, Creativity 101, Newyork: Springer, 2016.[6] D. &. C. A. J. Cropley, "Recognizing and fostering creativity in technological design education.," International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol
partnerships, arange of challenges can arise. When obstacles arise, additional support is often needed. Manyinstructors from the No-COIL and COIL+ programs felt fully supported in their in-house andinternational partnerships. However, both groups also emphasized the need for more consistentcommunication. This relates to [11]’s literature communication is key from all parties involved tohave a successful program. A few instructors from each group offered recommendations toimprove the program and address these barriers. These findings may be attributed to the varyingexperience levels among instructors. Challenges may arise from managing global collaborationswith students and international partners.Teaching Global Learning Exchange (GLE)/Virtual Global
the modern workforce,bridge the skills gap, and drive innovation in advanced manufacturing and related industries.AcknowledgementThis project was funded through the National Science Foundation (NSF)’s Research Experiencesfor Teachers (RET) Program. Award # 2206952.References 1. Smith, J. A., & Smith, L. B. (2021). Robotics in Education: A Review of Recent Literature. Journal of Educational Robotics, 6(2), 45-60. 2. Johnson, M., Taylor, P., & Williams, B. (2021). Robotics and Automation in the Classroom: Preparing Students for Industry 4.0. Journal of STEM Education, 22(4), 1-12. 3. Taylor, A., & Hall, R. (2022). Integrating Automation and Robotics into STEM Education. Journal of Technology Education, 33(2), 4
Paper ID #45924How well are EAC-ABET Accredited Civil Engineering Programs PreparingGraduates for the PE Exam?Dr. Matthew K Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He then earned his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech followed by research work at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center on concrete bridges. He is currently a professor of civil engineering and the Jackson-Hope Chair in Engineering at VMI. He teaches
] Nauta, M. and Epperson, D. (2003). A longitudinal examination of the social-cognitivemodel applied to high school girls' choices of nontraditional college[14] U. Nguyen, T. Russo‐Tait, C. Riegle‐Crumb, and K. Doerr, “Changing the gendered statusquo in engineering? The encouraging and discouraging experiences of young women withengineering aspirations,” Science Education, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21748.[15] J. Perez, D. Cohen-Jarvie, and D. Drew, “ICT and women’s careers: Using grassroots ICT roexpand women’s participation in nontraditional careers,” in Technology and Women’sEmpowerment, E. Lechman, Ed., New York: Routledge, 2021, pp. 134–150.[16] S. Stewman, “Organizational Demography,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 14, no
, “Organizing Higher Education. A Manifesto,” in The Organization of Higher Education: Managing Colleges for a New Era, M. N. Bastedo, Ed., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–17, 2012.[6] A. Kolsaker, “Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: a study of English universities,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 513–525, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1080/03075070802372885.[7] S. Fernández-Gubieda and Á. Rojas, “Listening: A way to improve university reputation and governance,” Journal of Education Advancement & Marketing, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 76, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.69554/HLJA3570.[8] J. J. Brunner, “Gobernanza universitaria: tipología, dinámicas y tendencias,” Revista de
-gradedactivities in online, interactive STEM textbooks. By breaking down complex programmingconcepts into smaller, manageable units and incorporating scaffolding techniques, we havevalidated that student struggle rates can be significantly reduced achieving an average decreaseof 8.55% and demonstrating proficiency in programming activities. Our analysis of variousmetrics such as completion rates and common errors, has provided valuable insights into theareas where students face the most difficulties and how to address the difficulties effectively.References[1] A. Steen-Utheim and A. Wittek, "Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning," Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, vol. 15, pp. 18-30, December 2017.[2] A. Smith, S
smart home networks. In NDSS, 2022. [8] Leonardo Babun, Amit Kumar Sikder, Abbas Acar, and A Selcuk Uluagac. The truth shall set thee free: Enabling practical forensic capabilities in smart environments. In NDSS, 2022. [9] Derin Cayir, Reham Mohamed, Riccardo Lazzeretti, Marco Angelini, Abbas Acar, Mauro Conti, Z Berkay Celik, and Selcuk Uluagac. Speak up, i’m listening: Extracting speech from zero-permission vr sensors. In NDSS, 2025.[10] H. Maenpaa, S. Varjonen, A. Hellas, S. Tarkoma, and T. Mannisto. Assessing iot projects in university education - a framework for problem-based learning. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training Track (ICSE-SEET
survey distributed to themembers of the engineering mechanics division, on the contexts in which the flipped classroomsare being implemented, the instructional design choices made by the instructors, the experiencesof the instructors in teaching these courses, and the lessons learned over time. By compiling thisinformation, the authors seek to present a number of different strategies to implement a flippedclassroom and provide advice to aspiring flipped classroom instructors on the design choices thatmay work best for their contexts.Literature Review:The idea of the flipped classroom has been around for many years, first emerging in the 1980’s[6] and gaining popularity in the US throughout the 1990’s and 2000’s [1], [7]. The central aspectof the
. Wei, “Trocr: Transformer-based optical character recognition with pre-trained models,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.10282 [5] B. Wang. (2024) Pdf extract kit. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/opendatalab/PDF-Extract-Kit [6] V. Paruchuri. (2024) Texify. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/VikParuchuri/texify [7] ——. (2024) Marker. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/VikParuchuri/marker [8] G. Kim, T. Hong, M. Yim, J. Nam, J. Park, J. Yim, W. Hwang, S. Yun, D. Han, and S. Park, “Ocr-free document understanding transformer,” in Computer Vision – ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXVIII. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
, Tarleton State UniversityLondon Knight, West Texas A&M UniversityVictoria June Vinzant, Texas A&M University - Kingsville ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 1 Intersection of Design and Society: Student and Faculty Reflection on an Interdisciplinary CourseJames K. Nelson Andrew S. CrawfordRELLIS Academic Alliance Mechanical Engineering Technology StudentTexas A&M University System Tarleton State UniversityCeleste A. Riley
refinements with the hopes that more manipulatives be created for use in calculuscourses as well as upper-division courses (e.g., differential equations, linear algebra, complexanalysis) at ERAU Prescott.References[1] S. Sorby and D. Smith, “2020 Survey for Skills Gaps in Recent Engineering Graduates,” in ASEE Corporate Member Council, Virtual due to Covid: ASEE, Jun. 2020, p. 21.[2] A. McKenna, G. Lichtenstein, P. Weilerstein, and Monroe-White, “The Entrepreneurial Mindset: Using the Questions of What, Why, and How as an Organizing Framework,” in Advanced in Engineering Education, Salt Lake City Utah: ASEE, Fall 2018, p. 8.[3] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering Students and Entrepreneurship Education