Paper ID #45952”I cannot relate”: The Importance Socioeconomic Status in the Journeys ofWomen of Color in Academia (Research)Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Education program. She researches topics such as engineering ethics, sustainability, social responsibility, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is a Fellow of the ASEE and a licensed P.E. in Colorado.Sheila Davis, University of Colorado Boulder
place in a ‘circle’, where all participants are equal, ensuring that ‘voice’ isgiven to everyone, and that everyone is listened to. Anonymity is ensured. The researchershave access only to whatever each group chooses to subsequently report back.4.2 EthicsOur project received approval from university ethics committees both at IUG and NU. Aparticipant information form was sent to prospective participants (in both Arabic andEnglish) and those who agreed to take part were required to complete a consent form beforethe event, with anonymity guaranteed (pseudonyms are used throughout this paper). Thiswarned participants that the conversation might touch upon potentially sensitive issues withintheir personal experience, and that they were free to leave
needs to be combated at primary levels of prevention by nurses,” Nurs. Open, vol. 7, pp. 678-679, 2020. 3. S. Oerther and D.B. Oerther, “The ethical challenges of antimicrobial resistance for nurse practitioners,” Nurs. Open, vol. 7, pp. 904-906, 2020. 4. H. Kosiyaporn, S. Chanvatik, T. Issaramalai, W. Kaewkhankhaeng, A. Kulthanmanusom, N. Saengruang, W. Witthayapipopsakul, S. Viriyathorn, S. Kirivan, W. Kunpeuk, R. Suphanchaimat, A. Lekagul, and V. Tangcharoensathien, “Surveys of knowledge and awareness of antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in general population: A systematic review,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. e0227973, 2020. [Online] Available: https://doi.org/10.1371
them keep up with the technological changes. Overallmore African American teachers participated over four years. The teachers who participated inthe surveys reported that the program had increased their confidence in research andincorporated STEM in their classrooms. In addition, the program has provided flexibility to theteachers as they start their research two weeks after the students (REUs), which required theteachers to work more at developing their teams.ConfidenceMost of the effects were seen in the teachers' confidence in producing research articles forpublication, understanding research literature, and understanding the ethical issues surroundingresearch. Teachers' confidence levels barely changed between 2019 and 2020 but increased
-based ethical barriers for American Indian/Alaska Native students and professionals in engineering,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual Conference: ASEE Conferences, Jul. 2021, p. 36888. doi: 10.18260/1-2--36888.[11] M. A. Beasley and M. J. Fischer, “Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors,” Soc. Psychol. Educ., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 427–448, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3.[12] G. Lichtenstein, H. L. Chen, K. A. Smith, and T. A. Maldonado, “Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering
.2005.11.036.[12] G. Downey and J. Lucena, “When students resist: ethnography of a senior design experience in engineering education,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 168–176, 2003.[13] J. A. Leydens, K. E. Johnson, and B. M. Moskal, “Engineering student perceptions of social justice in a feedback control systems course,” J. Eng. Educ., Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20412.[14] C. P. McClure and A. L. Lucius, “Implementing and evaluating a chemistry course in chemical ethics and civic responsibility,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 87, no. 11, pp. 1171–1175, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1021/ed1005135.[15] C. Baillie, A. L. Pawley, and D. Riley, Engineering and Social Justice in the University and Beyond. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University
approaches in each engineering department andgraduate degree. We used institutional data available at the engineering faculty in the researcheduniversity. After the approval of the ethics board and the Vice-Provost Student of the university,we accessed and worked with different sets of students’ records. Here are the datasets we used inour analysis in this study:Undergraduate students’ registration and academic performance (2006-2021): The researchsample included data from 26,842 undergraduate students with at least one university recordfrom 2006 to 2021. In total, there were 275,233 records from these undergraduate students,including every session they have registered at the university. Twenty-four parameters describedthis research sample, but we
funding needs to be available for engineeringextracurriculars in low economic and rural school districts. To improve the perceptions of womxnand other underrepresented identities in STEM, the representation of scientists and engineers needsto be shifted in the classroom and in media. Textbooks, educational videos, and classroomexamples need to depict people with different genders, races, and ethnographies, allowing youngstudents to see themselves as engineers. Teachers need to be trained on how to avoidmicroaggressions and foster inclusivity in classrooms. Diversity, inclusion, and ethics need to beincluded in the K-12 STEM curriculum.Undergraduate education: Following changes to K-12 education, undergraduate education needsto undergo systemic
enrollment data by gender and race were available. Since this data is publiclyavailable, our research ethics board does not require research study review.Gender data was limited to the categories “male” and “female”. We will use these terms whenexamining the data, but will use the terms “men” and “women” in discussing the results in linewith our constructionist approach to gender [33]. We acknowledge that there is a difference inmeaning between these terms (e.g., male versus man), and that the dataset does not represent allgenders (i.e., non-binary).Racial data was distributed among the following categories: ● American Indian/Alaska Native ● Asian ● Black ● Foreign ● Hispanic ● Multiracial (added in 2010) ● Native Hawaiian
student-centered approach to teaching and learning. [33].ITL aligns to guidelines provided by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)[34] to establish that students should be learning engineering in ways that look like the work engineers do([4], [35]). To meet ABET learning objectives and teaching through Inquiry, students work on teams toidentify, design, and solve complex problems and to create ways to test their ideas that meet specificneeds and constraints of health, culture, environment and economics, while communicating effectively todifferent stakeholders and exercising ethical and professional judgments. ABET learning objectives arerepresentative of Inquiry and not Transmission teaching ([4], [14]). Even
thesubject matter [33]. Disagreements regarding the coding or data analysis were addressed andresolved by consensus. This resulted in multiple iterations of the coding process with evolvingdialogue regarding the data to ensure that the analysis process maintained credibility andtrustworthiness in the substantive validation process [33]. We continually engaged in self-reflection and conversations regarding our positionality to reinforce ethical validation. Throughthese conversations, we evaluated how our positionality influenced our data analysis and tooksteps to ensure the participants' voices were centered in our minds.Table 3. Finalized list of codes organized based on the processes detailed in expectation statestheory. Theme
, no. 2, pp. 187–219, 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00048.x.[25] National Academy of Engineering, “Engineering the future,” Annual Report, 2004.[26] Engineers’ Council for Professional Development, “Canons of ethics for engineers,” New York, 1947.[27] M. Elshakry, “When science became western: Historiographical reflections,” Isis, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 98–109, 2010, doi: 10.1086/652691.[28] R. Eglash, M. Lachney, W. Babbitt, A. Bennett, M. Reinhardt, and J. Davis, “Decolonizing education with Anishinaabe arcs: Generative STEM as a path to Indigenous futurity,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1569–1593, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09728-6.[29] R. Eglash, A. Bennett, C
secretary ofthe CE program and assumed the role of observer and assistant to oversee the recordings,logistics and provision of materials, as well as to take notes on participant input. We hosted threeseparate sessions, having each of the groups participating separately. Sessions that involvedGroups S and F were conducted face-to-face, while the Group A session was held via Zoom Ⓡ.For the face-to-face session, we provided coffee, biscuits and other food for the attendees. Inboth formats, participants were formally welcomed and then we introduced the dynamics andobjectives of the sessions. Then we proceed to ask them to read and sign the informed consentdocument as part of the ethical framework of the research, which included consent to have
academic success,is only connected with specific outcomes, i.e., scores/performance in a task. For a well-roundedand ethical education, an individual must identify with what they are learning, see the value intheir learning outcomes and acquire significant knowledge. From the perspective of an educator,self-efficacy is a critical construct that helps students progress through the curriculum by passingprerequisite courses, while self-concept drives the student forward towards achievement of agreater goal of graduating as an engineer.Table 2 consists of the variables condensed from table 1, but re-categorized into which constructthis review has deemed as appropriate. It should be noted that table 1 had two columns based oninterpretations in
/sunday/the- asian-advantage.html[2] D. E. Naphan-Kingery, M. Miles, A. Brockman, R. McKane, P. Botchway, and E. McGee, “Investigation of an equity ethic in engineering and computing doctoral students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 337–354, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20284.[3] National Science Board, “The State of US Science and Engineering 2022,” National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA, 2022. Accessed: Dec. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/indicators[4] L. D. Patton and S. Bondi, “Nice white men or social justice allies?: using critical race theory to examine how white male faculty and administrators engage in ally work,” Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 488–514
of software design through the implementation and debugging of student-written programs; (4) introduction to engineering majors, career exploration, engineering practice within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, ethical, health and safety, and sustainability. Physics: This is the second course in the first-year engineering experience and has Intro as a pre-requisite. Many of the experiments involve rely on Python code to interact with sensors and actuators. Therefore, a solid foundation in the skills from Intro is necessary.From the population of position-of-stress participants, a stratified sampling technique was usedto choose interview candidates in three categories of decreasing
least one candidate who would be offered a faculty position.The Dean and Search Chair reiterated to everyone involved that this was an open-disciplinesearch and that the only limitation was that applicants had to specialize in an area that would fitwithin any tenure-home engineering department. That excluded individuals whose faculty homewould have been in the college’s humanities/society/ethics or engineering education programs.Along with the Search Committee chair (Lewis), the search committee’s equity advisor andlogistics manager (Sandekian) collected and organized relevant research and materials fromcomparable searches nationwide and placed them into a shared Google Drive folder. Thisincluded the rubric and website materials developed by
involveintense identity exploration and a period of planning for the transition to a career and adulthood[1]. When coupled with the demands of rigorous academic coursework and requirements, thisperiod of development can present significant psychological challenges. Indeed, mental healthconcerns have been increasing on college campuses, as students report more symptoms of stress,depression, and anxiety [2], [3]. This is concerning given the evidence of the link betweenmental health during college and students’ academic achievement, retention, work-ethic, andsocial well-being [1], [4]. Perhaps more alarming is the fact that suicide is the second-leadingcause of death on college campuses [1], [5].Seeking help from mental health professionals is one way
to solve a social good.Mr. Jacob Lam Herring, University of Virginia Research assistant with the team since Summer 2020Sin Lin, University of Virginia Undergraduate Civil Engineering Student at the University of Virginia.Dr. Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is the co-PI on the SCC Harlem project funded by the NSF that explores
Dominion University the senior project is a twosemester course, which is the case in most of the undergraduate programs. The Introduction toSenior Project is a first semester 1 credit course, which covers a series of career related topicsrelated to engineering technology such as engineering codes and standards, engineering ethics,technical report writing, job search and resume writing techniques, patents and property rights,and professional engineering licensure. By the end of this course the students are expected todecide on a project topic, establish partnership with a faculty advisor for the project and submita project proposal. In the second semester, the actual Senior Project is a 3 credits course inwhich students work under advisor
to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives (pp
FIU students participating in the Florida-Georgia Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (FGLSAMP). She is a past adviser of the Women in Computer Science (WICS) student club. From 2008 to 2010, Ms. Solis was a programmer analyst at the Department of the Attorney General in Hawaii, a member of the team revamping the State Juvenile Justice Information System. Her research and instructional Interests include software development, computer ethics and student success and development. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Impact of Social and Programmatic Experiences on Students’ Interest in Pursuing a Graduate Degree in a
York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional en- gineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and
. 2019.[5] L. A. Gelles, K. L. Youmans, and I. Villanueva, “Sparking action: How emotions fuel or inhibit advocacy around hidden curriculum in engineering,” in SEFI 47th Annual Conference: Varietas Delectat... Complexity is the New Normality, Proceedings, 2020, pp. 1566–1575.[6] I. Villanueva, T. Carothers, M. Di Stefano, and M. Khan, “‘There is never a break’: The hidden curriculum of professionalization for engineering faculty,” Educ. Sci., vol. 8, no. 4, p. 157, Sep. 2018.[7] L. Gelles, I. Villanueva, and M. Di Stefano, “‘Mentoring is ethical, right?’: Women graduate students and faculty in science and engineering speak out,” Int. J. Gender, Sci. Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 108–133, 2019.[8] American