). In spring 2016, the first cohortcontinued research projects and finalized summer clinical immersion plans while the secondcohort entered laboratories, began research projects, and planned summer experiences.EvaluationTo assess and continuously improve the CSP, the CSP development team works closely with anon-campus engineering education focused group, the Academy for Excellence in EngineeringEducation (AE3). The CSP received start-up funding through UIUC’s College of Engineering’sStrategic Instructional Innovations Program (SIIP) which requires a mid-year and end-of-yearreview by an AE3 panel. As part of the funding, the CSP is assigned a delegate from AE3 who istasked with attending CSP development team meetings and serving as an
an NSF research project.Nicholas Kumia Senior in the Undergraduate Mechatronics Engineering Program at Vaughn College He graduated high school at the age of 16 and has completed the 4-year Mechatronics Program in 3-years. Recently, He co-founded the UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) Club at Vaughn College and has been working as Lead Programmer. He plans to pursue a master’s degree in Computer Science to supplement this expertise in Mechatronics Engineering.Mr. Jonathan R. Zubarriain, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology Jonathan Zubarriain is a senior in the Mechatronics Engineering program at Vaughn College of Aeronau- tics and Technology. He is co-founder of the Vaughn College UAV Club and has held the
University of Glasgow (UoG) and the University of Electronic Science and Technology ofChina are partners in a joint educational programme (JEP) in Electronic and ElectricalEngineering (EEE). The Glasgow College, UESTC in which the JEP in EEE is housed is now in itsthird year of operation. The JEP in EEE has an enrolment of 600 students in the first threeyears of the four year undergraduate programme with a planned enrolment of 960 studentsin steady-state. As part of its mission, the Glasgow College, UESTC has organized severalsummer overseas immersion programmes (OIP) to enable all students in the programme tohave an international experience prior to graduation. One of the OIP is a trip to the UnitedKingdom and Ireland. The students spend a long
for academic success.1. IntroductionWith the increasing demand for a skilled and technically savvy workforce in the United States,addressing retention problems in the first two years of college is a promising and cost-effectivestrategy to address this need. A recent Committee on STEM Education National Science andTechnology Council report Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics(STEM) Education 5-Year Strategic Plan indicates that the United States needs make STEMeducation a priority. To achieve that goal, the Department of Education has committed $4.3billion to encourage states to develop “comprehensive strategies to improve achievement andprovide rigorous curricula in STEM subjects; partner with local STEM institutions
Immersion TripsOur International Programs Office offers various study abroad opportunities, including a 10-daycultural immersion trip offered during the summer between the junior and senior year. Eventhough these trips are short in duration, they offer a high-impact, motivational event in thestudent’s educational experience. We identified students that would be on the same seniorcapstone project teams and planned a cultural immersion trip that would be technically related totheir UAS capstone project. This had three benefits: (1) developing cultural awareness; (2)learning technical information which would aid in their UAS capstone project; and (3) a team-building experience for the capstone team. We tried two different formats for the trips. The
2Technical Elective 2Technical Elective 2Total MXET Core Courses 48Total MXET Focus Area (See Table 7 and 8) 29Total Required Courses 127Emphasis Areas Two different focus areas are presented as viable examples of the breadth of the MXETprogram in supporting multidisciplinary undergraduate experiential learning opportunities. Thefirst focus area planned for implementation will be mechatronics. Based on industry support andstudent interest, once the mechatronics focus area is stood up and operational, the entrepreneurialnew product development focus area will be created. Other focus areas which would
case, allstudents take the discipline-relevant core courses in support of the project they are working on.The students interact as a cohort from start to finish - from general education and math tograduation. However, such an idealized plan is difficult to implement in the face of alreadyestablished pedagogy. Electrical Mechanical Engineering VIP Engineering Senior Design Senior Design Senior VIP Team Member Junior Project Technical Elective Sophomore Project
students the intricacies of business practices and the help themunderstand the tradeoffs between different organizational goals in Supply Chain Management.In the Integrated Systems Engineering department, the undergraduate students take rigorouscourses in linear and non-linear programming as well as simulation modeling as part of theiroperations research core classes. In their junior year, they take a class where many of thesemethods can be applied called Production Planning and Facility Layout. It is this course that isthe subject of the research described in this paper.Today’s industrial systems engineering students do not just go into the traditional manufacturingsector, but also delve into many diverse fields such as healthcare, the airline
approach is not an attempt to abandon the traditional ControlSystems textbooks. Instead they aim to foster a stronger engagement and interest from studentsbefore facing complicated concepts in control systems. Presenting a less aggressive introduction,rather than going straight to formulas and long enunciates, may make students more comfortablewith Control Systems, promoting more self-motivation that can positively affect students’academic achievements.Results of a questionnaire at Florida Atlantic University have shown that students, who wereexposed to the new way of introducing Control Systems concepts, support a more nontraditionalapproach to teaching. We plan to further assess the educational value of the puzzles as related toControl Systems
-Disciplinary Research where as other partner academics were under pressure to use the Network to generate income and had targets in the areas of Internationalisation, Student Satisfaction and Curriculum Development.As a result of analysing these challenges the following Outcomes have been proposed and arein the process of being implemented to enhance the operation of the UNITWIN: • Development of a ‘New Partners agreement’ for new institutions joining the UNITWIN. This will incorporate a method of recording clear expectations on both sides, reporting methods and timings. • Better planning of subject specific meetings with exact regularity under negotiation. • Development of potential retreats and workshops (some on line
out.IntroductionEngineering freshmen at Grand Valley State University participate in a two courses sequencedesigned to explore the basic skills of electrical, computer, mechanical, and manufacturingengineering. The courses are EGR 106 - Engineering Design I and EGR 107 - EngineeringDesign II. The courses introduce computer aided design (CAD), computer aided manufacturing(CAM), microcontroller programming, and electrical interfacing. The lectures and laboratoriesare interwoven so that students may use the knowledge to design and build robots in the firstcourse, and create more complicated work in the second course. This paper describes the robotproject used in the first course of the sequence, EGR 106.A course plan for one winter 2015 lecture section is provided in
structure: Firstly, class time is insufficientto cover all the material and for the students to complete assignments with the assistance of theinstructor. Secondly, the tutorials are written in a format which may be confusing and difficult tofollow. In addition, these tutorials provide an emphasis on the tools to construct the CAD models,while dismissing the model planning stage, which is critical for an engineering design. Theauthors have attempted to address these drawbacks. Tutorial videos were created to clearly showthe model construction process from start to finish. One instructor taught the course in the usualmanner but made the tutorial videos available to the students. The second instructor converted theclass to a “flipped” or inverted
creation of a wide variety of objects.Learning Environments Department has embarked on a project to incorporate the Maker Campstrategy into a more formal process that includes creating sessions using learning blockswhich utilize a Project Based Learning (PBL) model at their core. This type ofstrategy could support the hands-on components of a Maker Camp combined with theinstructional strategies of Active and Project Based Learning in a simplified planning tool. Thedesign could then become a template moving forward. Our research explores what impact usingsuch a strategy had on our Tech-E Camp hosted at The University of Texas at El Paso –Undergraduate Learning Center as well as the impact of the technology challenges as theypertained to the
Paper ID #16659International vs. Domestic Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU):A Three-Year Assessment of the Preparation of Students for Global Work-forcesDr. Cheryl Matherly, The University of Tulsa Dr. Cheryl Matherly is Vice Provost for Global Education at The University of Tulsa, where she has responsibility for the strategic leadership of the university’s plan for comprehensive internationalization. Dr. Matherly’ co-directs the NanoJapan program, funded by the National Science Foundation in order to expand international research opportunities for students in STEM fields. She is the recipient of two
type of expertise is increasing at a fast rate.Trying to address the current and future needs of the industry in the areas of digital systemdesign, instructors and members of the Industry Advisory Board of the Electrical and ComputerEngineering Technology Department at Farmingdale State College-SUNY, are in theprocess of restructuring the digital design sequence of courses, placing a strong emphasis inthe study of modern tools, technologies and current industrial practices while considering thecharacteristics of the student population at this school and their educational needs. The resultsof the current restructuring process, challenges presented by the process, “lessons learned”are presented. Plans for the future include more access to “hands
groups of three or four members.Student opinions regarding the space and design of these classrooms were evaluated by paper-based surveys in the Introductory Solid Mechanics course during the Spring 2015 semester.Results are shown in Fig. 5. The results confirmed anecdotal feedback from students andteaching assistants: the classroom was too crowded and the chair arrangement did not facilitate Figure 1: Diagram of classroom layout in active learning configuration.collaborative learning. [11, 29, 32] To address this issue, a new active/flexible learning classroomwas created to host discussion sections for all three introductory mechanics courses.The initial planning of this active learning classroom began in February 2015. The selection
instructors on what areas to focus on when planning forfuture offerings of the course.References[1] Guskey, T. R. (2005). Formative Classroom Assessment and Benjamin S. Bloom: Theory, Research and Implications. In the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.[2] Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., and Madaus, G. F. (1973). Learning for Mastery. National Laboratory for Higher Education.[3] Bloom, B. S., and Carroll, J. B. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and Practice. Ed. James H. Block. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.[4] Keller, F. S., Sherman, J. G., and Bori, C. M. (1974). PSI, the Keller Plan Handbook: Essays on a Personalized System of Instruction. Menlo Park, Calif.: WA Benjamin.[5] Onipede, O
programs to families at all socioeconomic levels typically demands substantialfundraising. Given the considerable effort and resources required to plan and deliver high qualityprogramming, perhaps the most salient metrics of success from an institutional and donorperspective would be evidence that middle school programs attract more women into STEMmajors, benefiting higher education and society in general, or that programs provide direct valueto the institution in terms of recruitment.Based on the many social psychological factors that inhibit women from entering STEMdisciplines, recruitment strategies targeting women are critical to increasing diversity attechnological institutions or within schools of science or engineering at larger
students as is described below.The Triple Bottom Line LessonOnce the methodology was fully developed, the Sustainability Triangle and Index wereintegrated into a single lesson to introduce civil and environmental engineering (CEE) students atthe University of Wisconsin-Platteville to the concepts of sustainability and the triple bottom lineas a means of evaluating engineering design alternatives. By providing a framework forevaluating alternatives, students learn that sustainability is integral to the design process. Thelesson is scheduled within the first two weeks of a three credit Introduction to Infrastructurecourse which: • introduces civil infrastructure; social, political, historical, sustainability, and planning implications of
activities.Background of the PartnershipIntroduction of quality higher education resources from the western countries to China can betraced back to the early 20th Century. The purpose was to rapidly develop an effective model forChina’s higher education system to train talents that were desperately needed by the country. Inthe spirit of China’s reform and opening policy, the Chinese central government approved a 5-year strategic plan from the Ministry of Education in 2004 that emphasized the importance offurther opening the education system and encouraging international cooperation as one of thekey strategies of China’s educational development. One year earlier, the State Council passed theRegulations of People’s Republic of China on Chinese-Foreign
, themajority of the students believed that if they knew what the correct answer should be, they coulddraw the diagrams using the drawing tool (Fig. 9-g). It is not clear to the authors if the “difficulty”in object manipulation was associated with the fact that when students didn’t know the solution ofthe problem, they would just try random attempts using the drawing tool, and felt as if thedrawing itself was the frustrating part of the problem solution. Based on observation of studentsduring office hours, we noticed that students were spending a lot of time trying to place theobjects precisely on the canvas, even tough it was announced that the tolerances were very large.To remediate this, we plan to include more messages about tolerances in the
tools. It wasapparent that traditional teaching in a classroom was having limited results with overall passiveaudience which was partially engaged in the transfer of knowledge. The process of the coursemodification took significant planning effort along with lengthy restructuring of the material andcreating extensive supporting material that would assist students with actively engaging in thelearning process.The paper describes some of the modifications made to the course along with the resultsachieved over the four semesters that the course has been taught in the new format. The resultsindicate that modifications resulted in anticipated positive outcomes as students’ overall scoresimproved indicating better mastery of the material and ability
ABET briefings not to rely solely on surveys, exit interview data, tracking ofgraduates, etc. Many of our students go on to graduate schools, go to work for aerospacecompanies and rise to positions of great responsibility, work for government labs, industry, etc.,become MDs, lawyers, work in non-aerospace high tech companies, etc. None of this couldhappen without life-long learning. Professional success in today’s world provides strongevidence of the attainment of this SO, but there is nothing in current student work that provides agood way to measure this. Even a writing assignment that asks students to predict their futureeducational plans is merely another type of “survey”. We found no way to realistically measurethis student outcome
aclassroom: “weekly” (20%), “monthly” (15%), “5-10 times a year” (11%), “2-4 times a year”(10%), “once a year” (6%), and “never” (38%). The authors were surprised by how manyrespondents browsing the collection (and volunteering for a survey) reported that they had“never” taught curriculum from the collection in a classroom, which prompts the question: whatwere they doing on TeachEngineering? Many of them also reported that it was their first time onthe site, making it reasonable to guess that some hadn’t yet had the opportunity to teach thecurriculum in a classroom, but they might have had plans to do so in the future. Of those whohad taught curriculum from the site in a classroom, 94% anticipated that they would continuedoing so in the
writing studio model, a model developed byGrego & Thompson for developmental writers [8] and modified for partnerships betweenwriting centers and writing intensive courses within the disciplines. The paper describes thewriting assignment and the studio model, and then offers preliminary findings from the firstsemester of implementation. The authors conclude with implications for engineering facultyteaching writing within their disciplinary courses.Course Description and Assignment DesignActing on input from the External Advisory Council, the Electrical and ComputerEngineering Department at the researchers’ institution has begun discussing ways of adding awriting component to a course at each level of the major. The department plans to start
resultsindicate that the benefits of PBL and the students’ technical competency was not sacrificed. Thisindicates that implementing projects using the framework discussed herein has a large potentialto further expose students to EML effectively. There can be some difficulties in implementingthis framework, namely student resistance to such a different type of project, and increasedworkload on the instructor, particularly the first time it is implemented. These difficulties dodiminish as the framework is used more both at an institution and in a particular course.There are some suggestions that the authors plan to implement in the future and areas requiringadditional research. The specific implementation at Ohio Northern University is in a class withtwo
Professor at the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Michigan State University. From 2014 to 2016, he has been a Visiting Professor with the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Missouri. Currently, he is Assistant Professor with the Engineering Department, Colorado State University-Pueblo. He is the author of two book chapters, more than 54 scientific articles. His research interests include arti- ficial intelligence systems and application, smart material applications and robotics motion and planning. Also, He is a member of ASME since 2014 and ASEE since 2016. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Inexpensive Digital Light
for educational and communityoutreach. During the course of the design, build and fly competition portions of the challenge,the team directly led or provided support for three institutional camps and two communityoutreach events. These camps focused primarily on middle-school and high-school students thatare underrepresented in STEM education. Coordination for these outreach activities had to becompleted in tandem with the technical and operational tasks. This created another level ofdifficulty, specifically for the team’s leadership. Student-veteran attributes became apparent inplanning and conducting these events. The student-veterans treated these events like a militaryrange exercise. They planned, delegated responsibilities, and managed
obviously committed to teaching, enjoying his job (“truly amazing, themind of a child”) and accepting student feedback that spells trouble for him and the whole JediOrder. Yoda earns positive scores in each of these areas. The authors agreed that Yoda’sorganization was neutral. While having a clear lesson plan that captured the attention of so manyvery young students is impressive, allowing Obi Won to interrupt is a significant, if important,distraction. The authors disagreed on how to assess Yoda’s communication. While clearlyengaging young students at a level they could understand, “Yoda speak” is confusing to many.Ultimately, the largest Star Wars nerd among the authors insisted this not count against Yoda andassigned a positive score. However
practices as a Penaloza [7] way to enhance the talent pool Levensaler -Shortage of employees in the oil -Analyzing the competencies is key to [22] and gas sector is a major business succession planning as well as for future challenge particularly in Mexico recruitment purposes Reder [25] -The decline of student interest in -Promoting interest and brand image Power engineering domain causing through a Power engineering education a severe shortage of talent in the chapter to help with talent attraction industry. Wood [28] -The decline in the graduate Not Applicable students