Wyoming, and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech).RIT and Northeastern have formal cooperative education programs while University ofWyoming and Virginia Tech do not and consequently only a small percentage of students (2%and 10% respectively) participate in voluntary co-op programs at these two universities. Thepurpose of that study was to investigate the concern over a lower percentage of womenparticipating in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields which consequentlytranslates into a lower percentage of females in these areas of the work force.1 The studyexamined whether retention of students in engineering majors could be improved through astudent’s self-efficacy and to what degree contextual
ofeach step in the Engineering Design Process used in the engineering courses developed. The EDPdeveloped and used for this work is shown in Figure 1, below. As there is not one universallyaccepted EDP, there is also not one universally accepted approach for each of the steps in theEDP. For example, ‘ideation’ is generally understood to be a step about brainstorming differentpossible design concepts, but there are many different ideation and brainstorming strategiesadvocated by various members of the design community. It was necessary to provide scaffoldingfor students to provide clear evidence of their design process while still being authentic andflexible. The EDP log is not a replacement of a full engineering or design notebook; rather, it
the cybersecurity discipline. A longerterm objective is to increase female enrollment in higher-education cybersecurity majorsalthough for now, this is beyond the scope of this paper.The Information Technology (IT) industry demand for skilled cybersecurity analysts isincreasing. The “employment of information security analysts is projected to grow 37 percentfrom 2012 to 2022, much faster than the average for all occupations”1. Today, “women representjust 10 percent of the cybersecurity workforce”. 2 In the same article, David Shearer, CEO of theInternational Information Systems Security Certification Consortium (ISC2) stated: “Theinformation security field is expected to see a deficit of 1.5 million professionals by 2020 if wedon’t take
years, the University of St. Thomas School of Engineering has offered STEPScamps which stand for Science, Technology, and Engineering Preview Summer camp 1 2 3. Thissummer camp is aimed at introducing middle school students from various backgrounds to basicaspects of engineering with hands-on, engaging materials and methods. At the 2015 STEPScamp, participants were a mix of rising 7th-grade male and female students who expressed aninterest in learning science and/or engineering concepts on their application form. At each of thefive 13-hour camp sessions offered, 20 students worked in two small groups learning aboutcircuits and vector drawings, this was followed by a trip to the University of St. Thomasengineering labs. The camp educators and
looking for potential employees that can solve arange of intellectual and technical problems regardless of the job position.[1] Employers arelooking for individuals that are willing to use an engineering mindset in which they problemsolve, think critically, collaborate with others, and are able to solve elementary issues as well asmore complex problems that may arise. In other terms, employers are looking for employees thathave well-developed 21st Century Skills. While not always pictured this way, engineering is avery creative profession that uses 21st Century Skills on a daily basis. It is important thatengineers be able to design a solution that is effective yet still meets constraints such as time,cost, manufacturability, size, etc.[2
theGathering Storm”1, made recommendations in the areas of K-12 education, research, post-secondary education, and economic policy. Despite several positive reactions to the report, thelow U.S. ranking relative to other countries, as reported in the 2010 NAS report entitled "RisingAbove the Storm Revisited"2, gave rise to a revolutionary vision in the National Research Council“A Framework for K-12 Science Education”3. This vision was used by 26 states as a blueprintfor revolutionizing their K-12 education through the implementation of Next Generation ScienceStandards (NGSS)4.To provide an exemplar for the implementation of the NRC Framework and the NGSSengineering practices, a team of the University of Maine faculty from the College of Engineeringand
, Engineering and Robotics (SLIDER) is a five-yearDiscovery Research K-12 (DRK-12) project funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF)1.The project partners curriculum design specialists, educational researchers, and K-12 educatorsin an initiative to design and implement a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum thatintegrates science and engineering to teach eighth grade physical science standards, using LEGONXT robotics as a context or manipulative. As SLIDER is in its final year of design andimplementation, we are afforded a retrospective look at the capacity of LEGO robotics to beutilized on a large scale in traditional public school classroom settings, both from an educationaland organizational standpoint.At the time of SLIDER’s conception in
students in learning of several fundamental physical science concepts, computerprogramming, and engineering design. Some also use robotics as an educational strategy toincrease students’ excitement and motivation for pursuing STEM careers. With increasednational attention to and advances in STEM learning research, the National Research Council’sFramework for K-12 Science Education 1 and the Next Generation Science Standards 2 call uponcurriculum developers and teachers to increase the prominence of engineering within the contextof science education.A growing body of research suggests that problem-based learning, engineering curricula, and“design-based science” are effective means of increasing students’ conceptual understanding ofscience, their
dissertation ”Changing the Learning Environment in the College of Engineering and Applied Science: The impact of Educational Training on Future Faculty and Student-Centered Pedagogy on Undergraduate Students” was the first of its kind at the university. Whitney has been recognized by the National Technical Association (NTA) for her novel approach to studying students, specifically underrepresented minorities and women. Whitney also works with the Emerging Ethnic Engineers (E3) Program. She teaches Calculus 1 during the Summer Bridge program and instructs Cooperative Calculus 1 during the school year. Continuing with her commitment to community involvement, Whitney has previously served on the Na- tional Executive Board
this concern, as well as the ideasaround “starting young” which have recently come to the forefront by the Next GenerationScience Standards (NGSS) focusing on K-12 engineering education curriculum 1. Another ideathat has been coming to the forefront in the engineering education committee is that ofMakerspaces, which is directed towards bringing the Do It Yourself (DIY) culture into theclassrooms to aid teaching and learning 2. However, currently there lies a gap between this ideaof classroom Makerspaces and their implementation in learning environments. This paper is anattempt at filling this gap, by proposing how an interest-based framework would not only aid theimplementation of classroom Makerspaces, but also serve as a means for
studentsworked through the two components of the C3STEM system: CTSiM (Computational Thinkingusing Simulation and Modeling) and C2SuMo (Collaborative Cloud-based Scaled up Modeling),present the experimental study we conducted, and discuss the results in detail. We end the paperwith a summary of our accomplishments, and directions for future research.1. IntroductionThe Next Generation Science Standards place significant emphasis on combining the learning offundamental concepts with scientific and engineering practices that help students develop usea-ble knowledge that they can apply across multiple problems. In more detail, the standards em-phasize that students develop the skills to build and use models, plan and conduct experiments,analyze and
are two well-known high school programsavailable, Project Lead the Way, PLTW 1, and the Infinity Project 2. However both programs areexpensive and neither allows any flexibility to the teachers. Furthermore, there is a lack ofprogram outcomes assessments for Project Infinity, while reports on PLTW have shown existingissues. For instance, a curriculum content analysis concluded that the PLTW curriculumaddressed fewer content standards and showed far fewer points of integration of mathematicalknowledge than would be expected 3. Further, other published empirical studies showed mixedresults from state achievement test scores 4. In addition, neither of these two programs arealigned with the current standards. What had been considered alignment
ProgramThere were two key drivers for the change in the internship program. Since the impact of earlyinternships on STEM (specifically, engineering technology) major retention is the focus of thispaper, this driver is first presented.A. The Issue of STEM Major RetentionThe President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology’s (PCAST) recent report 1predicts that the U.S. workforce’s supply will be 1 million short of the demand for graduates inscience, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), but less than half of those who enterU.S. colleges to pursue majors in STEM persist to graduation. According to the NationalScience Foundation, in 2006 the relative percentage of students receiving STEM degrees were atlevels no different or lower than
institution andaugmented with ad-hoc communication between academics and students, often on a one-to-one basis by telephone and mail correspondence. During the 21st century the ubiquitousadoption of Internet-enabled technologies and methods has most significantly changed themethods and technologies relied upon for distance education, such that these students nowtypically obtain and interact with their study materials, academics, and fellow students via theInternet, and hence known as ‘online’ students. A combination of technologies and methods in conjunction with on-campus and online learningmodes for distance education is defined by Huang as a mixed-mode e-learning environment(MMEL).1 To accommodate on-campus as well as online students the term
role of the student notebooks in the engineeringdesign activities. In this study we pose two questions: • In what ways do notebooks structure engineering design activities? • What roles do the engineering notebooks play in helping student engage in engineering practices?Educational intervention and study contextData for this analysis were collected as part of a large-scale efficacy study of the Engineering isElementary curriculum. Engineering is Elementary (EiE) is an elementary engineeringcurriculum that fosters engineering literacy in students in grades 1-5. Each of the twenty EiEunits engages students in a particular field of engineering that is related to a science topic theyare already learning about in school, ultimately
providerecommendations for engineering faculty teaching freshman courses who want to explore theblended approach to teaching. Examples for online learning activities and how to integrate themwithin class active learning activities to increase student engagement and success rates areincluded. Key words: Engineering Freshman, Active learning, Blended course Design, & StudentPerceptions. 1. Introduction College instructors aim to craft curriculum and learning experiences which align withboth the needs of the learners and the content they are teaching in order to meet expected courseoutcomes. College instructors are content experts who have a multifaceted role. They serve asdiagnosticians who explore
the CivilEngineering Body of Knowledge and enter professional practice. The ultimate goal of thisinitiative was to change state licensure laws, such that a master’s degree or equivalent(augmented by appropriate work experience) would become the academic prerequisite forlicensure as a professional engineer in the U.S. In support of this goal, ASCE and NCEESpartnered to promote RTB-compliant professional licensing legislation in several states. Despitethese efforts, no U.S. licensing jurisdiction adopted such legislation, largely due to oppositionfrom other engineering professional societies [1].Acknowledging this lack of progress, the ASCE Board of Direction formally initiated a majorchange in the direction of the RTB initiative in March 2018
administrative rules were examined to determine how each state 1) definesthe practice of engineering and 2) addresses the licensure requirements of civil engineeringfaculty who teach upper level civil engineering courses. The study found that forty seven of fiftystate statutes define the “practice of engineering.” Fourteen state statutes specifically define“teaching advanced engineering courses or engineering design” as the “practice of engineering”which requires a professional engineer’s license. Three of the fourteen state statutes define“teaching upper level engineering courses” as the practice of engineering, but specificallyexempt faculty who teach engineering courses from licensure requirements. The other thirty-sixstate statutes do not require a
Outcome 4), andthe ability to function effectively on a team (Student Outcome 5) [1]. Engineering educatorswork to identify the most appropriate curricular approaches to address these outcomes withintheir programs [2], [3].Internships or co-op experiences as well as capstone design projects are some ways in whichschools can address these important student outcomes in their curriculum. When incorporatingthese high impact experiences into a curriculum, research has also shown that internships thatdirectly relate to the academic program provide higher internship satisfaction and a higherperceived relevance to student’s career development [4]. Additionally, when students have achoice in the projects they work on and a genuine interest in the project
of between 14 to 23students in the following school year.From 2008 to 2011, 157 elementary teachers received engineering TPD for the first time. Amongthem, 145 teachers (92.4%) responded to a survey at the end of their first Summer AcademyTPD program and 97 teachers (61.8% of 157) returned the following year after teachingengineering in their classrooms. Among the returnees, 92 teachers (94.8% of 97) answered thesame survey at the end of their second Summer Academy. Table 1 shows the number ofparticipants and respondents on the survey according to their year and times of attendance, andTable 2 shows demographic information for the 157 teachers.Table 1. Number of Participants of TPD in Engineering by Year First Summer Academy
American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Engineering for Colonial Times (Research to Practice) Strand: Addressing the NGSS: Supporting K-12 Teachers in Engineering Pedagogy and Engineering-Science ConnectionsIntroductionThe Framework for K-12 Science Education (Framework) 1 and the Next Generation ScienceStandards (NGSS) 2 are grounded in the notion that “children are natural engineers,” and thateducation must involve preparing them to “undertake more complex engineering design projectsrelated to major global, national, or local issues.” 1 In contrast to many of the previous standardsthat list requirements in content areas or steps of an engineering design process (e.g.,Massachusetts State Frameworks 3), the
described by the Frameworks and toenhance the ability of students to achieve performance expectations described by the NGSS. TheSCIIENCE instrument consists of four types of measures: 1) binary codes, 2) frequency codes,3) category of inquiry and 4) global ratings. The first two measures, binary and frequency codes,provide a micro-analysis of whether specified teacher behaviors occur during inquiry instruction. Page 24.508.4The last two components, category of inquiry and global ratings, provide an overall evaluation ofthe type and quality of instruction that is provided during inquiry instruction.Binary codesBinary codes are identified as
of STEM majorsfrom community colleges through relevant initiatives. Such initiatives offer advanced scientificknowledge, and laboratory experiences, and inspire aspirations for graduate school, therebyenabling these graduates to pursue a comprehensive education that opens up numerous careeroptions. However, the review also highlighted the challenges faced by community collegestudents and faculty in participating in these initiatives[1].It was reported that effective transfer strategies were developed to customize researchexperiences for community colleges and establish long-term partnerships with four-yearinstitutions, to improve accessibility and tackle obstacles [2]. These initiatives aim to expandopportunities for community college
have significant implications for future strategies andresearch initiatives to improve transfer student support and success across different regions.1. INTRODUCTIONOver the past few decades, researchers and policymakers have outlined the critical need to broadenparticipation in engineering in order to meet the growing demand for engineering graduates in theengineering workforce [1], [2], [3]. Diversifying the engineering workforce is essential forfostering equity, innovation, and competition in the global market [4]. The National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) has recently emphasized the urgent need to increase the participation ofunderrepresented groups, particularly women and racially minoritized individuals [5]. In highereducation, vertical
from the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEMEquity (CERSE, pronounced like the words “SIR”-”see”). We are here with CERSE Director Dr.Liz Litzler, Associate Director Dr. Erin Carll, and thank our collaborator Senior ResearchScientist Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran who is not able to be here today.40 minutes totalSlide 1-5: 4 minutesSlide 6: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlides 7-11: 4 minutesSlide 12: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlide 13-14: (Audience Engagement) 10 minutes DIYSlide 15: Takeaways – 1-2 minutesSlide 16: 10 minutes final Q&A 1 Topics for Today Why use logic models? What are the components of a
, BakersfieldAisha Farra ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Examining how Graduate Advisors in STEM Support Mental Health among Black and Latinx Graduate Women Kerrie Wilkins-Yel1, Stephanie Marando-Blanck1, Angela Wang1, Aisha Farra1, Pavneet Kaur Bharaj2, and Aishwarya Shridhar1 1 University of Massachusetts Boston 2 California State University BakersfieldIntroduction It is well known that Women of Color (WOC) navigate an onslaught of
academic disciplines. This understanding is critical to ensuring that students from allbackgrounds are appropriately supported in pursuing their degrees and faculty are equipped todiscuss these topics with their students. In this pilot project, researchers from RowanUniversity’s College of Engineering and College of Education who were interested in exploringDEIJ implementation in the classroom in a cross-collaborative manner explored the followingresearch questions: (1) What level of relevance do faculty members place on DEIJ as part oftheir degree program curriculum? and (2) How do faculty members’ conceptions of DEIJcompare across disciplines?There is scant literature on faculty members' conceptions of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, andJustice
Draw an Engineer Assessment in Context Paper presented at 22011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--17489The mere existence of a stereotype is enough to cause negative outcomes. • Studies demonstrate that the effort of trying to disconfirm a stereotype of about your group affects performance. • In particular, Black, Latino/a/x, and Indigenous students (BLI) students often experience chilly or hostile climates • Two salient mechanisms link environments to experiences to performance – Stereotype threat – Lack of social belongingAppel, M., Kronberger, N., & Aronson, J. (2011
University was re-classified as a R1 Research University • Historically a PWI and undergraduate serving institution. • CECAS is the largest of the 8 colleges which comprise Clemson University; and 1 of 3 of which are STEM focused colleges.Presenters will introduce Clemson University with a brief introduction and helpparticipants make connections or parallels between their own institutions and thecontext and factors at play at Clemson University which impact STEM BIPOC andwomen graduate students
CONCLUSIONS OR RECOMMENDATIONS EXPRESSED IN THISMATERIAL ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHOR(S) AND DO NOT NECESSARILYREFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. NATIONAL PRIORITY INCREASE GRADUATES BROADEN PARTICIPATION President’s Council of Advisors on Underrepresented groups in engineering Science and Technology estimated that are also the fastest growing segment of the United States will need 1 million the general population, and so it is also additional STEM professionals. important that the field similarly reflect the population it serves.Among the national priorities are increasing graduates in STEM and