] 5VLogic. "How to make a Boost Converter WITHOUT Microcontroller (w/ feedback)." 29 7 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re2qNc6MGR4.[4] ZETEX Semiconductors. "ZXGD3003E6." 5A(peak) gate driver in SOT23-6. 10 2007. https://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1726412.pdf.[5] Huang, Alex Q. "Novel two-pole-one-zero compensator design (a) op amp based compensator and (a) basic concept of novel active feedback compensator." 6 2005. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Novel-two-pole-one-zero-compensator-design-a-op- amp-based-compensator-and-a-basic_fig15_3280707.[6] Nise, Norman S. Control Systems Engineering. n.d. Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2023
/10.1007/978-1-4614-8515-5_13[3] Scott Kozin, “Syndactyly”, Journal of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2001. p. 1-13, doi:10.1053/jssh.2001.21778[4] Upton J., “Congenital anomalies of the hand and forearm”, Plastic Surgery, Vol 8, 1990, p. 5280-5308[5] Upton J., “Management of disorders of separation – syndactyly”, The hand and upper limb, 2006, Vol. 8, p. 139–84.[6] S. Wang, S. Zheng, N. Li, Z. Feng, Q. Liu, “Dorsal Hexagon Local Flap Without Skin Graft for WebReconstruction of Congenital Syndactyly”, J. Hand Surg Am. 2020, 45(1):63.e1-63.e9,https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31079892/[7] Juan Liu, Huaiyuan Zheng, Zhenbing Chen, Xinyi Dai, Arndt F. Schilling, Hans-Günther Machens,“Dorsal plane-shaped advancement flap for
Paper ID #37522Understanding the Impact of an LSAMP Scholar ProgramDr. Yang Lydia Yang, Kansas State University Yang Lydia Yang is an Associate Professor of Quantitative Research Methodology at College of Educa- tion, Kansas State University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum & Instruction from Florida Inter- national University. Her research interest include quantitative educational research design and statistical analyses, Q methodology, and recruitment and retention in STEM fields.Dr. Brenee King, Kansas State UniversityDr. Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University Dr. Amy Betz is the Assistant Dean for Retention
principle used to solve. Table 1 Fundamental Engineering Principlesa) Section The ability of an object to resist stress is proportional to its A = ∫dA Properties area (A), first moment of area (Q), and second moment of Q = ∫y·dA area or moment of inertia (I). Ixx = ∫y2·dAb) Static Sum of all forces on object, part, or
. PublicAffairs, 2021.[7] K. Beck, White feminism: from the suffragettes to influencers and who they leave behind. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc., 2021.[8] K. W. Crenshaw, “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics.,” University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 139–167, 1989.[9] K. W. Crenshaw, “Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color,” Stanford Law Rev., pp. 93–118, Feb. 1991.[10] B. Moradi, M. C. Parent, A. S. Weis, S. Ouch, and K. L. Broad, “Mapping the Travels of Intersectionality Scholarship: A Citation Network Analysis,” Psychol. Women. Q., vol. 44
tool for recruiting, engaging, retaining and educating students,” in Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS international conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Circuits and Systems, 2012, pp. 196–201.A. C. Passos, F. L. Junior, and H. H. de Arruda, “Project-based learning activity with robotics: A low-cost case study,” in 2022 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2022 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR), and 2022 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE), 2022, pp. 360–365.J. McLurkin, J. Rykowski, M. John, Q. Kaseman, and A. J. Lynch, “Using multi-robot systems for engineering education: Teaching and outreach with large numbers of an advanced, low-cost robot,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2013.L
. Seaton, “Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom Research into edX’s First MOOC.,” Res. Pract. Assess., vol. 8, pp. 13–25, 2013.[6] A. McAuley, B. Stewart, G. Siemens, and D. Cormier, “THE MOOC MODEL FOR DIGITAL PRACTICE:”.[7] T. R. Liyanagunawardena, A. A. Adams, and S. A. Williams, “MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 202, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455.[8] R. Legon, “MOOCs and the Quality Question,” 2013.[9] L. Wiest, “Effective Online Instruction in Higher Education,” Q. Rev. Distance Educ., vol. 13, pp. 11–14, Jan. 2012.[10] J. R. Drake, M. T. O’Hara, and E. Seeman, “Five Principles for MOOC Design: With a Case Study
, particularly the InvertedClassroom format at the use of the Mastery Tests (but not the repeated opportunities). Table 2. Characteristics of Teaching Methods Phase > Regular Inverted Inverted + Mastery Inverted + StudioElement 1997-2008 F2009-present F2020-S2022 F2022-presentLecture Format/ Instructor presents Minimal notes presented; Q&A with entire Minimal notes presented; activity-Instructor Role notes on board class; example-driven; Instructor provides driven; Instructor and peer tutor and leads Q&A some individual consultation
pathways and the options theyhave.Students indicated that speaking with engineering entrepreneurs provided them with moreknowledge of and confidence in the industry. Students from underrepresented groups and first-generation students in engineering may have had fewer opportunities to discuss compensationand negotiating strategies. However, students reflected on learning how to ask for their worthand discuss these important leadership and career strategies in their surveys. One student shared, This week's Q&A session with engineers who are also entrepreneurs. I was able to hear how our speakers have dealt with not knowing how to confidently name their prices. I feel that as people of color, it is a challenge for us to assign
beginning of each event. • Emphasize the participation of HUG students: We put a line in the registration form stating that “This program is designed for HUG students. If you don’t identify as HUG, we kindly ask you to quietly observe, refrain from asking questions, and not take up space during the event.” • Implementing an online anonymous comment tool: From the experiences of the first two panel events, we found that HUG students favored asking questions and providing feedback anonymously instead of raising their hands in front of audiences. Thus, we included the interactive Q&A online tool, allowing attendees to ask questions anonymously. • Discuss HUG students’ challenges in pursuing a research career
response. 𝑝𝑝: 𝑝𝑝 value of a Mann Whitney U-testcomparing pre- and post-survey distributions. Bias: Noting if the result was significant betweenpre- and post-survey responses and that the distribution does not appear to have acquiescencebias. 3.a. Responses from Hispanic/Latino(a) Population Pre-survey Response Post-survey Response Q. Mode Med. 𝜎𝜎 𝑓𝑓 Skew Mode Med. 𝜎𝜎 𝑓𝑓 Skew 𝑝𝑝 Bias 1 4 4 1.14 0.48 -1.23 5 5 0.80 0.65 -2.06 0.004 Yes 2 1 2 1.19 0.13 0.45 1 1 1.41 0.54 1.32 0.314 3 5 5 0.67 0.83 -3.27 5 5 0.32 0.88 -2.48 0.526 4 4
drastically different, as I replaced in-person office visits with online Q&A. (#93) Content: often could not cover as much online Delivery: many videos created, used webcam/doc cams, Zoom Preparation time: about double the preparation Assessment methods: online exams had to be a completely different format to lower effect of cheating Supporting students: bookable virtual office hours and more 1-on-1 meetings. (#42)Of those instructors who completed the survey (n=81), 85% (i.e., 69 instructors) reported havingaccessed at least one of the eight options in the survey for instructional support during thepandemic. As shown in Table 2, the most widely accessed one was the online resources providedby the education
to discuss their researchareas with clear application to the K-8 classroom. As with the teachers, we met with theresearchers a week prior to the workshop and asked them to prepare an 8 minuteteacher-practice-friendly presentation about some of their research that would directly apply toclassrooms. The structure of this session was as follows: • 8 minutes for researcher presentation • 5 minutes of table talk within small groups in the audience • 5 minutes Q& A between the audience and researcher (influenced by the table talk)The researchers’ topics included negative impacts of gender stereotypes in K-8 CS education,scaffolding CS curriculum for K-8 students, and strategies to include students with disabilities inK-8 CS
instruction in multiple STEM disciplines,”presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual Conference, Jul 26-9, 2021. Available:https://peer.asee.org/37955.[2] C. Torres-Machi, A. Bielefeldt, and Q. Lv, “Work in progress: The strategic importanceof data science in civil engineering: Encouraging interest in the next generation,” presented at theASEE Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, Jun 26-9, 2022. Available:https://peer.asee.org/40713.[3] S. Grajdura and D. Niemeier, "State of programming and data science preparation in civilengineering undergraduate curricula," Journal of Civil Engineering Education, vol. 149, no. 2, p.04022010, 2023, doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000076.[4] J. G. Hering, "From slide rule to big data: How data
, 2011.[10] J. Gerlach, “Is STEM interest fading with students?” Everfi.com. https://everfi.com/infographic/k-12/is-stem-interest-fading-with-students/ (accessed December 1, 2022).[11] R. H. Tai, C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, & X. Fan, “Planning early for careers in science,” Science, vol. 312, no. 5777, pp. 1143-1144, 2006.[12] A. Martinez Ortiz, L. Rodriguez Amaya, H. Kawaguchi Warshauer, S. Garcia Torres, E. Scanlon, & M. Pruett, “They choose to attend academic summer camps? A mixed methods study exploring the impact of NASA academic summer pre-engineering camp on middle school students in a Latino community,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, vol. 8, no. 2, Article 3, 2018
Education, 106(3), 475-526.[2] Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 8(1), 1.[3] Lohmann, J. R., Rollins, H. A., & Joseph Hoey, J. (2006). Defining, developing and assessing global competence in engineers. European journal of engineering education, 31(1), 119-131.[4] Berger, E. J., & Bailey, R. (2013, June). Designing short-term study abroad engineering experiences to achieve global competencies. In 2013 ASEE International Forum (pp. 21-19).[5] Virginia Tech. Virginia Tech Rising Sophomore Abroad Program, Accessed on: March 21, 2022. [Online]. Available: https
sponsored projects compared to industrysponsored projects, and if student and team performance and satisfaction is similar between thethree project sources. Student interest is measured using the results from the Project RankingSurvey (PR Survey). Student and team performance are measured using their grades and theevaluations by the coaches. Student satisfaction is measured using the results of the TCPevaluations (Team, Coach & Program). Use of this data for the study was approved by the UFInstitutional Review Board.Students receive the PR Survey on the first day of class, during which the faculty advisor (coach)for each project gives a pitch presentation of their one or two projects, followed by a short Q&Asession. The presentations use a
unique, 8 new Total 240 56 30On the first day of class, the faculty advisor for each project gives a pitch presentation of theirone or two projects, followed by a short Q&A session. The presentations use a standard template,and coaches do not compare projects or suggest unique workload expectations. The standardtemplate of the pitch presentation slides with a pseudo-example is illustrated in Figure 1. Eachproject pitch slide is encoded with a set of descriptive Engineering Keywords specific to theproject. “Engineering Keywords” are defined as words related to engineering theories,technologies and skills related to executing engineering tasks. The authors of this study
report of the national summit meeting on the globalization of engineering education. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 4(1), 1–28.[14] Parkinson, A. (2007). Engineering study abroad programs: Formats, challenges, best practices. Online journal for global engineering education, 2(2), 2. Available at http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol2/iss2/2[15] Allert, B. I., Atkinson, D. L., Groll, E. A., & Hirleman, E. D. (2007). Making the case for global engineering: Building foreign language collaborations for designing, implementing, and assessing programs. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 2(2), 1–14.[16] Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global
: Using Photography as a Learning Tool in Early Childhood Classrooms,” Child. Educ., vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 243–248, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1080/00094056.2009.10523090.[11] A. Webster, S. Feiner, B. Macintyre, W. Massie, and T. Krueger, “Augmented Reality in Architectural Construction, Inspection, and Renovation,” Proc. 1996 ASCE Congr. Comput. Civ. Eng., Sep. 2000.[12] S. L. Tang, C. K. Kwoh, M. Y. Teo, N. W. Sing, and K. V. Ling, “Augmented reality systems for medical applications,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. Q. Mag. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 49–58, 1998, doi: 10.1109/51.677169.[13] T. Sielhorst, T. Obst, R. Burgkart, Riener, R., and N. Nassir, “[PDF] An Augmented Reality Delivery Simulator for Medical
,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 28, no. September 2017, pp. 110–130, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.003.[2] B. Blanchard, W. Fabrycky, and W. Fabrycky, Systems engineering and analysis. 1990.[3] C.M. Vest - National Academy of Sciences, Educating engineers for 2020 and beyond. 2005.[4] IEEE Press, “standard for application and management of the systems en gineering process,” 1998. Accessed: Jan. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C10&q=standard+for+application+and+management +of+the+systems+engineering+process&btnG=.[5] J. Gibson, W. Scherer, W. Gibson, and M. Smith, How to do systems analysis: Primer and casebook. 2016.[6] “Stakeholder Needs Definition
practical ethics,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, pp. 767-787.2015.[14] I. M. Goldin, K. Ashley, R. L. Pinkus, “Validity and reliability of an instrument forassessing case analyses in bioengineering ethics education,” Science and Engineering Ethics,vol. 21, pp. 789-807. 2015.[15] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, & A. D. Mead, “Thedevelopment of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-baseddesign teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. 2014.[16] P. W. Odom, & C. B. Zoltowski, “Statistical analysis and report on scale validation resultsfor the Engineering Ethical