-minute work habits. Perceivers see Judgers as inflexibleand up-tight. Through discussion, students see the value of having both types on a team.Each preference is effective given the right circumstances and each contributes to thesuccess of the team.7. Values and Ethical Decision Making In the final weeks of the course, discussion centers on values and on how valuesinfluence team performance. Students typically struggle with this topic. Theyacknowledge that each individual has different values, but they do not understand howvalues relate to engineering design. Values are not inborn, but are developed over time.Students are introduced to the stages of values development: acceptance, preference, andcommitment. Then the instructor introduces
professional andleadership skills are usually learned the hard way – through experience in the workplace as aprofessional engineer3. The importance of these attributes is also underlined by its closealignment with the skills delineated by ABET28. The skills outlined by ABET are (a) an abilityto apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) an ability to design andconduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) an ability to design a system,component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability;(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; (e) an ability to identify, formulate
on current issues and vice versa.Ethics Students should consider ethical situations inherent in the practice of engineering.Teamwork (Team) In K-12 engineering education, it is important to develop students’ abilities to participate as a contributing team member.Engineering Communication Communication is the ability of a student to effectively take in Page 24.555.4(Comm-Engr) information and to relay understandings to others in an
which students used the engineering design process todesign a park. For the second and third segment, students were able to choose two of six quasi-major-specific seminars. Each three-week seminar had a class size around 33 students, a lab sizeof about 16 students, and featured a team-based hands-on project. Seminar titles included:Engineering Athletics, Programming a Computer, Green Engineering, Flinging Things, PastaTowers and Digital Logic Design. Not only did these seminars allow a smaller classroom settingand more in-depth study, we found that it provided an opportunity for both students and facultyto take ownership of the course. The final section was also taught in the large classroom settingand centered on ethics and professional
would be a candidate for eliminationby the campus administration.Phase II - Program Objectives and Outcomes - The current IME Department MissionStatement was developed in 1994 during participation in campus-wide strategic planning. : Page 5.685.31. To serve the university, the community, and our alumni by offering ABET accredited degree programs and courses that prepare students for study at both the undergraduate and graduate level.2. To teach sound engineering principles, ethics and theory supported with significant classroom, laboratory and industrial experiences to a diverse student population. Our goal is to
respond to the complex ethical, social, political, andenvironmental challenges of today, they may begin to eschew traditional case studies that portrayengineering as objective and apolitical. In this way, they may begin to “transgress” againstdominant views of engineering that can limit students’ critical thinking and engagement withsocio-political issues within engineering contexts. Liberatory pedagogy also disrupts the statusquo of power dynamics and practices in the postsecondary classroom, opening up space for newclassroom activities and assessments that create a more collaborative and equitable learningenvironment [1].In this paper, I explore the redesign of an undergraduate engineering technology and societycourse in relation to the idea of
engineer [6], making it difficult for some students to staymotivated and to continue their engineering studies [7]. In addition, this lack of societalcontextualization causes engineering students’ social responsibility to decrease over the courseof their education [1, 8, 9]. Engineering is sociotechnical by nature; the design process involvestechnical and non-technical (social, economic, environmental, political, legal, cultural, ethical)factors that are simultaneously connected with one another [10-12]. Graduates should beprepared with sociotechnical problem solving skills to tackle the complex engineering challengesfacing the world today and in the future [13, 14]. Courses that approach engineering from asociotechnical framework may better
prompted by a one page scenario that frames an interdisciplinary, complex, societalproblem related to engineering. Examples of scenarios include a discussion of the FukushimaDaiichi nuclear reactor incident and the use of offshore wind power. The student discussion isthen scored by an instructor using the EPS rubric. The EPS rubric assesses student performancethrough indicators associated with an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams,understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, ability to communicate effectively,understanding of the impact of engineering solutions, recognition of and ability to engage in life-long learning, and knowledge of contemporary issues.Collaborators from ABET, Norwich University, University of Idaho
, undocumented lessons linked to values, ethics and beliefs, that is, the lessonsfrom the Unwritten Syllabus. These skills, frequently described as professional skills or softskills, are often discussed by both teachers and human resource personnel. Skills such ascreativity, motivation to learn, personal accountability and positive work ethic are not alwayssubject to defined teaching methods. There are clearly benefits to acquisition of professionalskills, but what methods and techniques provide paths to success in these skills? The UnwrittenSyllabus, if implemented correctly, may encompass many of these professional skills, includingintellectual curiosity, caring for others, honesty and ability to overcome obstaclesIn prior research on the Unwritten
needed. (d) ability to function on multi-Programs are free to define their own SOs, but disciplinary teamsthey must be mapped to the ABET a-k. In (e) ability to identify, formulate,addition, there should be a clear relationship and solve engineering problemsshown between the program SOs and the program (f) understanding of professionalPEOs. The PEV will be paying close attention to and ethical responsibilitythe assessment and evaluation procedures used to (g) ability to communicatedocument that the SOs are being achieved. This is effectivelyprobably the most critical aspect of the entire (h) broad educationABET
nurturethe essential relationship between science and the law. Hence, many of the professional guidelines in the science and engineering fields call for adherence to objective analyses and reporting.However, attorneys’ expectations for expert witnesses may, at times, conflict with engineering ethics. Undergraduate engineering students participated in an expert witness role play scenariodesigned to foster experiential learning in ethical conduct. Students prepared a legal report based on their analyses of a hypothetical vehicle crash scenario. A panel of role playing attorneysthen interviewed the students as potential expert witnesses in a civil lawsuit concerning the crash. The research team, which included an expert crash reconstructionist and
needs within realistic c constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g an ability to communicate effectively the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, h economic, environmental, and societal context i a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j a knowledge of contemporary issues an ability to use the techniques, skills, and
instructors at four Canadianinstitutions.Although there is research on engineering ethics education3,4,5,6, there is a gap in examining howengineering instructors view the inclusion of ethics and the other hallmarks of STSE in their ownteaching. This research was designed to help fill this gap in the field, focusing on three keyresearch questions: (1) How do undergraduate engineering instructors describe their teachinggoals and practices?; (2) How do undergraduate engineering instructors describe their teachinggoals and practices with respect to exploring the relationship between engineering, society andthe environment (i.e. STSE)?; and (3) What are the specific challenges or enabling factors inexploring the relationship between engineering, society
). Addressing these challenges requiresstrategic planning, leadership, ongoing training, ethical decision making, and a genuine effort tocreate an inclusive culture. The purpose of this paper is to highlight some of the strategies usedin building Wake Forest Engineering and what has now become one of the most diverseacademic units on the Wake Forest University (WFU) campus and the highest ranked (US NewsReport 2023) academic unit on campus. Despite WFU being a predominantly white institution,Wake Forest Engineering as one of the newest academic units on campus adopted hiringpractices that enabled the hiring of a very diverse engineering faculty team – over 50% femalefaculty, 25% racial and ethnic diversity, engineering disciplinary diversity, etc
research interests include: engineering for social justice, engineering with community, innovation, ethics, transformative learning, reflection, professional identity.Mr. Ramon Benitez, Virginia Tech Ramon Benitez is interested in how engineering identity and animal participatory design can be used to recruit Chicano K-12 students to engineering professions. Benitez completed his BS in Metallurgical and Materials Engineering at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), and is now a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech (VT). Benitez seeks to understand how to best instruct and assess ethical reasoning of engineering practices and engineering responsibilities, including wildlife and humanity, in
has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living- learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Kevin G. Sutterer P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kevin Sutterer is Professor and Department Head of Civil Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology in Terre
Paper ID #14655Sports, arts and concrete canoes: Engineers learning to lead outside the for-mal curriculumDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is a Research Associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, critical theory, teacher leadership and social justice teacher unionism.Dr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Dr. Sacks is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto teaching leadership and positive
, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for
Paper ID #21160Perceptions of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge Outcomes by SeniorStudents: Effect of Activities, Internships, and Career GoalsDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the ABET assessment coordinator for her department. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity
research interests center around interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering and engineering education, including studies of the collaborative relationships between engineers and education researchers. She was recently awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study interdisciplinarity in engineering graduate programs nationwide.Jenny Lo, Virginia Tech Jenny Lo, assistant professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, is interested in understanding and improving engineering curriculum related to introductory engineering courses, engineering design, engineering ethics, and undergraduate research
measures. b. Ethical and professional responsibilitiesIssues such as ethics in engineering businesses are best addressed through context; otherwise thesubject essentially receives lip service. The conflict between quality product/process and costeffectiveness should be illustrated through examples of where this issue arose and was/was not Page 25.800.3addressed, e.g., costs of oil spills, externalities in production processes, social vs. out of pocketcosts. Ethics is becoming increasingly important in engineering and business courses and is afocus of ABET5 (2011) accreditation as reflected in the associate-level Criterion 3Ah andbachelor-level
range of intended goals. The University of Virginia’s engineering school hasboth an undergraduate thesis that has been required of every student since the early 1900s and anestablished Systems Engineering capstone project that has been in place since 1988. Both projectstreat constraints in areas such as economics, the environment, ethics, politics, sustainability, andsocial considerations as integral parts of engineering problem solving and decision-making. In sodoing, they anticipated and reflect the integrated approach of EC 2000.Most students who major in Systems Engineering (SE) use their capstone project as the basis forthe undergraduate thesis, which is jointly advised and must be jointly approved by a facultymember from the humanities
Page 25.70.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Model for the Development of Personal and Professional Social Responsibility for EngineersAbstractImportant attributes for engineering professionals include an understanding of the global andsocietal impacts of engineering projects and a well-developed professional and ethical code ofresponsibility; these attributes must be developed in engineering students. Furthermore, the roleof an engineer is becoming increasingly global, requiring an international perspective and cross-cultural skills. The core foundation for these skills can be found in a well-developed sense ofsocial responsibility, contextualized by the
) ● sub-disciplinary cultures (Gilbert, 2008; Godfrey, 2007; Murphy et al., 2007) ● national cultures (Downey and Lucena, 2005) ● assessment cultures (Borrego, 2008).Godfrey [9] also cites studies of cultural change in engineering education, related to the role of ● institutional culture in effecting change (Covington and Froyd, 2004; Kelly and Murphy, 2007; Kezar and Eckel, 2002; Merton et al., 2004), and ● measuring cultural change (Fromm and McGourty, 2001; Lattuca, Terenzini, and Volkwein, 2006).4.1.2 Observable Engineering Education Cultural Beliefs and ValuesBeliefs such as meritocracy, ethics, complexity, difficulty, worthiness and stress are beingstudied with respect to engineering education culture and the impact on
programmingeducation and real-time feedback, relieving teachers’ workload while giving studentspersonalized curricular information tailored to their needs. Additionally, AI is usually used as adata analytics tool to predict student performance. The reviewed articles focus on AI’s cognitiveand affective impact on students and found positive effects on those variables. At the same time,AI allows for better analysis and utilization of data on student behavior while programming.Limitations in the current reviewed articles on AI in K-12 CS education include insufficientattention to theoretical adoption, ethical concerns, and methodological issues like small samplesizes. This review highlights the critical role of AI in K-12 CS education and illuminatesdirections
Intelligence (AI) applications have become an integral part of our lives, from socialapplications on smartphones to crewless vehicles. However, as they remain in the domain of“computer magic,” these new advancements of knowledge processing and reasoning using AI toolswill not be of a great benefit to humanity, unless a complementary education environment isprovided to help students and communities become involved in this scientific revolution early,ethically, and systematically. Introducing and exploring AI concepts and basics earlier in thestudents’ learning journey will help address the future AI job market needs as well as AI ethicsissues and will open the door for new innovative AI applications in all segments of life. The long-term goal of this
introduction to disciplinary conventions, scientific ethics, and informationliteracy specific to science. The course was designed to achieve these goals in two main ways:students were assigned typical composition assignments but with a scientific component, and thecourse emphasized the practical and analytical elements of the writing process to help demystifyit.Table 1 – University of Colorado Denver Composition Program Outcomes, with TypicalAssignments for Traditional Composition and ELC Composition Classes. Outcomes Traditional Composition Composition Assignments Source: [14] Assignments Adapted for ELC Rhetorical knowledge & Rhetorical analysis
States Coast Guard Academy (CGA), located in New London, Connecticut, is thesmallest of the United States military academies with approximately 1100 cadets. The mission ofthe CGA is to educate, train and develop leaders of character who are ethically, intellectually,and professionally prepared to serve their country and humanity [1]. CGA offers Bachelor ofScience degrees in nine majors, including civil engineering, and all cadets are required tograduate in four years. The civil and environmental engineering curriculum is broad and providesa solid background in the structures, environmental, geotechnical, and construction sub-fields ofcivil engineering. Graduates pursue several different career paths and many of them serve in theUnited States
, rather thanPh.D. level academic writing and speaking. Joshua Schimel’s Writing Science is among the fewresources for learning how to write scientific and engineering journal papers along with H.Glasman-Deal’s textbook focusing on science writing for non-native English speakers [2,3].Engineering communications theory and practice is described in [4], and a recent effort todevelop an engineering writing course for Ph.D. students in China is elaborated in [5].[6] investigates the benefits of providing ethics education in an engineering graduate program inorder to raise awareness of ethical norms and wider exposure to the societal implications andcontext of the field of engineering. In fact, the addition of ethics-based writing assignments tothe
, Solutions, and Impacts (ISI); Ethics (Ethics); Teamwork(Team); and Engineering Communication (Comm Engr). These indicators guided our contentanalysis and served as a coding rubric showing engineering content evidence. The standard wascoded only when the engineering content was met and if students were doing and involved in theengineering framework. One standard could have multiple key QEE indicators. Each researchercoded the standard separately to reach the consistency of and validate the codes with the QEEframework. Each standard document included key terms and definitions, for instance, design,solution, investigation, criteria, constraints, materials, test, failure, and model. These key termsand definitions served as guidance for the