similar increases in the participants’ engineeringidentity, such as “I enjoy laboratory research and would like to make it my career.” On average,personal characteristics and educational goals did not change significantly, although these tendedto be high already (around 5.5).Faculty summer teaching workshop: A survey instrument was sent to faculty participants to collecttheir thoughts on the teaching workshop. All ten faculty members participated and returnedevaluation surveys. The results are summarized in Figure 4. The survey asked participants to ratetheir skills and knowledge in the four workshop content areas before and after the workshop on ascale of 0 (None) to 4 (A great deal). The mean increase was almost a full position, from 2.93
design.Dr. Robi Polikar, Rowan UniversityDr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Dr. Kevin Dahm is an associate professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. from WPI in 1992 and his Ph.D. from MIT in 1998. His primary areas of pedagogical scholarship are teaching design, process simulation in the curriculum, assessment of student learning and teaching engineering economics. He has received the 2011 Mid-Atlantic Section Outstanding Teaching Award, the 2005 Corcoran Award, the 2004 Fahien Award and the 2003 Martin Award from ASEE.Prof. Robert M Nickel, Bucknell University Robert. M. Nickel received the Diplom-Ing. degree in Electrical Engineering from the Rheinisch- Westflische Technische
Computer Engineering at the University of Washington in Seattle. His research is centered on developing remote laboratories with a lens of equitable access to engineering education, and driven by his commitment to promote diversity, equity and inclusion in STEM education. In addition to his research on remote laboratories, Marcos has expertise in digital communication theory, signal process- ing, radar technology, and firmware engineering. Additionally, he has extensive experience in teaching embedded systems and senior design courses.Zhiyun Zhang, University of Washington Zhiyun Zhang is an undergraduate research assistant in the Remote Hub Lab at the University of Wash- ington. He is a graduating senior and an
AC 2012-3281: PROJECT-BASED DESIGN OF A BIOMETRIC FACE RECOG-NITION SYSTEMDr. Ravi P. Ramachandran, Rowan University Ravi P. Ramachandran received the B.Eng degree (with great distinction) from Concordia University in 1984, the M.Eng degree from McGill University in 1986 and the Ph.D. degree from McGill University in 1990. From Oct. 1990 to Dec. 1992, he worked at the Speech Research Department at AT&T Bell Laboratories. From Jan. 1993 to Aug. 1997, he was a Research Assistant Professor at Rutgers University. He was also a Senior Speech Scientist at T-Netix from July 1996 to Aug. 1997. Since Sept. 1997, he has been with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rowan University where he has
research experiences for teachers in the laboratories of faculty and providesyear-long activities to support implementation of research-based curriculum in the classroom.High school teachers and community college faculty are engaged in a six-week summer researchand training program in cutting edge research in sustainable polymer engineering. Integratedwith the research experience are education and professional development programs, includingteam-building workshops, short courses in polymer science, field trips to industry, presentationskills development, and workshops in developing activities for laboratory experiments based ontheir research. Teachers partner with graduate students, who serve as research mentors during thesummer and visiting
Paper ID #29762Understanding Context: Propagation and Effectiveness of the ConceptWarehouse in Mechanical Engineering at Five Diverse Institutions andBeyond – Results from Year 1Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the
AC 2012-5166: PHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS TO ENHANCE MODEL-ELICITINGACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATIONDr. Andrew Kean, California Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University Brian P. Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-12 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education
Paper ID #8998An Examination of the Effects of Contextual Computer-aided Design Exer-cises on Student Modeling PerformanceDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Xiaobo Peng, Prairie View A&M University Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Prairie View A&M UniversityDr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science and engineering education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his
scholar in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State University. Debra has an M.BA, an M.S, and four years of industrial experience including a position in sensor development. Sensor development is also an area in which she holds a patent. She currently has research focused on student learning in virtual laboratories and the diffusion of educational interventions and practices.Prof. Erno Lehtinen, University of Turku ERNO LEHTINEN is professor of education at the University of Turku and is currently holding a five- year Academy Professor position in the Centre for Learning Research of the University of Turku. He has studied early development of mathematical skills, technology
patents and has over twenty-five years of experience in industry and academia. Research Interests Sylvia Wilson Thomas, Ph.D. leads the Advanced Membrane/Materials Bio and Integration Research (AMBIR) laboratory at USF. Dr. Thomas’ research and teaching endeavors are focused on advanced mem- branes/materials for alternative energy sources, sustainable environments, electronics, and bio-applications from the micro to the nano scale. Her research investigates the fabrication of inorganic and organic thin films and nanofibers for device integration. Thomas’ research group specializes in characterizing, mod- eling, and integrating membranes that demonstrate high levels of biocompatibility, thermal reflectivity
Paper ID #10224NSF-NUE: Using Nanotechnology to Engage Students from High School throughGraduate SchoolDr. Raquel Perez Castillejos, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Raquel Perez-Castillejos is an assistant professor of Biomedical Engineering at the New Jersey Insti- tute of Technology (NJIT). Her research (www.tissuemodels.net) focuses on the development of tools for cell and tissue biology using micro- and nanotechnologies. Raquel obtained her Ph.D. with the National Center of Microelectronics in Barcelona. She was a postdoctoral fellow at the Laboratory of Miniaturized Systems (Univ. S˜ao Paulo, Brasil) and later
boy, he filled sandbags to channel a river down State Street in his native Salt Lake City after the El Ni˜no winter of 1982-1983. He earned his B.S. from the University of Pennsylvania in 1995, then taught high school through Teach for America and worked as a contractor at Los Alamos National Laboratory before earn- ing his M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of California Berkeley in 1999 and 2005, respectively. He has been at CU Denver since 2005, where he applies ideas from complex systems science to study flow in porous media, leads the graduate track in Hydrologic, Environmental, and Sustainability Engineering (HESE), leads the NSF-sponsored faculty learning community Engineering is Not Neutral: Transforming
Paper ID #22265Optimizing Student Team Skill Development using Evidence-Based Strate-gies: Year 3: NSF Award 1431694Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best
Biomechanics Lab at the Mayo Clinic. Dr. Ringleb research interests include, biome- chanics and rehabilitation engineering as well as multi-disciplinary approaches to improving engineering education.Dr. Jennifer Jill Kidd, Old Dominion University Dr. Jennifer Kidd is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Teaching and Learning at Old Dominion Uni- versity. Her research interests include engineering education, computational thinking, student-authored digital content, classroom assessment, especially peer review, and diversity issues. She currently has sup- port from the National Science Foundation for two projects related to engineering education for preservice teachers.Dr. Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University Pilar
Paper ID #42041Board 395: Supporting STEM Faculty in Adopting and Adapting WritingPedagogiesBruce Kovanen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Bruce Kovanen is a PhD candidate in the Department of English and the Center for Writing Studies. He works with faculty and teaching assistants across the disciplines to help hone their writing pedagogy. His research and teaching focus on sociocultural perspectives of literacy and learning.Prof. Paul Prior Paul Prior is Professor Emeritus in the Center for Writing Studies and the Department of English at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research has focused on
development. This paper outlines the proposed work and the materials developed tosupport the implementation of the project in Fall 2015.IntroductionComputer programming is a common mandatory course taught in the first year of engineeringand computer science programs. These types of courses typically utilize a common programminglanguage (MATLAB, C, Java) to teach students about syntax, programming techniques, andintroduce students to applied problem solving1-4. Learning a computer programming languagehas been known to be difficult for high-school and university students because of the lack of timefor practice5, in addition to the conceptual complexity of the topic and logical reasoningprocesses required for understanding. Programming courses are
the learning objectives of the courses have been accomplished, theirconfidence in taking on new challenges in these domains, and the degree to which they feel thatthe HPL centers entered into the course. This last topic was addressed by a series of elements notdirectly asking about HPL, but framed to reveal this. For example, to understand whether thecourse was assessment-centered we asked their level of agreement with the statements, “Ireceived adequate feedback on my work,” and “I was able to obtain enough practice onimportant topics.”Another part of the quantitative study was gauging to what extent the teaching reflects HPL. Weexpected simply by using the laboratory kits and employing active learning, these courses will beassessment and
access to the PHY and MAC as enabled by the programmable wireless platforms.• To integrate the SDR experiments and projects with traditional wireless communications courses to enhance teaching and student learning.• To develop a new SDR laboratory course for junior and senior level wireless engineering students. The objective is to expose undergraduate students to the advanced SDR technology with a hands-on approach, and to train the future wireless workforce with the much needed SDR expertise.The proposed project will enhance student learning and improve the quality of our undergraduateeducation, specifically, enhancing Auburn University’s ABET-accredited Bachelor of WirelessEngineering (BWE) program, first-of-its-kind in the nation. The
an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She teaches courses in circuits, electromagnetics, and medical imaging. Before joining academia in 2006, she was at the Computed Tomography Laboratory at GE’s Global Research Center for 8 years. She worked on several technology development projects in the area of X-ray CT for medical and industrial imaging. She is a named inventor on 9 patents. She has been active in the recruitment and retention of women and minorities in engineering and currently PI for an NSF-STEM grant to improve diversity at Rose-Hulman.Dr. Kathleen Meehan, Virginia Tech Kathleen Meehan earned her B.S. in electrical engineering from Manhattan
they are used as tools for generating ideas and visual communication, especially when it involves the skill to generate quick and realistic sketches of an object or idea. He has also conducted research on how to effectively teach these skills to novice engineers.Miss Myela A Paige, Georgia Institute of Technology Myela Paige is a first-year graduate research assistant in the Engineering Design Research Lab at Georgia Institute of Technology. She is pursuing her Master of Science and PhD in Mechanical Engineering under the advisement of Dr. Katherine Fu. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Maryland Baltimore County in 2015. Myela is passionate about helping students from all walks of life
research on Si and GaAs electronic devices and semiconductor lasers at the research laboratories of GEC and ITT and published numerous articles in this field. He was a professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Dominion University. He has advised 14 PhD and 16 MS students. He received numerous awards: Doctoral Mentor Award 2010; Excellence in Teaching Award 2009; Most Inspiring Faculty Award 2008; Excellence in Research Award 2004; and Certificate of Recognition for Research - NASA, 1994. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and a Member of the Electrochemical Society.Dr. Demetris Geddis, Hampton University Demetris L. Geddis is an associate professor and Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Hamp
Paper ID #14778Planning and Assessment of a Workshop on Undergraduate Education in Bio-metric SystemsDr. Ravi P. Ramachandran, Rowan University Ravi P. Ramachandran received the B. Eng degree (with great distinction) from Concordia University in 1984, the M. Eng degree from McGill University in 1986 and the Ph.D. degree from McGill University in 1990. From October 1990 to December 1992, he worked at the Speech Research Department at AT&T Bell Laboratories. From January 1993 to August 1997, he was a Research Assistant Professor at Rutgers University. He was also a Senior Speech Scientist at T-Netix from July 1996 to
School of Engineering Educa- tion at Purdue University. His research interests include creating systems for sustainable improvement in engineering education, conceptual change and development in engineering students, and change in fac- ulty beliefs about teaching and learning. He serves as the Publications Chair for the ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division.Dr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Programs in the Depart- ment of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). She has been active in improving undergraduate education including developing laboratories to enhance experimental
“immediate value” by participating in workshop activities. Thisimmediate value is gained through the information presented and the activities, e.g. presentationsand laboratory exercises. Immediate value is assessed through pre-workshop and post-workshopsurveys. The post-workshop surveys will also point to “potential value,” i.e. the intent tointegrate workshop material into the classes that they teach, or in other professional activities, ifthey don’t teach. For immediate value, 29 faculty attended (16 community college instructors, 13four-year engineering technology professors). 16 out of 29 (55%) faculty currently teachmicrocontrollers in their classes. On the other hand, for potential values, 24 out of 29 (83%)faculty plan to incorporate workshop
cost effectiveness issues due to the recent economic crisis. Manufacturingcompanies are cautious about sustainable workforce, particularly in equipment operation. Theworkers’ faulty operations could cause significant damage of the facilities and personal injuriesand safety hazards. Therefore, the intensive, informative and 24 hour access learning andtraining tools are demanded. This is a collaborative project between IMSE department and MEdepartment to significantly enhance effectiveness in cyber based learning. This collaboration isto address the fundamental, yet challenging problem in manufacturing education: (1) How toimprove teaching and learning effectiveness in online course and facility oriented learning andtraining; (2) How to better
, 1998. 2 U.S. Department of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/ May 8, 2011. 3 Dean J, Schechter AN. “Sickle-cell anemia: molecular and cellular bases of therapeutic approaches,” New England Journal of Medicine. 1978;299:752-63. 4 Horne M. “Sickle cell anemia as a rheological disease.” The American Journal of Medicine. 1981;70:288-98. 5 Merrill E. “Rheology of Blood,” Physiol Rev. 1969;49:863-88. 6 Vernengo, J., C. Purdy and S. Farrell, An Experiment for the Undergraduate Laboratory that Teaches Fundamental Concepts of Rheology within the Context of Sickle Cell Anemia, Chemical Engineering Education, in press, 2014. 7 Lysaght, M.J. Boggs, D.R. and Taimisto, M.H., “Membranes in Artificial Organs,” in Synthetic Membranes, M.B. Chenoweth, ed
Engineering Course”, IEEE Trans. on Education,56(4), 430-435.[11] Ng, W. (2014). Flipping the Science Classroom: Exploring Merits, Issues, and Pedagogy. Teaching Science Page 26.175.14 60(3), 16-27.[12] Smith, J. D. (2013). Student Attitudes Toward Flipping the General Chemistry Classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 14, 607-614.[13] Thorsen, D.L. and Sowa, L.S. (2014). Transforming a Freshman Electrical Engineering Laboratory Course to Improve Access to Place Bound Students. Poster presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 25
Society of Engineering Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005 Quinn Award for experiential learning. Stephanie has conducted workshops on a variety of topics including effective teaching, inductive teaching strategies and the use of experiments and demonstrations to enhance learning.Dr. Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Taryn Bayles, Ph.D., is a Professor of the Practice of chemical engineering in the Chemical, Biochemi- cal, and Environmental Engineering Department at UMBC, where she incorporates her industrial expe- rience by bringing practical examples and interactive learning to help students understand fundamental
21st century of digital learning, and technology integration. Yang’s latest research focuses on employing an innovative synergis- tic approach to prevent/eliminate misconceptions from forming with first-year engineering students, and teaching STEM disciplines in online environments.Dr. Inanc Senocak, Boise State University Dr. Inanc Senocak is an associate professor with the Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineer- ing at Boise State University. He obtained his Ph.D. degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Florida in 2002. Dr. Senocak served as a postdoctoral research associate at the Los Alamos National Laboratory and Stanford University prior to joining Boise State in 2007. Dr. Senocak
literature reviews, identifying opportunities for external funding (scholarships andfellowships), applying to graduate school, and communicating scientific findings through oralpresentation. In addition, the effect size (Cohen’s d)11,12 was calculated for each item (Table 1).This indicates the practical significance of changes for each item between TP1 and TP2. Thesevalues show that there was not significant overlap between the TP1 and TP2 responses except forItem 1 (“document my research in a laboratory notebook”) and Item 2 (“steps to patentresearch”). Focus group interviews conducted by the evaluator confirmed these survey findingsand pointed to specific REU programming that boosted students’ self-efficacy in these areas.Table 1: Mean values of