projects because the heart of the school year is whenmost project work is in full swing. To counter this issue, the TCROV team has, under thesupervision of adults, experimented with using their ROVs under the ice. Figure 10 shows aspecially designed (to be small and maneuverable) ROV being launched through an auguredopening.Figure 10: ROVs exploring under the ice, note the plant material under the ice roof. Also note the Page 22.1577.15excellent real-world physics demonstration of internal reflection of light off the water’s surface.The team has now developed safe protocols for using ROVs under the ice and has captured somefascinating video. These
other to achieve the common goal. • Face-to-face interaction: Team members do most of the work together. They provide assistance, encouragement, and feedback to the other team members. • Individual accountability and personal responsibility: Each team member is responsible for doing his/her share of the work, and is expected to master all necessary material. • Interpersonal and small-group skills: Team members use effective communication and conflict-management skills. Page 22.1254.6 • Group processing: Team members set common goals, reflect on team accomplishments, and make adjustments as
InteroperabilityPlans, DHS evaluated all 50 states with regards to the completion and effectiveness of theirSCIP. It was found that most states had completed their SCIP but many were behind inperforming regular exercises to verify those plans, did not plan for use of plain languagecommunications in their plans and rarely updated those plans to reflect training, equipment orstructural changes. As stated previously, these exercises are invaluable in establishing preexisting relationships. The fact that DHS has made available standards and templates hasallowed the states to make progress in documenting their operating procedures but many statesare still behind in verifying and refining those plans.AlternativesGiven that SDR is new technology with limited
campus is directly driven byenrollments and state allocation. Hence, administratively, there are varying degrees of resourcesavailable to each of the 15 regional coalition campuses to address challenges associated withstudent retention. To reduce this disparity and examine the effect of intervention strategiesrelative to the project scope and goals, the retention and academic pathways of STEM degreestudents at these campuses are being tracked as part of the Toys’n MORE project.7. Preliminary Results after Two Semesters of Implementation A. Demographic CharacteristicsBased on the first two semesters of implementation, demographic characteristics for theparticipants reflect the overall enrollment patterns in STEM disciplines across institutions
under grant numbers DUE-0618571 (CCLI Phase 2), DUE-0622466(STEP Type 1) and DUE-0817332 (CCLI Phase 3), and by a Teaching Enhancement Fund grantat Wright State University. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation or Wright State University.Program InformationMore information on the Wright State model for engineering mathematics education (includingall course materials for EGR 101) can be found on the program website:http://www.engineering.wright.edu/cecs/engmath/Bibliography1. Kerr, A.D., and Pipes, R.B., 1987. “Why We Need Hands-On Engineering Education.” The Journal of Technology Review, Vol. 90
2. and Mointoring Activation 4. Reaction and 3. Control • Behavior Reflection • • Context Figure 1: Simplified Diagram of Pintrich’s Self-Regulated Learning FrameworkOur project is centered in the Motivation/Affect domain where we seek to understand how anintervention impacts motivation for learning. In this framework, as in much of Pintrich’s work,motivation is defined broadly and includes elements firmly grounded in a variety of differentmotivation theories 1, 4. Capitalizing on this broad definition, our
captured on a digital audiorecording. All students consented according to the university policy on human subjects socialscience research.To open the focus group discussion, the facilitator asked the students to reflect about the pre-class assignments and quizzes. In general, tell me your thoughts about the pre-class assignments and quizzes. The consensus was that the pre-class assignments and quizzes were beneficial because class time could be spent on examples. However, students thought the quantity of assignments was excessive; that turning in a paper each class was too much even though this was helpful to work on the material. Students admitted that the pre-reading would not have been done if it was not required.The first discussion
. Any opinions, findings, or recommendations are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. Page 25.411.13References 1. Yamamoto, A., Nakashima, T., Higuchi, T., “Wall Climbing Mechanisms Using Electrostatic Attraction Generated by Flexible Electrodes,” International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science, 2007 (MHS ’07), pp. 389-394, Nov. 11-Nov. 14, 2007, Nagoya, Japan. 2. Berengueres, J., Tadakuma, K., Kamoi, T., and R. A. K. R. Kratz, "Compliant distributed magnetic adhesion device for wall climbing," in Robotics and Automation, 2007 IEEE International
28 95.82 4.56Boiling 2.80 0.49 3.23 0.84 2.57 0.85 15 95.70 10.0From table 2 the scores for the worksheets are observed to be consistently lower than those forthe textbook problems. This is attributable to the fact that the worksheets are more complex thanthe typical text book problem. The worksheets were crafted by the professor to reflect howcognition is developed in the domain, whereas most text book problems have similar solvedproblems within the text (indeed some of them are partially or completely solved in thecompanion solutions manual). Thus text book problems may not be as challenging as theworksheets. See appendix B for a typical worksheet and text book problem.A further look
. They utilizethree interdigitated (ID) cantilever beams to minimize the sensitivity to external vibrations.The students begin by calibrating the AFM. For this system, the laser spot is centered on the IDportion of the beam. Thus the reflected laser beam is not a focused spot, but rather a diffractionpattern. The laser and detector positions must be adjusted so that a single mode (preferably 0thmode) passes through the detector’s slit. Next, the students mount a sample and bring the tip intocontact. They must bias their system so that the z-displacement is centered around zero and theAFM is at its point of maximum sensitivity when the cantilever tip just comes into contact. Thesystem is calibrated by applying a cyclic z-input with the piezo
and, therefore, reflect the feedback that has been received from those highschool students who have participated as beta testers for the 40+ E-Clock™ kits that have beencurrently distributed.Wiki-based instruction / feedback – While the hardware and software design of E-Clock™ arecritical to the overall success and functionality of the project, the deployment strategy thataccompanies the platform is equally important. The industry is riddled with excellent productsthat have had limited success due to weak deployment strategies characterized by poor oroutdated documentation, insufficient customer service, or inadequate support material. With E-Clock™, the goal was to develop an all-inclusive online wiki-based solution that provides
to note thatthe system is self-measuring. Performance information is not sent to an external group ofmanagers. Figure 7. Students in Japan Working Together on the Manufacturing System Design8. Run and Re-Run Simulation Until the Team Achieves the System FRs. If, the systemdoes not achieve the FRs, the students re-design and re-run their plant simulation, until thesystem achieves each of the 6 FRs. The approach is that the student teams invent the 6 PSs toachieve the 6 FRs. In addition students may add additional FRs to the initial set of 6 FRs.9. Team Reflection and Coaching. After each simulation run, the students discuss theirobservations about the simulation run. The teacher helps students put into words theirobservations about the
the Subjectline for emailassignmentName=get(handles.edit1, 'String');subject=['Returned Graded ' char(assignmentName)];%Get inputpath of graded assignments from handles.browse and generate list of student names and IDSinputpath=getappdata(handles.browse, 'inputpath' );[na roster]=xlsread([cd,'\Class_Roster.xlsx']);lastname=roster(2:end,3);firstname=roster(2:end,2);blackboardID=roster(2:end,1);recipients=roster(2:end,4);% Modify these two lines to reflect% your account and password.myaddress = 'Grader@gmail.com';mypassword = 'password';setpref('Internet','E_mail',myaddress);setpref('Internet','SMTP_Server','smtp.gmail.com');setpref('Internet','SMTP_Username',myaddress);setpref('Internet','SMTP_Password',mypassword);props
more biomedically relevant experiment wasincorporated into the class. Rather than focusing on cell growth, a cell cytotoxicity experiment Page 25.21.3was developed based on appropriate ISO and ASTM standards (1-5). This experiment was 2motivated by lectures on biocompatibility and relevant biocompatibility tests for differentmedical devices, illustrating that cell cytotoxicity tests are required for all body-contactingmedical devices (1,6). At the same time, the amount of time required in lab both in and outsideof class was reduced to reflect the fact that the course was not a full credit course
their fieldworkportion. The assessment program has been reviewed and approved for use by MichiganTech’s Institutional Review Board. The presented results should be interpreted withcaution given the relatively low numbers in this quantitative study. While reflective of theprograms presented herein, additional years of data are needed before conclusions can betransferred to such programs in general at other institutions. A. Identity- Motivations Comparable to many international service experiences in developing communities, both programs within this study are options, and demanding ones at that. Understanding motivations becomes especially important to the student, their team, and their host community. This paper focuses
gotten right or wrong until much later.”Based on the above observations, we are planning to develop and assess the effectiveness ofthese unlimited assessment quizzes for all topics of a typical course in Numerical Methods.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos0717624, 0836981, 0836916, 0836805, and the Research for Undergraduates Program in theUniversity of South Florida (USF) College of Engineering. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation
could be strengthened. Upon reflection, almost all curricular changessuggested and undertaken in the department, in regard to course enhancements, were recognizedto come from Part 1 of the instructor assessment (See Figure 1) rather than the numerical ratingsobtained from the student assessments or Part 2 of the instructor assessment. Part 1 is filled outby the instructor, where a portion of this form requires the instructor to identify strengths andweaknesses of the students based upon direct assessment. Requiring each instructor to evaluatethe performance of each course each semester generates a tremendous amount of ideas toimprove the curriculum in a manner that the numerical data, from either the instructor or thestudents, never does.The
Engineering Status and MaturityEngineering education has been subjected to in-depth study every decade or so, beginning withthe Mann Report in 1918.12 The most recent and authoritative study was conducted by the Page 25.95.12National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and published in 2005 under the title, Educating theEngineer of 2020.2 This section picks up on quality concerns for the 21st Century.Engineering in the 21st Century. Although acknowledging that certain basics of engineeringwill not change, this NAE report concluded that the explosion of knowledge, the globaleconomy, and the way engineers will work will reflect an ongoing evolution that
engineering design. The societal impact of theproject, Solar Energy Scavenging, also makes students more aware of what engineering can do toaddress current energy issues worldwide. Presently we are modifying the content of the projectto address the main concern that many students expressed in their reflection papers, i.e. the levelof complexity and the amount of time needed to complete the project. The project presentedabove, together with other projects proposed by the authors in the areas of renewable energy,energy harvesting and wireless sensor networks have been used to draw student’s interest in thefield of renewable energy sources, advanced and intelligent monitoring systems
Fe, NM: The SAR Press, pp. 117-141.47. Mikic, B. and Grasso, D. (2002). Socially-Relevant Design: The TOY-Tech Project at Smith College. Journal of Engineering Education, 91: 319-326.48. Ellis, G. W., Mikic, B., & Rudnitsky, A. (2003). Getting the "big picture" in engineering: Using narratives and conceptual maps. ASEE Conference Proceedings.49. Riley, D. Employing Liberative Pedagogies in Engineering Education. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9 (2): 137-158 (2003).50. Howe, S., Moriarty, M.A., and Errabelli, A. (2011). Transfer from Capstone Design: A Model to Facilitate Student Reflection. ASee Conference Proceedings, 2011.51. Cech, E.A. (2010). Trained to Disengage? A Longitudinal Study of
terms of time when the outer edge of the ripple is moving at a constantrate. There was a substantial gain on this item of 32 percentage points from the pre-test (n = 8,16% correct) to the post-test (n = 24, 48% correct). In the other symbolic item (Q18), thestudents had to interpret the meaning of the parameters in an exponential growth function: “Themodel that describes the number of bacteria in a culture after t days has just been updated fromP(t)=7(2)t to P(t)=7(3)t. What implications can you draw from this information?” There was asubstantial gain on this question of 36 percentage points from the pre-test (n=19, 38% correct) tothe post-test (n=37, 74% correct). This likely reflects the emphasis in the model developmentsequence on making
the Introduction to Propulsion Systems for Hybrid Electric Drive Vehicles" lab course.The first course is a prerequisite for the second course “Advanced Propulsion Systems forHybrid Electric Drive Vehicles”. In the advanced course, students utilize the subsystems datathey collected in the introductory course to calibrate their previously developed vehiclesimulation models. In doing so, their models begin to accurately reflect the performance of theCHEV. With their models calibrated, they conduct validation experiments using the powertraintest cells and vehicle. Figure 3 shows students preparing to collect drive cycle data on the CHEVfor model validation. Figure 3. Students preparing for data
non-persistence), the frequency of responses wascompared between institutions. The data was also analyzed with respect to gender for thelarge and medium-sized schools (the female population at the small school was too smallto be used in this analysis).Methods:Data for this study were taken from student essays written as part of an in-classassignment. As a part of this assignment, the students were asked to respond to theprompt, “Engineering is a very broad field of study. What is it about engineering thatinterests you?” Two engineering education researchers reviewed and coded thesequalitative reflections independently. The independently coded responses were comparedand discussed until a consensus was formed. The coding categories and
programs, the size of the population studied will expand and the influence of one ortwo students on the overall average performance will be reduced. Furthermore, study of theoverall program goal of increasing retention and graduation rates from CEAS will need to bepostponed until sufficient time has passed for students to graduate.AcknowledgmentsPartial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation's Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent Expansion Program (STEP) under Award No.0757055. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The authors would also like to thank
undergraduate hourly workers is more costeffective than hiring TAs, which is an important consideration for many schools today. This isparticularly significant when the use of the peer-led study groups has been demonstrated to bequite effective, as done here.AcknowledgmentsPartial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation's Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent Expansion Program (STEP) under Award No.0757055. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The authors would also like to thank Tina Tang, Cindy Walker, Todd Johnson, TinaCurrent, Sharon Kaempfer, and Jennie
application/acceptance process.The fourth area identified by the solar energy industry is utility management. Although there isno specific degree associated with utility management, individuals are needed who possessworking knowledge of centrally generated and distributed generation of electricity as well asknowledge of utility scale generation. The successful individuals tend to have some workingexperience within an electric utility company.Wind Industry NeedsThe participation in this project by the wind industry was less robust than the solar industry.This may be a reflection of its infancy of the industry within the state. Regardless, the types ofjobs foreseen by the wind industry revolve largely around maintenance of wind turbinegenerators, which
thesurvey and we will have a better chance to examine the relations between engineers and students.AcknowledgementThis material is supported by the National Science Foundation under EEC Grant Numbers 1129403and 1129411. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations presented are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Field, D.A., (2004). Education and training for cad in the auto industry. Computer-Aided Design, 36 (14), 1431-1437.[2] Hamade, R.F., Artail, H.A. & Jaber, M.Y., (2007). Evaluating the learning process of mechanical cad students. Computers & Education, 49 (3), 640-661.[3] Ye, Z., Peng, W., Chen, Z. & Cai, Y.-Y., (2004
Page 25.227.4 - Engineering reporting including presentations, design reviews, and technical reportsThe course grading was originally in-progress grading for the Fall and Winter quarter. A finalgrade was determined in the Spring quarter after completion of the project and all coursedeliverables. After determination of the final grade, this was reflected retroactively for the Falland Winter quarters. This created administrative issues and created an atmosphere of delayedachievement with a negative impact upon the course. In-progress grading was abandoned afterthe second year of experience in favor of well defined course deliverables with team grades andindividual grades determined each quarter.The development of standardized course
. Hisrationale is that if the student makes an attempt to solve the problem, they should get something.He has given up to 75% credit for a problem if a student solved half of the problems correctly.In discussions, it was found that there are significant differences between the gradingphilosophies of the instructors and this is the greatest source of difference in the final gradesissued in a class. The work of a “C” student in the eyes of one instructor could as easily be an“A” or “F” in the eyes of another instructor.SummaryOverall, the committee was effective at improving consistency in the coverage and rigor of thematerial. This consistence is reflected in the material covered on the exams and on the overallgrade distribution for the class. There were