control for the bioreactor system.Specifically, the pH of the fluid is targeted next as it directly affects the growth of the tissue.Thus, the opportunities for continually updating the laboratory while simultaneously aiding inthe research objectives of the experiment are numerous. This experiment will also be utilized inother courses with an emphasis on the integrating concepts together for students.Since the students’ reaction to the lab and project was a positive one, it seems most appropriateto recommend this method to other teaching establishments. However, several challenges existfor initiating a laboratory and program like the one presented above. One challenge for theprofessor will be to judge how much instruction students will need. Thus
2006-2008: WEB-BASED DELIVERY OF LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ANDITS EFFECTIVENESS BASED ON STUDENT LEARNING STYLEJavad Hashemi, Texas Tech University Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University.Sachin Kholamkar, Texas Tech University Graduate Student Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University.Naveen Chandrashekar, Texas Tech University Postodoctoral Instructor and Research Associate, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University.Edward Anderson, Texas Tech University Director of Teaching, Learning, and Technology Center, Texas Tech University
, utilizing and integrating computers within loop isessential. Electrical power engineering has for many years been taught in a rather traditionalmanner. Laboratory equipment is based on large test sets using analogue instrumentation.Computerization of these teaching laboratories that allows data acquisition and display of datahas not been widely used. It should be noted that developing a fully functional high voltagePower Systems Lab that would cover all the various areas of power and their control systemswould require a large facility and hundreds of thousands of dollars and possibly into the millionsdollars1. A number of Universities work in conjunction with large power companies to subsidizethe cost of these larger laboratories2. An
AC 2012-3442: LAB-IN-A-BOX: TECHNIQUES AND TECHNOLOGIESTO MANAGE LARGE AND NOT SO LARGE LABORATORY COURSESMs. Justeen OlingerMichael HuttonMr. Christopher Gretsch CovingtonDr. Kathleen Meehan, Virginia Tech Kathleen Meehan is an Associate Professor in the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Virginia Tech. She joined Virginia Tech in 2002 after having taught at the University of Denver (1997-1999) and West Virginia University (1999-2002). Her areas of research include optoelectronic materials and devices, optical spectroscopy, packaging for power electronic applications, and electrical engineering pedagogy.Dr. Richard Lee Clark Jr., Virginia Western Community CollegeMr. Branden McKagen
located in a highly industrialized area. Our MET students arerequired to take several senior level classes such as Fluid Power, Heating, Ventilation and AirConditioning (HVAC), Robotics, and Mechanical Vibration. We started teaching Vibrationformally in the fall of 2006 and currently this course does not have a formal laboratory. We maynot be able to set up such a laboratory in the near future because of the budget cuts we are facingat the departmental and university levels. Therefore, the author decided to include two vibrationrelated hands-on activities, the Helmholtz resonator project and an industrial visit. The studentteams are required to design, build and test Helmholtz resonators, and write a formal report.They are also required to visit
AC 2010-1785: INSTRUCTIONAL LABORATORY FOR VISUALIZATION ANDMANIPULATION OF NANOSCALE COMPONENTS USING LOW COST ATOMICFORCE MICROSCOPESSalahuddin Qazi, SUNY Institute of Technology Salahuddin Qazi is a full Professor at the School of Information Systems and Engineering Technology, State University of New York Institute of Technology (SUNYIT), Utica, NY. He teaches and conducts research in the areas of Fiber Optics, Optical and Wireless Communication, and Nanotechnology. Dr. Qazi is recipient of several awards including the William Goodell award for research creativity at SUNYIT and engineering professionalism by Mohawk Valley Engineering Executive Committee, and forging closer
Two Processing-Structure-Property Laboratory Activities to Culminate a Course in Engineering Materials Mark A. Palmer Associate Professor of Manufacturing Engineering Kettering UniversityAbstractMost engineering students are required to take a course which focuses on Engineering Materials.A common theme of these courses is that Processing affects Structure which in turn affectsProperties which ultimately determine Performance. Two laboratory sessions have beendeveloped which demonstrate this principle: TTT Diagram Evaluation and Evaluation ofStrengthening Mechanisms. To complete the TTT Diagram Evaluation
grades received by the students were alsoexamined, with the results indicating that the traditional laboratory manual group had an averagegrade point average (GPA) that was almost two-tenths of a point higher than the project-basedlaboratory manual group. Since the groups were chosen randomly, other possible factors such asacademic preparedness could be shown to contribute to the higher GPA value seen. It isconcluded that the type of laboratory manual used did not significantly affect the overallperformance of the students.Introduction There are as many approaches to teaching computer programming, as there areprogramming languages to teach. One method involves presenting the syntax and logic structuresalong with basic background
integrated into EENG 4409. The secondinstrument under development is a general-purpose workbench for teaching aboutinstrumentation systems. This paper presents developments to date, describes curricular use ofthe instruments, and gives an overview of the expected path of the second year of this project.Prior developments in instructional computer-based laboratory instrumentationThe use of virtual instrumentation in the undergraduate curriculum is well-documented; theNational Science Foundation has funded a number of efforts in this regard.1–5 Development ofinstructional computer-based laboratory instruments (CLIs) has taken place at the University ofTexas at Tyler since its College of Engineering opened in 1997. A series of CLIs have beendeveloped
Session # A Comparison of Web-Based and Laboratory Learning Environments Bonnie Burrell1, Rae Jean N. Wiggins2, Nishikant Sonwalkar2, Michael C. Kutney1, William Dalzell1, and Clark K. Colton1 1 Dept of Chemical Engineering/2Hypermedia Teaching Facility Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyI. IntroductionA Web-based computer simulation of an actual laboratory experiment was developed for the MITLaboratory classes. This virtual experiment, which we call the Web Lab, was introduced into the"Chemical Engineering Projects Laboratory" in spring 1999 and the
Session 3532 A Sequence of Closed Laboratory Exercises for a Course in Data Communications Sanjay P. Ahuja Associate Professor Department of Computer and Information Sciences University of North Florida Jacksonville, FL 32224. sahuja@unf.eduAbstractA sequence of closed laboratory exercises for a course in Data Communications is described in thispaper. The exercises are a combination of client-server programming, and
andpresentations when they become available. Some of the experiments are presented in thefollowing. They demonstrate how the enhanced CMM systems can integrate metrology,CAD/CAM/CAE/CIM, rapid prototyping, and polymer processing facilities and curriculum atKettering University.A. MFGE-101 Manufacturing ProcessesExperiment 1: Inspection of a Penholder through the two CMM systems using Teach, Off-Line, and CAD-Directed Programming [2 hours of CMM in a 6 hours structured laboratory].Objective: Students learn the fundamentals of CMM hardware with MPH/APES/SCPRS and software (Geomeasure/PC-DMIS) by inspecting a penholder made from their machining projects.Experiment Performed: Students will (a) machine a penholder according to its blue print, (b) use
Session 2793 Bridging the gap between discrete and programmable logic in introductory digital logic laboratories Kevin Nickels, Farzan Aminian, J. Paul Giolma Department of Engineering Science Trinity UniversityAbstractMost contemporary introductory digital logic design laboratories utilize discrete small-scaleintegrated (SSI), medium-scale integrated (MSI), and programmable logic such as fieldprogrammable gate arrays (FGPAs) or complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs). Thesemore complex programmable devices (CPLDs and
conduct sampling pointsapproximately every 6 hours and can focus on proper execution of the lab. This laboratory isideally suited for a class size of 12-15 students. However, the lab could be scaled up with anadditional GC, more shaker table space, and the assistance of teaching assistants.The laboratory class in which this experimental procedure was designed is a 3.0-credit, lab-basedcourse that takes place at Stanford University once every two years and focuses on current topicsin applied microbiology. Each class is unique; therefore no student assessment data is currentlyavailable. The laboratory will best support ABET Engineering Criteria Program EducationalOutcome B, “an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and
that the automated titration experiment is more simpleand significantly faster, experimental results in this mode are more accurate because the controlis not by eyeballing. The students were very positive about automation of manual operations intheir laboratory practice. Many of the students expressed interest and motivation in studyingautomation and participation in designing and building automation devices.ConclusionOur experience of creating simple affordable automation devices, their integration with a datalogging system and teaching automated laboratories indicates the considerable potential of thistechnology for improving experiential chemistry education in high schools.Application of the developed devices enables to save time spent for
An Interdisciplinary Control Systems Course for Engineering Technologists: Description of Lecture Topics and Laboratory Experiments Harry W. Fox Cleveland State UniversityAbstract For the past two years we have offered a required senior-level control systems course withlaboratory designed to be taken jointly by mechanical engineering technology (MET) andelectronics engineering technology (EET) students. This course focuses on the interdisciplinarynature of control systems and represents a departure from the traditional approach of teaching aseparate control systems course to each engineering technology discipline. Certain controlsconcepts, such as
Video laboratory manuals and kits that explain nanoscale science and engineering concepts J. Aura Gimm1, Anne Bentley2, Mohammed Farhoud2, Arthur B. Ellis2, George C. Lisensky3, Wendy C. Crone4 1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 2 Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 3 Department of Chemistry, Beloit College, Beloit, WI 4 Department of Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WIAbstractThe Interdisciplinary Education Group of the Materials Research Science and
collaboration and partnership with the relevant industries to directly match the industryexpectations and needs. The academic partners in this project come from university andcommunity college. These institutions that specialize in STEM education are listed below.New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) is a public university located in Newark, New Jersey.It is home to 17% Hispanic, 8% other minorities, and 27% female students as of 2017. TheEngineering Technology (ET) Department at NJIT offers high-quality ABET-accreditedprograms that target the immediate and future needs of industries and is recognized for nationalleadership in engineering technology and STEM education through excellence in curricula,teaching, laboratory development, and service
Paper ID #35605Promoting First-Semester Persistence of Engineering Majors with DesignExperiences in General Chemistry LaboratoryMr. Corey Payne, University of FloridaDr. Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida Kent Crippen is a Professor of STEM education in the School of Teaching and Learning at the University of Florida and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. His research in- volves the design, development, and evaluation of STEM cyberlearning environments as well as scientist- teacher forms of professional development. Operating from a design-based research perspective, this work focuses
2006-386: A NEW APPROACH IN MICROPROCESSOR/MICROCONTROLLERCOURSES/LABORATORIES MATERIAL DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENTSteve Hsiung, Old Dominion University STEVE C. HSIUNG Steve Hsiung is an associate professor of electrical engineering technology at Old Dominion University. Prior to his current position, Dr. Hsiung had worked for Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Seagate Technology, Inc., and Lam Research Corp., all in Silicon Valley, CA. Dr. Hsiung also taught at Utah State University and California University of Pennsylvania. He earned his BS degree from National Kauhsiung Normal University in 1980, MS degrees from University of North Dakota in 1986 and Kansas State University in 1988, and a PhD
of Surgical Education, Vol 72, No. 5., 2015, 868-874[13] Parrino, T.A. “The Acqusition of Practical Skills by U.S. Medical Students”, The American Journal of theMedical Science, Vol. 307, No. 3, 1994, 163-166[14] Boulet, J.R., Murray D., Kras, J. Woodhouse, J., McAllister J. and Ziv, A. “Reliability and Validity of aSimulation-based Acute Skills Assessment for Medical Students and Residents” Anesthesiology, Vol. 99, No. 6,2003, 1270 - 1280[15] Epstein R.M. “Assessment in Medical Education” The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 356, No. 4,2007, 387-396[16] Jones, S.J., Staib, S.A., and Fusner, A. “Expanding Classroom Time: Teaching Clinical Intravenous Skills inCampus Laboratory”, Teaching and Learning on Nursing, Vol. 4, 2009, 94-97[17
study is to determine whether these skills have been carried over into the twosemester capstone design course. If the earlier course is effective in teaching experimentaldesign and laboratory techniques, this should translate to more sophisticated experimental designand execution in the capstone design course. To determine whether these concepts have beenretained in the capstone design course, design reports were examined to note the instances ofspecific Measurements and Analysis topics in the design projects. Reports were examined forstudent populations that had taken the revised course and were compared to reports for studentswho had taken the original course with two different instructors. Both the number of topicsaddressed and the number of
- plementing undergraduate laboratory and lecture courses that address the evolving needs of biomedical engineers, and managing the ABET assessment program for the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineer- ing.Dr. Marcia Pool, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Marcia A. Pool is an Instructional Laboratory Coordinator in the Weldon School of Biomedical En- gineering at Purdue University. She is responsible for overseeing and assessing junior level laboratories, bioinstrumentation and biotransport, and is involved with teaching and mentoring students in the Senior Design Capstone course. Recently, she has worked with colleagues to plan and implement a problem- based learning approach to the biotransport laboratory to improve
“experimental” group. Student surveys showed generally positive disposition of students towardsthe newly introduced VR experiment. Page 25.724.2IntroductionComputer-based immersive visualization in recent years has become an important catalyst in thedevelopment of virtual reality (VR) laboratories that hold considerable promise for becoming apowerful teaching and learning tool in engineering education. The fiscal realities of the shrinkingresources coupled with escalating cost of modernizing engineering laboratories have promptededucators to investigate innovative ways in which VR labs can be used for laboratory instruction.Maturation of digital
of the surveys and lessons learned are presented in sectionV.II. Background of the Fluid Mechanics Laboratory courseThe revised course CEE325 Fluid Mechanics was first introduced in the fall of 1999 as a result ofcurriculum changes in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University ofMichigan. The College of Engineering bulletin describes this course in the following manner:“(CEE325 teaches) principles of mechanics applied to real and ideal fluids. Topics include fluidproperties and statics; continuity, energy, and momentum equations by control volume;dimensional analysis and similitude; laminar and turbulent flow; boundary layer, drag, lift;incompressible flow in pipes; free-surface flow; adiabatic flow of ideal gases
2025 ASEE Northeast Section Conference, March 22, 2025, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT, USA. Enhancing Engineering Curricula Through Laboratory-based Learning: Pedagogical Approaches, Challenges, and Innovations Marvin Gayle, Danny Mangra Queensborough Community College The City University of New York [CUNY] Queens New York, USA Abstract—Laboratory-based instruction is a critical underscore ways to evaluate the effect of laboratory education oncomponent of engineering education. It
a very high level. The @HOLM™ approach istherefore demonstrated as a viable alternative to conventional brick-and-mortar teaching labtechniques now used by all accredited mechanical engineering Bachelor of Science programs.This new approach provides the opportunity for mechanical engineering B.S. programs to offertheir students rigorous hands-on fluid mechanics lab experiences without need or expense ofmaintaining physical laboratory spaces and equipment. Additional benefits of on-line instruction;including massively parallel instruction, asynchronous content delivery, and multimediapresentation to address a variety of learning styles; are also enabled by this new approach.IntroductionDespite the rise of remote education delivered online
the National Science Foundation under thegrant TUES 1245482. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. Ma, J., and J. Nickerson. 2006. Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 1-24.2. Wieman C. and K. Perkins. 2005. Transforming physics education. Physics Today,58(11), 36-41.3. Perkins, K., Adams, W., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N., Reid, S., Wieman, C., & LeMaster, R. 2006. PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. The Physics Teacher, 44, 18.4. Finkelstein, N.D., W.K. Adams, C.J
associate professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison University (JMU). Prior to joining JMU, Dr. Prins was a faculty member at Virginia State University. Dr. Prins’ industrial experience includes one year as a suspension engineer at Visteon, Inc. and five years as an engineer at Perceptron, Inc., a machine vision company. Page 26.111.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Student-developed Rotational Mechanics Laboratory Exercise to Link Engineering Design and ScienceIntroductionA noted challenge in our curriculum when teaching
Lecturer at the Uni- versity of Washington teaching the Chemical Engineering Laboratories (traditionally the Unit Operations lab). Her worked as a Lecturer included the development of new experimental modules for undergraduate ChemE students, the submission of proposals with an educational focus and the supervision of the labora- tories. During this time she also participated in outreach activities arranged by the College of Engineering to target increasing the number of students from underrepresented minorities in engineering programs. Today, Marvi serves as a Senior Research Scientist in the Bioengineering Department at the University of Washington and works as an independent consultant in engineering innovations.Dr