feedback. Students need to know how well they are doingand are typically open to suggestions for improvement. Generally, the clearer and morespecific an instructor can be with feedback, the better the results for students. Students alsobenefit from peer reactions and should be encouraged to take responsibility for their ownlearning (i.e., taught to self-evaluate). Providing accurate feedback and helping students totake charge of learning can stimulate healthy minds. Page 15.695.3Improving Pedagogy with Differentiated InstructionA key concept in differentiated instruction is applying a proactive approach to the learningand teaching model. As such
year and they have the chance to choose between them. By the end of the junioryear teams, are selected and faculty advisors start working with the students. By the end of thefirst semester of the senior year each team is required to write a project proposal that includes theproject feasibility, its implementation plan, and the scope of the work to be accomplished. Theproposal is reviewed by Project Review Board (PRB) who are a group of faculty including thefaculty advisor and each team is required to give a presentation. If the project is approved byPRB, the team starts the building and testing during the second semester. A second round ofreview by PRB is done during the mid-semester to evaluate the progress of the project. In thismodel, the
Applied Engineering Technology@ BCC Transfer articulation agreement 187.5 creditsCourses Completed @ BCC AAS.MHT Transfer Credits into Drexel AET-MHT Course # Course Description Credits Course # Course Description CreditsENG 101 College Composition I 3 ENG 101 Expository Writing & Reading 3ENG 102 College Composition II 3 ENG 102 Persuasive Writing & Reading 3 0 ENG 103 Analytical Writing & Reading 3MTH 130 Pre -Calculus 4
,interactions with faculty and peers, team projects, student organizations, and independent travel.Yet even as such programs and experiences gain traction against the backdrop of ambitiousglobal visions, challenges remain. To begin, there is the problem of scaling up. Even generousestimates suggest that only about 5% of American engineering students have a substantial globalexperience during their undergraduate years, while others assert that only 10-15% of U.S.engineering schools are taking global education seriously.11,14 Persistent barriers to expandingglobal engineering education – ranging from financial considerations and inflexible curricula to alack of institutional support and language issues – are well documented.6 But even as these kindsof
that anindividual can draw on these skills when they are needed. In the context of basketball this meansreviewing basics such as shooting and dribbling, developing new skills such as defensive movement orrebounding, developing plays which focus on team interactions, and preparing for a particular opponentor situations. In preparing for a project, students must do similar activities. They have to repeat basicskills like report writing or preparing charts and diagrams, they must acquire new skills like the designof an assembly line. They also need to work together as a team where individuals develop designs forcomponents that must fit together into the final product. They must also look outside their own team toprepare for the client
: Study science and engineering phenomenon at the Arizona Science Center. Demonstrate knowledge gained throughout this year-round program by engaging younger peers and their families visiting the center through small-scale hands-on workshops on specific project-based challenges. 2. Industry-Internship: Study alternative energy sources (wind, solar, hydro, and hydrogen fuel-cells) and build renewable energy models at the Salt River Project, a local water and energy service provider. 3. Technology Workshop: Study basic TI-84 plus graphing calculator functions (graphing, creating tables, performing calculations, etc.) and its connection to basic programming, data collection probes (temperature
through several iterations. The paper also demonstrates a process toshow how some certainty can be achieved in developing an ambitious advanced concept throughthe notion of a “figure of merit”. The results have led to a poster presentation and progresstowards peer-reviewed archival publication. 2. IntroductionWeary travelers have long dreamt of flying supersonic in spacious comfort across the world. Yettoday there appears to be no immediate prospect of the leading airliner manufacturers developingaffordable and viable realizations of this dream. This paper explores the notion of using thehydrogen-fueled SST as the focus of undergraduate projects, thereby raising awareness,debunking superstitions and
surveys, one of studentswho took open-book open-Web exams, and one of instructors who administered onlineexams.1. IntroductionIn today’s world, tests and exams are given in an environment that is increasingly artificial.Most technical work is done with computers. Few people would attempt to write acomputer program, analyze forces on a building, or even write a piece of prose, without theaid of a computer. But that’s just the kind of environment we place our students in whenthey take an exam.All of the leading learning-management systems and textbook publishers have online testingmodules that can be used to deliver quizzes or exams. However, few instructors havecompletely done away with paper exams. Online exams preclude certain types of questions
student response systems("clickers") to enhance small group interactive discussions and peer-based learning; CAE/CAMsoftware and rapid prototyping technology to allow students to design and manufacturesophisticated components without overwhelming our machine shop resources; in-classdemonstrations of engineering principles with oversized components and associated interactivestudent team discussions and clicker responses; inverting the lecture/homework paradigm byproviding lectures on YouTube and using in-class activities to work on homework/exampleproblems in small groups in class; elimination of some textbooks when lecture material cansuffice in order to save the students money; hands-on laboratory experiments using inexpensive,mass-produced
definition of what (Roth, 1996, common materials. meanings for materials and writing). In order constitutes a good 1997, 2001) Learn: Stability, artifacts, (3) being for science design task; the shapes, forces. conscious of participation in learning to effectiveness of the Task: Build a design, (4) negotiating with occur, discourse design context machine that uses classmates, (5) using a must hold as depends on the simple machines. variety of tools in much weight as individual teacher. Learn: Physics of interesting
arrive at general consensus ofwhat appears to be widely accepted definitions, and to shed light on how common terms areused.Active learning is generally defined as any instructional method that engages students in thelearning process. It is widely accepted that active learning requires students to take part in “pre-planned” learning-related activities, believed to spark and stimulate their learning, while in theclassroom 5, 6 .These activities would include: reading, writing, solving problems, answeringquestions, participating in a discussion, etc.; and most important, students must be engaged inthinking tasks while actively involved. It is generally understood that during active learning, lessemphasis is placed on transmission of information
Cooperative Writing and Oral Presentation as Peer Teaching – Evaluating the Effectivenessof Element of Inductive Teaching and Social Constructivism on Student Outcomes”, Proc. ASEE Frontiers inEducation Conference, 2009, Session T4D.4. Kitto, K. L., “Developing and Assessing Conceptual Information in Materials Engineering, Using WrittenResearch Papers and Oral Poster Presentations, “Proc. ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008, SessionF4A.5. Kitto, K. L., “The Sound of Materials: Creating Excitement for Materials Engineering and Science InEngineering Technology Programs, June 2007, Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, AC 2007-297.6. Kitto, K. L., “Analyzing What Students Write About Materials – Another Strategy for Developing ConceptualLearning in a
Fischetti, M., “Working Knowledge: Fresh from the Sea”, Scientific American, Vol. 297, Issue 3, pp. 118-119. Page 15.345.9Appendix A : Pre-Project Survey Name e-mail address Major Do you live on campus or off campus? Best times to meet outside of class Is there any student you cannot work with? Rate your skills in the following areas from 1-10 : Handiness (mechanical abilities with tools) Math Computers Writing Leadership (managing a team) Page 15.345.10Appendix B
an M.A. in creative writing from Iowa State University.Ann Burnett, North Dakota State University Ann Burnett is an Associate Professor of Communication at North Dakota State University. Burnett holds a Ph.D. degree in Communication from the University of Utah and an M.A. degree in Communication from the University of Northern Colorado.Roger Green, North Dakota State University Roger Green is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. Green holds Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Wyoming. Page
Beyond Boundariesrelative to transforming undergraduate engineering education have been in the areas of: • Leading a change management process • Getting broad faculty involvement • Applying research on engineering education innovation from peer institutions and educational research.The work of the Engineering Beyond Boundaries (EB2) Task Force and Roundtable has beenfully supported from the college administrative leadership and increasingly has formed the basisof the college’s strategic plan. Department Chairs and Faculty have been invited to engage in theplanning process as members of the Task Force and/or Roundtable to provide ideas and create
’ peers; Beliefs concerning the nature of professional engineering work; The social status of the engineering profession. This has a wider dimension which embeds the social as well as industry evaluation of engineering as an occupational group and touches upon issues of professional autonomy, social orientation and inclusion of ethics in the course of professional practice; Knowledge base and intellectual abilities required prior to undertaking studies in engineering; and Teaching and Learning in schools and faculties of engineering. Prospective students often rely on indirect information from their peers, friends and siblings who are or have studied engineering. These opinions are influenced by engineering academic beliefs and perceptions of
meetcertain criteria. To do so, there is a formal assessment procedure. ≠ All senior projects in the College of Engineering are presented in a public forum during the Spring semester of each year. ≠ The students prepare and present the results of their projects. ≠ The audience consists of students (peers), faculty, members of the College and Departmental industrial advisory boards, and any other interested parties. ≠ After the formal presentation and question and answer period, the attendees are requested to complete an assessment form for each project. The form includes questions on content, visual aids, the presenter’s delivery, the presentation mechanism, responses to
communication is frequently is used to convey ideas and project results. Reports, proposals, andproject results are transmitted to others in written form. These documents must be clear, concise, anderror free because there is no opportunity for immediate response from the reader. Oral presentations toan audience of peers and superiors also must be clear, concise and error free. In addition, key ideas mustbe presented visually in such a way that a knowledgeable audience can follow them without prior study.The effective engineer-leader must continually strive to improve both written and oral communicationskills.Two-way communication is much more commonly encountered in day-to-day activities. Here, of course,there is an opportunity for verbal exchange of
inSTOMP to their peers, it should be noted that most of the teachers reported initiating theirinvolvement in STOMP themselves based on their perceived lack of confidence with, orknowledge of engineering and technology content. This was supported by teacher statementslike: “I did not feel as confident in teaching engineering and technology as other science topics. My coworker suggested contacting you.” “…we are supposed to teach engineering concepts according to my school district, but we have been given hardly any training!!”A comparison group would provide deeper insight into the impacts of STOMP.Bibliography1. Portsmore, M., Rogers, C., & Pickering, M. (2003). STOMP: Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship
students from different majors to interact and communicate with each other.Students were strongly encouraged to seek advice from peer students for assignments that werenot in their fields.Nine assignments were given in the first eight weeks of the semester and accounted for 40% ofthe final grade. Student grade information on these assignments is given below in Table 1. Theaverage score in all areas is above 80%. Table 1: Student grades on individual homework assignments Homework Area Average Minimum Maximum grade % grade % grade % Robotics 82.6 20 100 Algorithms and data
Requirement for GraduationIntroductionProfessional internships are not a new concept to college and university programs.However, to require this experience in the form of a demanding, well designed andimplemented internship is a very time consuming investment, which will yield excellentreturns for your students and for your program. Students, both traditional and non-traditional, are given an opportunity to demonstrate, advance, and refine technical andsupervisory competencies learned in the classroom and in the laboratories. Graduateswith this type of resume-worthy experience have a substantial advantage over peers withno internship experience. “Once, having an internship or two on your resume made you areal standout in the marketplace. Today
to develop these outcomes the Engineering Technology faculty at MU had to complete acareful analysis of each required course in the curriculum as well as the technical electives. Themodel suggested by Angelo was used in this process21. The model is based on four basicpreconditions: shared trust, shared vision and goals, shared language and concepts, and sharedguidelines22. Shared trust is one of the most important preconditions needed for a meaningfulanalysis of the curriculum and to identify outcomes that will be high quality assessmentindicators. Angelo points out that in order for trust to occur the “participants need to feelrespected, valued, safe, and in the company of worthy peers”23. To facilitate this approach, theEngineering
communication).As part of a National Science Foundation CCLI Phase 1 grant, DUE: 0836861, three designactivities are being developed and incorporated in the first-year engineering program at MichiganTech. For this project, three groups (undergraduate, graduate and faculty) with differenteducational backgrounds developed learning modules. The student groups were selected to helpwith the development because it would give a fresh perspective on the design projects. Theundergraduate students would gain some ownership in the education of their peers. The graduatestudent would learn more about teaching through the development of a design project. Theutilization of the student groups to develop design projects would permit more design projects tobe available
weregiven a chance to teach the module contents to students enrolled in the Upward Bound Programand then assessed each of their own and peers performances. Teacher Training 9:00am-12:00pm Course Content and Pedagogical Methodology Application Refine 1:00pm-2:30pm Incorporate Lessons from Evaluation in Teacher Training of the Subsequent Day. Conduct Module with Upward Bound Students Evaluation / Reflection 2:30pm-4:00pm Actively Evaluate Peer and Self PerformanceFigure 2: Schematic of the general
. Conduct economic analyses of the various systems proposed. 3. The ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (ABET outcome e). In particular, you will be expected to: i. Solve heat loss problems relating to building envelopes. ii. Solve problems of thermodynamic equilibrium and energy balance. iii. Solve piping and airflow distribution problems. 4. The ability to communicate effectively (ABET outcome g). In particular, you will: i. Write technical reports and memos regarding findings. ii. Make presentations of technical material to peers and colleagues. 5. The ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
findings, 10 respondents, or 91 percent, reported that they were “likely”or “very likely” to mention the Innovations course during a job interview or with colleagues (seeTable 2). Several respondents chose to write additional responses related to the questions in aprovided text box labeled “please explain.”In response to Question 4, many participants highlighted aspects of the program that they wouldor have mentioned to a potential employer or a colleague. Consider the following written responses to Question 4: “I am likely to mention the Innovations course in a job interview because it was a very unique experience. I think potential employers will appreciate my experience in working with interdisciplinary
, and professional liability Demonstrate an ability to explain the reasons for seeking professional licensure after graduation Demonstrate an ability to write effective essays and technical reportsGraduates have an ability to Demonstrate an ability to compose and deliver an effective oral presentation communicate effectively Demonstrate an ability to prepare a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) for a civil engineering project Graduates have the broad education necessary to Demonstrate an ability to develop community consensus building techniques for a understand the impact of civil
rising energy prices create a renewed opportunityto move U.S. public policy and engineering education in a mutually beneficial direction. Callsfor change in the way energy education occurs are certainly not new, and earlier expressions ofconcern are a good source for our current reflection. Writing in 1973, the highly respectedRepublican legislator Howard Baker pondered the then-current oil supply shortage.4 Heconcluded that well-developed education programs linking environmental attitudes with energyuse could have a strong and lasting impact on energy consumption behaviors in the country. Inthe 1970‘s, President Jimmy Carter advocated the development of energy education programs tochange students‘ perceptions of energy and alter patterns of
adding online students to their existing courses using NEW,and these efforts gradually expanded to allow students to complete an MS in Computer Science Page 15.687.4entirely online.The open-source NEW system has similar functionality to many widely-used commercialsystems for online synchronous course delivery. The primary interface is a computer-basedwhiteboard, which can be used to display slides, share images of running applications, write, ordraw. The system includes audio, so that the instructor's voice is broadcast along with theimages, and students in the distance environment who have microphone-equipped computers canparticipate via voice
advancement ofequipment whether due to increased enrollment or increasing functional capacity. Students aregiven the chance of using industry scale devices in the laboratory and are given increasingresponsibilities as the term progresses in terms of setting up equipment and writing their dataacquisition programs. The final culminating task is to simulate a set of previously conductedexperiments using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software packages.Historical Regional Teaching StyleThe Regional teaching styles have historically relied on rote memorization and reproduction, acarryover from the regional cultures as well as a result of the extreme pace of the modernizationthat has carried through much of the Region.4,7,9 The regional teaching style