. Page 26.1752.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Work in Progress: Flatlab–An interactive learning environment for experiential learning, problem-based assessment, and dynamic instruction in engineering Peter Goldsmith peter.goldsmith@ucalgary.ca Dept. Mechanical Engineering University of CalgaryAbstractThe goal of this work in progress is to design a virtual environment that integrates experientiallearning with assessment and teaching. The proposed FLATLAB is a Focused Learning,Assessment, and Teaching Laboratory with a
., 1999.[8] J. J. Summers, A. Waigandt and T. A. Whittaker, "A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class," Innovative Higher Education, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 233- 250, 2005.[9] D. Xu and S. Jaggars, "Adaptability to online learning: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas.," Community College Research Center, 2013.[10] N. J. Shukla, H. Hassani and R. Casleton, "A Comparison of Delivery Methods for Distance Learning Mathematics Courses.," Columbus State University, 2014.[11] U.S. Department of Education, "Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IEPDS)," National Center for Educational Statistics, Washington, D.C., 2013.[12] E. G
Paper ID #12484Using a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment (CCLE)to Promote Knowledge Building Pedagogy in an Undergraduate Strength ofMaterials CourseProf. Borjana Mikic, Smith College Borjana Mikic is the Rosemary Bradford Hewlett 1940 Professor of Engineering and the Faculty Director of initiatives in Design Thinking and the Liberal Arts at Smith College. She is former Director of the Picker Engineering Program and of Smith’s Sherrerd Center for Teaching and Learning, as well as being a 2007 recipient of the Sherrerd Prize for Excellence in Teaching. Her current areas of research are in the
students. In order to attract more support for EMT program, the EMTfaculty members have submitted several proposals to the federal and local agencies. The recentgrants from DHS and NRC have allowed the EMT program to provide students with a diverseand newly developed set of course and course modules as well as an integrated laboratoryenvironment. Students can participate in the activities through coursework, laboratory practices,and research, and will later attend conferences to present research papers. The EMT program willbe constantly revamping the curriculum to meet the expectations of industry by supplyingqualified technologists who have extensive practical knowledge and hands-on experience.ACK OWLEDGEME TS:The authors wish to acknowledge
is the recipient of the 2014 NCSU Outstanding Teacher Award, 2014 ASEE Southeastern Section Outstanding New Teacher Award, and currently serves as the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division’s newsletter editor. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics. Page 26.927.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Improving Technical Communication in the Chemical Engineering Classroom via Student-Based FeedbackAbstractOne area
enhance their curriculum. Students are asked to prepare a 30 second pitch of their proposal, which they present in a mock poster session to reviewers (graduate students). o Pitch / Proposal (Individual)—this final presentation of the course goes hand-in- hand with the proposal assignment described further (below). Students are asked to present their proposal to a defined set of reviewers, as applicable to the topic, using the medium they deem most appropriate. Evaluation is on building a convincing argument, choice and development of appropriate media, and presentation skills. • Critical Reading and Research Summary—similar to an
Paper ID #12964Introducing Students to Electronic Devices and Electric Circuit Applicationsat Early Level in the Engineering Curriculum through Multiple ProjectsDr. Nesreen Alsbou , Ohio Northern University Dr. Alsbou is an Assistant Professor at the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Com- puter Science at Ohio Northern University. She has experience teaching a variety of classes, including: Electric Circuits, Networks and Data Communication, Wireless Sensor Networks, Digital Logic Design, and others. Dr. Alsbou research in the area of wireless communications is focused on designing Media Access Control
projects. Page 26.1349.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Robotics in the Core Science Classroom: Benefits and Challenges for Curriculum Development and Implementation (RTP, Strand 4)AbstractThe Science Learning Integrating Design, Engineering and Robotics (SLIDER) project at theGeorgia Institute of Technology is in the 5th year of developing and implementing an inquiry andproject-based learning curriculum that is aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS) and designed to teach middle school physical science disciplinary
UniversityEngineers must work within multinational and multicultural environments, butincorporating international experiences into a packed undergraduate curriculum in ameaningful and scalable manner is difficult. This paper addresses the need to betterunderstand how course instructors can effectively internationalize their learningmaterials in a domestic engineering classroom. The course used as a qualitative casestudy in this paper is an Introduction to Engineering course at a large public university inthe United States. We highlight a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning case study of onecourse’s efforts to provide international experiences in a domestic classroom.Introduction and RationaleEngineers must work within multinational and multicultural
System CourseIntroduction Technology innovation moves at an exponential rate making it extremely difficult forengineering curriculum to educate students on all current developments. All over the nationinstructors are given a limited set of time to cover a wide variety of topics while ensuring thenext generation of professional engineers1-3. This constraint forces instructors to a disciplinebased education, sacrifices hands on experience and student engagement for textbook basednotes and passive student learning3-5. Although students are trained in a professional engineeringdiscipline, they lack the full understanding of the broader role that fundamental engineeringprinciples play in other sectors of industry3, 6. As a direct result
the design of mechatronic applications and devicesthroughout their career21, it is important that they have an understanding of not only theengineering science governing mechatronic functions, but also how they are designed andmanufactured. In addition, both alumni and prospective employers have recently voiced a desirefor additional coursework and education in hands-on engineering skills and knowledge.Furthermore, alumni and graduating students at Ohio State, as along with many other voices inthe literature, often bemoan the lack of integration between an academically rigorous engineeringscience curriculum and the application of this subject matter to real world problems and models.This lack of integration and application is often cited as a
. Page 26.902.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Implementation of a Case Study in an Engineering Science Course: A Pilot Project for Increasing Experiential LearningAbstractIt is valuable for instructors to provide real-world connections in their curricula so thatengineering students can appreciate and practice integration and application of knowledge. Thisis essential in both engineering science and design. A variety of mechanisms have been used toaccomplish this, including guest speakers, field trips and company-sourced design projects.Another useful mechanism to achieve this objective is the case study.For this reason, a case study was developed for a second year mechanical
general.The skills associated with an entrepreneurial mindset fall into three main categories,Opportunity, Design, and Impact (Table 1). Of these, the skills associated with design arealready integrated into our engineering curriculum to various degrees of success, thebiggest example being the capstone design experience usually positioned in the senioryear. Additional design experiences in the earlier years also exist in many curriculums,but in most cases the focus is on developing a purely technological solution to aspecifically stated need. The skills associated with discovering opportunities, assessingtheir potential impact, are acting upon viable opportunities are rarely, if at all, covered inthe standard engineering curriculum. Doug Melton, KEEN
, professional devel- opment, and educational outreach programs. She is co-PI for a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant to broaden participation among minority engineering students through engagement in innovation and entrepreneurship and a co-PI for an i6 Challenge grant through the U.S. Economic Development Admin- istration (EDA) to foster regional economic development through innovation and new business start-ups. She is institutional integrator for the Partnership for the Advancement of Engineering Education (PACE) at NMSU. She is also co-lead for a NSF funded Pathways to Innovation cohort at NMSU with a focus on integrating innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum through a blending of indus
capstonesenior design projects, however, many students would benefit from a greater depth of study.This has been indicated through student surveys and industry feedback. To support this, threedepartments within The Ohio State University (OSU) College of Engineering have developedcomplementary courses that cover topics in project management. In addition, students engagedin extra-curricular student projects, such as the EcoCAR 3 project, must practice projectmanagement techniques to manage multi-person teams on deliverable-oriented projects. Thispaper offers a review of these three courses within Electrical and Computer Engineering,Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and Integrated Systems Engineering. An overview ofthe techniques applied by the EcoCAR
trainer currently working for MAEF as the K-8 STEMCoordinator.She received an undergraduate degree from Mobile College and a master’s degree inmiddle school mathematics education from the University of South Alabama. For twoyears she served as a master teacher for the Southeastern Consortium for Minorities inEngineering Summer Institute.3) Tami Johnson served the Mobile County Public School System for 17 years as a K-12educator, administrator, and STEM Resource Teacher. Currently, she is an Elementaryand Middle Grades Initiatives Program Specialist at the Mobile Area EducationFoundation where she focuses primarily on integrated STEM curriculum for K-8. Sheobtained her B.S. in Elementary Education and her M.Ed. in Educational Leadership fromthe
Paper ID #13529Transformation of a large civil engineering department curriculum using theASCE BOK2Dr. Kelly Brumbelow, Texas A&M University Dr. Kelly Brumbelow is an Associate Professor and the Assistant Department Head for Undergraduate Programs in the Zachry Department of Civil Engineering at Texas A&M University. He has been a faculty member at Texas A&M since 2002, where his technical specialty is water resources engineering, planning, and management. Prior to this position, he completed his undergraduate and graduate studies at Georgia Tech, where he taught undergraduate courses for 7 years. His
results show a 20% - 30% increase in the number of students who meet or exceedexpectations when comparing the results from the spring 2013 term to the spring 2014 term.While it is too early to conclude these improvements are a result of the updated curriculum andequipment, it does suggest that a correlation exists. Future assessment results will be analyzedto further investigate the impacts that these improvements have had on student learning.ConclusionThe redevelopment of the PLC training units satisfied the objectives identified. First, the newunits allow for an open and reliable platform for the students to develop integrated hardware.Secondly, the lab sequence was redesigned to limit the scope of the course and increase the depthof the
four year grant4 directly supports the development and implementation of new fourthyear curriculum at three of the largest TexPREP sites. The developed curriculum has been madeavailable to all sites and teachers from around the state have been provided training on using thenew curriculum.Challenge Based InstructionThe development of new curriculum for the program offered an opportunity to review thepedagogy and consider new research on effective teaching strategies. The program has had along history of success through integrating projects into the curriculum. In year-end surveys,participants often cite the projects and associated competitions as the highlight of the summer.There are several proven pedagogies that use projects as an integral
to identify when these results do not make physical sense.Another concern about the coverage of FEA in our program was that the curriculum did notinclude an opportunity for students to exercise FEA as it is used in industry in terms of guidingthe development of prototypes which are then fabricated and physically tested. Our departmenthas a machine shop with versatile manufacturing and fabrication equipment, but we lackedgenuine, cost-effective, rapid prototyping capabilities. To address this issue, which was broaderthan just achieving effective instruction in FEA, the department purchased a Stratasys ObjectModel 30 three-dimensional (3D) printer in the spring of 2013. 3D printing is an additivemanufacturing technology where physical parts
, mathematics, engineering andarts, and greater focus on the Design Process through activities such as Rube Goldbergchallenges and the Dyson Project.13 One STEM related hands-on project is an invention project.Students are challenged to find a solution to a problem by creating/designing something that willmake someone’s life easier.ResultsThe statement: “Assessment of curriculum changes based on the field trip, student reflectiveessays, and future attendance at middle and high school STEM magnets will demonstrate theimportance of collaboration between universities and elementary and middle school programs(especially STEM focused programs) on engagement with STEM disciplines in the future,” waspresented as part of the abstract. These visits to The
. Page 26.1345.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Revitalizing an Electromechanical Energy Conversion CourseOur University’s Electrical and Computer Engineering Department has offered an electivecourse in “Electric Machinery” for decades. It is a 4-credit course offered each fall term forjuniors and seniors, with a laboratory component. Prior to fall 2013, this course had been lecture-heavy due to school scheduling requirements, and it suffered from use of old laboratoryequipment that was difficult to maintain. With increasing focus on renewable energy and powerelectronics in the curriculum, we felt the need to modernize this course so that it provides a betterlearning experience and
Fellow of ASEE in 2008 and of ASME in 2012. He holds a B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from Penn State, an M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering from RPI, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Princeton.Dr. Tricia Bertram Gallant, University of California, San Diego Dr. Bertram Gallant is a Lecturer with the Rady School of Management and Director of the Academic Integrity Office at UC San Diego. She is also the Outreach Coordinator for the International Center for Academic Integrity (Clemson University).Dr. Robert G. Melton, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr. Shiyu Liu, Pennsylvania State University Shiyu Liu is a postdoctoral scholar at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering
success.References[1] J.S. Lamancusa, J.E. Jorgesen, and J.L. Zayas-Castro, “The Learning Factory – A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 2, January, 2013[2] K. Yelamarthi, J. Slater, J. Wu, and P.R. Mawasha, “Engineering Management in an Interdisciplinary Senior Design Project,” Balkan Region Conf. on Engineering and Business Education. vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 153–156, August 2014[3] Z. Siddique, “Structuring Senior Design Capstone to Develop Competencies,” ASME Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Design Education, vol. 7, August, 2012
, University of PittsburghProf. Kristen Parrish, Arizona State University Kristen Parrish is an Assistant Professor in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environ- ment at Arizona State University (ASU). Kristen’s work focuses on integrating energy efficiency measures into building design, construction, and operations processes. Specifically, she is interested in novel design processes that financially and technically facilitate energy-efficient buildings. Her work also explores how principles of lean manufacturing facilitate energy-efficiency in the commercial building industry. Another research interest of Kristen’s is engineering education, where she explores how project- and
professional level, and describing the interactions betweenthe use of standards, integration, formalization, level of effectiveness, and degree ofunproductive tension between Program Management and Systems Engineering. The surveyquestionnaire that emerged contained 39 questions that explored the organization (e.g., industrysector, annual revenue, and location), program characteristics (size of the program, budget,duration and main result), processes (e.g., main standards and practices, tools and techniquesadopted) and professional characteristics such as background, years of experience, andengineering and program leader responsibilities in the organization. Data were collected during the fall of 2012. An invitation to participate in the study was
required mechanics sequence in a new integrated format to sophomores beginningwith the Fall 2009 semester. As shown in Table 1, the classical sequence of coursework insubjects of Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics of Solids, Fluid Mechanics, and Civil EngineeringMaterials was replaced with a series of three four credit courses. An overview of this curriculumrestructuring process is provided by Glynn et al.1 and Wadzuk et al.2 A Body of Knowledge(BOK) approach was used to identify the key concepts to be included in the three new courses.3 Page 26.780.2 Table 1 – Old and new mechanics curricula in CEE at Villanova University
education, there has been lack of measures toaddress the fundamental integrity of the online learning environment. This results in lack ofacceptance of online degrees by potential employers12. In addition, only a few faculty membersaccept the value and legitimacy of online education13. To address this issue on academic integrityin online education, the WCET developed, in 2009, a statement of best practice strategies topromote academic integrity in online education. The statement is organized into five discretesections: institutional context and commitment, curriculum and instruction, faculty support,student support, and assessment and evaluation14.The Council of Regional Accrediting Commissions has developed the interregional guidelinesfor the
,like the New Jersey Project. This 1986 conference developed an inclusive curriculum that beganas distinct women’s studies and evolved into curricular integration of race, ethnicity, class andgender, introducing both content and methods. By 1996, the project grew to involve more than100 faculty members in two- and four-year higher education institutions; it was followed by theCurriculum Mainstreaming Teaching Initiative that involved faculty from New Jersey, Maryland,Massachusetts, New York, Illinois, California and Tennessee.History textbooks in British Columbia tended to add content about women’s issue in sidebarsand asides from the main text. This “filler feminism” trivialized the contributions of women anddepicted a subservient, lessor role
Page 26.863.2found that introducing American engineering education style could stimulate the Chinesestudents’ creative thinking and help them apply their knowledge at a higher level 1, 5. Theybelieved that the application of the successful experiences of American higher education couldbe an asset to the development of the Chinese engineering curriculums 7.During the last decade, the Chinese higher education programs started modernizing theircurricula to meet the demands from the rapid growth of the global economy 7. Through thecollaboration among Chinese universities and universities in western countries (especiallyAmerican universities), engineering educators tried to integrate the best practices from theAmerican engineering education with