involveaccessing memories, reasoning and planning to organize concepts and connections. Brainfunctional connectivity, which is defined as the temporal dependency of cognitive activationpatterns of different brain regions [29] also support reasoning process during systemsthinking. Thus, brain regions of interests in this paper to study cognition of systems thinkinginclude pre-frontal cortex, which is associated with reasoning and working memory [30] andposterior parietal cortex, which is associated with planning and sequence processing [31].Research QuestionsUsing the three different assessment tools (concept map scoring, self-evaluation, andcognition measured by fNIRS) to measure systems thinking, this study investigates bothbehavior and cognition of
capabilities of the constituent parts.The mission engineering competency model establishes the proficiencies for practitioners toperform effective mission engineering based on interviews and open source literature. We alsodetail the relationships between mission engineering, systems engineering, and system ofsystems engineering.What is Mission Engineering?There is no single definition of mission engineering, also referred to in the published literature ascapability engineering. For example, the US Department of Defense (DoD) defines missionengineering as “the deliberate planning, analyzing, organizing, and integrating of current andemerging operational and system capabilities to achieve desired war fighting mission effects”[1]. A more general
show a planlayout and the interior of the office, respectively. The office had a desk, chair, computer, printer,and filing cabinets similar to a standard office. In addition to that, the office had a round meetingtable with four chairs around it. Two of the office walls are adjacent to other offices, the thirdcontains a large 1.8 m×1.2 m double pane window, and the fourth wall has the entrance door thatleads to the building hallway. The hallway was generally kept at a higher temperature than thetesting office and the adjacent offices. The room ceiling is made up of squared acoustic tiles with0.6 m on each side and has two triple-bulb fluorescent light fixtures. Figure 1. Office plan layout
appropriate plans forthe semester. These one-hour workshops/lessons were recommended for the initial weeks of thesemester only, replaced by weekly “progress check-in” meetings once product designs wereestablished.Other recommendations for the course format are summarized in Table 1.Table 1: Summary of course recommendations Topic Recommendation Notes Provide list of One student recommended setting more specific Fabrication available tools – guidelines to prevent choosing strengths: “I wouldn’t tools require students to necessarily try to branch out and try to learn new things choose 2 to 3 because I’d focus on what I already know I’m good at.” 2 to 4 students per Creating multiple
) generic 3D view with surrounding environments shown in Figure 2. T00 was attached to the wall next to the room’s thermostat to represent thetemperature of the actual thermostat connected with the actual AC system for the room. Toensure experimental consistency, all thermocouples were 7.62 m (25 feet) long and were thencalibrated against two known temperatures [boiling 100 ˚C (212 ˚F) and freezing 0 ˚C (32 ˚F)].Distilled water was used in both calibration tests. Figure 2. Plan view for the room with locations for window, door, thermocouples, air-supply and return ducts All thermocouples were connected to an “Automation Direct” programmable logic controller(PLC) unit (model: H2DM1E
Competency-Based Education“Competency-based education (CBE) is an outcome-based, student-centered form ofinstruction whereby students progress to more advanced work upon mastering the necessaryprerequisite content and skills [11].” Although CBE is not new, it has increasingly beenreceiving much attention as a method for reaching a more diverse and inclusive studentpopulation. Scholtz and colleagues [12] shared results from an intervention conducted in aninformation systems degree program which incorporated competencies based on enterpriseresource planning (ERP) systems. They found that students perceived satisfaction with thehands-on approach and there was an increase in student self-efficacy related to ERP systemsand concepts. Mojab et al [13
for plagiarism afterstudents hand in their assignments. Both TurnItIn [50, 51] and Viper [52] provide the ability tocheck student essays against a database of existing content. They differ in their privacy policiesand payment plans. Viper is a pay-as-you-go platform where the author retains ownership oftheir work and receives a free limited report [52]. TurnItIn includes a product called iThenticate,a basic plagiarism checker [51], and also Feedback Studio, which includes a rubric and feedbackplatform for writing similar to some of the features in the previous annotation category [50].TurnItIn products also include the ability to integrate with existing LMS platforms [50]. Thepricing for TurnItIn products is not publicly available.Discussion
mostinteresting results from this survey came in the section concerning their 2-year programs as theysupport the need of the VTAB grant. Most of the students always planned to go to a 4-yearschool after completing their 2-year program (22 out of 23 respondents or 96% of the secondcohort, which was almost identical to the 22 out of 24 respondents or 92% for the first cohort).Question #5 of the online survey asked, “What were your main reasons for enrolling in the 2-Year school instead of a 4-Year college or university? (Check all that apply): (a) Academicreasons, (b) Financial reasons, (c) Personal reasons, and (d) Other reasons.” Figure 1 presents abar chart of responses to this question from each of the two cohorts.What were your main reasons for
foster growth is a critical element for the female and faculty fromminority backgrounds to flourish.Clarity in policies and follow through in the implementation of these policies has beenidentified as one of the elements to aid the success of retention and hiring of female and facultyof color. Hence for female faculty of color to succeed, it is essential to carve out a plan thatstrives to meet their needs.Workshops, training sessions, personal development opportunities, teaching training, researchmaximizing training and opportunities to network and create collaborations can help assist inthis endeavor. Besides work support, it is also important to ensure work-life balance,adjustments to teaching schedules, encourage new and creative teaching and
, resource-constrained courses.The first element in the planned automated evaluation aspect of the writing application is theidentification of students scoring at the lowest end of a holistic scale. This is of significant valueas there is evidence that such students are at-risk to fail the electric circuits course as it is currentlyconstructed. Use of a basic natural language processing (NLP) pipeline on a dataset of more thanone hundred student responses is described as are the initial results of the at-risk / not at-risk binaryclassification task.IntroductionStudent struggles in gateway STEM courses such as electric circuit analysis are common. Areview of the literature points to at least two important factors that help explain such struggleseven
optimization models. To help students understand how OR can beapplied beyond the business and production-related areas that appear in most texts and cases, twoChangemaking cases have been written. For each scenario, teams of students develop and solvea model, perform sensitivity analysis and write a one-page executive summary of theirrecommendations along with supporting analysis.In the first case, students develop a model to select a sustainable energy action plan for a collegecampus that considers tradeoffs between different strategies for reducing CO2 emissions (e.g.LED lighting or Photovoltaic panels). Students must allocate a limited budget while consideringtradeoffs between 5-year and 20-year energy costs and savings, and the CO2 reduction
designer and the situation that may assist in adeeper understanding of the problem (Adams et al., 2003). Likewise, Ambrose has called forengineering curricula with “opportunities for reflection to connect thinking and doing,” and the“development of students’ metacognitive abilities to foster self-directed, lifelong learning skills.”(Ambrose, 2013, p. 16-17). Ambrose highlights a gap in the formal inclusion of metacognitiveactivity in the engineering curriculum (Ambrose, 2013). Regular reflection plays a critical rolein the construction of metacognitive knowledge and self-regulatory skills – or planning for,monitoring, and evaluating one’s own learning, knowledge, and skills (Schraw, 1998; Steiner &Foote, 2017). Metacognition is “knowing about
showed higher increase in the post-test score for thecontrol group (that did not have the team collaboration) as compared to the experiment group(that included team collaboration). The result from paired t-test showed that the increase wasstatistically significant (at p < 0.001) for both groups.We had expected that ability to collaborate and earn extra virtual points when working withpeers would motivate students to perform better, however the results seem to indicate otherwise.Based on the feedback from instructors, it was found that teams were formed randomly (size of3 students) which limited the engagement and that could have resulted with less team-basedcollaboration within SEP-CyLE. In future work, we plan to evaluate the impact of
the T1X1 Technical Sub-Committee (the organization responsible for SONET standardization) from 1990 through 1994. He has been active in SONET’s National and International Standardization since 1985. In addition, Rodney has published numerous papers and presentations on SONET. Rodney began his career with Fujitsu Network Communications in 1989 as the Director of Strategic Plan- ning. He also held the positions of Director of Transport Product Planning, Vice President of Business Management, Senior Vice President of Sales Management, Senior Vice President of Manufacturing, and Senior Vice President of Business Development. Before joining Fujitsu, Rodney worked for Bell Labora- tories, Bellcore (now Telcordia
during which we were studying combined loading and drawing the stress state blocks was beneficial. Of this, the exercise during which we related the cross sectional [sic] depiction of each individual loading to its effect on the stress state block was incredibly helpful for me. I had been struggling to visualize this concept for a significant amount of time before we did that exercise.”This study did not incorporate a pre-/post-test design or compare exam scores across othersections that did not use the conceptual exercises because the focus was on the development ofthe activities. A more rigorous evaluation of student outcomes is planned for future semesters.Conclusion and Future WorkThis paper details six active learning
therefore were penalized forthe design challenge.In order to determine how long teams spent designing we used Energy3D’s logs, which is likelyto be a conservative estimate as time spent planning, revising plans, or group discussions are notcaptured through the action-logging of the system. In sticking with a conservative estimate, wesubtracted out time in which students appear to idle. The clearest example of this is whenstudents run an analysis, which may take up to 20 minutes to complete on complex designs.Additionally, if students were inactive for 40 minutes or longer their idle time was subtractedout. While we cannot rule that students’ may be active at this time, we are unable to definitivelyascertain this, so a conservative measure of time
students prior to project selection as to the electromechanical nature of the project; Electromechanical projects within MET capstone programs should contain mechanical aspects near the chronological start of a project such that students have the opportunity to become comfortable with the new subject material; and Encourage early prototyping to identify and address gaps in student knowledge.Regarding the introduction of a multidiscipline capstone project, the recommendations from thisstudy include: Begin the planning process with instructors from both capstone courses at least one semester before the start of the project; The planning process should account for project scope, what ABET outcomes are
multi-faceted concept you develop about yourself that evolves over the course of your life Impacted and influenced by positive/negative factors No right or wrong identity Different people have different identities Shapes how you experience the worldImage Source: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/science-choice/201901/5-key-ideas-about-identity-theory 26 LGBTQ+ Identity Development Process Straight, Healthy heterosexual & Heteronormativitycisgender cisgender identity Cisnormativity child All is according to plan
admitted engineering U Transfer Orientation Service/Program transfer students Official plans of study by engineering degree/major with U Checksheets Web Resource required courses for degree completion Advising Advising staff/faculty within each engineering U Department Advisors Faculty/Staff department/major Support University information sessions, college tours, and campus U Information Sessions/Tours Service/Program visit programs for prospective students U Community College Support University staff visits to community colleges to facilitate Visits
is shown in Fig.3. Whereas typical cybersecuritycompetitions focus mostly on the computer technical skils, with some teamwork and criticalthinking, the CCIC is designed with a much wider set of skills to be demonstrated.4.3 Stage 3: Timeline and evidence creationThe digital evidence trail is time consuming to create as each activity on a digital system is loggedin real-time. First, an evidence trail for our crime had to be planned out. This included emails,Skype calls, web browsing, document creation, photos, and other such common activities on acomputer. Some of these pieces of digital evidence were either hidden (placed on different harddrive partitions for instance) or encrypted (as a password protected .zip files). Then, to create
Skyline College in San Bruno,CA majoring in Environmental Engineering, planning to transfer to a 4-year university in the Fall of 2019. Her passion for environmental engineering stems from her upbringing in environmental awareness, appreciation for the beauty of nature, and personal interest in math and science. She hopes to use her passion and determination to help protect the environment and promote a sustainable lifestyle.Yardley Ordonez, Chico State University Yardley Ordonez is currently a Junior at Chico State University working on a bachelor’s of science degree in mechatronics. His plan is to become a Robotics/Automation Engineer and have his own consulting business in helping companies to optimize performance
has been integrating innovative and novel educational paradigms in STEM education to support student engagement, retention, and diversity.Prof. Omar Youssef, University of Arizona Dr. Omar Youssef is a Lecturer at University of Arizona (UofA), College of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Architecture, and the School of Sustainable Built Environments. A Building Scientist in the Institute on Place and Wellbeing Performance. An Architecture Designer in Practice focusing on Environmental Application within the Industry. Dr. Youssef has extensive industry experience of constructed large-scale projects. Omar’s interdisciplinary background combines between Architecture Practice, Environmental Sciences, Health and
underrepresented faculty, more emphasis must be placed on building allies to develop a better community and institutional culture for underrepresented faculty. The critical mass theory states that roughly 30% of people are required to create an influential body for policy changes [7]. 2. Lack of strategic planning for early-career faculty towards coping with the demands of the academic career based on informed/realistic expectations [8]. There are many unsaid nuances to obtaining and keeping faculty positions, and due to implicit bias, and culture, sometimes it is difficult to know what to ask, whom to ask, or how to ask to get the information required for success. 3. Lack of encouraging URMs into the professoriate
training. Also, weexpected that through exposure and use of the divergent thinking methods during the courseproject, these effects would persist until the end of the course. Planned comparisons wereconducted between the pre-DTSD training, post-DTSD training, and end-of-course data usingpaired t-tests. In the summer semester, we found some evidence supporting these hypotheses. Wealso found a significant increase in CSE from pre-DTSD training and the end of the course,t(7)=5.33, p=.001, Δ=0.41. We found marginal evidence that CSE increased immediately after thetraining (i.e., pre-post comparison), t(7)=2.31, p=.054, Δ=0.24, and between the post-DTSDtraining and end-of-semester measurement point, t(7)=2.16, p=.068, Δ=0.17. For CPI, we foundmarginal
enhanced my ability for systematic planning in problem solving. 5. The project-based learning approach improved my confidence in solving engineering problems. 6. Working in a group for the design project helped me to improve teamwork skills. 7. This course encouraged me to be more of an “active learner” compared to other courses I take.Table 9. CMG250 Student Survey Summary (Followed by the Survey Question Sample) Survey Spring 2018 Spring 2019 Questions Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly agree disagree agree disagree #1 76
sets.MethodParticipants & ProceduresThe survey was administered to undergraduate students. Three potential innovation styles (as anoutcome, a process, and a mindset) were tested before and after program intervention andcompared with the control group. The intervention group is students who enrolled to the pilotcourse of the Engineering and Business Innovation Experience. In contrast, the control group isthose who had neither took this course before nor had any prior experiences with similar courses.The innovation team began to collect the Wave 1 data in Fall 2019 and plans to collect Wave 2data in late Spring 2020. In addition, students will be surveyed each semester as they progressthrough their studies, and each year new cohorts will join the study. Since
(ANSAC) and Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC),respectively. These programs follow an “Introduce, Reinforce, Master” curriculum map as partof the assessment plan where each student learning outcome (SLO) is assessed in at least threecourses of different levels, so that each SLO is assessed at each of the three levels (introduced,reinforced, and mastered). We seek to effectively assess, at the introductory level, the proposedANSAC SLO (5) and the new EAC SLO (4) with a series of case studies and a rubric in ourintroductory physics course. There are two primary difference between the SLOs from the twocommissions. Firstly, the EAC requires that the students recognize while the ANSAC requiresthat the students understand ethical and
milk scandal as aprototypically unethical behavior. However, there might be other incidents similarly impactful tospecific national groups, for instance, the Deepwater Horizon/BP oil spill. Further, rather thanconceiving of unethical behaviors as ones by companies affecting people and the public, USparticipants might be more likely to conceive of unethical behaviors in terms of the intentions ofindividuals.[27] Interestingly, the term “justice” was not used to respond to either prompt –“rights,” “fair,” and “unfair” comprised only small nodes in the why network. Towards this end,the authors plan to explore website data using theories from moral psychology, for instance,Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and the developmental stages/schema
inthe engineering curriculum, the projects were completed in single classes.In this study, a PBL approach is implemented by developing projects in a series of requiredcourses in a Mechanical Engineering curriculum. The projects assigned in each course are relatedand planned to build up the knowledge and skills needed to develop a successful senior designproject or capstone project. In implementing the approach, the instructor identifies the topic orproblem to be proposed as a senior design project. In the first of the sequential courses, anexperimental measurements laboratory course, a project is assigned regarding a sensor that couldbe used in the senior design project. In the second of the sequential courses, a thermal-fluidslaboratory course
unlikely, it illustrates a concrete connection between thereading and the student’s planning. Figure 1. Student responses about planned future actions placed in quadrants reflecting specificity of topic vs specificity or ambiguity of proposed future action.The final theme was the diversity of topical themes. Emerging technology was a common themeand many of the entries included references to nanotechnology and artificial intelligence. Othertechnologies mentioned less frequently were autonomous vehicles and cybernetics. Relationshipswere also discussed at length with many student engineers focusing on friends and family.Several of the student engineers explicitly tied work-life balance to their relationships with theirfriends and