hand,refers more to how an individual self-identifies along a continuum between male and female thatincludes, but is not exclusive to, traditionally (socially constructed) feminine or masculinecharacteristics between male and female. In contrast to sex, the definition of gender is fluid andevolves over time. Some of the most common genders in modern terminology are cisgender(gender identity aligns with sex), transgender (gender identity is opposite of sex, “T”), non-binary (gender identity does not clearly align with either male or female sex, sometimes “Q”),and gender non-conforming (exhibiting behaviors that do not conform to traditional norms fortheir sex). Genders that are not binary male or female are collectively referred to as
, no. 4, pp. 583-610, 2018.[19] A. Haverkamp, A. Butler, N.S. Pelzl, M.K. Bothwell, D. Montfort, and Q. Driskill, “Exploring Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Engineering Undergraduate Experiences through Autoethnography,” In Proc. CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity, 2019. Available: https://peer.asee.org/31764[20] K.F. Trenshaw, A. Hetrick, R.F. Oswald, S.L. Vostral, and M.C. Loui, “Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender students in engineering: Climate and perceptions,” In Proc. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1238-1240, 2013. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.6685028[21] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021-2022
given by the instructors during the Q&A session of the oral presentation to enhance /improve the written report. The development of these deliverables was based on the feedbackfrom current and former students from Louisiana State University currently working in industryto provide essential training in how engineers communicate findings. Each deliverable also had adetailed grading rubric to help achieve uniform grading across the different lab instructors.Responsibilities of undergraduate coachesGiven the complex nature of the course, the abundance of instruction required of the students,and the numerous graded deliverables described above, the author decided to implement theundergraduate coaches model as both a resource for the students and
, “Exploring Agency in Capstone Design Problem Framing,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 96, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.69.[4] X. Du, A. Lundberg, M. Ayari, K. K. Naji, and A. Hawari, “Examining engineering students’ perceptions of learner agency enactment in problem- and project-based learning using Q methodology,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 111–136, 2022.[5] M. Wilson-fetrow, V. Svihla, S. Wettstein, J. Brown, and E. Chi, “Consequential Agency in Chemical Engineering Laboratory Courses,” in American Society of Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[6] R. A. Engle and F. R. Conant, “Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive
://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.217[7] Li, C. Q. (2021). Teaching mechatronics to non-traditional mechanical engineering students- an adaptive approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 11(3), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v11i3.15833[8] Craig, K. (2001). Is anything really new in mechatronics education? IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 8(2), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1109/100.932752.[9] National Science Foundation Award https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1935708
Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, 2006. [2] J. Hattie, “Visible learning,” 2008. [3] A. Yadav, D. Subedi, M. A. Lundeberg, and C. F. Bunting, “Problem-based learning: Influence on students learning in an electrical engineering course,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, p. 253–280, 2011. [4] R. Mayer, “How engineers learn: a study of problem-based learning in the engineering classroom and implications for course design,” [5] H. Siy, B. Dorn, C. Engelmann, N. Grandgenett, T. Reding, J.-H. Youn, and Q. Zhu, “Sparcs: A personalized problem-based learning approach for developing successful computer science learning experiences in middle school,” 2017 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT), 2017
Design Course. 3. Chen, X.-Y., Gao, Q., Wang, X.-L., & Li, X.-D. (n.d.). Experimental Design and Parameter Optimization for Laser Three-dimensional (3-D) Printing. In Lasers in Eng (Vol. 33). 4. Elliott, L., Yanagida, C., & Raines, J. (n.d.). On the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Parts for Design Optimization Work in Progress: On the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Parts for Design Optimization. 5. Hanon, M. M., Alshammas, Y., & Zsidai, L. (2020). Effect of print orientation and bronze existence on tribological and mechanical properties of 3D-printed bronze/PLA composite. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 108(1–2), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1007
the opportunity to hold a Bistlinegrant in support of the development of this course in the CSAS major. We would also like tothank the School of Computing and Data Science and the School of Sciences and Humanities forthe resources to deliver this course in Fall 2021.References1. Gary R. Skuse, Daniel A. Walzer, Kathryn Tomasek, Douglas Baldwin and Mark Bailey,“Computer Science and the Liberal Arts: Hidden Synergies and Boundless Opportunities,” NewDirections for Computing Education, eds. S.B. Fee et al., Springer, 2017, 48.2. Dawson, J. Q., Allen, M., Campbell, A., & Valair, A. (2018). Designing an IntroductoryProgramming Course to Improve Non-Majors’ Experiences. Proceedings of the 49th ACMTechnical Symposium on Computer Science
. Nature 483, 29 (2012).[6] Gui, Q., Lawson, T., Shan, S., Yan, L. & Liu, Y. The Application of Whole Cell-Based Biosensors for Use in Environmental Analysis and in Medical Diagnostics. Sensors 2017, Vol. 17, Page 1623 17, 1623 (2017).[7] Thouand, G. Handbook of Cell Biosensors. Handb. Cell Biosens. (2020). doi:10.1007/978- 3319-47405-2
.[Accessed: March 29, 2022].[9] Future Engineers. Future Engineers, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://www.futureengineers.org. [Accessed: March 28, 2022].[10] Invention Convention. Invention Convention Worldwide, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://inhub.thehenryford.org/icw/home. [Accessed: March 28, 2022].[11] Rube Goldberg. Rube Goldberg, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://rubegoldberg.com.[Accessed: March 28, 2022].[12] Du, X., Lundberg, A., Ayari, M. A., Naji, K. K., & Hawari, A. (2022). Examiningengineering students' perceptions of learner agency enactment in problem- and project-basedlearning using Q methodology. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 111–136. Available:https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20430. p. 132 [Accessed: March 28, 2022
online videos. After Spring 2020, they learned to take notesand make the information “their own” when accessing any online resource and that this change issomething they have continued, and it has improved their ability to learn on their own andimprove their own academic performance. Interpreting the students’ comments and sentiments, itwas clear that using the supplemental video resources, and taking notes throughout those“viewing” sessions, improved the students’ ability to synthesize information from multiplesources.During the pandemic, guest lecturers were invited into the virtual classroom to reinforce coursematerial. Initially, the lectures were presented in real-time and included a Q&A period with thestudents. Subsequently, there
/2702123.2702529.[18] P. G. Yock, S. Zenios, J. Makower, T. J. Brinton, U. N. Kumar, F. T. J. Watkins, L. Denend,T. M. Krummel, and C. Q. Kurihara, Biodesign: The Process of Innovating MedicalTechnologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.[19] A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries,Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.[20] J. F. Morie, “Ontological Implications of Being in Immersive Virtual Environments,” inSPIE Proceedings 6804, The Engineering Reality of Virtual Reality, Jan. 27-31, 2008, San Jose,California, no. 680408, I. E. McDowall, M. Dolinsky, Eds. pp. 1–12, Feb. 8, 2008. [Online].Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.778617.[21] A. Heinzel and T
”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2014, p.23.1249.1-14.[9] J. Wang, X. Wang, W. Shou, H.Y. Chong, and J. Guo, “Building information modeling- based integration of MEP layout designs and constructability,” Automation in construction, 61, 134-146, 2016.[10] J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, S.P. Philbin, H. Huijser, Q. Wang, and R. Jin,“Toward next‐ generation engineering education: A case study of an engineering capstone project based on BIM technology in MEP systems,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2021.[11] C. Moreno, S. Olbina, and R.R. Issa, “BIM use by architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry in educational facility projects
Musical Sound, p. 126; ISBN-13:978- 0716760054. [4] H. F. Olson (1967), Music, Physics, and Engineering, p. 224-226; ISBN-10:0-486-21769-8. [5] Hong Kong Chinese Orchestra, “Standard Orchestra Instrumental Range Chart” (2022). [6] M. Schutz, “Sculpting sound: A new tool for visualizing musical timbre”; https://maplelab.net/maestro/. [7] Suona photo adopted from “The Metropolitan Museum of Art”; https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search?searchField=All&showOnly=openAcc ess&sortBy=relevance&pageSize=0&q=suona [8] D. Heiman and H. Kumarakuru, “Acoustics and Fourier Transform”; https://web.northeastern.edu/heiman/3600/index.html
practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model," Computers & Education, vol. 135, pp. 1-14, Jul 2019. [7] J. Campbell, A. Macey, W. Q. Chen, U. V. Shah, and C. Brechtelsbauer, "Creating a Confident and Curious Cohort: The Effect of Video-Led Instructions on Teaching First-Year Chemical Engineering Laboratories," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 4001-4007, Nov 2020. [8] K. Woelk and P. D. Whitefield, "As Close as It Might Get to the Real Lab Experience Live-Streamed Laboratory Activities," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2996-3001, Sep 2020. [9] K. Cook-Chennault and A. Farooq, "Virtualizing Hands-On Mechanical
. J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644- 659.Sapsford, R. (2007). Survey research (2nd ed.). Sage.Smith, N. M., Zhu, Q., Smith, J. M., & Mitcham, C. (2021). Enhancing engineering ethics: Role ethics and corporate social responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00289-7Sottile, B. J., Cruz, L. E., Burleson, Y.-A. L., & McLain, K. (2021, July). It’s about time: An analysis of student activities under remote learning. Paper presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37412Sottile, B. J., Cruz, L. E., &
. Tucker, A. M. McCarthy, J. A. Hoxmeier, and M. M. Lenk, “Community Service Learning Increases Communication Skills Across the Business Curriculum,” Bus. Commun. Q., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 88–99, Jun. 1998, doi: 10.1177/108056999806100211.[4] A. Strage, “Long-Term Academic Benefits of Service-Learning: When and Where Do They Manifest Themselves?,” Coll. Stud. J., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 257–261, Jun. 2004.[5] M. Salam, D. N. F. A. Iskandar, and D. H. A. Ibrahim, “Service Learning Support for Academic Learning and Skills Development,” J. Telecommun. Electron. Comput. Eng. JTEC, vol. 9, no. 2–10, Art. no. 2–10, Sep. 2017.[6] “Graduate Attributes,” Engineers Canada. https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/Graduate-Attributes.pdf
, 1998.[8] C. C. Lavis, K. A. Williams, and S. J. Thien. “Assessing Intellectual Development ofHorticulture Undergraduates Using the Perry Scheme and Learning Environment PreferencesInstrument,” NACTA Journal, 52(4), 25–31, 2008. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43766022[9] R. Liu & J. Zhu. “Personal Epistemology: The Impact of Project-based Learning,” ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2-30873, 2018.[10] Q. Li, and J. Zhu. “Engineering Students’ Epistemological Thinking in the Context ofSenior Design Projects,” ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online.10.18260/1-2—34562, 2020.[11] W.S. Moore. “The Learning Environment Preferences: exploring the construct validity of anobjective measure
Paper ID #36459Prepare Data Science Program Student Outcomes andCurricula for ABET AccreditationDavid Liu © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Prepare Data Science Program Student Outcomes and Curricula for ABET Accreditation David Q. Liu Department of Computer Science Purdue University Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 2, pp.263-290, 2018.[17] T. Huston, and C. L. Weaver, “Peer coaching: Professional development for expe-rienced faculty”, Innovative Higher Education, vol. 33, no.1, pp. 5–20, 2008.[18] S. Sheppard, S. Gilmartin, H. L. Chen, M. Besterfield-Sacre, N. Duval-Couetil, A. Shartrand, L. Moore, E. Costache, A. M. Fintoc, Q. Jin, C. Ling, F. M. Lintl, L. B. Cavagnaro, H. Fasihuddin, and A. K. Breed, “Exploring what we don't know about entrepreneurship education for engineers”, Paper presented at 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015.[19] I. Liccardi, A. Ounnas, R. Pau, E. Massey, P. Kinnunen, S. Lewthwaite, M. A. Midy, and C
. McNamara, Y.-F. Huang, D. H. Robinson, “Impact of Step-Based Tutoring on Student Learning in Linear Circuit Courses,” 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Erie, PA, October 2016.[10] B. J. Skromme, X. Gao, B. Korrapati, V. Seetharam, Y.-F. Huang, D. H. Robinson, “Interactive Tutorial System for Linear Circuit Analysis: Impact on Learning and Novel Tutorials,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (NSF Grantees Poster Session I), American Society for Engineering Education, New Orleans, LA, June 2016.[11] C. D. Whitlatch, Q. Wang, and B. J. Skromme, “Automated problem and solution generation software for computer-aided
1 7 0 1 7 16% 3) Spring 2021; Instruction Mode: Synchronous Live Lectures and Q&ADuring this semester, the instruction was still virtual and no classes were held on campus. Theclass was held synchronously but completely live. The students met three times a week with theinstructor, each time for 50 minutes, and the lectures were taught live and were recorded as well.Originally, the instructor plan was to post the Zoom session lecture recordings a week after eachsession. Since there were several individual requests to see the recorded videos earlier, especiallyfrom the international students in different time zones, the videos were posted the same day ofthe class for more
empirical study of iterative improvement in programming assignments,” 2015, pp. 410–415.[6] K. Ala-Mutka and H.-M. Jarvinen, “Assessment process for programming assignments,” 2004, pp. 181–185.[7] Q. Hao et al., “Towards understanding the effective design of automated formative feedback for programming assignments,” pp. 1–23, 2021, doi: 10.1080/08993408.2020.1860408.[8] K. Ala-Mutka, “A Survey of Automated Assessment Approaches for Programming Assignments,” vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 83–102, 2005, doi: 10.1080/08993400500150747.[9] J. Prather, R. Pettit, K. McMurry, A. Peters, J. Homer, and M. Cohen, “Metacognitive difficulties faced by novice programmers in automated assessment tools,” 2018, pp. 41–50.[10] P. Ihantola, T. Ahoniemi, V. Karavirta
] X. Ge and Q. Wang, “Cultivating Design Thinking in an Interdisciplinary Collaborative Project-Based Learning Environment,” in Intersections Across Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and learning, B. Hokanson, M. Exter, A. Grincewicz, M. Schmidt, and A. A. Tawfik, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 187–196. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-53875-0_15.[3] K.-Y. Lin, Y.-T. Wu, Y.-T. Hsu, and P. J. Williams, “Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9.[4] B. J. Ranger and A. Mantzavinou, “Design thinking in development
Before European Contact. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2017.[2] M. A. Meyer, “Our own liberation: Reflections on Hawaiian epistemology,” Amerasia Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 139–164, 2003.[3] J. N. Q. Kerr, D. J. Hess, C. M. Smith, and M. G. Hadfield, “Recognizing and reducing barriers to science and math education and STEM careers for Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 17, no. 4, Dec. 2018.[4-] L. Vanasupa and L. T. Schlemer, “Transcending Industrial Era Paradigms: Exploring Together the Meaning of Academic Leadership for Diversity,” in Jazzed About Engineering Education: 123rd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and
(firm)(2015) Searching for computer science: access and barriers in UG K-12 education. https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/searching-for-computer- science_report.pdf[2] W. Feurzeig. Toward a Culture of Creativity: A Personal Perspective on Logo's Early Years and Ongoing Potential. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15(3), 257-265 2010.[3] E. Graczyńska. ALICE as a tool for programming at schools. Natural Science, 2(02), 124. 2010[4] Q. Burke. The Markings of a New Pencil: Introducing Programming-as-Writing in the Middle School Classroom. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 4(2), 121-135. 2012[5] C.S. Lai and M.H. Lai. Using computer programming to enhance science learning for 5th
instructor to understand more about thestudents and adjust the course to assist students in a better way.Prompt feedbackIn both 2020 and 2021 fall semesters, the instructor tried to reply to students’ emails, messages onCanvas, or comments at Q&A discussion forum within 20 minutes. Prompt feedback may be oneof the easiest practice the instructor applied to improve teaching presence. However, many studentsexpressed great affirmation of this practice during the one-on-one communication or in the surveys.For example, 8 out of the 29 students in 2020 fall semester left comments in the end of the surveythat they really appreciated the instructor’s prompt feedback or the instructor’s prompt feedbackrelieved their stress about online
flexibility on how studentsidentify and integrate assets in the learning and engineering design process. To this end,instructor professional development on ABP is needed. As a next step, we will explore ways toengage other instructors in ABP-related training and identify a broader set of ABPs.References[1] A. Haverkamp, M. Bothwell, D. Montfort, and Q.-L. Driskill, “Calling for a Paradigm Shift in the Study of Gender in Engineering Education,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 55, Feb. 2021.[2] A. E. Trauth, J. M. Buckley, T. N. Barnes, J. Enszer, S. Rooney, and R. Davidson, “Adjusting the Lens: Comparison of Focus Group and Cross-Sectional Survey Data in Identifying and Addressing Issues of Diversity