data collection.Motivation - Why Research on Adult Nontraditional Engineering StudentsEngineers seek to find solutions to society’s problems. The keystone to successfully attainingsolutions may be said to be diversity - diversity of our lived experiences. We can claim thatengineering, by its very nature, is dependent on teamwork and creativity of thought. Diversity Page 26.879.2increases the range and creativeness of possible solutions the team or individual can attain(1).Whereas gender and ethnic diversity are commonly studied aspects, studies involving studentage comprise a much smaller set of the available literature within the engineering
had large numbers of dots placed next to them, there wasbroad representation of the different types of attendees at each workshop, suggesting that themost highly ranked ideas will potentially serve the needs of a broad spectrum of users. Tables 1and 2 show the ideas with the most votes across the three workshops.Table 1. Top Online Resource Ideas To Address Needs of PreK‐12 Educators in EngineeringEducation from Workshop Attendees Online Resource Idea (PreK-12 Educators) CountTeacher clearinghouse 41Multi-tier PreK‐12 teacher activities that take content deeper or scale down according to
methods. This can be useful in the education of history and engineering to a generalaudience, as well as research in the same fields. This project will be recreating the constructionof one of the most famous ancient monuments: the Colosseum of Rome. Page 26.546.2 II. HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS The erection of the Colosseum (Fig. 1) was begun by Vespasian in AD 727,3, but he died inAD 79 prior to its completion. When his son Titus dedicated the Colosseum in 80, a year beforehe himself died, the top story was still incomplete11; however, Lanciani4 believed that by thistime, the structure had reached the fifth and topmost floor. In AD 81 Titus’ brother Domitianbecame the next
laboratories. One of the DHS Center of Excellence (the Coastal Hazards Center of Excellence)is also engaged to provide expertise and guidance in order to enhance EMT program’s researchcapabilities.1. I TRODUCTIOIn 2005, Hurricane Katrina [1,2] devastated the Mississippi coastal area. Hurricane Sandyslammed the eastern seaboard in 2012. Every year, many Americans face a disaster oremergency and its horrifying consequences. The need for specialists in the field of emergencymanagement has never been greater. Those in the field of emergency management must haveadequate training, experience, and education.The Department of Technology at Jackson State University has established a concentration inEmergency Management Technology to prepare our students as
one of the orientation courses is required by all students in the CoE.Since the creation of these orientation courses, evaluations and student surveys have beenregularly assessed to continuously improve curriculum and better meet the needs of the differenttypes of incoming students.Undergraduate studies in both the United States and Canada have shown that students with peer-and near-peer mentoring supports are more heavily engaged in their academic curricula and aremore socially integrated into engineering-related programs than those students without mentors.1-6 Student evaluations in both the freshman and transfer sections at the University of Oklahomareflect that the mentorship techniques that are currently in place not only encourage
flexibility of the platform weare now using these units in multiple classes. Our analysis shows that the critical properties itoffers to the learning experience are • Immersive interactive learning • Immediacy of interactive control (direct manipulation) • Tactile and experiential learningThe problems of this approach include the lack of experience of IT students with the HWThe key parameters to handling this problem are 1. Provide ready-packaged hardware that obviates the need to build circuits 2. Use a source of hardware that provides three key properties, IE a wide selection, standardized interfaces and software libraries for accessing the softwareEducational impact evaluation at this stage is mostly qualitative. An example
Program Assessment Workshops, IDEAL and the assessment webinar series. He also directs activities related to the workshop facilitator training and professional development. Page 26.1615.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Undergraduate Facilitators’ Perspectives of Engineering Summer Programs 1. Introduction Summer programs are often used by universities to recruit students into engineering by educating and inspiring them. Programs have various target audiences and objectives. For example, some programs are targeted at
education and outreach programs, STEM teacher development, and climate change education programs. Page 26.785.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Flipping the Infrastructure ClassroomThis paper and its companion poster are the result of a recent (September 1, 2013) funding award fromthe National Science Foundation. The outcomes of the proposed work are: Establish and sustain the Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E) as the source for infrastructure education materials that are continuously improved by a vibrant
questions beg for input from all areas of thought. Both scienceand the humanities have important things to say about human origins, for example. And solvingthe riddle of human origins appears to be the key to answering many of our biggest questions.Near the middle of the twentieth century, British scientist and novelist C. P. Snow described thedisconnect between science and the humanities in his now famous book, The Two Cultures andthe Scientific Revolution. He wrote that the intellectual life of all of western society is split intothese two cultures (science and the humanities) that have a terrible time trying to communicatewith each other, and that this is a major hindrance in solving the world’s problems.1 The tragedyhere is that humanity needs
industry.Most undergraduate computer engineering programs require a 1-year senior capstone designcourse. In this Program, team projects start in the first semester and are required in each of thefollowing semesters. As they develop through the Program, students have increasingly morecreative control over their projects and are responsible for component selection, design, testing,and implementation of their own hardware and/or software systems. Design constraints that areencountered in industry are followed, such as developing use models, cost, power, andportability. Examples include robotic toys, human interface devices, hand-held gaming consoles,and a stratospheric balloon data acquisition / telemetry system. These projects complementrigorous
wild” will be noted. Based on this feedback, we have produced four new variations on the inquiry-‐based Page 26.463.2activities. These involve: a) replacing the students’ experiments with simulations; b) replacing the students’ experiments with the students observing the experiment 1 as an in-‐class demonstration; c) the students’ watching the simulation as an in-‐class demonstration and d) replacing both
. On the right side, thefractions of each phase present areshown in a bar graph, and thecomposition of each phase is abovethe bar for that phase. In order to Figure 1 Interactive simulation for vapor-liquid-liquidrepresent the behavior on the T-x-y phase equilibrium. This simulation is located at:diagram when three phases are http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/VaporLiquidLiquidEpresent, a slider for heat added is quilibriumVLLE/.manipulated instead of temperature.In this way, when more heat is added at the temperature where three phases exist, the relativeamounts of each phase change, but the temperature remains constant until one of the phasesdisappears. A second example from thermodynamics is shown in Figure 2 for
,including “evaluate the effectiveness of a designed experiment…verify and justify the solution toa complex civil engineering problem…develop and evaluate new, advanced technicalknowledge…synthesize and explain the relevance and application of new, advanced technicalknowledge…” and so on [1]. This list is admirable in its strong connection to the field of studyand the intended purposes of graduate studies, and is one that likely represents key desired out-comes of any graduate program. However, we suggest that this list does not capture many of theknowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) required for success in academic settings (e.g., identifiedin typical advice to faculty publications [2]). The lived roles of engineering educators includeswork well
that will engage users and other designers, engineers and stakeholders. Compellingstories promote and manifest a user-centric approach often forgotten especially in theengineering world when focusing only to the technical approach of the problem. Here is howeffective storytelling addresses the four story message problems described above: 1. The in-the-moment response to the perfectly rehearsed narrative articulated by engineering and business students, such as John, can serve to help them identify moments when they lack empathy. He heard that his approach was ineffective because of explicit comments by the students in the class. As a result, he will try other, not so practiced approach that can encourage true
Appendix A.Faculty Ulysses Contract SurveyTo gain more targeted insights, the following questions were asked of the Fall 2014 Neural Sig-nals and System class and Biomedical Signals and Systems classes as part of their end-of-courseevaluations. 1. What aspects of the project structure/assignments helped the most? 2. What was the most difficult/frustrating part of the project? 3. In what ways did you find yourself coping with the instructor’s lack of knowledge about the specifics of your project? 4. What was most rewarding aspect of this approach? 5. Did it help or hurt that the project was team-based? 6. What suggestions do you have for the future
whenfollowed will lead to facilitating a real learning experience for the students.Student Learning ComparisonAssessing the extent of student learning is accomplished through the use of written essays andexams. During the term, a series of four written essays based on the readings, lectures anddiscussions are assigned, submitted by the students, and graded. In addition, the students take fourexams that cover between six to eight chapters from the textbooks along with all of the materialdiscussed in class.A comparison of student learning results for eight traditional classroom courses and eightdistance education blended learning courses is presented in Table 1. These courses were offeredover the past six years. The table compares courses offered during
connect courses from different disciplines in orderto provide our students with an interdisciplinary learning environment is the first-year LC model.A first-year LC is a group of students who enroll in two or more courses, generally in differentdisciplines that are linked together by a common theme in an academic semester. We haveimplemented LCs at our institution for over 10 years, and the academic performance of studentsparticipating in LCs reflects national trends.1, 14 We have been running the LC linking the PS andEG1 courses once per year for the last six years. The best practices and lessons learned in thatLC are described in section 2. Those lessons inspired the strategies to integrate writing in PScourses for majors and non-majors that
challenges, and capstone team failure modes.References 1. Paliwal, Manish, Bijan Sepahpour (2012). A Revised Approach for Better Implementation of Capstone Senior Design Projects, Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio TX, June 10-13 2. Paretti, M, Richard Layton, Stephen Laguette, Greg Speegle (2011). Managing and Mentoring Capstone Design Teams: Considerations and Practices for Faculty, International Journal of Engineering Education, v27n6, 1-14. 3. ABET (2014), Accreditation Criteria and Supporting Documents, http://www.abet.org/accreditation- criteria-policies-documents/, Accessed December 6, 2014. 4. Taylor, Dorothy G
college in the fall semester–found the flipped classroom too disarming, and too unfamiliar based upon their prior knowledgeand experience. So we backed off, and lectured a bit more. By the last one-third of the 15-weekcourse, students reported that the new pedagogy, which included 15 to 30 minutes of traditionallecture per week, worked well.Gains in Content Knowledge Do Count: Quantitative results from our fall 2013 offering wereremarkable. Student scores on the FMCE, a well-respected standardized physics test, were by farthe highest (average 31.4 out of a possible 47) of all five cohorts to date, and the gains from thepre- to post-test were also, by far, the highest ever, as shown in Table 1. Without a doubt,students’ physics preparation was
inthe rest of the course. In order to determine if the “flipped” course actually improved student learning, finalexam scores from the first offering were compared with the final exam scores from the fiveprevious semesters the course was taught by the instructor. For standardization, the final examconsisted of questions taken from the Fundamentals of Engineering Exam. Table 1 shows theaverage scores (out of 100) and standard deviations from the first “flipped” offering as well theprevious offerings from the instructor. As can be seen, the average score was essentiallyunchanged between the two groups going from 82.8 to 82.7. The standard deviations were alsopretty similar in both groups. While these results suggest the “flipped” course had
. L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education,” Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005.2. Ordua, Pablo and Irurzun, Jaime and Rodriguez-Gil, Luis and Garcia-Zubia, Javier and Gazzola, Fabricio andLpez-de-Ipia, Diego. Adding New Features to New and Existing Remote Experiments through their Integrationin WebLab-Deusto. International Journal of Online Engineering (iJOE), vol. 7, no. S2, Oct. 2011.3. Lowe, S. Murray, E. Lindsay, and D. Liu, Evolving remote laboratory architectures to leverage emerginginternet technologies. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 289294, 2009
of equipment and materials installed in mechanical, electrical, and plumbing building systems. • Comprehend the design intent and constructability issues in mechanical, electrical, and plumbing building systems. • Synthesizing the knowledge gained through class readings and exercises by participating in construction site visits. Page 26.455.4Learning Objectives:The learning objectives of the exercise are: 1. To give the student a first-hand chance to observe the management factors that affect job productivity 2. To be able to articulate and apply recognized techniques that improve labor productivity. 3
National Science Foundation underGrant #DUE-1140852.Bibliography 1 The National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineeringin the New Century, The National Academics Press, 2004.2 J. Frolik, T. Weller, P. Flikkema, and C. Haden, “Implementing an Inverted ClassroomUsing Tablet PCs For Content Development”, in The Impact of Tablet PCs and Pen-Based Technology on Education: Going Mainstream, Robert H. Reed and Dave A.Berque, eds., Purdue University Press, 2010.3 P.G. Flikkema, J. Frolik, C. Haden, and T. Weller, “Experiential Learning of ComplexEngineered Systems in the Context of Wireless Sensor Networks
will usuallybe able to see other reviewers’ comments, and be informed of the editor’s decision onwhether to accept the work. However, compared to reviewing for conferences or fundingagencies, you don’t get to see a range of work, and you don’t get to discuss it with otherexperts.It is also important to find a good mentor [1, 2], a more senior person who will work withyou and advise you. You may be able to be a co-PI on a proposal with your mentor. It isbecoming more common for universities to set up formal mentoring relationshipsmatching senior faculty with junior faculty [3]. But it’s also possible to set up aninformal relationship, maybe with someone at another institution.Students can also be helpful in preparing new ideas. Sometimes
research.IntroductionThe University of Pittsburgh houses the archives of Dick Thornburgh, former Governor ofPennsylvania (1979-1987), Attorney General of the United States (1988-1991), and Under-Secretary General of the United Nations (1993).1 His years in office as Governor coincided withnewly enacted dam safety legislation following the devastating 1977 Johnstown flood, in whichseveral dams failed, most notably, Laurel Run Dam, which claimed 40 lives.2 The efforts of thenewly elected Governor to implement and support the call for greater state oversight of dams inthe Commonwealth was of primary interest and can be related to the importance of public policyon the engineering profession. In engineering education, the ASCE Body of Knowledge (BOK-II)3 and ABET4
outstanding cooperation.The project completed all of the original project goals: (1) Advancing collaboration betweenEPCC and the UTEP College of Engineering to support student success through cooperativeadvising, guidance and transfer programs, (2) Promoting student success in the engineeringeducation pipeline through (3) Cooperative advising, curriculum development, and peermentoring that (4) Supports increased enrolments, persistence and graduation rates through ourjoint process of (5) Achieving continuous quality improvement.Working cooperatively, the El Paso Community College [EPCC] and The University of Texas at Page 26.1369.4El Paso [UTEP
51% 606 2,909 23% 665 19% 547 9% 250 50% 1,462 37% 13% Figure 1: Persistence in Engineering Technology ProgramsData from the study1 showed that the greatest program retention losses were those declaring forElectrical (82%) and Mechanical Engineering Technologies (83%). However, a closerinspection revealed that 31% of the EET transfers moved into Electrical Engineering and threepercent to other ET programs. METs had similar transfers with 32% to Mechanical Engineeringand two percent into other ETs. The balance of transfers went to other programs and Collegeswithin the university. Overall, those initially
students' development strategies throughcode snapshots and event logs. Blikstein and coworkers3, 8 have also used machine learningtechniques to understand student pathways to completing a program.Our work adds the elements of requesting live student feedback regarding their level offrustration during the development process, and an ability to play student work back in time-lapse form, keystroke by keystroke, at any point in the development process.MethodsMethods: LearningIDE ToolWe studied student programming assignments conducted using LearningIDE(www.LearningIDE.com), a web-based integrated development environment (IDE). This IDE,whose user interface is shown in figure 1, provides typical facilities for editing a set of sourcecode files
gender and ethnicity have c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #12876caused institutions to change policies so that they may improve. Awards and publications may be foundat https://engineering.purdue.edu/people/russell.a.long.1. Page 26.346.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Characterizing and Modeling the Experience of Transfer Students in Engineering— Progress on NSF Award 0969474Major Goals 1. Understand the transfer
the participation of minority group members in an organization.1 Particularlywhen a majority group is highly dominant, these barriers pervade recruitment, retention,advancement, and overall climate; diversity suffers, and the overall effectiveness and health ofthe organization is diminished. Academia has a long history of dominance by men. This hasbeen and remains particularly true in engineering, an example where “inequality regimescontinue to be relatively resistant” to change.2There is a growing body of evidence that men and majority individuals can serve crucial roles tosupport the advancement of women within organizations.3-6 Online gender equity advocacyorganizations, such as Men Advocating Real Change (http://onthemarc.org/home) also