Paper ID #30981Integration of C programming and IoT in a Raspberry Pi Controlled RobotCar in a Freshmen/Sophomore Engineering Core ClassDr. Shaghayegh Abbasi, University of San Diego Shaghayegh Abbasi received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Washington in 2011. In her thesis, titled ’Integrating top-down and bottom-up nanomanufacturing: Controlling the growth and composition of seeded nanostructures’, an innovative nanomanufacturing method is explored and optimized. Upon graduation, she started her career as Senior System Design Engineer at Lumedyne Technologies. She worked on design, simulation, and
incorporate legitimate engineering tasks into curricula which help students advance towards and prepare for careers in engineering.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr
focus of the grant is on connecting students to high-impact practices such asundergraduate research experiences or internships that achieve the following: ● Achieve student-identified goals; ● Improve immediate and future financial stability, e.g. paid internships with additional scholarships, summer research experiences that provide academic year funding, higher hourly rate, STEM work experience; ● Include mentoring or professional development components; ● Inform self-knowledge about possible career choices; and ● Increase marketability for future competitive opportunities.The program reflects a personalized approach to supporting students and invites active scholarinvolvement in recruiting and supporting other scholars and
Lineberry, Mississippi State University Lineberry is currently a Ph.D. student in Engineering with a concentration in Engineering Education at MSU with a research focus in cybersecurity education. She received her MS in CS with a concentration in Information Assurance from North Carolina A & T State University. Her BS in CS was received from Voorhees College. Previously, Lineberry was Area Coordinator and an Instructor in CS at Voorhees.Dr. Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University Sarah Lee joined the faculty at Mississippi State University (MSU) after a 19 year information technology career at FedEx Corporation. As an associate clinical professor and assistant department head in the Computer Science and
graduating with an engineeringdegree [1], [2], [4], [6], [7] and career certainty [8]. To address research questions regardingstudents’ engineering role identity, researchers have been using the survey measure “I see myselfas an engineer” to represent students’ holistic view of their identity as engineers [2], [4], [6], [9],[10]. However, there are debates among researchers concerning the use of a single-item measureto capture complex and abstract psychological or affective concepts such as engineering roleidentity (e.g., [11], [12], [13]). Specifically, some arguments against using single-item measuresare that they lack depth and provide limited insights into the abstract constructs of interest.Additionally, single-item measures cause concern for
of higher education remains underrepresented in the literature, this paper alsohighlights the need for more studies in this area.Mentorship is an important topic in STEMM education due to its role in a student’s professionalformation. Defined as “a professional, working alliance in which individuals work together overtime to support the personal and professional growth, development, and success of the relationalpartners through the provision of career and psychosocial support,” mentorship may “enhancestudent outcomes, experiences, and retention” and “help with workforce development byincreasing access, equity, and inclusion in STEMM” [1]. A mentorship relationship can lastanywhere from three months to a lifetime and is most effective when
to students'performance in campus environment [7]. Essentially, how students perceive the culture withinSTEM and their belonging within that culture is not contingent but does correlate with facultysupport through interactions during their academic careers [8]. As a result of this correlation,students describe feelings such as hostility and lack of caring when characterizing the instructor-student relationship [9]. Report from previous studies shows that there is still negative form ofinteraction between faculty and students like discrimination from instructors [10]. This reckoninghas allowed scholars to conclude that there is a beneficial connection between facultyrelationships and student’s self-efficacy and their persistence in STEM
;).Who is in a makerspace?Makerspaces are often staffed by university and students representing varies degrees of studentrun experiences. Student staff are inherently important in the culture and operations of thesespaces (Andrews and Boklage, under review). Despite this recognized importance, little isknown about how these student staff are recruited and hired to work in these spaces.Importance of mentorsStudents hired in makerspaces provide the opportunity serve as peer mentors in the space. Recentresearch outlines domains peer mentors can support including: psychological and emotionalsupport, goal setting and career path support, academic subject knowledge support, existence of arole model. (Ogle, Bolding, Lloyd, and Wade, 2020
consistsprimarily of adult learners with a majority of them either military veterans or still serving in themilitary. The research was conducted in various undergraduate courses that historically havepresented greater challenges to students, such as statics, dynamics, digital circuit design, andaerodynamics. The research supports engineering education and the support interventionsinvestigated have potential to increase persistence in the associated engineering disciplines. Theprogram also offers professional development to the peer leaders who are recruited fromprevious course offerings and participate in peer leader training to best support other students intheir acclimation to engineering and commitment to engineering career pathways. Initial yearone
in Table 5 show that participants found the workshop relevant with practicalstrategies for expanding/enhancing electricity and sustainable business education. In the firstoffering of this workshop, participants had asked for more opportunities for interaction. Thus,we are pleased that in this offering, all participants agreed or strongly agreed that they weregiven such opportunities. Most participants said that the workshop improved their understandingof skills and experiences that students need to pursue careers in electricity access although theresults show that there is room for improvement in this area since 8 participants were neutral ordisagreed.Table 5 Participant Responses about Workshop
, and diverse strategies used by universities [1].Craney et al. [2] surveyed 465 undergraduate research participants from varied disciplines andbackgrounds, discovering high satisfaction and significant gains in professional development,deeper subject understanding, and better preparedness for graduate studies and careers. Similarly,Lopatto [3] found that 85% of UR participants in science continued to postgraduate education,with those not pursuing further studies reporting lesser gains. Haddad and Kalaani [4] introduceda model to integrate research into traditional curriculums via summer workshops and designatedcourses, aiming to boost participation through the creation of an Undergraduate Research Office.Lopatto's further research [5
attributes at each stage of an engineer’s development (upon completionof high school/secondary school; university; early-career professional), the importance andproficiency levels of each attribute varied, as follows:The most important/proficient attributes for the secondary school graduate are:1. Demonstrates an understanding of engineering, science, and mathematics fundamentals2. Maintains a positive self-image and possesses positive self- confidenceFor individuals at this stage, the need to have sound preparation in the disciplinary fundamentalsis needed for successful transition to and success in university-level engineering educationprograms. Furthermore, student retention and success in most first-year university engineering
has worked in postsecondary education for over two decades in various capacities. She be- gan her career at Santa Monica College as a counseling aid at the Extended Opportunities Programs and Services office prior to her role as an Assistant Director of Admissions at the University of Southern California. She then moved to Cambridge, MA to pursue her Master’s Degree in Higher Education, with a focus on Risk and Prevention, and began working at Tenacity, a non-profit organization focused on social-emotional learning and literacy development for middle school youth, as a Prevention Specialist. Dr. Harris formally moved to the east coast when she began her work at the Gates Millennium Scholars Program as a Senior
University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a 2016 National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Journal of Civil Engineering Education Best Technical Paper, the 2021 Chemical Engineering Education William H. Corcoran Award, the 2022 American Educational Research Association Education in the Professions (Division I) 2021-2022 Out- standing Research Publication Award, and the 2023 American Institute of Chemical Engineers
thriving incomputing careers. 1 Positionality- Before diving into our presentation today, each of us will give a brief positionality statement to situate our perspectives in this work.- Hello, my name is Alia Carter. My pronouns are she/her. I am an able-bodied, cisgender Black woman living in the United States. I am a research scientist in the electrical and computer engineering department at Duke University. I have worked in informal and formal STEM education for the past 15 years including serving as the director of science engagement at a science center and teaching math and 2
Paper ID #40886Community Cultural Wealth from an Engineering and Science EducationDepartmentMr. Tim Ransom, Clemson University Doctoral candidate with the Engineering and Science Education Department at Clemson University re- searching computer science education.Randi Sims, Clemson University Randi is a current Ph.D. student in the department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson Uni- versity. Her research interests center around undergraduate research experiences using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Her career goals are to work as an evaluator or consultant on education- ally based research
way to help prep our students, we partner with one corporatesponsor (previous years Altria, fall 2023 Alpine). Where students learn the properattire for the event, receive resume assistance, and work on their elevator pitch.Takes place the week before SEC Career Expo.Major Scoop – is an annual event that allows students to come to one place and learnabout the different engineering majors offered at VT and eat ice cream. Typicallytakes place right before course planning for spring.End of mentor celebration – takes place at the end of mentoring program (last weekin October). 11 2021 to 2022 VT Peer
Institute and State University Olivia Ryan is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. in engineering with a specialization in electrical engineering from Roger Williams University. Her research interests include developing professional skills for engineering students and understanding mathematics barriers that exist within engineering.Mr. James Nathaniel Newcomer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University I’ve been an Academic and Career advisor for first-year engineering students for nine years. I help first-year engineering students develop their career goals and set off on academic trajectories to help them achieve those goals.Mr. Hamidreza Taimoory, Virginia Polytechnic
around undergraduate research experiences using both qualitativeand quantitative methodologies. Her career goals are to work as an evaluator or consultant on educationallybased research projects with an emphasis on statistical analyses and big data. 15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE): Boston, Massachusetts Jul 28WIP: Survey Validation to Enable Investigating Community Cultural Wealth in Engineering Students’ First Year Experiences (FYE)IntroductionFirst-year curricula typically include a variety of foundational concepts and skills and in manycases, students have the opportunity to work in teams in a project/inquiry-based learningenvironment. The first year is also a unique time in students’ lives when they
, andprogram attrition further exacerbate the challenges faced by graduate students, impacting theirwell-being [18]. Having a supportive supervisor along with departmental or faculty support canmitigate emotional exhaustion [18]. In Canada, it has been reported recently that graduatestudents are facing serious financial challenges, largely due to limited funding available fromboth institutions and funding agencies [18]. This further adds to the stress and anxiety that manyearly-career academics face and highlights the reality of the many challenges faced by graduatestudents on a daily basis, not including the added element of experiencing grief.Despite the substantial impact of grief and traumatic events on academic performance, researchon grief and
Paper ID #42303Capturing First- and Second-Year Master’s Engineering Students’ Perceptionsof Support in Their Transitions to Graduate SchoolDr. Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering
and career aspirations. Training modules are beingdeveloped for mentors through LinkedIn Learning and other resources.Each mentor plays a unique role for the mentee. The peer mentors are available on a weeklybasis, providing academic tutoring and campus support. Mentees meet with their faculty mentorsat least once a semester to share their academic goals and inquire about academic strategies froman educator's perspective. The industry mentors must have at least one virtual or physicalmeeting with their mentees per year. Their role includes mentoring on career readiness,professional development skills, and internship opportunities. Throughout the study, the menteeshave the autonomy to interact with their three-tier mentors outside of the
Utah State University (USU). Her research focuses on the intersections of disability, identity formation, and culture and uses anti-ableist approaches to enhance universal access for students with disabilities in STEM, particularly in engineering. At USU, she serves as the Co-Director of the Institute for Interdisciplinary ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID #47960Transition Services. In 2024, Dr. McCall received a National Science Foundation CAREER grant toidentify systemic opportunities for increasing the participation of people with disabilities in engineering.Her award-winning
communities often faced the challenges of navigating anti-DEI legislationwithout understanding its potential impact on their faculty careers. While most scholarssuccessfully transitioned to faculty roles within the university, some departments were unwillingto make the necessary sacrifices. Ultimately, these legislative actions resulted in institutionalharm to postdoc scholars, with universities and departments offering little acknowledgment ofthe damage caused.Acknowledging and Addressing Institutional Wrongdoings As a former inaugural department chair at the Ohio State, the director of the LEGACYScholars Program was keenly aware of the cultures and politics at play at the institution. Amongthese included several marginalized postdoctoral
resources to this mission. To date, theprogram has provided eighty-three semesters worth of tuition support to thirty-six students.Additionally, the program provides financial support to promising student projects that havebeen vetted by the scholar cohort and undertaken as class projects in the host department’sProject-Based Learning (PBL) curriculum. This paper outlines the program and activitiesundertaken in 2024.2. Program ObjectivesThe FLiTE scholarship program is strongly motivated by the financial needs of students and thecommercial needs of the western North Carolina region that WCU serves. Frequently, studentsfrom the region who obtain STEM degrees will choose to build their careers elsewhere due to adearth of local employment
interest in STEM careers byempowering teacher leaders to enhance their own and their colleagues' effectiveness.Faculty and staff at MTU and NMU are collaborating for MTP to enact long-standing plans forcollaboration to improve teaching and learning in Michigan schools. The partnership betweenNMU and MTU leverages NMU’s strengths in teacher education in pedagogy and praxis andMTU’s strengths in STEM. The project is managed by the PI team at MTU in coordination withrepresentatives from NMU and an external evaluator from Western Michigan University.Program ObjectivesTwenty teachers with master’s degrees are supported as a cohort in their development asteacher-leaders. Years 1-2 of the teacher leadership programming will include training onleadership
)IntroductionAccess to enriching engineering experiences remains a challenge, particularly for Latinx highschool students with one or more parents who are migratory seasonal farmworkers, herein referredto as migratory students. A migratory student is a child/ whose parent(s) is a migratory agriculturalworker. There are approximately half a million migratory children navigating the Americaneducation system, and they face unique challenges—including frequent relocations, Englishlanguage learners, and disrupted schooling—that significantly impact their academic outcomesand career aspirations [1], [2]. Migratory students have limited access to engineering learningexperiences and also encounter curricula that often fail to connect meaningfully with their
were at acomparable point in their degree program. Of the 22 students in the two cohorts, 10 graduatedwithin 4 years, 10 are on track to graduate within 4 years while 2 are progressing toward degreecompletion within an extended timeline of 4.5 years. Key successes included full placement ininternships or research experiences, which proved to be vital for both professional and academicdevelopment. Additionally, graduates of the program achieved high rates of professionalplacement or entry into graduate programs. These outcomes underscore the program’s ability toeffectively prepare students for success in their careers or further education, reflecting the robustsupport and opportunities provided throughout their participation in the ECS Scholars
cultivates and unites multidisciplinary interests to studyadvanced structures and systems with application to hypersonics, space, propulsion, and energy.Participants engage in a 10-week experience, conducting graduate-level research under a facultymentor and alongside a graduate student teammate. In addition to the core research experience,HYPER incorporates a series of professional development seminars, technology training sessions,faculty mentor presentations, and social events.HYPER has seven core objectives: (1) technically prepare students for graduate school and/orresearch oriented careers, (2) escalate students’ abilities to simulate phenomena using multi-physics software, (3) improve participants’ oral/written communication skills, (4
courses. The Postsecondary Instructional Practices Survey (PIPS) revealed severalcore strategies consistently employed by instructors. These included guiding students throughmajor topics, connecting course content to their lives and future careers, and crafting detailedsyllabi that provided clear expectations. Immediate feedback emerged as a key practice whichenabled students to quickly correct misconceptions. Additionally, instructors frequentlyacknowledged and built upon students’ prior knowledge and created a foundation for deeperlearning. Peer and instructor interaction were also emphasized that fostered collaborative andinteractive learning environments.Classroom observations offered further evidence of thoughtful course design and