AC 2008-616: IMPACT OF INSTRUCTORS’ USE OF THE TABLET PC ONSTUDENT LEARNING AND CLASSROOM ATTENDANCEKyu Yon Lim, Pennsylvania State University Kyu Yon Lim is a PhD candidate majoring in Instructional Systems with emphasis of instructional design with emerging technology. Her research interests relate to technology integration, generative learning, and problem-based learning. She can be contacted at kylim@psu.edu.Roxanne Toto, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Roxanne Toto is an Instructional Designer and e-Learning Support Specialist for the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at the Pennsylvania State University where she teaches faculty, teaching
doing (problem formulation and problem solving), and design andengineering learning (focused on change in the student’s conceptual understanding of design).Research Methods and ParticipantsTo best address the research questions, this study uses multiple methodologies to collect andanalyze data around engineering students’ learning. Empirical evidence of what design andengineering thinking looks like and how it changes over time, and how students conceptualizedesign and engineering, comes from two participant groups: (1) a spread of undergraduateengineering students across fields of engineering, and (2) a homogeneous group of MechanicalEngineering graduate students in a project-based learning course in design and innovation forMaster’s students
Page 24.1234.4component of successful mentoring relationships, and a failure to communicate clearly aboutschedules, goals and deadlines can lead to difficult relationships between mentors and students.Thus, the pre-experience survey asked mentors whether they had discussed practical concerns(e.g., work schedules, lab safety, research procedures) and whether they had explored broaderissues like the responsible conduct of research and the societal impact of research in this area.Since the pre-experience survey was deployed about 10 days into the summer programs, theseresponses capture mentors’ conversations with students in the first week or two of theundergraduate research experience.The response options for this set of questions were Yes/No
Paper ID #22507Engagement in Practice: Socio-technical Project-based Learning Model in aFreshman Engineering Design CourseDr. Raghu Pucha, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Raghu Pucha is a Senior Lecturer at the Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Insti- tute of Technology, in the area of CAD/CAE and Manufacturing. Dr. Pucha teaches computer graphics and design courses at Georgia Tech., and conducts research in the area of developing computational tools for the design, analysis and manufacturing of advanced materials and systems. Dr. Pucha has three provisional U.S. patents and co-authored over 60
that ETscholarship should take on an applied flavor while maintaining an appropriate objective andthorough peer review component to ensure the quality of ET scholarship and maintainrespectability and acceptance within the wider academic community.11, 14In a survey of seventy-six institutions with ET programs designed to investigate appropriatecreative endeavor, research, and scholarly activities deemed important for promotion and tenureof ET faculty, Buchanan identified the most highly rated creative endeavor activities forpromotion and tenure of ET faculty to be: (1) papers or presentations given at technical orinstructional conferences, (2) applied research activities, and (3) development of courseware orinstructional material.5During an
specificprojects of current interest to the Navy and its contractors. However, robust relationshipsdeveloped with Navy labs through program alumni and graduate research sponsorships havefostered a strong cohort of Navy mentors which provide substantial support to the student teams,who share expertise beyond that of the program faculty, and bring an important Navy perspectiveto the students’ work. Weekly design reviews are conducted with naval S&T faculty, Navyengineers and, when appropriate, student organization members, providing feedback andtechnical support to the student teams.Recent projects have included design of a ducted propeller for the student organizationcompetition boat, a semi-autonomous underwater glider, and elements of an
Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Competencies for Graduate Student Training in Transdisciplinary FEWS ResearchabstractTransdisciplinarity is gaining traction as a research approach for developing impactful solutionsby bringing together diverse sources of technical and local expertise. Many of the skills andknowledge for conducting transdisciplinary research are not currently emphasized inconventional graduate education. The objective of this paper is to present a literature-supportedorganization of competencies that contribute to transdisciplinary graduate education. Anextensive literature review of more than 160 papers was undertaken to
“(c) an ability to design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”and (h) “the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal, economic, environmental, and societal context”). The senior design project can serve as anexcellent culminating experience in the program of study when it focuses on research and designprojects that have practical value to consumers or to industry. For the Engineering Technology(ET) Department at Drexel University, the senior design course is a year-long educational journey(three quarters) that takes an idea generated by a
journal entry surveys and used to develop the nationwidesurvey. Future manuscripts will detail the methods and findings in the other phases of this workand will examine additional components of the GTA experience.Situation in Current LiteratureWhile there is considerable literature on programs created for GTA development, many of thestudies are descriptive and often lack either a research component altogether or an evaluation ofthe long-term impact of the interventions.7-9 As Jamieson and Lohmann10 have stressed, practicemust inform research and research inform practice. Both components are essential to ensure thefuture establishment of research based training programs geared towards enhancing the specificpedagogical needs of GTAs. This study
Paper ID #19683Geographically Distributed Teams in Engineering Design: Best Practices andIssues in Cases of International Teams Working from Different ContinentsDr. Constanza Miranda Mendoza, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile Constanza Miranda holds a PhD in design with a focus in anthropology from North Carolina State Uni- versity. While being a Fulbright grantee, Constanza worked as a visiting researcher at the Center for Design Research, Mechanical Engineering Department, at Stanford. Today she is an assistant professor at P.Universidad Cat´olica de Chile’s Engineering School. There, she directs the DILAB: the
competitive pool of applicantsby a committee of faculty research advisors who consider students’ academic records, facultyletters of recommendation, and student skills and interests.SURE students receive subsidized on-campus housing for the duration of the program, a mealplan, travel allowance, and full access to institutional facilities, including health care,recreational facilities, and the library. In addition, the participants are awarded a stipend. The Page 12.22.3financial incentives offered by SURE are designed to attract some of the best available students,many of whom choose to participate instead of accepting more lucrative summer
hopes to study chemical engineering and continue to pursue research in college. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering and Science Practices of Stormwater Problems for High School STEM Education University of Maine College of Engineering, Orono, MaineAbstract— This paper describes a program to encourage high school students, especially femaleand under-represented minorities (URM), to participate in hands-on Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education. The program provides a learning model forscience and engineering practices of the Next Generation Science
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Integrating The Charrette Process into Engineering Education: A Case Study on a Civil Engineering Capstone CourseABSTRACTAs engineering educators rethink the structure and value of capstone courses, many have turnedto practical applications. In order to reflect the recent approaches within engineering, capstonecourses can be enhanced through the integration of charrettes. Charrettes are hands-on,collaborative sessions where stakeholders come to a design consensus. These sessions provideopportunities for students to improve communication, technical evaluation, teamwork, peerevaluation and professionalism skills. This research provides a framework for adapting thecharrette
students for the changingdesign processes they will encounter after graduation.17,18 Incorporating stakeholder interactioninto the design process can be challenging for students who do not typically encounter thesetasks during early engineering coursework. Prior research on student understanding and use ofstakeholder interaction during the design process has found that students do not always interactwith stakeholders successfully (as outlined in the design practice literature).19–21 Some of thedifficulties student encounter when attempting to interact with stakeholders causes them toneglect or dismiss stakeholder interaction during design.20,22 Thus, more research is needed todevelop pedagogy for teaching these complex processes.This study sought
Paper ID #27409Identifying Phenomena and Developing Sustainable Engineering EducationalModules that Integrate STEM Education Best Practices and Next GenerationScience Standards for Middle School Science TeachersMr. Michael Lorenzo Greene, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Michael Greene is a PhD Student at Arizona State University. He is pursuing his degree in the Engineering Education Systems and Design program, concurrently while pursuing a Master’s degree in Engineering. Michael graduated with his B.S. in Mechanical engineering from University of Pittsburgh in April of 2018. His research interest lies in diversity
second day, twoparallel 90-minute sessions are held: one for relatively new faculty members on getting academiccareers off to a good start, and one for more experienced faculty members on techniques forpromoting effective teaching on individual campuses. For each topic addressed in the workshop,practical suggestions are offered and the research attesting to their effectiveness is cited anddiscussed. Page 14.177.2 Participant evaluations collected at the conclusion of each workshop offering have beenconsistently positive. In the eighteen years that the workshop has been given, 820 overall ratingshave been submitted of which 84% were
profitability.In this paper we present preliminary results from a graphical design environment developed tointegrate design visualization research into the classroom to enhance student learning aboutmultiobjective design and optimization. By understanding the impact of graphical designenvironments on design efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction, we can improve studentunderstanding of multiobjective optimization and its use for resolving tradeoffs during design.Another objective of this research is to develop and refine technology that can allow fastgraphical interfaces for commercial design environments such as Abaqus18, Patran19, and I-DEAS20. Our results can help to define performance requirements for approximation-basedgraphical interfaces
Paper ID #37126Use of Communities of Practice to Analyze and ImproveGraduate Engineering Education.Brayan Alexander Díaz I am a Fulbright Scholar, currently in a program towards a Ph.D. in Learning and Teaching in STEM- Science Education at NCSU. I received a bachelor's and M.Sc. in Chemistry at the University Federico Santa María Technical University (UTFSM). I was very proud to receive a Trajectory Sport Award for athletes who have demonstrated leadership and highlighted sports careers at UTFSM and Undergraduate Research Grant from the Center of Ionic Liquids (CILIS- University of Chile). My interests are
, work-life balance and integration into the scientific communitywere cited as the two most common factors in driving them to leave. Issues related to relationshipswith the advisor, department, and the scientific community as a whole are mentioned as negativelyimpacting the students’ experiences in graduate school.While external factors may be at play, few studies have researched how students’ initialexpectations for graduate school impact their experiences. In a case study of two “questioners”(students who are seriously considering leaving their graduate programs) in engineering graduateprograms, the results showed that academic capability and advisor relationships were not majorfactors in each student’s decision to leave [14]. Instead
insight into team organization and structure and the team's interdisciplinary andmultifaceted skillset. Best practices, successes, and areas of opportunity for leveragingmultistakeholder collaborations were essential to our project. Our aim is to document our processas a road map for other university researchers who wish to collaborate with industry and non-profitorganizations.Keywords: Design Thinking, Systems Thinking, Collaboration Ethics, Community Engagement.IntroductionConducting collaborative research across multiple stakeholders can be considered a cumbersometask, which often requires room for adjustments and process improvement. Collaborating andcommunicating, especially in the context of longitudinal interdisciplinary research examining
architecture for long lasting software systems and pro- viding tool support to the community to nurture software feature architecture. Dr. Rahman is the first author who extracted feature-architecture while understanding the best practices of feature management and its impact on software architecture, which is another major research interest of his. Understanding and visualizing feature architecture is necessary to advance software development and engineering by maintaining a controlled architectural growth of software systems. Dr. Rahman is currently focusing on the following research areas: software feature-architecture, release management in trunk based de- velopment, software quality in trunk-based rapid-release cycles
modern practice of engineering for technology development & innovation‘has itself changed substantially’ from that portrayed by linear research-driven paradigm ofengineering practice of 1945 U.S. science policy (See Appendix A). 6 Yet, with notableexceptions, the mainstream of U.S. engineering graduate education has not reflected this change.As outcomes of investigating the need for reform of engineering graduate education forcompetitiveness in the UK and in the US, the UK Parnaby Committee and the US NationalCollaborative Task Force have basically reached similar conclusions from essentially twoparallel efforts and from two different national perspectives: UK Parnaby Report Although the UK government had already begun to
GE’s Design for Six Sigma initiative. Dr. Steiner has taught advanced design methods to hundreds of new and experienced engineers. His research interests include; design education, product architecture, mechanical reliability, design for manufacture and quality. Mark graduated from Rensselaer with a B.S. in mechanical engineering in 1978 and a Ph.D. in 1987. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Framework for Developing a Deeper Understanding of the Factors that Influence Success and Failure in Undergraduate Engineering Capstone Design ExperiencesAbstractThe engineering undergraduate curriculum presents substantial opportunities for
AC 2009-1926: GOOD JOBS, BAD JOBS: DESIGNING PROGRAMEDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVESJane Fraser, Colorado State University, Pueblo Jane M. Fraser is chair of the Department of Engineering at Colorado State University-Pueblo. She was formerly on the faculty at the Ohio State University and Purdue University. She has a BA in mathematics from Swarthmore College and MS and PhD in industrial engineering and operations research from the University of California-Berkeley. Page 14.651.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Good Jobs, Bad Jobs
.”One recent graduate wrote to praise for the program, particularly the writing process. Pellerin8, aMay 2011 graduate, writes about his current job experience and the importance of writing skillsin an open letter to current seniors: The design-build process requires the submission of a technical proposal much like the capstone projects you are working on. It has become evident that coming up with a concise and clear proposal is crucial to winning these design build jobs since a lot of the designs and cost estimates can be similar between competing teams. Expressing your research, design and proposed methods of construction in a clear and concise way are equally as important as the design itself. I have found
project management and leadership texts and training guidesavailable in the literature, including many valuable electronic resources.The research team took a similar approach in providing teacher training for the graduate studentmentors. The graduate students were provided with references on teaching best-practices. Thesereferences taught the graduate students how to develop learning objectives, employ differentquestioning techniques, understand different learning styles, and develop interpersonal rapport.3As with project management and leadership, there are many teaching references available in theliterature, which are not listed herein.Early in the project, the research team recognized that encouraging effective communicationbetween the
AC 2011-2275: CIRTL: IMPACTING STEM EDUCATION THROUGH GRAD-UATE STUDENT PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTJustin P. Micomonaco, Michigan State University Page 22.325.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning: Impacting STEM Education through Graduate Student Professional DevelopmentAbstract This paper summarizes findings of a national, multi-institutional effort to reform STEMundergraduate education through the implementation of graduate student professionaldevelopment programs focused on improving teaching practice
Paper ID #42429Different Teaching Styles and the Impacts on Test Design for DynamicsDr. Amie Baisley, University of Florida I am an Instructional Assistant Professor at the University of Florida teaching primarily 2nd year mechanics courses. My teaching and research interests are alternative pedagogies, mastery-based learning and assessment, student persistence in their first two years, and faculty development.Dr. Julian Ly Davis, University of Southern Indiana Jul Davis is an Associate Professor of Engineering at the University of Southern Indiana in Evansville, Indiana. He received his PhD in 2007 from Virginia Tech in
undergraduate and experienced graduate students who have a demonstrated interest in issues of sustainable development. 2) Integrating the research experience into education initiatives that are focused on sustainable development. 3) Ensuring the research experience focuses on appropriate technology (defined here as the use of materials and technology that are culturally, economically, and socially suitable to the area in which they are implemented). 4) Using an operational model for sustainable development that is a global partnership, so students understand how to integrate and transfer the best and most appropriate knowledge, methodologies, techniques, and practices between the developed and developing
design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Dr. Diane L. Peters, Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University. Her engineering education research focuses on returning students in graduate education - those who practice in industry for a substantial period of time before returning to school for a graduate degree. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Challenges and Benefits of Applied Experience as an Engineering Returner in a PhD ProgramI. IntroductionThis research paper describes the experiences of returning