semester or two of preparatory mathematics before they are able to take partin the fundamentals of engineering course that is a first-year, first-semester course for studentswho are enrolled in mathematics course of pre-calculus or higher. These populations of studentsare likely to have low social capital or pre-existing networks in areas that would support theircollege experience [1]. Therefore, the peer and faculty mentoring and cross-cohort socializationhave been integrated into the program as ways to help expand the social capital of students whomay need it.Social Capital is the availability, accessibility, and activation of resources via social relationshipsaccording to Lin [1]. While overarching societal structures encompassing
implementing a curriculum focused on cohort formation, career exploration, andprofessional development. The AcES, consisting of a weeklong pre-fall bridge experience, twocommon courses, and a variety of co-curricular activities, has been operating for eight years.Students who receive S-STEM funded scholarships participate in three focus groups and twoone-on-one interviews each semester throughout their undergraduate studies.Student responses from the one-on-one interviews and focus groups conducted from 2017-2020were examined with qualitative coding methods. Questions examined in this work include: 1)Did the engineering in history course help make you feel like you belong in engineering at WVUand that you are included in engineering at WVU?, 2) Do you
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 STEM Enhancement in Earth Science (SEES): A Reimagining of an Onsite NASA/TSGC/UTCSR High School Internship Program Celena Miller, Margaret Baguio Texas Space Grant Consortium, Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at AustinAbstractNASA, the Texas Space Grant Consortium, and The University of Texas at Austin Center for Space Researchsupport the STEM Enhancement in Earth Science (SEES) program which provides selected high school studentswith exposure to Earth and space research. Interns learn how
areas that thecapstone team and their peers had faced when taking the control systems course; namelyabstractness and continuity. As mentioned before, the architecture of the education tool features anoverarching real-world example of a system the student user is hoping to control. The real-worldexamples ultimately used in the tool are reflective of the engineering concentrations of the capstoneteam. The biomedical track used an example of controlling the glucose level within a human body;and the mechanical track used an example of controlling car speed. Figure 1. Screen capture of the track selection page Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
Assistant at Texas A&M University. He received a bachelor’s degree in Technical and Scientific Communication from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in 2009, and in 2011 he received a master’s degree in Asian Studies, with a focus on East-Asian security and technology issues, from Florida State University. Drew is currently working on a Master’s of Public Service & Administration.Dr. Shawna Thomas, Texas A&M University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 Session XXXXThe Development of a Texas A&M
analysisis grounded in the views of the universities on taking on the pandemic, as expressed throughtheir content in the COVID-19 related web pages.Grounded Theory MethodologyGrounded theory is a systematic qualitative research methodology initially developed as a way tomerge qualitative and quantitative approaches in social science research [1], [2] and isconsidered as an emerging methodology in engineering education research [3]. Thismethodology enables researchers to build theory from data through constant comparison,identifying analytical codes and categories from data, and then using these categories to generatetheories and theoretical models [4]. Our approach thus takes advantage of features of theconstructivist approach of Charmaz [4], as
in collaborative research between engineering education scholars and social scientists that focuses on the processes through which inequalities are enacted, reproduced, and/or challenged in various educational contexts. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021An Analysis of Gendered Outreach Messages on the Engineer Girl Website:How Female Engineers Promote Engineering to Young WomenIntroductionWomen’s underrepresentation in engineering in the United States has been an ongoing area ofconcern to engineering educators and administrators [1], [2]. Despite the fact that women nowearn more undergraduate degrees than men, and girls now perform as well as boys in
feeling a sense ofbelonging. Finally, survey findings provide evidence that cognitive diversity, opportunity towork with people who have different styles of problem-solving, is among trainees’ favoriteaspects of the program. In addition, we discuss the structure of our NRT and recruitmentstrategies we have used to advance more diverse participation.1. IntroductionWomen have been underrepresented in STEM at four-year institutions and the workforce. Thenumber of advanced degrees earned by women have increased, with women earning larger shareof graduate degrees [1] [2] yet national data show a large STEM gender gap: in 2018, 29% ofmaster’s degrees in engineering and computer information science were awarded to women and24% of doctoral degrees were
increasing the creativity and effectiveness of engineeringteams [1], yet can have an adverse effect when these viewpoints result in negatively imposedbiases. Unconscious bias (or implicit bias) can be defined as “a prejudice in favor of or againstone thing, person, or group compared with another usually in a way that’s considered to beunfair. Biases may be held by an individual, group, or institution and can have negative orpositive consequences” [2]. Unconscious bias is pervasive and affects our decisions, even whenwe think we are operating objectively. Yet because of identity-protective cognition, engineerswho are immersed in a culture of objectivity often pride themselves on only looking at facts, andcan have strong emotional reactions and
, Alexandra received a bachelor’s degree in aerospace engineering from MIT and a master’s degree in systems engineering from the University of Virginia. Alexandra comes to FIU af- ter completing a postdoctoral fellowship at Georgia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) and three years as a faculty member at Olin College of Engineering in Massachusetts. Alexandra’s research aims to amplify the voices and work of students, educators, and Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs) overall and support continued educational innovation within engineering at these in- stitutions. Specifically, she focuses on (1) educational and professional development of graduate students and faculty, (2) critical
persistence among diverse students.Placing STEM history and cultures directly in the critical frameworks of WGS may help providethese populations with epistemological and personal insights that boost a sense of belonging inengineering and support their persistence.Numerous studies have addressed aspects of the complex question of student under-representation. The National Academies’ Beyond Bias investigated the factors contributing tounderrepresentation, and determined that biases and structural disadvantages overwhelm talentedwomen and other would-be engineering students. “Women who are interested in science andengineering careers are lost at every education transition,” and “the problem is not simply thepipeline” [1].Concern over the proper
,environmental pollution, food, education, and so on. These obstacles require the attention ofprofessionals who know what technology can do, can work as or with engineers, and who havethe necessary socio-political inclinations and capabilities.” This program was both a naturaloutgrowth of Lafayette College’s founding principles of liberal education and consistent with thetrends in engineering education in the 1960s, which also impacted other institutions [1].Our campus newspaper greeted the new program with enthusiasm: “It will explore the nature androles of engineering, the problem solving skills employed by engineers, and the socio-politicalissues involved in the direction and control of technology,” student journalists wrote in 1970 [2].Since its
deeply in graduate education,interdisciplinary learning has not been highly reflected or cultivated in engineering educationcurricula [1]. This lack of acknowledgment may be attributed to the historical exclusion ofinterdisciplinary ways of being and thinking across the disciplines, which also limits how studentssee themselves as engineers. Historical perspectives within engineering education include thosethat “institutionalize cultural and epistemic injustice” by excluding views that deviate from thedominant ways of thinking in engineering [2, p. 4]. Riley and Lambrinidou [2] expressed how thisapproach to educating engineers may result in engineers who do not feel they fit into the mold ofa stereotypical engineer, which emphasizes technical
by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET),which, in its most recent manifestation, cunningly integrates societal context and professionalskills throughout its technical objectives. The new ABET Student Outcomes 1-7 renderengineering programs unable to decouple technical skills from what are commonly (and oftendisdainfully) referred to as “soft skills.” Our program, and specifically the course discussed inthis study, embrace the integration of the liberal arts into engineering and purposefully frametechnical engineering content by its broader social context, as well as take a humanisticapproach to engineering by orienting the core of our program around social justice [1, 2].Much of the literature tying engineering
improve its sustainability as a lab course modality.Introduction and Purpose In many universities, graduate students have been recruited as economical and valuableadditions to the teaching staff. They serve as a cost-effective solution to increasing face-to-faceinteraction with students while reducing the teaching and/or grading burden on senior staff andinstructors through service as a graduate teaching assistant (GTAs). There are both benefits anddrawbacks to the graduate assistant position [1], but one prevalent theme in existing literature isthe murky and ill-defined nature of a GTA’s practical role in academia, as it sits firmly in thegrey area between teacher and student that often comes with unclear expectations [2], [3
doctoral programs, the numbers are staggering,especially for engineering disciplines. According to the Council of Graduate Schools, attritionfrom engineering doctoral programs ranges from 35% for men to 44% for women, with higherrates reported for students in minority groups [1], [2]. Despite such staggering statistics,researchers have just begun to focus on education at the graduate level in response to a call fromthe National Academies for educational change, particularly in science, technology, engineering,and mathematics [3]. Ameliorating attrition at the graduate level is vital because each Ph.D.student who leaves their program represents an investment of both time and money by thestudents themselves and universities, departments, and
culture, equity in engineering education and increasing diversity in STEM through transformation of traditional teaching methods.Dr. Randy Yerrick, Fresno State University Randy Yerrick is Dean of the Kremen School for Education and Human Development at Fresno State University. He has also served as Professor of Science Education at SUNY Buffalo where he Associate Dean and Science Education Professor for the Graduate School of Education. Dr. Yerrick maintains an active research agenda focusing on two central questions: 1) How do scientific norms of discourse get enacted in classrooms and 2) To what extend can historical barriers to STEM learning be traversed for underrepresented students through expert teaching
to obtain a job. Many faced personal/discriminatory interviewquestions, biases, and assumptions about what they could or could not do, in addition to beingsubjected to explicit discouragement and gender discrimination. The paper offersrecommendations for addressing these issues as well as further areas of research to pursue. Bybringing to light the issues surrounding females entering engineering professions in Qatar, thisstudy offers a contribution to women’s role and empowerment in the region.IntroductionWhile attracting women to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fieldshas been a steady concern in Western countries, female students across the Arab world aredominating most STEM educational programs [1-2]. Engineering
identified collaboration and communication as core aspects ofengineering work. Discussions of other social aspects of engineering, such as engaging withstakeholders, collaborating with users, or considering the societal implications of engineeringwork, were relatively limited. Understanding engineering students’ beliefs about the socialaspects of engineering work based on their previous experiences can help us better alignengineering curricula to promote more holistic and inclusive views of engineering.1. IntroductionEngineering is an inherently social discipline. The social aspects of engineering work include thevarious ways that engineers, within the context of their professional roles, impact, interact with,and relate to both broader society and
Paper ID #32392#LaHoraSTEAM (The STEAM Hour) – An Initiative to Promote STEM-STEAMLearning in Quarantine Times (Work in Progress)Mr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the outreach programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for To- morrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) learning in community centers in the Chicago area, 2) the Junior
biomicrofluidics. More recently, her interests have emphasized mentorship of women and underrepresented students in order to promote persistence and success in engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Book Club Model to Promote Personal and Professional Development Activities for Female Engineering and Computer Science StudentsIntroduction and MotivationProfessional and leadership development is one recommended strategy to support and retainfemale engineers and computer scientists in their professional careers in industry or academia[1], [2], [3], [4]. For women in engineering and computer science, personal
Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021A Characterization of Engineering and Computer Science Undergraduate Participation in High Impact Educational Practices at Two Western Land Grant Institutions IntroductionTo maintain its technological competitiveness and innovation leadership into the 21st century,the United States requires a robust engineering and computer science (E/CS) workforce withsubstantial diversity across gender and underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups [1][2]. However, there are growing concerns about the ability of U.S. educational
in engineering education and its adverse realizations. Engineering issocio-technical in nature i.e. there is no engineering that is solely technical, and bydichotomizing or picking a side we break up a complex conceptualization into one that is neitherauthentic nor realistic. By sitting with tension as a guiding metaphorical framework for thisstudy, we attempt to break up the dualism that exposes itself in engineering education.Our discussions in this paper are informed by our ontology or sense of being. Such explorationsin ontology are not traditional to engineering. We bring in this construct from the liberal artsbecause of the lack of such a device in engineering scholarship. We discuss: 1) our conception ofthe soul of engineering
consumer products (International American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33434Flavors and Fragrances) prior to his current role. He served on the executive committee of the ASEEWomen in Engineering division from 2010 to present. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Collegiate External Women’s Advisory Committee: Origins and the Development of a Strategic PlanAbstractGender diversity increases collaboration [1] enables better and more creative problem solvingleading to greater
most in achieving 3 out of 5 student outcomes.1. IntroductionEngineering design is an important component of higher education in engineering. In mostinstances, these experiences in engineering design become incorporated into standards-baseddesign courses. In this case, the courses are designated as engineering/engineering technologycourses and the engineering design component is emphasized. Engineering design projects areproblems that may be approached and resolved using strategies and approaches commonlyconsidered to be engineering practices. The term “engineering” is used because developingsolutions to the problems involves processes similar to those used in the professional practice ofengineering, in addition to the integration of knowledge
, two are administered in the first year for a cohort: (1) an introductionto computer science course where teachers learn fundamental CS topics and programming in ahigh-level programming language (e.g., Python), and engage in problem solving and practicecomputational thinking, and (2) a course in pedagogy for teachers to learn how to teach K-8 CS,including lesson designs, use of instructional resources such as dot-and-dash robots, andassessments. Then, the following academic year after the summer, the PD program holds a seriesof workshops on five separate Saturdays to support teacher implementation of their lessonmodules during the academic year, reflect and improve on their lessons, reinforce on CSconcepts and pedagogy techniques, review and
all.However, faculty can and do influence the climate of the department and achievement ofstudents through choosing to implement evidence-based teaching practices like active learningand inclusive teaching [1], and having a growth mindset in relation to the abilities of students [2].It is also possible, for example, that the local climate in our department could cause students ofcolor to be driven from STEM [3], or that a chilly climate could have a disproportionate impacton female students [4].Over the course of the last several months, our department, college, and university have begun tocreate institutional structures to support these efforts. There is a new Associate Dean forDiversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) at the college level, and at the
enhance the curriculum of a graduate-level engineering ethics course, Engineering Ethics and the Public, at Virginia Tech, a large land-grant, Research 1 university. The course is a three-credit elective course offered annually to engineering students. The overall course itself was originally co-conceived and co-developed by an engineer, one of the authors of this paper, and a medical ethnographer, with the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF) [1]. The learning objectives, topics, and assignments are presented in Table 1. The course aims to address relationships between engineering, science, and society by incorporating listening exercises, personal reflections, individual
education. Thisredesign demonstrates that a mastery-based course structure is consistent with our updated modeland TPS principles. In this redesign, a continuous and iterative process was employed to ensurecontinuous improvement, and it follows a closed loop pattern of diagnosis, analysis, design,implementation, and evaluation (diagnosis).I. IntroductionThe factory model for education is based on Taylorism and principles of ‘scientific management’[1]. This factory management system was developed in the late 19th century and emphasized ontop-down management and power, and standardization and simplification of tasks in order tomaximize efficiency [2], shown in Figure 1. Parts and materials enter an assembly line andundergo numerous processes applied
graduates to fill these new jobs.There is currently a large gap in the number of K-12 level teachers available in the area of careerand technical education. One possible solution to this problem may come from a specificsegment of the workforce, veterans. This paper will provide an overview of different challengesthat many veterans are facing after joining career switcher programs for future teachers.IntroductionDigital transformation is leading to a shift in many current jobs. Cybersecurity has become partof any virtual job [1], which became quite clear during the Covid-19 pandemic. The pandemicalso led to more openings for cybersecurity professionals, as well as a huge growth of thatspecific industry sector since there was a large rise in the