Education: Perspectives, Issues andConcerns, Delhi, India: Shipra Publications. pp. 419-436.[4] Lohani, V.K., Kachroo, P., Chandrachood, S., Zephirin, T. Loganathan, G.V., & Lo, J.L., (2006). Mechatronicsexperiment in a freshman year course. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Engineering Education(iCEE06), Puerto Rico, July 23-28, 2006, 5 pages.[5] Castles, R., Zephirin, T., Lohani, V. K., and Kachroo, P., (2010). Design and Implementation of a MechatronicsLearning Module in a Large First Semester Engineering Course, Paper to appear in August 2010 issue of the IEEETransactions on Education.[6] Mullin, J., Jinsoo, K., Lohani, V. K., and Lo, J., (2007). Sustainable energy design projects for engineeringfreshman. Proceedings from
you include all design parameters that you will need for your calculations in Task 2 below. 2. Aerodynamics at Cruise: a. Describe a typical high-speed cruise segment for a reconnaissance mission. Create a table summarizing the cruise Mach number, altitude, initial and final weights (most airplanes burn fuel when they fly), range of the cruise segment, and other mission values that are important. You will need to read some of the flight manual information to estimate these weights, ranges, etc. This information will be used to define the reference condition(s) for your aerodynamic analysis. b. Lift at initial cruise weight i.Estimate the lift at the
5.6 6.0 4.8 5.0 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.2 4.5 4.6 4.7 5.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.0 3.2 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 us r Tou cienc e r. p r. r. r. e r. r. gr. r. b r cul Eng sho Eng m Eng i l Eng Scienc s Eng er Eng al En al Eng tr y La lar Ca
, Berkeley, CA. Wankat, P. C. and Oreovicz, F. S. (1993). Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Inc.References Burghardt, M. D. (1999). Introduction to Page 17.32.5
. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 3Presenter Name(s):1) Koller Emma University of St. Thomas2) Van Beek Lauren University of St. Thomas3) Thomas AnnMarie University of St. ThomasContact Person’s Name: AnnMarie ThomasContact Person’s Email: apthomas@stthomas.eduContact Person’s Phone: 651-263-9979 Page 18.5.2Contact Person’s Alternate Phone
, 2013. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 2Presenter Name(s):1) Last: Farmer First: Cheryl Affiliation: The University of Texas at Austin2) Last Leslie First Arnie Affiliation Tesla STEM High School, Lake WashingtonContact Person’s Name: Cheryl FarmerContact Person’s Email: cheryl.farmer@mail.utexas.eduContact Person’s Phone: 512-471-6196Contact Person’s Alternate Phone: n/a
. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters:Presenter Name(s):1) Last: Balesdent First: Chantal Affiliation : Museum of Science, EiE2) Last: McManus First : Shannon Affiliation: Museum of Science, EiE3) Last First AffiliationContact Person’s Name: Shannon McManusContact Person’s Email: smcmanus@mos.orgContact Person’s Phone: 617.589.4296 Page 18.32.2Contact
Paper ID #14373ENGINEERING FACULTY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (TRAIN-ING OF TRAINERS) AT RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIESJulia Ziyatdinova, Page 19.12.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 ENGINEERING FACULTY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (TRAINING OF TRAINERS) AT RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIES German S. Dyakonov, Youri Pokholkov, Vasiliy G. Ivanov, Vladimir V. Kondratiev, Julia N. ZiyatdinovaA peculiar feature of Russian engineering education is that the majority of faculty who teachengineering disciplines do not have any pedagogical
diagrams also allow studentsto pan the view port to display different regions of the system, and to zoom the view port todisplay a wider area or to examine a particular region more closely. Figure 4. Example of One-line Diagram Projected on U. S. MapCourse Design and Students’ Evaluation Results 1. Course DesignLoad flow analysis, one of the representative steady-state power system analyses, was performedusing the PowerWorld simulator and simulation results using the advanced visualizationtechniques were incorporated into the Electric Power Systems course (ELEG 3163), which is anundergraduate senior course.The developed pedagogical procedure is shown as follows: a. Some classroom lectures on theoretical basics of load flow
every four hours…”. Assume each teaspoon was pure DEG and calculate the mass of diethylene glycol a patient would have ingested in a day. (b) The probable oral lethal dose of diethylene glycol is 0.5 g/kg weight. Determine the human weight this corresponds to for the dosage given. (c) Explain why this would be dangerous even if the patient was well above this weight. (d) If the total distribution had been consumed according to the quoted dosage guidelines, how many people would have been poisoned? (e) Develop a chronological list showing the error(s), the corrections to them that were not applied, and how the corrections would have
computer engineering curriculum at University of California- Davis. IEEE Transactions on Education, 1994. 37(2): p. 136-146.12. Gibbs, G. and T. Habeshaw, Learning to teach. Powerful ideas in teaching and learning. 1996, Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.13. Hartley, J. and I.K. Davies, Note-taking: a critical review. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1978. 15: p. 207-224.14. Gibbs, G., S. Habeshaw, and T. Habeshaw, 53 interesting things to do in your lectures. 1988, Bristol: Technical and educational services.15. Ruhl, K., C. Hughes, and P. Schloss, Using the pause procedure to enhance lecture recall. Teacher Education and Special Education, 1987. 10: p. 14-18.16. Hativa, N
CO2 for every gallon of fuel consumed. • To showcase solar-electric technology in a novel manner. • Development of a method of recreational transportation that is pollution-free to the streams and lakes that is applicable to our state, country and world. • To do all of this without taking the fun out of it all.Because the details of the problem faced by each team differed, the methods pursued woulddiffer each year. The first year team was primarily concerned with making an entry. Subsequentteams built upon the knowledge, experience and challenges encountered by the previous team(s).The project’s main sponsor is Iowa Energy Center (IEC), a non-profit state organization whichinvests its resources to
Creating Access, 1997-1998.” NACME Research Letter, Vol. 8, No. 2. http://www.nacme.org/pdf/RL-1998-10.pdf4. May, Gary S. and Chubin, Daryl E. (2003). “A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success for Underrepresented Minority Students.” Journal of Engineering Education, January.5. Baker, G. (1984). “Pre-College Preparation of Minority Students for Careers in Engineering.” Transactions of American Nuclear Society, Vol. 46, pp. 35-36.6. Snyder, N. and Bowman, B. (1989). “Improving the Pre-Engineering Education of Low-Income Minority Youth: Lessons from a Demonstration Project.” ASME Tech. Soc. Publicn.,Vol. 2, pp. 1-6
Session 2155 A Look at Representative Templates for Professionally Oriented Faculty Reward Systems in Other Service ProfessionsG. R. Bertoline, 1 D. R. Depew, 1 M. J. Dyrenfurth, 1 A. L. McHenry, 2 E. M. DeLoatch, 3 P. Y. Lee, 4 D. D. Dunlap, 5 S. J. Tricamo, 6 D. A. Keating, 7 T. G. Stanford 7 Purdue University 1/ Arizona State University East 2/ Morgan State University 3 California Polytechnic State University 4 / Western Carolina University 5 New Jersey Institute of Technology 6/ University of South Carolina 7
bothmotion and speech, the next step was to determine the scope and logical order of these functions.First, when motion (a child approaching) is detected, the abominable snowman, who is hidingbehind a large Christmas tree, pushes the tree aside, revealing himself and startling guests. Then,the scary creature looks around, ostensibly, seeking out the victim. Suddenly, he raises his armin a threatening manner. Then, his demeanor changes and he waves. Simultaneously, thesnowman speaks! He cheerfully greets his audience, transforming at once into a lovable friend.A complete flowchart of the scope of the project is given in Figure 1. S ta rt S en se
case studies) is provided below. Moreover, these references Page 10.590.7 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationare categorized according to the two disciplines that most closely intersect the field of industrialtechnology, namely, engineering and business.BooksEngineering and Technology EthicsAlcorn, P. A. 2001. Practical Ethics for a Technological World. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Beder, S. 1998. The New Engineer: Management and Professional Responsibility in a Changing
Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996. p.57-95.10 Blaisdell S. Predictors of women’s entry into engineering: why academic preparation is not sufficient. Women in Engineering Conference; 1998 Jun 14-16; Seattle, Wash.: Women in Engineering Programs & Advocates Network; 1998. p. 31-37.11 Anderson L, Gilbride K. Gender bias towards engineering careers: does it still exist? 2002 WEPAN Conference Proceedings; 2002 Jun 8-11; San Juan, Puerto Rico: Women in Engineering Programs & Advocates Network; 2002.12 Kauser Jahan PE, Sukumaran B, Head L, Keil ZO. AWE: a workshop for attracting middle school girls to engineering. 2000 WEPAN National Conference; 2000 Jun 25-27; Washington, D.C.: Women in
decisionmaker’s final target. The edges show the causal relationships among those concepts or ideas or,in other words, how the concepts interfere each other. It is done through two basic laws ofinteraction of parts, which are, for example, “cause” or “not cause”. However, in a “cause” case,we need to inform if the action of a given concept Ci is in direction of strengthening orweakening the other(s) concept(s) C j .To construct a CM, the opinions of several specialists about a pair of concepts could becombined through a process called a vote procedure (the most voted opinion wins), what is donewhen we use a questionnaire. But, if the relationships were obtained, for example, from a textwritten by a specialist about a particular subject, we need to find
are important to employers of engineering program graduates. Such omissions fromCriterion 3 outcomes has been noted by Cupp et al.25 Thus, the profile provides a usefulfoundation or checklist for defining engineering program outcomes.Table 5: Mapping of ABET Engineering Criterion 3 Outcomes to Engineer Profile Roles 3 h Impact 3c Design 3d Teams 3g Comm 3a M/S/E
).Bibliography1. Bransford J, National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning., National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Expanded ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2000.2. Schwartz DL, Brophy S, Lin X, et al. Software for Managing Complex Learning: Examples from an Educational Psychology Course. Educational Technology Research and Development. 1999 1999;47(2):39-59.AMY L. DE JONGH CURRY is an Assistant Professor in Biomedical Engineering at TheUniversity of Memphis. Her interests in enhancing engineering education include incorporatingtechnology into the
1.3 %“We” Collocated We can n/a We areUse of 2.8% 2.2% 1.4%“Cluster(ing)”“Cluster(ing) Cluster was Join the cluster Un-patternedCollocated” Cluster were Help in the clusterUse of 0.6% 0 0.5%“Engineering”“Engineering” Engineering n/a n/aCollocated becauseUse of 1.0% 0 0.4%“Instructor(s)/Teacher(s)”“Instructor(s)/ Un-patterned n/a Un-patternedTeacher(s)”CollocatedUse of
formulas for the user. This provides aworking example of a formula that users can copy and edit for their own use.As shown in Figure 2, the calculator has two insert buttons. The first, near the top, inserts one oftwo formulas capable of computing the critical properties (TFCritProps and TFCritProp). Thelower one, just below the calculate button, inserts the cell formula for the state results from theuser-selected input conditions. Clicking this insert button brings up the insert dialog shown inFigure 3. This dialog allows the user to specify the kind of cell formula(s) desired and thelocation where they will be entered.There are two basic kinds of property formulas. One kind of formula returns a single property
educators should also consider testing the PBL method of instruction in different Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright. 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationengineering subjects, and the implementation and assessment approach used in this paper caneasily be applied to study its impact on enhancing student learning in their course(s).AcknowledgementsThis work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant No. DUE-0126671. The proposal, "Developing and Assessing Impact of Problem-Based LearningMaterials " is funded by the Division of the Undergraduate Education (DUE) at the NSF undertheir Course, Curriculum, and
nanotechnology –into the entire ECE curriculum, with additional elective courses designed to provide a minor orconcentration in the novel content area. If successful, this approach can then be used for integrat-ing BME into other engineering disciplines within a college of engineering, which may thenserve as the foundation of an interdepartmental undergraduate BME degree program. 3. Implementation The proposed prototype includes eight experiments to be incorporated into the ECE corecurriculum, along with a new technical elective with its own project(s) to achieve the abovestated goals and objectives. Depending on the specific class, the experiments can take anywherefrom 1 week to 15 weeks. The experiments are designed to be increasingly complex and
Technology, NISTIR 5536, 1994.2. “The Challenge of the 90’s,” Civil Engineering Magazine, American Society of Civil Engineers, October, 1990.3. Sheehan, J., “Dilemmas Facing Construction Education and Research in 1990s,” Discussion, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, American Society of Civil Engineers, Volume 117, Number 4, 1991, Pages 795-797.4. Tener, B., “Industry-University Partnerships for Construction Engineering Education,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, American Society of Civil Engineers, Volume 122, Number 4, 1996.BiographyOSAMA ABUDAYYEH. Dr. Abudayyeh is currently an associate professor of Construction Engineering atWestern Michigan University. He was a
Baltimore, Maryland; majoring in Civil Engineering. § Michael Watson – A sophomore at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona; majoring in Construction. § CarmaLisa Washington – A freshman at El Paso Community College in El Paso, Texas; majoring in Architecture REU STUDENT(S) RESEARCH PROJECT FACULTY MENTOR/ PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORStephanie Barta and The Applicability of Autoclaved Aerated Cellular Concrete in Dr. Anil SawhneyGabriel Buttram
Session 3613 The Role of Experiments in Inductive Learning Robert P. Hesketh, Stephanie Farrell, and C. S. Slater Department of Chemical Engineering Rowan University 201 Mullica Hill Road Glassboro, New Jersey 08028-1701ABSTRACTThis paper presents the results of Rowan University chemical engineering department’s efforts inteaching using the inductive method. In this paper our use of incorporating experiments into theinductive teaching and learning process will be given. We
. E. (1998). 'Scientific writing' - A course to improve the writing of science students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 27(4), 267 - 272.[15]. Sharp, J. E., Olds, B. M., Miller, R. L., & Dyrud, M. (1999). Four effective writing strategies for engineering classes. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(1), 53 - 57.[16]. Tobias, S. (1990). They're not dumb, they're different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.[17]. Tobias, S. (1989). In Paul Connolly and Teresa Vilardi (Eds.), Writing to Learn Mathematics and Science. New York: Teachers College Press.[18]. Hein, T. L. (1995). Learning style analysis in a calculus-based introductory physics course. Annual conference of the
Session 2370 The Computing and Composition as an Integrated Subject in the Secondary School Curriculum Fadi P. Deek, Robert S. Friedman, and Howard Kimmel College of Computing Sciences New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ USA 973.596.2997 (O) 973.596.5777 (Fax) Email: fadi.deek@njit.eduAbstractMany students enter college lacking basic problem solving and communication skills.The situation is even more exacerbated for students from urban
forces acting on the rocket, the mass of the rocket, and time, t. S F = m*a = T – W – D (2) a(t) = T (t) – W(t) – D(t) (3) m(t) Drag Weight Thrust Figure 1: Forces acting on the rocketThe acceleration is also the derivative of the velocity, a(t) = dV/dt (4) dV(t) = T (t) – W(t) – D(t