methods allow the individual student to learn from the instructor, peers, and as anindividual student researching and mastering material. Active learners could benefit by activelyparticipating in lab, hands-on activities. Reflective learners can use the PBL and case studies toreflect over the problem or the framework story associated to the module activities. The researchor fact gathering opportunity the students conduct while developing their environmentalsustainability projects would facilitate learning for students who are sensing learners. Intuitivelearners can use the case studies and PBL to investigate “what if” scenarios in their projects.Visual and verbal learners receive both types of learning styles using PBL and case studies.Sequential
and create a presentation of the plan to peers and mentors by the end of first week.Weeks 2 – 6: Research Study Conduct the research study according to plans developed in Week 1. Meet once per week with the full group to review progress with peers. Meet twice per week within subgroups working on related research questions. Document changes in research plans as needed. Initiate and document plans for development of curriculum learning module in consultation with mentor and engineering research and development consultants. Page 22.1250.4Curriculum Learning Module Implementation:During the summer RET
to the student outcomes, faculty were interested in observing the students duringprogress and troubleshooting sessions. As part of the Project Based Learning approach in theseengineering programs, active learning is a common theme in the student projects. Alison King5describes what she calls guided reciprocal peer questioning as part of the active learning process.The types of questions she describes that induce higher-order thinking include How does…affect…? Why is….important? Explain why… What are the strengths and weaknesses of…?The faculty were interested in seeing if the students had grasped these concepts in their freshmanthrough juniors years and were able to apply them instinctively in this project
. Page 22.1498.5Mid-career development opportunities include: having dedicated time for major retooling ofcourses and curricula (e.g. reduced teaching load); engaging in education as a research problemthrough grant writing and publications (e.g. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning); andcollaborating with colleagues both inside and outside of engineering disciplines.Finally, late-career development opportunities include: having senior faculty serve as mentors tojunior faculty; providing training on how to mentor; and keeping pace with technology, trends,tools, etc. – something that should reasonably occur throughout the career.2. How engineering faculty are motivated and rewarded for these opportunitiesFaculty need: real-world, practical
- secondary programs, she has also had responsibility for writing and administrating educationally oriented grants at the K-12, secondary, and post-secondary levels. Previously she worked extensively in the health care industry, including work as a senior microbiologist for Pharmacia Upjohn and as a laboratory research assistant at a Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. She earned a Master’s degree in Public Administration in 2002 from Oakland University and a Bachelor’s degree from Illinois College in 1981. She is a current member of the Oakland County’s Workforce Development Business Round table and serves
school, receiving encouragement andsupport, work and career satisfaction, learning perspective and alternative solutions to theirproblems, less work and non-work conflict, and gaining individual recognition, confidence andself esteem. The mentor’s role is to listen, refer, advise, help the mentee gain perspective, and toserve as a role model. Mentors and mentees discuss problems and recurring themes. The peermentoring program is voluntary. Mentees who begin the peer mentoring program can opt out atany time. When the teacher quality improves, the students’ achievements also improve8. Mentorsfeel an even greater commitment to engineering and enjoy the experience of helping others.ObjectivesThe objectives of this study are to (1) provide new
team demonstrates their working robot to the class, writes afinal written report on it, and makes an oral presentation to the class on the design, fabrication,and performance of their robot. A video of their working system is submitted with their finalreport and shown at their final presentation. Page 22.674.3Multidisciplinary Engineering Focus Prerequisite skills needed for the Robotics course are rather minimal. Students are required tohave fourth or fifth year status in order to register for the course. They should have experiencewith DC circuits and circuit troubleshooting using a multimeter. Mechanical engineeringstudents will have taken
higher destruction rate clearly results incontaminated food. The assignment requires a written report and an oral report, both completed by theentire group. Students are given a rubric (Figure 1) used to evaluate the oral presentations, andall students complete an evaluation of all presentations. This has the benefit of training studentsin evaluation, and forces them to note the distinctions between good and poor presentations. At Page 22.384.4the conclusion of the project, students complete a peer evaluation of each member of their owngroup (Figure 2). Knowing from the beginning that an anonymous peer evaluation will be donehas, in our
program offerings.1.0 IntroductionVirginia Tech is relatively unique compared to peer institutions in that the Ocean Engineering(OE) program grew out of the Aerospace Engineering (AE) program. In planning thisdevelopment, we found that the Aeronautical Engineering program at MIT grew out of theirNaval Architecture program in 1912. Similarly, the Aeronautical Engineering program atMichigan grew from their Naval Architecture department. “An example of the pioneeringteamwork provided by Cooley and Sadler came in 1914 with the offering of aeronauticalengineering courses, following Sadler's organization of the UM Aero Club in 1911. By 1916 acomplete four-year aeronautical degree program was offered within the renamed department ofNaval Architecture
). Engle and Tinto11 address various obstacles to college success for low-income students.They state that “After six years, only 11 percent of low-income, first-generation students hadearned bachelor‟s degrees compared to 55 percent of their more advantaged peers.” One of theirrecommendations includes cohort development. Furthermore, the learning community modelimproves the persistence of the low-income and the first generation students12.A learning community is an environment that encourages student-student, and faculty-studentinteraction. At Colorado State University - Pueblo, a pilot learning community was initiated inthe Department of Engineering in fall 2009. Two first-year courses were linked with shared
that identifiers could notinclude spaces, but novice programmers will have difficulty making a connection between theadmonition and the error message.Another issue here is that we don’t make mistakes on purpose. A student may write error-freeprograms 99% of the time, and encounter her first syntax error on a graded event. Because thestudent previously had no syntax errors, she had no motivation to learn how to correct syntaxerrors. Despite the traumatic effect errors have on students, they are ultimately beneficialbecause the process of correcting them helps students learn more about how the computer works.Typically, programming is taught to computer science majors. These students have chosecomputer science as their field of study and it is
understanding of the learning processand recognizing the conceptual difference between various communication methods and learningstyles, as interpreted in Situational Leadership. Cycling through various styles of leadershipfacilitates peer-to-peer learning by implementing articulate and practical applications in thecourse materials to broaden students’ perspective toward engineering education and practice.IntroductionSituational approach to leadership is widely recognized in organizational management. Thetheory of situational leadership was developed by Hersey and Blanchard (1969) based onleadership style theory by Reddin (1967). This theory has been revised and refined several timesto facilitate its implementation in various environments, such as
AC 2011-2419: TOOLS TO CRAFT ETHICAL BEHAVIORMartin S. High, Oklahoma State University Marty High is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University. His aca- demic interests include teaching in all areas and at all levels of chemical engineering with a focus on instruction in thermodynamics and mass transfer. His research interests are in the areas of mass transfer in polymeric systems, corrosion modeling, equation of state development and refinery catalysis. Marty also writes in the area of sustainability and on the intersection of law, science and society. He received his engineering education at Penn State (B.S., M.S., and Ph.D.) and earned his law degree (J.D.) from the
University; the New Jersey Institute of Technology; and the University ofPuerto Rico, Mayagüez, and it is funded by the National Science Foundation. The goal of theCenter is to become a national focal point for developing structured organic particulate systemsused in pharmaceuticals and their manufacturing processes. XX University has partnered as anoutreach/education member institution to expand the impact of the Center through SMETeducation and outreach.This paper describes problem sets for introductory chemical engineering courses such as materialand energy balances. The problems emphasize concepts of unit conversions, engineeringcalculations, estimations, writing a process flow diagram, mass balances, safety, heat offormation, and looking up
projects include the blog STEMequity.com, and a study, with sociologist Mary Ebeling, of economic equity in nanotechnology training and employment. She is also writing on distributions of blame between workers and materials for failures in contemporary building technologies, as economies of scale and automation continue their long incursion on the labor of commercial construction. Page 22.1061.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Metrics of Marginality: How Studies of Minority Self-Efficacy Hide Structural InequitiesAbstractIn ongoing
traction with a race and “sumo” competition at the end ofthe semester. Each team was required to perform a full motion analysis of one “foot” of theirwalker using the techniques developed in class. This proved to be more difficult than expectedfor some: many teams used an eight-bar linkage similar to the “Strandbeest” of Theo Jansen. Page 22.1603.5 Figure 3: Student team with winning walkerConclusions and Lessons LearnedFirst, it must be stated that, in terms of student learning and satisfaction, the course was asuccess. The first-year students performed nearly as well as their third-year peers onexaminations and homework
method12.The dataobtained from faculty interviews and student focus groups were treated as independent groups.Therefore, for each institution, the faculty interviews were analyzed as one unit and the studentfocus groups were analyzed as a separate unit of data.The research team met as a group to analyze the data from the first two institutions. The teamfollowed this procedure to identify strong categories for the initial themes and to utilize peer Page 22.1499.3debriefing concurrently. The interviews for these particular institutions were transcribed andindividual units of data were placed on note cards. The note cards, particularly for the
2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00EGT 320 Robotic Systems and Material Handling 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00EGT 340 Applied Dynamics 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00ENGD080 Writing Lab 2010-2011 Not Transferred 1.00ENGD090 Writing Workshop 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00PHI 194 Global Ethical Viewpoints 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00AELP000 Non-Credit/American English Lang 2010-2011 Not Transferred 0.00CHE 120 General Chemistry I 2010-2011 D Transferred 3.00CHE 120L General Chemistry I Lab
computer skills training classes for older adults inthe community. By conducting the class, students would benefit from learning how to design a trainingprogram for a user group different from their peers while also serving older individuals in thecommunity. Within the course of a quarter (10 weeks), students recruited participants, designed thetraining, and conducted the training. The five one-hour classes were: introduction to computers,introduction to the internet, introduction to Microsoft Word, images and videos and Facebook.Participants completed weekly evaluations which were then used to improve future sessions. Feedbackfrom the sessions indicated that teaching environment and pace of learning were among the most notedparticipant concerns
course to teach writing and a public speaking course to complement the secondclinic. All teams in a specific Clinic will be given the same well defined problem statement that isthe subject of the entire semester. The individual student’s grade will be based on theirperformance in both team and individual presentations or writings. At the end of this yearstudents should understand that an engineer maybe called to act as project interpreter andadvocate. So their ability to accurately convey knowledge with many different audiences may bedirectly correlated to their later career success. It is also at this stage that students work in theirfirst inter-disciplinary team, a hallmark of the Rowan Clinic Experience.Junior and Senior Engineering Clinics
design courses. He has conducted research, with peer-reviewed publications, in biomedical engineering in the areas of biomechanics, bioelectricity, and biomedical imaging, since 1992. Other research interests include renewable energy, optical fiber communications, and project-based multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary education. Page 22.912.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Integrating Online Learning in Interdisciplinary Electromechanical and Electromechanical/Biomedical Design Courses AbstractThe following paper
course focuses on planning, development, andimplementation of an engineering design project, which includes formal report writing, projectdocumentation, group presentations, and project demonstrations. The goal of these courses is todemonstrate the ability to manage a major project involving the design and implementation ofproducts with a mixture of electrical and mechanical elements as a member of a productdevelopment team. In these project-based courses, the students are expected to effectivelymanage their time and team efforts to produce a finished product in three ten-week quarters. Notextbook is required. Weekly progress reports, design notebooks, formal reports, and oralpresentations constitute integral components of this course sequence
course focuses on planning, development, andimplementation of an engineering design project, which includes formal report writing, projectdocumentation, group presentations, and project demonstrations. The goal of these courses is todemonstrate the ability to manage a major project involving the design and implementation ofproducts with a mixture of electrical and mechanical elements as a member of a productdevelopment team. In these project-based courses, the students are expected to effectivelymanage their time and team efforts to produce a finished product in three ten-week quarters. Notextbook is required. Progress and formal reports, and oral presentations constitute integralcomponents of this course sequence. Before beginning the projects
to relate these disparities among African American students and criticalthinking. The shortage of African Americans earning college degrees affects the nation as a whole.Reported achievement gaps by Fleming, Garcia & Morning (1995); Fleming & Morning (1998);McDonald & Powell (1998); Lee (1986); Garibaldi (1997); and Jibrell (1990), havedemonstrated that White students scored 30 percent higher than Black students taking theNational Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) science and reading and writing scores 11,12, 13, 14, 15 . Exposing students to critical thinking pedagogies in the K-12 education systems andhigher education institutions can narrow the academic achievement gap for African
mentors and the overall scope of theorganization. Existing models of mentorship do not adequately describe the specific relationshipbetween the college and high schools students: (1) Due to the proximity in both age andexperience, the college students cannot be considered more experienced (traditional model ofmentorship) and (2) Due to the fact that both student populations are in different educationalsystems, the college students cannot be considered peer mentors. To help understand thisalternative mentoring relationship, this study was guided by two research questions:1) Whatmotivates PFP participants to become mentors to high school students? 2) What do theseundergraduate students learn by mentoring high school students? A survey of
ABET-TAC Accreditation in 2006. We spent much time inthe preceding years deciding on what direct measures of assessment we should do in whichcourses in the curriculum. After our process was set up, we wanted to do what Moskalrecommends, which is after an initial assessment process is set up, “greater attention can be paidto concerns of validity, trustworthiness, triangulation, and the completeness of the plan”6.In Borrego’s review of engineering research including such topics as assessment, it was foundthat the reliability and validity of the tests and homework assignments developed by programsare usually not established7. This is certainly the case for our EET program. We write all ourown tests, quizzes, etc., with no peer review, pre-test
the U.S. Senate committee of the Judiciary on security issues associated with peer-to-peer networking. Page 22.1379.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Teaching Computer Security Literacy to Students from Non- Computing DisciplinesAbstractGone are the days when cyber security education was only a concern for computer and Internetexperts. In today’s world of pervasive computing, everyone is a target. The volume,sophistication, and
offers frequent networkingopportunities among the teachers (peer support) and a regularly scheduled direct link touniversity program managers (programmatic support). Most instances of HSE function asafterschool programs, and teacher-coaches are paid for their coaching and mentorship just asthose who direct afterschool athletics. Students on HSE teams work on projects that are selected Page 22.539.2by the coach and team and that have local significance for the students and their community.These projects can continue from one academic year to the next. In the course of their HSEexperience, the students write business plans, solve real-world
selection process? Does the prestige of the NAE, and of its members, lend grand-ness (orgrandiosity?) to the Challenges?At least some of the Grand Challenges relate very closely to the work of individual Committeemembers. For example, the emphasis on personalized medicine in Engineer Better Medicinesreflects Craig Venter’s interest in innovation in this area, exemplified by his controversialpublication of his own genome.22 Managing the Nitrogen Cycle is a passion of Rob Socolow,whose work is cited in the write-up.23 He is also deeply involved with Carbon Sequestration,another one of the Challenges, where he is cited again.24 This raises a question about framing –why the heavy emphasis on personalized medicine in Engineer Better Medicines? Why
learning, teachers should continually check for understanding and provide studentswith thoughtful, timely, and precise feedback. Students need to know how well they are doingand are typically open to suggestions for improvement. Generally, the clearer and morespecific an instructor can be with feedback, the better the results for students. Students alsobenefit from peer reactions and should be encouraged to take responsibility for their ownlearning (i.e., taught to self-evaluate). Providing accurate feedback and helping students totake charge of learning can stimulate healthy minds.Improving Pedagogy with Differentiated InstructionA key concept in differentiated instruction is applying a proactive approach to the learning andteaching model. As