identified themes in this study. Future research couldexplore alternative approaches (e.g., GPT-4) to streamline the clustering and code generationprocesses, potentially leveraging advanced natural language processing techniques to automatethe identification and consolidation of overlapping themes.References[1] A. Alsharif, A. Katz, D. Knight, and S. Alatwah, “Using Sentiment Analysis to Evaluate First-year Engineering Students Teamwork Textual Feedback,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. Accessed: Nov. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41460.pdf[2] R. S. Baker and P. S. Inventado, “Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics,” in Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice, J. A. Larusson
2001 and teaching engineering courses since 2008. Renewable Energy Technologies, Electrical Circuits and Electronics, Introduction to Engi- neering, Electrical Substations, Introduction to AutoCAD, Digital Electronics and Systems and Controls are among the courses Dr Melendez-Norona has taught. She is committed to an engineering education of excellence and to service the community and has participated in a training for cybersecurity issues immersed in smart grids also funded by the NSF. Dr Melendez-Norona is currently a postdoctoral fellow at Florida Atlantic University (Florida, United States), with the support of the ASEE eFellows program, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF).Dr. Maria M. Larrondo
offering resources and organizingengagement events for female STEM students and faculty. Initially, OWISE efforts wereprimarily focused on faculty support, but over time the office has grown to incorporatecommunity-building activities and essential resources for both graduate and undergraduatefemale students in the College of Engineering and Science [14].Project MotivationBeginning in 2019, OWISE committed to hosting monthly student engagement events. Theseevents range from bringing in guest speakers from industry to providing community-buildingactivities. During a share session event in the spring of 2022, both students and female facultymembers engaged in an open dialogue sharing their experiences of attending classes that werepredominantly
. Dewsbury and C. J. Brame, “Inclusive Teaching,” LSE, vol. 18, no. 2, p. fe2, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0021.[12] D. Mitchell and D. Sutherland, What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education: Using Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies, 3rd ed. Third edition. | Abingdon, Oxon ; New York : Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, 2020. doi: 10.4324/9780429401923.[13] S. Brookfield, Becoming a critically reflective teacher, 1st ed. in The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.[14] L. Schlemer, L. De Greef, and T. Harding, “Stories of Change: Faculty in Reflective Dialogues,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017, p
diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado Boulder Jacquelyn Sullivan is founding co-director of the Engineering Plus degree program in the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She spearheaded design and launch of the Engineering GoldShirt Program to provide a unique access pathway to engineering for high potential, next tier students not admitted through the standard admissions process; this program is now being adapted at several engineering colleges. Sullivan led the founding of the Precollege division of ASEE in 2004; was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education, and was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011. She has
origins to the 1994 ASEE report Engineering Education for aChanging World, which, among many other recommendations, asserted that “engineeringeducation must take into account the social, economic, and political contexts of engineeringpractice…” [2, pp. 20–21]. The report emphasized that contextual skills should be deliveredthrough multi- and interdisciplinary coursework, integrated into the existing curriculum, andfocused on an understanding of the ethical dimensions of engineering. A decade later, theNational Academies report Educating the Engineer of 2020 re-emphasized the importance of thethemes of interdisciplinarity, societal context, and ethics to the engineer of the then-future [3].In 2018, Dr. Ruth Graham, in her report on The Global
Academy of Engineering, Volume 49, Number 4, Winter 2019. 9. C. O. Hilgarth, "Should We Consider Transforming the Definition of Technological and Engineering Literacy,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 10.18260/1-2—33964, ASEE, 2020. 10. J.A. Stieb, “Understanding Engineering Professionalism: A Reflection on the Rights of Engineers,” Sci Eng Ethics 17, 149–169, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9166-x [Last accessed 7 October 2024]. 11. L. Callaway, “The Origin of the Word Engineer: A Linguistic Exploration,” Symbol Genie, September 27, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://symbolgenie.com/origin-word- engineer/ [Last accessed 7 October 2024]. 12. A. Portillo-Blanco, H
Society of Engineering Association (ASEE)Virtual Conference. Accessed February 9, 2023, https://peer.asee.org/37585.16. Beghetto RA, Dilley AE (2016) Creative aspirations or pipe dreams? toward understanding creative mortification in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016(151):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20150.17. Hennessey BA (2019) Motivation and creativity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, pp. 374–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.020.18. Conti R, Amabile TM, Pollak S (1995) The positive impact of creative activity: Effects of creative task engagement and
results (particularly Figure 4) support thefinding that even partial implementation of ETT can result in an improved teamwork experiencefor the students in the context of this study, both in terms of their perception of psychologicalsafety and their perception of how well their team embodied good teamwork practices.References[1] K. K. Wobbe and E. A. Stoddard, Project-Based Learning in the First Year: Beyond All Expectations. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2019.[2] Folk-Williams, John, “How Diversity Improves Collaborative Problem-Solving – Cross Collaborate,” Sep. 01, 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20220901160838/http://www.crosscollaborate.com/2010/05/div ersity-improves-collaborative-problem-solving/ (accessed Sep. 01, 2022).[3] D
target and perceiver effects 𝜌𝑟 0.167 correlation between reciprocal ratings Next, we independently generate two sets of 1,000 datasets using equations (6)-(15) andthe parameter values in Table 1. The first set of 1,000 smaller datasets each has 15 student teamswith five students per team, and we observe ratings across four different time periods. The nextset of 1,000 larger datasets each has 30 student teams with other settings identical. Aftergenerating the simulated datasets, we estimated the modeling parameters in Table 1 separatelyusing our Bayesian method, the SR-SEM using the "srm" R package (Nestler et al., 2019), and astandard two-step model using the "TripleR" package (Schönbrodt et al., 2012). The
Student Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Education by Improving Teaching and Assessment,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–30, 2019.[28] National Research Council, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.[29] H. W. Fennell, G. S. Coutinho, A. J. Magana, D. Restrepo, and P. D. Zavattieri, “Enhancing student meaning-making of threshold concepts via computation: The case of Mohr’s circle,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017, vol. 2017-June.[30] K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no
career success: a pilot study,” in ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, paper # 11735, 2015.[2] A. Mohammadi, K. Grosskopf, and J. Killingsworth, “Workforce development throughonline experiential learning for STEM education,” Adult Learning, vol. 31. no. 1, 2019.[3] J. M. Nunley et al., “College major, internship experience, and employment opportunities:Estimates from a résumé audit,” Labour Economics, vol. 38, pp. 37-46, January 2016.[4] E. Townsley et al., “The impact of undergraduate internships on post-graduate outcomes forthe liberal arts,” NACE Center for Career Development and Talent Acquisition, TechnicalReport, 2017.[5] J. Gault, J. Redington, and T. Schlager, “Undergraduate business internships and careersuccess: Are they related
, and graduate schoolacceptance. Nonetheless, the desire to attain a competitive grade-point-average may lead tonegative psychosocial effects such as increased mental exertion, physical exhaustion, anxiety, andoverall lack of work-life balance. In this paper, the authors extend their prior study on the impactof grades in engineering education. The first study was conducted in the spring of 2019 at a tierone, small private research university in Texas with the intention of understanding the mindset ongrades before, during, and at the end of the semester. The study extended herein aims to explorethe emotional and academic impact grades have on engineering undergraduate students in aminority-serving institution, and further understand the issues
contribution to theliterature in this context.Table 1. Summary of prior literature that focuses on labor based grading methods. Author/Citation Year Class Context Summary Medina [10] 2018 English Social justice pedagogy and grading contracts. Inoue [3] 2019 English Equity and inclusion in the context of labor based grading. Gomes et al. [11] 2020 English Student and faculty narratives about grading contracts. Shubert [12
enrollmentin engineering majors was 17,689, a number far shorter of the need of engineers and techniciansfor the nation’s industrialization strategy (Jiang and Wang 2019). The Soviet Union’s experienceof fast industrialization contributed in important ways to the appeal of its higher education system– if the American engineering education could be considered as a primary model for producingprofessional engineers, the soviet system targets more at qualified technical human resources, withregarding to the scale and speed of engineering training.Following the central government’s call for “learning from the Soviet Union,” Tsinghua enteredan era of close engagement with experts from Soviet Union and other socialist nations in EastEurope, such as the
(2020) Quo Vadimus: Humanism, Going Beyond the Boundaries of Capitalism and Socialism.Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems, 4(3):20200060. https://doi.org/10.1520/SSMS20200060[4] (2020) The Impact of the Coronavirus on Food Insecurity in 2020.https://www.feedingamerica.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/Brief_Local Impact_10.2020_0.pdf[5] (2020) Food Insecurity | Healthy People 2020. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion,https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/social-determinants-health/interventions-resources/food-insecurity[6] Risk for COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Death By Race/Ethnicity | CDC.https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investigations-discovery/hospitalization-death-by
) Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participa- tion (LSAMP) in STEM Program at Cal Poly. She previously served as elected co-chair of the Science and Technology Taskforce of the National Women’s Studies Association, and as a Postdoctoral Research Officer at the Centre for Informal Learning and Schools (CILS) at King’s College, University of London. Most recently, she served as the 2019-20 Inclusive STEM Initiatives Fellow in the Colleges of Engineer- ing, Science and Mathematics, and Liberal Arts at Cal Poly. Her graduate training is in Science and Technology Studies and Women’s Studies at Virginia Tech.Dr. Daniel Almeida, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Daniel Almeida is an Associate
engineering education, software, and hardware engineering.Dr. Racheida S. Lewis, University of Georgia Racheida S. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the University of Georgia in the Engineering Ed- ucation Transformations Institute (EETI) and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. She has been recognized as a Gates Millennium Scholar, GEM Associate Fellow, New Horizon Scholar, and a 2019 inductee into the Bouchet Honor Society. She completed her doctoral work at Virginia Tech where she focused on the impact matriculation structures have on self-efficacy development in electrical and computer engineering students. As well, she received a Bachelor of Science and Master of Engi- neering in Electrical
American Societyfor Engineering Education, 2019.[7] Talbert, R., “Specifications grading: We may have a winner”, https://rtalbert.org/specs-grading-iteration-winner/, 2017.[8] Stutzman, R. Y., & Race, K. H., “EMRF: Everyday Rubric Grading”, The MathematicsTeacher, 97(1), pp. 34-39, 2004.[9] Arshad, M., Romatoski, R., “Effective Learning Strategies: Grading Rubric to EnhanceStudent Learning”, ASEE 2020 Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual Conference, June2020, ASEE2020-29374, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34498
Oxford, UK. Professor Zilouchian is senior member of several professional societies including Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, Phi Kappa Phi, ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Nancy Romance , Florida Atlantic University Dr. Romance is Professor of Science/Engineering Education and Director of FAU’s STEM Collaborative. She is currently PI on the Title III Hispanic Serving Institution STEM Articulation grant and Co-PI on the College of Engineering and Computer Science’s NSF S STEM grant guiding engineering majors toward completion of a MS degree in Artificial Intelligence. Her work is focused extensively on science and engi- neering activities to promote enhanced classroom engagement of students and increased discipline-based educational
engineers,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 1367–1370, Aug. 2000.[3] P. K. Imbrie, S. J. Mailer, and J. C. Immekus, “Assessing team effectiveness,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2005, pp. 831–837.[4] H. J. Passow, “Which ABET Competencies Do Engineering Graduates Find Most Important in their Work?,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 95–118, Jan. 2012.[5] ABET, “Engineering Programs,” 2019.[6] R. Guimerà, B. Uzzi, J. Spiro, and L. A. N. Amaral, “Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance,” Science (80-. )., vol. 308, no. 5722, pp. 697 LP – 702, Apr. 2005.[7] S. Wuchty, B. F. Jones, and B. Uzzi, “The Increasing Dominance of
., "Doctoral initiative on minority attrition and completion.," Washington, DC, 2015.[3] N. Curtin, J. Malley and A. J. Stewart, "Mentoring the Next Generation of Faculty: Supporting Academic Career Aspirations Among Doctoral Students," Journal of Research in Higher Education, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 714-738, 2016.[4] J. Gordon, Haynes, C. and May, G., "Impact of mentoring and enrichment activities on the academic careers of underrepresented STEM doctoral students," in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[5] J. Mondisa and S. A. McComb, "The role of social community and individual differences in minority mentoring programs," Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, vol. 26
., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 15 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational climate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race stratification in education and the workforce. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Who benefits most from a holistic student
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Transformative Diversity Changes in U.S. Demographics: Recognizing the Cultural Implications in Higher EducationAbstractThe demographic face of the United States is changing in a way never before seen. The year 2035will see the culmination of three major forces: (1) the last of the Baby Boomers turning 65+ yearsof age (2030), (2) the cross-over where the number of people 65+ years of age outnumber theyouths under the age of 18 (2035), and, (3) the recognition that the primary driver for populationgrowth in the U.S. will be from international migration (2030).These three major events will take place over the upcoming decade. Each of which, by itself, mayappear relatively harmless
) students. In February 2019, Andrea received the prestigious National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER award to research professional identity development processes in undergraduate AEC women. She has also received grants from East Coast Construction Services, Engineering Information Foundation, and the Na- tional Association of Home Builders. Dr. Ofori-Boadu was selected to participate in the 2019 QEM-NSF INCLUDES summit. In 2018, she was selected as a 2018 National Science Foundation - NC A & T ADVANCE IT Faculty Scholar. She also received the 2018 CoST Teaching Excellence Merit Award. Dr. Ofori-Boadu received both the 2017 NC A & T - CoST Rookie Research Excellence Award and the 2017 North Carolina A &
. Lafayette’s enrollment is currently about 2700. Thestudent body population is 48% male and 52% female. In Fall 2015 the college had 220 full-timefaculty, 35 were members of minorities and 13 were international. At this time 17 percent of ourU.S. students identify as students of color (Hispanic/Latino, 6 percent; Asian-American, 4percent; African-American, 5 percent; multiracial, 2 percent) [9]. In 2015 our engineeringdivision college was recognized by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) forits commitment to diversity and inclusivity. At this time the student body within the engineeringdivision consisted of 36% women and nearly 25% identified within the underrepresented group,approximately double the national average [10].Over the
labor predictions through 2024 show that forevery ten jobs, only three will require a bachelor’s degree or higher [2].In this project’s state, Louisiana, skilled workers are the backbone of our most importantindustries. Louisiana Economic Development has identified nine key industries in Louisiana [3],and six of those nine industries rely heavily on automation technology and skilled technicians.In addition, the North Louisiana Economic Partnership (NLEP) has named AdvancedManufacturing as a target sector for North Louisiana. Since 2014 NLEP has hosted an annualManufacturing Week, and in 2019 over 1,300 high school students visited over 50 manufacturingand training facilities in North Louisiana to learn about occupation needs and possible