, American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 Session XXXX Online Delivery of Engineering Courses where Hand Calculations are Vital Dani Fadda and P L Stephan Thamban Mechanical Engineering Department The University of Texas at Dallas AbstractFollowing the coronavirus pandemic, an abrupt and temporary transition to a virtual teaching formatis found necessary and engineering courses
Paper ID #35119Outreach and Recruitment with 3D Printing and CADDr. MEHMET EMRE BAHADIR, Southeastern Louisiana University MEHMET EMRE BAHADIR is an Assistant Professor of Industrial Technology at Southeastern Louisiana University. His teaching and research interests are in the field of product design, industrial ecology, sus- tainable manufacturing, and additive manufacturing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 Outreach and Recruitment with 3D Printing and CAD
course.Literature search to support these personal experiences is performed. Lastly, student feedbackvia survey on such course is supplied providing statistical data on such course teaching modalitythat have been suddenly pervasive with the COVID-19 gripping the world scene. Evencomparative course grades and course evaluations are supplied to compare any major up-tickor down-tick from the pre-COVID era. Based on the survey and grades/course evaluationscomparisons, it is concluded that the shift to pure online teaching was successful.Introduction:Online learning has been going on since at least 1982 [1]. This educational delivery mode hasonly been strengthening and diversifying since (in terms of features, capabilities and content).Although the advent of
accreditationvirtual-site visit compared to a physical on-site visit. IntroductionIn 2009, the ABET’s Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) started a process to review andrevised Criterion 3-Student Outcomes (a-k) of the general accreditation criteria which was developedin late 1990s and implemented in 2000. After an extensive review process, in 2015 the EACrecommended changes to both Criterion 3-Student Outcomes and Criterion 5-Curriculum1-3. Thechanges, included: 1. expansion of definition of terminologies used in the general criteria, 2. changing student outcomes a through k into student outcomes 1 through 7, and 3. clarifying the statements in criterion 5 by stating that it requires a minimum of 30
Session XXXX Preparing for an Online ABET Visit Matthew G. Green, Chad L. File School of Engineering and Engineering Technology LeTourneau University, Longview, TX AbstractHere we share insights to help those preparing for an online ABET accreditation visit. These insightsare gleaned from our own visit which pivoted to entirely online six months before the event. ABET(formerly known as the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) conducted all 2020-21 reviews remotely (online) 1 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Preparing for an online visitinvolved (1) preparing the
minorities within minorities in personal and STEM self-efficacy. She earned her undergraduate and graduate degrees from UTEP and holds a doctorate from the Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.Dr. Cole Hatfield Joslyn, University of Texas at El Paso Cole Joslyn is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education and Lead- ership at The University of Texas at El Paso. His research emphasizes humanizing engineering education, particularly 1) increasing Latinx students’ sense of belonging in engineering by a) integrating holistic, socio-culturally responsive practices and Latinx cultural assets and values into educational success strate- gies, and b) understanding how
Paper ID #35105Recent Strategies for improving Undergraduate Engineering Education: AReviewMs. Monikka M. Mann, Texas Tech University Monikka M. Mann, PMP is a PhD student at Texas Tech University in the Systems and Engineering Management Program.Dr. George Tan, Texas Tech University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 Session XXXX Recent Strategies for improving Undergraduate Engineering
Department of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin since 2005.Dr. Laura Suggs, University of Texas at AustinProf. Mia K. Markey, University of Texas at Austin Dr. Mia K. Markey is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professorship in Engineering #1 at The University of Texas at Austin as well as Adjunct Pro- fessor of Imaging Physics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Dr. Markey is a 1994 graduate of the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy. She has a B.S. in computational biology (Carnegie Mellon, 1998). Dr. Markey earned her Ph.D. in biomedical engineering (2002), along with a certificate in bioinformatics, from Duke University
. His research interests include Mixed-signal/RF circuit design and testing, measurement automation, environmental & biomedical data measurement, and educational robotics development. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 Session XXXX Self-publish textbook for Embedded System Education using an MSP432 microcontroller Byul Hur Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution
grant by CPS Energy, a local Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Baylor University, Waco, TX Copyright © 2021, American Society for Engineering Education 2power company in San Antonio, to conduct research regarding safer and more efficient ways toundergo the powerline inspection process.Research ObjectivesThe objective of this Senior Capstone was to develop an autonomous UAV system to detect andtrack powerlines and utility poles to perform fault inspections of their electrical and materialcomponents.OrganizationThe overview of the project is shown in Figure 1. The project is based around an autonomous
. Benjamin Lee Stilwell, The University of Texas at TylerMr. Edgar Reyes Edgar Reyes is an undergraduate Mechanical Engineering student at the University of Texas at Tyler. His interests include thermal fluid sciences and alternative energy systems. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 Session 35108 Simulated Laboratory-Based Learning In A Thermal Fluid Laboratory Course Mohammad Abu Rafe Biswas, Benjamin Stilwell, Edgar Reyes Department of Mechanical Engineering
criticalthinking.IntroductionRobotics has tremendous use in education and has helped improve daily life operations. Furtheradvancement in miniaturization, automation, lightweight, and artificial intelligence technologies are atthe forefront of current research for long-term usability [1-2]. Manufacturing robots as a pedagogicalpractice supports student learning in different entities of the engineering field. Prior to the COVID-19pandemic, limited studies explored the impact of remotely teaching robotics on pedagogy for replacingor supplementing theoretical courses and traditional hands-on laboratories. Assessment of remoteteaching on student performance has revealed online labs as effective learning environments [3-4]. Thispaper reports a robotic design project framework
pandemic, a Proteus simulator was developed to allow for this project to becompleted remotely. This paper details the pandemic-driven process of developing a tool forremote game creation in C/C++ and assesses the effectiveness of this online delivery.MotivationThe Software Design Project (SDP) assigned at the end of the autumn semester synthesizes thetechnical programming skills that students learned throughout the semester while also providinga teamwork approach to writing code. Kecskemety, et. al, discussed the motivations and formatfor this project more thoroughly in [1]. This project relies on using the in-house Proteusmicrocontroller, which was not possible due to COVID-19. Thus, it was decided that a Proteussimulator should be developed to
engineering course to introduce the idea ofcapacitance and capacitors. The origination of the activity was in the Fall 2019, but it was trialedmore as a prototype activity with significantly less structure. It had been developed as part of anEntrepreneurially Minded (EM) activity, however, this paper is not focused on the EM orientedaspect of the activity [1]. The activity was to be used in Fall 2020, but due to how COVID-19disrupted the classroom experience, it was not provided to students during Fall 2020. Withincreasingly familiarity of how to operate a classroom in-person during COVID-19 in a safemanner and following university guidelines, the activity was revived for Spring 2021 but thistime with input from a senior undergraduate electrical
fully online) it is important to ensure that alternatives existin all methods to accommodate and enhance learning. The recent Pandemic has caused a rapidtransition to online teaching without time to adjust teaching methodologies. This paper compares theuse of face-to-face and online teaching methodologies in some first-year engineering classes.Conclusions are then made on opportunities to improve teaching and learning in an onlineenvironment.IntroductionThere are many theories of learning which include: behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, andconnectivism theories. Reviews and discussions of these theories have summarized behaviorism aslearning as a change in behaviour from external processes [1] while cognitivism focuses on
importance of collaboration in the workforce.The format of the workshop will be as follows: short introduction on teaming by the facilitator, followedby small group discussions and then full group sharing. The presenter will close by sharing someresearch on team performance in the workplace, mostly based on research by Google [1]. At the end ofthe seminar participants will have some new tools to help guide their students in running an effectiveteam.[1] Duhigg, C. (2016). What Google learned from its quest to build the perfect team. The New York TimesMagazine, 26(2016), 2016.
system to use depends on thedesigner [1]. Historically, the instructor teaching CE 111 (Civil Engineering Graphics) has usedBentley’s software MicroStation in the course. Upon review of survey data from departmentconstituents, the instructor teaching the CE 111 (Civil Engineering Graphics) course beganimplementing AutoCAD Civil 3D into the course.Software TransitionIn the Fall of 2019, the instructor developed tutorial exercises for the students to help themtransition from MicroStation to AutoCAD Civil 3D. The instructor’s experience has been that itis easier for the students to learn MicroStation at the beginning of the semester and thenintroduce AutoCAD Civil 3D to the students in the latter portion of the semester. During the firsttwo weeks
these strategies were in enhancingthe ability of engineering students to exercise spatial reasoning.The Study: Our study was conducted at Tennessee Tech University, a medium-sized, STEM-focused, level-1 doctoral granting institution located in the suburban southern region of theUnited States. The College of Engineering is the largest college at the university and the numberof undergraduate majors has grown significantly over the past five years. Data were collectedfrom all students present and enrolled in ENGR 1110: Engineering Graphics for Fall 2017. Thisis a large-enrollment, introductory course, required by four majors in the college, and studentsare encouraged to take it in their freshmen year. The pre-test included 112
accessibility. U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics data show a rise of 88% in thecost of textbooks from 2006-2016, compared to a rise of 63% in college tuition and fees [1]. Oneimpact of this is that students simply do not buy the textbook, thus missing out on a significantcomponent of their coursework. OERs provide a free and electronically available option in whichinstructors can customize the content to tune it to their course. This paper describes integration ofKhan Academy [2] (Khan) into an Introduction to Engineering course as an OER.Using Khan Academy as an OERThe content of a first-year engineering (intro) course varies widely. Thus finding a textbook withthe exact desired sequence of topics, OER or not, is challenging. The intro class at this
,including (1) binary numbers, (2) ASCII code, (3) Caesar Cipher, (4) looping, (5) algorithmwriting, (6) message transmission, (7) computer networking/topology, and (8) computer security.Learning Objectives for Workshop: By the end of this workshop, attendees should be able to: 1. Explain each activity and present them to students 2. Explain that binary is the language of a computer (i.e., letters, numbers, and symbols have a representation in binary) 3. Explain the purpose of encryption in modern networking to students 4. Explain the basic concept behind Public-Key Encryption to studentsBrief DescriptionChildren use electronic devices daily (especially after online learning during the pandemic) buthave little
from real life cases. Thiscan often put students in the position of searching for the “right ethical response,” rather than applying their personalethic toward reasoning through various contingencies and trade-offs to determine their best path to solution in aparticular moment. Drawing on the contemporary learning theory of situated learning [1][2], playful learning mayenable instructors to create assignments that enable students to break free of the typical student mindset of findingthe “right” answer, and use various game mechanics to induce them to act more as themselves, as they wouldon-the-fly within a real engineering project context, drawing on personal reasoning and justifications, rather thansimply right/wrong answers. Our
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Workshop: Transcending Engineering’s Weed-Out Culture Through Feedback to StudentsWorkshop SummaryIntroductionPolicies and practices informed by research have been put into place to improve engineeringdiversity and inclusion through expanded K12 education, recruitment efforts, and supportprograms. (e.g. [1]–[3]). With that framing, what can be done on an individual instructor levelthat does not align with engineering’s weed-out culture but instead aims to be actively inclusiveand retain more engineering students? Feedback is a critical aspect of student learning throughwhich instructors communicate misconceptions or gaps in knowledge [4]. Feedback’simportance
available more of what restricts our ability to improveour resilience baseline under routine conditions: time (Pfluger, Butkus, Wallen and Read 2021).The overarching priorities of USMA are unchanged from pre- to post-COVID, as they areexpressed in Table 1 below. 3Table 1. USMA Mission and Leader Development Programs USMA Mission The U.S. Military Academy at West Point's mission is "to educate, train, and inspire the Corps of Cadets so that each graduate is a commissioned leader of character committed to the values of Duty, Honor, Country and prepared for a
on the child’s attributes allowing forthe ability to interpret and present statistics using a database of relevant information. Despite theoriginal manual practice being improved, the project is now moving towards addressing anotheraspect of the process. Namely, creating a user-interface application that will contain all thefunctions necessary to create progress reports. This is where the project currently stands.South Carolina Early Learning StandardsThe South Carolina Early Learning Standards (SC-ELS) are goals and developmental indicatorsof what children are expected to understand from age birth to kindergarten-entry (5 years of age).These standards are divided into 6 indicators [2] as depicted in Figure 1. Each of the indicators
students further develop both hardware andsoftware skills while researching. For the project, students focused on the Arduino Mega Board.Some of the expected outcomes for the project include: 1) understand the physical boardcomponents; 2) learn how to attack the board using the STRIDE technique; 3) create a DataFlow Diagram (DFD) of the system using the Microsoft threat modeling tool; 4) understand theattack patterns; and 5) generate a threat model based on the user's input.The goal of threat modeling is to prevent future threats and attacks from taking advantage ofsystems vulnerabilities. This method allows the analysis of potential attackers, including theirgoals and techniques, while also providing solutions and mitigation strategies. Although
researcher at Sandia National Laboratory. He served as Department Chair from 2011-2019, and currently serves as the Director of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for his department. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A DEI Task Force within a Mechanical Engineering DepartmentMotivation and BackgroundFaculty and staff can and do influence the climate of a department and achievement of students.Research shows the positive effects of choosing to implement evidence-based teaching practiceslike active learning and inclusive teaching [1], and having a growth mindset in relation to theabilities of students [2]. However, research also shows that the local
abruptlyinterrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic in the first semester and completely moved to online inthe second semester, survey and interview data was collected on five undergraduate engineeringstudents and three mathematics teacher candidates, which offer encouraging qualitative evidenceof their soft skills development, particularly for the engineering mentors. In this paper, we willintroduce the collaborative mentorship program and the differentiating design considerations,then discuss the results with focus on 1) the journey of these engineering students as theycollaborate with mathematics teacher candidates and serve as mentors in the afterschoolprogram, and 2) the impact of the interdisciplinary model on fostering their soft skills.1. IntroductionThere