-assessment ispossible. This means that students become more self-critical as they participatedirectly in their own learning process. Team, group and class assessment isintegrated into every module of our programs (supported by active codespreadsheets, computer programs, often with embedded 3D objects, video-clipsand animations) that the students can interrogate to understand either thequestion(s) or the answers better.The important observation about millennial generation students is that all of thenoted attributes should be respected, and that the education system should adjustto delivering these customer expectations at a high quality level. In this paper 1some tested
T_ph uV_p p_hs T_ps uL_p p_hrho T_hs uV_T Specific Enthalpy, h Spe cific Entropy, s uL_T hV_p sV_p u_pT hL_p sL_p u_ph hV_T sV_T u_ps hL_T sL_T Specific Volume, v h_pT s_pT vV_p h_ps s_ph vL_p h_px
threshold, piecewise linear, sigmoid, tansigmoid and Gaussian are usedfor activation.3.2. Control Vibration control techniques for flexible structures are generally classified into twocategories: passive and active control 20. Passive control utilizes the absorption property ofmatter and thus is realized by a fixed change in the physical parameters of the structure, forexample adding viscoelastic material to increase the damping properties of the flexiblemanipulator 21, 22, 23. Active control utilizes the principle of wave interference. This is realizedby artificially generating anti-source(s) (actuator(s) to destructively interfere with the unwanteddisturbances and thus result in reduction in the level of vibration. Active control of
that had been tried and thesuccess (or lack thereof) that followed. For example, if change agents are considering alternativepedagogies as an approach to achieve their course goals, they may to investigate the literaturethat supports the efficacy of student-centered pedagogies3,4,13-39.Bar r ier s to ChangeResistance to change is inevitable40,41. Recognizing its inevitability, Mauer34 encourages changeagents to anticipate and address resistance in their plans, rather than be surprised at itsoccurrence and have to improvise. Change agents who are prepared to address commonlyoccurring barriers are likely to be more effective than unprepared change agents.Research by Sunal et al.42 showed that faculty in their survey, which asked respondents
that integrating many differentmathematics ideas in one concrete context is challenging. Further supports, such as using thedesign context as a capstone activity or incorporating structured transfer activities, may berequired to effectively enable students’ mastery of the more general mathematical ideas. In ourfuture work, we intend to consider more case studies of the curriculum in-action withimprovements to the implementation based on these findings, in addition to conductingcomparative analyses of the curriculum relative to alternative approaches. This will help us tofurther elaborate on the conditions necessary for designing effective K-12 engineering curricula.Bibliography1. W. H. Schmidt, C. C. McKnight, and S. A. Raizen, A Splintered
.) The Nature of Expertise (pp. 261-285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2. Bransford, J.D. (1993). Who Ya Gonna Call? Thoughts About Teaching Problem- Solving. In P. Hallinger, K. Leithwood, J. Murphy (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Educational Leadership (pp. 171-191). New York: Teachers College Press. 3. French, S., Simpson, L., Athertona, E., Belton, V., Dawes, R., Edwards, W.,O P. Hamalainen, R.P., Larichev, O., Lootsma, F., Pearmani, A., Vlek, C. (1998)Problem Formulation for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Report of a Workshop. J. Multi- Criteria Decision. Analysis, Vol. 7, pp. 242–262. 4. Jonassen, D.H. (1997). Instructional Design Models for Well-Structured and Ill
AC 2008-1705: ENHANCING THE SOFTWARE VERIFICATION ANDVALIDATION COURSE THROUGH LABORATORY SESSIONSSushil Acharya, Robert Morris University Sushil Acharya, D.Eng. Assistant Professor of Software Engineering Acharya joined RMU in Spring 2005 after serving 15 years in the Software Industry. With US Airways Acharya was responsible for creating a Data Warehouse and using advance Data Mining Tools for performance improvement. With i2 Technologies he led the work on i2’s Data Mining product “Knowledge Discover Framework” and at CEERD (Thailand) he was the product manager of three energy software products (MEDEE-S/ENV, EFOM/ENV and DBA-VOID) which are currently in use in 26 Asian and 7
WPI many entering students have recently expressed an interest in robotics. During theacademic year 2006/07, for example, over 130 visiting prospective students listed robotics eitheras a principal interest area or as their planned major on WPI Admissions Information forms. InFall 2005 and 2006, 96 and 101 freshmen, respectively, joined the WPI Robotics Team. One-third of them stated an interest in pursuing robotics for their senior project or academic major.43% had known of the WPI/FIRST/robotics connection before enrolling at WPI and 62% ofthese indicated that this knowledge was a strong positive reason for selecting WPI.3.0 Education in RoboticsOne may date the earliest robotics-related undergraduate curricula to the 1980’s where
outside of class; note that other types of communication were notreported. Page 13.1109.4Table 1: Student Responses to Background Items(n = 322) Item No. Read Skim No NR 1 Have you read the UH academic honesty policy? 44.1% 39.8% 14.3% 1.9% Often Some Never NR 2 I communicate with other students in most of my 14.9% 63.7% 21.4% 0.0% course(s) outside of class time via electronic means. Strly
create anyproblem. Page 13.535.5Design and Delivery Consideration IssuesThe following were identified/recommended for the design and delivery process.• Hybrid-based course(s) should be clearly designated and advertised as such to prevent student confusion at the time of enrollment.• Students should be informed regarding course delivery methodology and the requirements for student participation. This is particularly important from the point of view of student satisfaction, as student expectations must be molded to fit the constraints of the online-based course delivery.• Support for online delivery classes needs to be expanded
) Kinematic Equations Since the crate doesn’t slip relative to the truck, we have (aA )x = (aB )x and (aA )y = (aB )y = 0. Now, using the constant acceleration eqns, we can find the acceleration of the truck, that is, (vB )2x = (vB0 )2x + 2(aB )x (xB − xB0 ) Profs. Gray & Costanzo (Penn State) Lecture 12: N-E Eqns: Examples February 12, 2007 7 / 20 Example: Problem 3.3 (continued) Plugging in numbers: 0 = (88)2 + 2(aB )x (350) ⇒ (aB )x = −11.06 ft/s2 . where I have used the fact that (vB0 )x = 60 mph = 88 ft/s. Computation
completed a task that required hands-on use of 1 2 3 4 5 3 equipment 4 Abandoned a task that required hands-on use of equipment 1 2 3 4 5 Verbally encouraged team member/s to get involved with tinkering 1 2 3 4 5 5 use of equipment, tools and materials Verbally discouraged team member/s from getting involved with 1 2 3 4 5 6 tinkering
educations and explore how misalignments betweenuniversity and workplace practices impact preparation and retention.This paper presents recent research results on the engineering student learning experience fromthe multiple campuses involved in the study. These summarized results—from the students'perspective(s)—present initial conclusions about significant themes. In the longer run, thesethemes will be synthesized across the results of this large study. Among other ideas, theseresults question the veracity of the pipeline metaphor that has been used to describe students’navigation through their education. The “leaky pipeline” metaphor has also been questioned byothers, including Watson and Froyd26 recently, who are calling for an alternative view
or static. b. For kinetic friction, apply the rule Fkf = µk FN . c. For static friction, know when you can and can’t assume Fsf = µ s FN . (You only can assume this when something is at the threshold of slipping.) d. Do not assume FN = mg !Day 4 – Trigonometry1. Given some angles and/or sides of a triangle, find other angles, sides, and trigonometry functions using the Pythagorean theorem and SOHCAHTOA.2. Given a figure with angles labeled in one or more places, figure out what other angles in the figure must be equal to the given ones.3. Vector components a. Given the magnitude and angle of a vector, find its components. b. Given the components of a vector, find its magnitude and angle. c
understanding the field.Some of the research questions would be best explored by a math-educator who can look throughtheir lens of expertise of common students’ K-12 experience based on current policies oncontent, the theories of semiotics, and theories of cognitive development in a social environment.Other questions are best tackled by engineering faculty, especially those which describe thenature of student misconceptions and lack of abilities in using mathematics in engineeringcourses. Page 13.627.16References1. Fink, L.D., Ambrose, S., & Wheeler, D. (2005). Becoming a professional engineering educator: A new role for a new era. Journal
qb23,wmm24,emg26,kusic,fromme,af63@drexel.eduAbstract Since the 1960’s, Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) has been promoted as the new standardfor teaching and learning. Schools were provided with computers and internet connections atan astounding rate in the 1990’s, but there was no correlated increase in student performance.1Investigation into this problem has revealed that computer technology is simply used to augmenttraditional ‘instructionist’ teaching strategies,1,2 and this type of integration does not parallel thecurrent real-time problem solving domain that is driven by technology. Therefore, the integration of technology to reinforce science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) education must not simply augment the
weighted list 5. Aggregate factor values into context scenario(s) Figure 3: The Contextual Needs Assessment Method as Published17,18 Page 13.923.8* Available electronically, email MatthewGreen@letu.edu.The contextual needs assessment method facilitates and directs the process of discovering,documenting, and applying contextual information and is easily adaptable to a variety of designneeds. The straightforward method provides valuable structure and insight for organizing anddriving the needs assessment process, and the templates place the power of contextualassessment in the hands of even novice engineers
andmade 22 trips to Peru. All of these systems were designed and installed by undergraduate andgraduate students and local people, assisted by faculty and experienced volunteers.The original goals of the program were: • To advance international understanding and cooperation through collaborative development of innovative solutions that support mutual cultural and technical learning; • To explore the use of renewable energy in the Andes in ways that bring local Peruvian residents and UML students together to work in partnership; • To optimize educational experiences of students involved through the integration of service and learning, what is termed service-learning (S-L); • To promote local economic development within Peru.The program has
of minutes. In order to improve detection and forecast of such phe-nomena using radar, one of the key factors is fast scan capability. Conventional weatherradars, such as the ubiquitous NEXRAD (Next Generation Radar developed in the 1980’s),are severely limited by mechanical scanning. Approximately 175 of these radars are in anational network to provide the bulk of our weather information. Under the developmentfor weather applications, the electronically steerable beams provided by the phased arrayradar at the NWRT can overcome these limitations of the current NEXRAD radar. Forthis reason, the phased array radar was listed by the National Research Council as oneof the primary candidate technologies to supersede the NEXRAD [1]. By definition
: x ? rh , rFr ? I rh%%, rF f ? I f h%% (3) and: / F - W sin s ? m%x% (4) where F ? Fr - F f and Page 13.1095.9 Fig. 7 Vehicle coasting down an incline. W cos s ? Wr - W f ? mg cos s .Substitution and rearrangement yields the fundamental equation describing the vehicle’s motion: g sin s %x% ? »C (5) iwhere i ? 1 - I
. B. (2006). Introduction to operations and supply chain management. Pearson Education, Inc.: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Builder Magazine http://www.builderonline.com/Burt, D. N., Dobler, D. W. & Starling, S. L. (2003). World class supply chain management: The key to supply chain management, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Irwin: New York, NY.Bushnell, R. D. & Meyers, R. B. (1999). Getting started with bar codes: a systematic guide.Chopra, S. & Meindl, P. (2004). Supply Chain Management, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), http://www.cscmp.orgDrickhamer, D. (2004, May). Supply Chain Superstars. Industry Week, 253(5), 59-66.Heizer, J. & Render, B. (2006). Principles of
ongeometrical optics with a survey of wave optics. In order to compensate for the lack oflaboratory work, an optics project was introduced alongside class demos. Studentsbrowsed for possible topics for a couple of weeks and then proposed one based oninstructor’s feedback. The project concluded with a short presentation of the work infront of the class and a brief written report. In order to increase class interest in theproject, the presentation took the form of a competition and the winner(s) were chosen bythe class, who judged the presentations according to preset criteria. Student feedback wasrecorded and quantized, and the peer evaluation and feedback were returned to thepresenters. The winners received small prizes in recognition of their
education philosophy allows offering a degreeprogram with significant amount of the course work and other requirements, such as labwork, met by external courses and work experience, the above mentioned on-lineinstruction in nanotechnology will be phased in gradually.Bibliography1. Daly, S. and L. Bryan. “Models of Nanoscale (Phenomena) as Tools for Engineering Design andScience Inquiry”. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEEAnnual Conference.2. Dhillon, H. and S. Anwar. “A Framework for the Assessment of Online Engineering TechnologyCourses: A Case Study”. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference.3. Anwar, S., J. A. Rolle, and A. A. Memon. “Development and Delivery of On-line Upper DivisionEngineering Technology Courses”. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE
education structure. Nowadays, Formula-S is the biggeststudent project at the University.The student team has up to 40 members from 4 different departments – Vehicle Technology (ca.30 students), Industrial Design, Management International Processes, and Information Design.This project starts in summer before the junior year of study and takes 12 months. In the last twoyears the students decided to enter the main contest in Detroit; for these teams the project takes22 months.The main task is to design and manufacture a racing car, due to the Formula-S requirements, andto compete with up to 120 university teams worldwide. Our undergraduates have the possibilityto compare their knowledge and skills with that of their peers worldwide5. To cope with
. Fifty years ago, the biggest regionalcompanies included International Harvester, General Electric, Westinghouse, Magnavoxand ITT Communications Division. Today, the largest employers of engineers andtechnologists include ITT Aerospace /Communications Division, Raytheon Net CentricSystems, General Dynamics, Undersea Sensors Systems Inc., Zimmer, Biomet, DePuy,General Motors, Dana Corp, and International Truck & Engine. These companies neededucational resources to grow their local talent.The lack of graduate programs in urban areas such as Fort Wayne is rooted in the legaciesof the land grant college system. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, the U.S. governmentgave states allotments of federal land with which to create an endowment to
authorship cluster. Women are more likely to bring together otherwisedisconnected groups in the creation of publications.References1. Etzkowitz H, Kemelgor C, Uzzi B. Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000.2. McIlwee JS, Robinson JG. Women in Engineering: Gender, Power and Workplace Culture. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1992.3. Padgett JF, Ansell CK. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. The American Journal of Sociology 1993;98(6):1259-1319.4. Morselli C, Giguere C, Petit K. The efficiency/security trade-off in criminal networks. Social Networks 2007;29(1):143-153.5. Kochan S, Teddlie C. An
worker in this packaging process. Theresulting designs incorporate a number of the universal design principles, providing studentsvaluable knowledge they can use in evaluating the usability of their designs for their capstonedesign projects and beyond.References[1] D. Culver and S. Fellows. Using Assistive Devices for the Disabled to Teach Design in a Freshman Engineering Course, Proceeding of the 1998 Annual ASEE Conference, June 1998, Seattle, WA.[2] B. Ankenman, J. Colgate, P. Jacob, R. Elliot, and S. Benjamin. Leveraging Rehabilitation Needs into Freshman Engineering Design Projects. Proceeding of the 2006 Annual ASEE Conference, June 2006, Chicago, IL.[3] L. S. Baczkowski, J. D. Enderle, D. J. Krause, and J. L
shows the reduction in the FLbackscattered radiated power as distance increases, which is a familiar characteristic ofRF signal propagation. Page 13.972.6 " D i s t a n c e A p a r t ( m ) 0 " d ど 0 0 . 5
likely given that validity is not aproperty of the instrument, but is instead related to the scores, which must be interpreted incontext.6 Page 13.207.3ABET resisted rigid specification of what institutions must to in assessing their students' learningand discouraged reliance on any single measure. The consequence of the generality of ABET'sspecifications and the associated flexibility in operationalizing EC2000’s Criterion 3 learningoutcomes led to the emergence of a wide array of items, scales, and instruments for assessingstudent performance on one or more of the criteria. Few, if any, of these measures, however,appear to have been developed
attend professional conferencesthat will enhance their professional growth and further the mission of the university. Eachfaculty member has a budget of $2,400 per academic year for this purpose.Faculty scholarshipsA scholarship support system is set up to enhance faculty research, funded internally by theuniversity. The scholarship is awarded to the faculty member(s) who demonstrates that he/she is Page 13.907.5more deserving of the award than his competitors.Presidential awardsTo support faculty research and/or to assist faculty who are completing their terminal degrees, aspecial fund is established annually. Faculty members who wish to apply