participants fluent in her three major spokenlanguages are represented in the study. The analyzed data for this study include surveys, in-personand virtual classroom observations, teacher reflection journals, classroom artifacts, school policydocuments, and semi-structured interviews with 37 engineering faculty members, 2 provosts, 5engineering college deans, and 2 students. The findings reveal a strong leaning for analogies andproverbs as analogical bridges engineering instructors in this context used when traditionalexperiments, classroom demonstrations, or local educational resources failed. Nuances ofculturally-relevant teacher conceptions are discussed in light of CRP: using proverbs to buildcognitive reasoning in Nigerian engineering classrooms
5deadline, four additional students were added from a fourth school. After the enrollment process iscompleted, parents and students commit to a parent and child agreement. The agreement details the criteriafor completing the time and topic goals in ALEKS and committing to attend the Saturday sessions.Based on the feedback from the school administrators, we were encouraged to continue the Ab7G programover the next few years. We were able to open the program to other schools as indicated in Table 2. Thedemographic profile of each cohort is reflected in Table 2. Note, over 50% of the participants were fromAHLN demographics. For continuing students that began as 3rd graders in 2017, the initial cohort of 17 -3rd graders completed the 6th grade in 2020
then highlighted. Thisinformation grounds the research questions that were explored in this study.BackgroundWithin civil engineering, there is debate over the extent that a master’s degree or similar formalpost-baccalaureate education is necessary for professional practice. Reflective of this debate arechanges in ASCE’s Policy Statement 465 and the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge(CEBOK) over time [4,5,6], as well as changes in the National Council of Examiners forEngineering and Surveying (NCEES) model law. The current version of Policy 465 states:“ASCE believes that the most effective means of fulfilling the formal educational requirementsof the CEBOK is by completing a baccalaureate degree in civil engineering from an ABET-accredited
Yale University’s School of Management. [Statements attributed to Corinna Ward were not made in her capacity as an associate of Capital Group and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates.] American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Comprehensive Review of US Minor Degrees in Aerospace, Aeronautical, and Astronautical Engineering and Unmanned Air SystemsAbstractThe demand for graduates with aerospace engineering skills is outpacing the annual number ofgraduates from US academic organizations. Minor degrees programs in aerospace engineering (orsimilarly titled) are less common than bachelor and postgraduate degree programs
will require some post-secondary education7 .Competitiveness will increasingly depend on the capacity to tap into global pools of knowledgeand leverage the best human resources available in the world. The explosion of knowledge,coupled with the global movement of ideas, makes it impossible to fully anticipate the nature offuture innovations. It remains that countries that will derive the most from globalization will bethose in which the systems of education, business, and government can cooperate to educate,train, and put to work their human capital.6 According to the IMF 2007 World Economic Outlook, the effective global labor force has risen four folds over thepast two decades, reflecting population growth and the integration of China, India
) has been the leader in the development of fundamental concepts and terminology for V&V. "... Of the work conducted by DMSO24,25 , Cohen28 observed : 'Given the critical importance of model validation ... , it is surprising that the constituent parts are not provided in the DOD directive 24 concerning validation. A statistical perspective is almost entirely missing in these directives.' We believe this observation properly reflects the state of the art in V&V, not just the directives of DMSO. That is, the state of the art has not developed to the place where one can clearly point out all of the actual methods, procedures, and process steps that must be undertaken
dynamic and varies fromteacher to teacher, and even changes across classrooms taught by the same instructor, as thespecific interactions vary with different students. The assessed curriculum refers to the specificcontent that is tested and can differ markedly from the intended and enacted curricula as tests aredrafted by the federal government (thought instruments like NAEP, for example), individualstates, districts, and the teachers themselves. The learned curriculum captures the actual changesin knowledge by the individual students, which reflects the notion that students can and often dolearn more and less than offered in the instructional context
3x3-in. test section. A smaller test section (1x2 in.) allowed Mach 5 tobe attained. This facility played an important educational role for nearly 60 years, until it had tobe dismantled in 2006 for the renovation of Guggenheim Hall. The wind tunnel was also used atvarious times for research purposes, especially toward the end of its life. The size of the Department during this time can be best characterized by “slow growth”.The Department had a regular faculty of five throughout the period 1935-1945. Eastwoodstepped down as department head in 1946 and retired in 1947, and Kirsten retired in 1951 (hedied shortly thereafter, in 1952, at the age of 67). A faculty position was added during the late1940s reflecting the addition of the MAE
prior projects underthe same faculty in future years. The report also provides students with an opportunity to learnhow to write academic research papers and reflect on their semester’s work. Guidelines areprovided in Appendix C. Sample Projects and Outcomes. Over the tenure of the FIRE program, a number of projectshave been offered, ranging from analyzing human gait to develop a prototype for a prosthetichuman ankle to modeling and creating energy models of buildings for predicting energy efficiencymeasures to designing a fire suppression system. The project offerings selected for each cohorttake advantage of faculty expertise while maintaining a balance of theory based analysis (such asgenerating order of magnitude calculations or
stories as a group. The thematicanalysis section of the paper is useful when considering the larger implications of this research.For example, by examining how all participants reflect on their graduate school experience andwhat they wish would have been different, we can provide insight to current graduate studentsand their advisors. Graduate students might feel empowered to pursue a teaching opportunitydespite it taking away time from research, and advisors might consider different ways ofsupporting their graduate students to achieve their career goals.Six new engineering assistant professors, two females and four males, were interviewed as partof a larger research project exploring the pathway to and current experiences of faculty membersat
more amenable to theirlearning than in a classroom full of other students at a set time. These advantages addressmultiple levels of diversity amongst learners.The newly found “class time” gained by delivering content outside of class rather than in theclassroom is then often used in F2F courses for activities that help students learn and retaininformation better. Some of these in-class activities could potentially be just as well done by astudent on their own; working on a calculation problem, reading and interpreting a passage,studying and interpreting a figure or graph, reflecting and writing a minute paper, to name a few.Other activities benefit significantly from the interactions between students or students andlearning facilitators
% program I feel like I am successful in my 25% 43% 31% 2% engineering program I doubt my abilities to succeed in my 2% 8% 66% 25% engineering program*In my engineering classes, I feel like I 31% 34% 31% 3% matter. Always Most of the time Sometimes Never Findings from the focus group interviews are presented in order to reflect the majorfoci of the interviews: (1
of Liberal Arts Education [23], [31]. • Engineering work/practice considerations (7 items): respondents rated the importance of seven considerations relevant to engineering based on ABET criteria (e.g., technical, environmental, social, economic, health/safety, manufacturability, and ethical) [1].• Macro-ethics (8 items): Comprised of items about the obligations, duties, and social responsibilities of engineers, including in relation to the technologies they create.• Moral Attentiveness (7 items): A scale intended to measure the extent to which students perceive and reflect on moral issues in their day-to-day experiences [32]. • Moral Disengagement (24 items): A scale that measures students’ tendency to morally
the participants' workshop experience--a testament to the effort put forth bythe workshop coordinators and staff. ASCE will offer three ETWs in 2018, reflecting thecontinued strong demand for the program as its 20th anniversary approaches. The third workshopis made possible through generous funding from the Durham School at the University ofNebraska, Omaha where the third workshop will be hosted. The ExCEEd demand as defined bynumber of applications received is shown in Figure 2 as well as in Table 1.In total, 267 different institutions have sent faculty members to ETW. The eleven universitieswith the most ETW graduates are listed in Table 2. Given these institutions’ high level ofparticipation in Project ExCEEd, it is evident that ETW
from the participants should be succinct, and the designteam should analyze the feedback without reflecting their own bias (Delp et al., 1977). Selectingparticipants for the Delphi method is considered one of the crucial steps in designing the researchas the output mainly will be based on the opinions of the selected experts. Skulmoski et al.(2008) recommended four criteria for the selection of the experts: 1) their knowledge andexperience with the research topic, 2) they voluntarily agree to participate, 3) they have adequatetime to participate, and 4) they have proper communication skills. Based on these criteria, theparticipants for this research were selected from four different groups of people who wereinvolved in the engineering
(STEM).Dr. Tamara Ball, University of California, Santa Cruz Dr. Tamara Ball is a project-scientist working with several education and research centers at the Univer- sity of California, Santa Cruz. Her work with the Institute for Science and Engineer Educators focuses on informing efforts to redesign undergraduate STEM education to reflect workplace practice and engage stu- dents in authentic scientific inquiry and problem solving through design. Her work Sustainable Engineer- ing and Ecological Design (SEED) collaborative at has focused on developing programmatic structures to support interdisciplinary and collaborative learning spaces for sustainability studies. She is the program director for Impact Designs
transferrable skills in contrast to the content andknowledge-based approach taken in most classes where the emphasis is on facts, memorization,and rote problem-solving that reward correct (and singular) answers. The need for 21st centuryskills has evolved to focus on “learning progressions (that) reflect typical trajectories of specifiedlearning domains that describe how skills or concepts might be demonstrated, both in their earlyforms and in increasingly advanced forms.” [16, p. 19] Important in this approach is acombination of “scaffolding” – providing a means to deal with knowledge or skills not yetavailable to the students – and guided learning transition from “unknown” to “known” or“inexperience” to “experienced.” What is then rewarded is the
improvement in student learning, however it had itsown issues, the most troubling being the long waits that the students tended to encounter whentrying to get their pre-labs checked. The following is the Reflection section from the FCAR: What worked well: Needing to get the pre-labs 100% correct helped the students understand the concepts better and certainly made the post-labs drastically better. I felt that the students learned more and fewer were just going through the motions when doing the experiments. My post-lab grading time was cut to almost nothing. The field trip was great. What didn’t work as well: I spent A LOT of time checking and re-checking pre-labs and helping students. The lines were long
aremore frequently placed in the role of a passive spectator, it can often be difficult to get studentsto participate in class1-3. Despite some of its drawbacks and difficulties, discussion can also be used as a tool foractive learning when applied in an online discussion forum. During discussion, participants havethe opportunity to interact and collaborate with one another to fulfill and meet their learningneeds8. Furthermore, moving discussion to an online venue has several advantages. First,instructors and students have the convenience of being able to add to a discussionasynchronously. They have the time to reflect on discussion prompts and to formulate a well-thought out response. Second, online discussions can increase the amount of
reflection aboutindividual career goals. It is reasonable to expect that students need to complete multiple GCDELI units in order to get a broader perspective on engineering as a career choice.Research question #2: Which components of the GC DELI unit impact student learning in apositive way?We analyzed students’ responses to two survey questions to answer this research question. Page 26.811.11Students were asked to rate how important the following factors were in forming an opinionabout their GC DELI unit: the online content, the hands on projects, the details and lecturematerials added by the instructor, and the interest they had in
, there are“marked differences in the responses of boys and girls” in topic interest. For example, “girls’priorities lie with topics related to the self and, more particularly, to health, mind and well-being.The responses of the boys reflect strong interests in destructive technologies and events.”14 Theseand similar findings, as well as research in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science,have suggested the existence of “epistemic differences between men and women from theirstandpoint in life” and that these differences provide “differential interaction with the nature ofscience, and hence their participation in the field.”15In response, some researchers and educators in this area call for re-evaluation of the “values andstandards of
grad-ing scheme is used in which students must demonstrate mastery of specific concepts to pass theclass. Mastery of additional outcomes beyond these specific concepts leads to a higher grade.This paper focusses on the outcomes-based grading used in the course and the students reactionsto the grading scheme.Results of preliminary assessment indicate that outcomes-based grading may create greater un-certainty in students regarding their final grades and can lead to the perception that final gradesdo not reflect their true knowledge of the material. Outcomes-based assessment can help stu-dents to better anticipate what they will be tested on, but a well-organized traditional “points-based” grading scheme can accomplish this just as
-related practices for one of thesurvey questions, which asked the participants to rate 41 learning activities on how often theyhappen in their own undergraduate teaching (Very Often/Often/Sometimes/Never) and howimportant they perceive them to be in the undergraduate engineering curriculum as a whole(Very Important/Important/Somewhat Important/Not Important). The 41 learning activities,which in particular went through many iterations as part of the overall survey design process,reflect the 6 STSE Currents2 and the literature on Engineering and STSE-related practices as afoundation. It should be noted that several items represent more than one current, to represent theintermingling that occurs between the currents in practice, which is described
, physical, and mechanical properties and durability performance of infrastructure materials, with a focus on sustainable concrete materials technology. He also researches new strategies to improve STEM education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Implementation of a laboratory experience in reinforced concrete coursesIntroduction College students enrolled in an engineering curriculum learn in a variety of ways (e.g.,sensory vs. intuitive, visual vs. verbal, inductive vs. deductive, active vs. reflective, or sequentialvs. global). In a reinforced concrete design course, where students learn how to designcomponents of large structures, it can be