Demographic Questions Please indicate your first semester of Open response enrollment as a graduate student in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech (i.e., Fall 2019, Spring 2022) Please indicate your primary academic Multiple choice department List of academic departments in the college of engineering What degree(s) are you seeking? (check Checkboxes all that apply) ● Master’s (thesis) ● Master’s (non-thesis) ● PhD Which most closely describes your Checkboxes gender? (check all that apply) ● Prefer not
goal.AcknowledgmentsAuthors would like to acknowledge the following for their contribution to the ethics case studyproject in which without their help would not have been as successful. Teachers: William Trent of Monticello High School, and Alexis Mason of Charlottesville High School Mentors: Daniel Sparks and Rick White of 100 Black Men of Central Virginia and Chad Ratcliff of M-CubedUVA - President & Provost's Fund for Institutionally Related Research to Garrick Louis.This work was supported by the National Science Foundation 568 under Grant # 1827820.References 1. IEEE, STEM and the American Workforce, FTI Consulting for IEEE Public Policy, 29 January,2020. https://ieeeusa.org/stem-supports-two-thirds-of-u-s-jobs/. Accessed
. Journal of social issues, 60(1), 17-34.• Hurtado, S. (2007). Linking diversity with the educational and civic missions of higher education. The review of higher education, 30(2), 185-196.• Milem, J. F. (2003). The educational benefits of diversity: Evidence from multiple sectors. Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in higher education, 126-169.• Smith, D. G., & Schonfeld, N. B. (2000). The benefits of diversity what the research tells us. About campus, 5(5), 16-23.• Backlash refers to social and economic penalties for counterstereotypical behavior (Rudman, 1998). By penalizing vanguards (atypical role models), backlash reinforces cultural stereotypes as normative rules.• Chapter four - Reactions to
[Accessed 14 Sept 2023][4] C. R. McGeorge and C. Bilen-Green, “Engaging men as allies for gender equity in highereducation: An exploration of an Advocates and Allies Program,” Journal of Women andMinorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 27, no. 2, 2021.[5] A. Call, C. Bilen-Green, and A.L. Burnett, “NDSU ADVANCE FORWARD Advocates & Allies: Thesuccession of a good idea or what’s in a meme?” Studies in Social Justice, vol. 12, no. 1, pp.152-164, 2018.[6] C.L. Anicha, C. Bilen-Green, A. Burnett, K. Froelich, and S. Holbrook, “Institutionaltransformation: Toward a diversity-positive campus culture,” Journal of Women and Minoritiesin Science and Engineering, vol. 23, no. 2, 2017. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017017021[7] S.J. Gervais and A.L
the circuit of Figure 2, obtained using a Multisim Transient analysis, using default parametersFinally, the students use Multisim to perform a Fourier analysis on the load current (the currentthrough PR2 in Figure 3), which is the same as the source current, in the circuit of Figure 2. Forthe Fourier analysis parameters, a frequency resolution of 60 Hz is specified, and the defaultparameters of 9 for number of harmonics, 0.001 s for stop time, and 6000 Hz for samplingfrequency are used. The result of the Multisim Fourier analysis is shown in Figure 6. 8Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section
-centeredengineering class can inspire students to actively participate in and outside the classes, allow studentsto enjoy their skill development and help students to improve their academic performance.Reference[1] B. Kerr, “The flipped classroom in engineering education: A survey of the research,” in 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), Sep. 2015, pp. 815–818. doi: 10.1109/ICL.2015.7318133.[2] H. Baytiyeh and M. K. Naja, “Students’ perceptions of the flipped classroom model in an engineering course: a case study,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1048–1061, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1252905.[3] G. Barata, S. Gama, J. Jorge, and D. Goncalves, “Engaging Engineering
/jae.v64i3.60[5] Diefes-Dux, H. A., Hjalmarson, M., Miller, T., & Lesh, R. (2008). Model eliciting activitiesfor engineering education, in Models and modeling in engineering education: Designingexperiences for all students, pp. 17-35.[6] English, L. (2009). Promoting interdisciplinarity through mathematical modeling. ZDM:The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 161–181.[7] Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering:Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 139-151.[8] Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., & Elber, S. (2008). Competencies beyond countries:the re‐organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin
mentoring is becoming more widely known throughout business and academic fields,women still feel at a disadvantage in terms of finding a mentor or a group of mentors to assistthem during their careers. Because STEM fields, such as engineering, are traditionally maledominated fields, women may find it difficult to find a proper mentor(s) to suit their needs. Fewwomen occupy high organizational ranks, which in turn may create difficulty when femaleprotégés are trying to initiate a mentoring relationship with potential female mentors20. Studies have also shown that the gender of the mentor and protégé may affect the overallmentoring experience20,21. Mentoring relationships that contain participants with the same genderare often more successful and
support education institutions that embrace manufacturing as anecessary and critical career pathway and in the process create the workforce necessary for theeconomic growth and stability of the United States.Bibliography1 National Science Foundation, Available from: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/nsf07315.pdf2 Georges, Annie.“Keeping What We’ve Got: The Impact of Financial Aid on MinorityRetention in Engineering” NACME Research Letter Volume 9, No 2. NACME, New York, NY1995.3 Sullivan, J., Davis, S., deGrazia, J., and Carolson, D., “Beyond the Pipeline: Building a K-12 EngineeringOutreach Program”, Proceedings of the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 11b5-21-26, San Juan,Puerto Rico, Nov. 1999.4 Poole, S., deGrazia, J
one of the FIGs, called FORCES (FocusOn Retention in Cohorts of Engineering Students), compared to students in the other three FIGsand the College of Engineering as a whole. FORCES is funded by NSF’s S-STEM (Scholarshipsin Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) program and targets students inunderrepresented groups for recruitment with the broad goals of removing financial barriers andimproving student retention.Recognizing that success in mathematics is critical to engineering student success, key FORCESprogram elements were designed with a focus on calculus. FORCES scholars were required todemonstrate first fall semester calculus readiness by either earning an acceptable score on theuniversity’s Math Aptitude Test (MAT) or by
Liquid Chromatography Laboratory (HLCL) which is designed to facilitate ablended learning mode. Page 22.1662.6 Figure 5: Actual LP Biologic Chromatography SystemLearning cyclesThe proposed blended learning cycle recommends a five-step approach to student learning: 1. use simulations and online materials to learn the theory and basic principles underlying protein purification; 2. use simulations to become familiar with a liquid column chromatography system, its components and their function; 3. perform virtual experiment(s); 4. evaluate knowledge and virtual skills, using a built-in assessment tool, before granting access
Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA, 2001.2. Wankat, P. C. and Oreovicz, F. S., Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1993.3. Lowman, J., Mastering the Techniques of Teaching, 2nd Edition, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1995.4. Klosky, J. L. and VanderSchaaf, R., “Hands-on-Demonstrations in Introductory Mechanics”, Proceedings of 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 9 pp., June, 2002.5. Lesko, J., Duke, J., Holzer, S., and Auchey, F., “Hands-on-Statics Integration into an Engineering Mechanics- Statics Course: Development and Scaling”, Proceedings of 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC, 7 pp., June, 1999.6. Graves, E., “Demonstrations that Work in the
controllers. 2. The Premium kit uses the CM-510 controller with additional capabilities beyond the CM- 5’s as it can also interface with user-created sensors using memory-mapped I/O ports. It also has similar RS-232 and ZigBee communications capabilities. 3. The CM-700 became available in mid 2010 as a bare-bone controller having all the capabilities of the CM-5 and CM-510, and also RS-485 interfaces to the more advanced servo motors from Robotis series RX and EX. The CM-700 is not yet used in our robotics course. Figure 1. Current Bioloid controllers CM-5, CM-510 and CM-700.For communications between a PC and the various CM-5/510/700 controllers, there are a varietyof options (see Fig. 2): 1. Plain RS-232 9
. Thurston, S. Hundley, “Enhancing Student Classroom Engagement through SocialNetworking Technology”, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.3. L. Frehill, A. Lain, C. Didion, “Destination Unknown: Gender Differences in Attrition from Graduate Study inEngineering”, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.4. J.K. Estell, “Connecting with Alumni: An Experiment In Social Networking Using Facebook Groups”, 2009ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.5. ABET, “2010-2011 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.” http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2010-11%20EAC%20Criteria%201-27-10.pdf Page 22.1707.6
authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Daniel Frey for consenting to use his course as acontext for this study and also thank the students for their participation. The work described inthis paper was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Award 0830134. Theopinions, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed are those of the authors and donot necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. Page 22.1501.15References1. Hsi, S., Linn, M., and Bell, J. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158.2. Sorby, S. (2009). Educational
experience with the team project. If you speak about thecontents of the focus group outside the group it is expected that you will not tell others whatindividual participants said. Please let us know what you think. 1. To start off this conversation, I’d like to know more about you: a. Please state your name, major(s), and minor(s) b. Please take a minute to explain the MTR project in your own words. c. List three things you learned (specifically) while working on this project. 2. In what way has participation in the MTR project shaped your global awareness and understanding (of other people and cultures). Please give an example. 3. You may consider yourself a
, evidence and narrative. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press.3. Foenix-Riou, B. (2006). When search engines play at maps: Visualization technologies. Online, 30(2), 29-32.4. Marcinko, R., & Arnold, S. (2009). Grokker mystery : Beyond search. Retrieved 2/18/2011, 2011, from http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/08/22/grokker-mystery/5. IBM Research, & IBM Cognos Software Group. (2010). Many eyes. Retrieved 2/22/2011, 2011, from http://www-958.ibm.com/software/data/cognos/manyeyes/6. Simboli, B. D. (2008). Web of science's "citation mapping" tool. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, (54), 5-5. http://www.istl.org/08-summer/electronic-1.html7. Luther, J., Kelly, M., & Beagle, D. (2005). Visualize this. Library Journal
educational system. Why cannot a system develop wherefaculty with research aspirations are balanced by those who have passion for teaching, withouttrying to get “a little bit of everything” from each person? In this way both sets of individualshave the ability to expand there potential to greater heights within their own area of passion.In fact the power structure of most of academia is held by those who have doctorates, and believethat this is the single criteria for exclusion. This is in part due to the diversity of criteria acrossthe various technical and non-technical fields. It also has roots in the executive directives of the1960’s to develop a research powerhouse within the United States to compete with cold war
they are not in a traditional engineering program nor in the EDDP.Appendix A contains a comprehensive listing of the month and year each survey participantgraduated and Appendix B shows the distribution of responses by engineering discipline.Research QuestionsResearch questions were developed to gather a large amount of data that can be evaluated toanswer the research problems. The questions were compiled using an if/then system in thesurvey tool. The employment questions (3-10) were given based upon the previous question’sresponse. Each participant was asked questions 10-14. The questions are: 1. Month and year of graduation 2. Major(s) 3. When did you receive your first job offer (related to your major)? Month and year 4. Did
problemsolving task, we explored how technology and engineering students approach solvingcomputational problems. This study is guided under the premise that people’s ways ofexperiencing phenomena result from the unique interaction of their understanding of thephenomena and the situation in which they must apply that understanding 6 . Our ultimate goal isthat by identifying, comparing, and contrasting students’ understandings and strategies toapproach problems, more effective instructional approaches will be identified.Theoretical FrameworksProblem-based learning and Computational thinking theoretical frameworks are merged in thedesign and analysis of this study. Problem-Based learning is a student-centered instructionalstrategy to guide the learner(s
(s) made to your program. 6. Has further assessment been made to measure the effectiveness of the change(s) made?The primary modes of assessment asked about were surveys, focus groups, and advisory boards,along with an “other” category to allow for the accounting of other assessment modes. Of the113 responses to this question, 99.1% of the programs reported using one or more surveyinstruments, with 55.8% using paper surveys, 42.5% using e-mail surveys, 60.2% using web-based surveys, and 4.4% using telephone surveys. The next highest used mode was the industrialadvisory board, with 87.6% of the programs indicating their use. Finally, only 43.4% of theprograms reported using focus groups, with 37.2% using alumni focus groups and 33.6
v – cursor velocity (P1 - P0) / t P1 – cursor’s position, found by the equation (P0 + v*t) A, B, C, D – the four corner points of a brick’s rectangular side n – the surface normal to the plane of the brick’s side s – the distance between the cursor’s previous position and intersection point when moved along the direction of vIf t = 1, Page 22.495.10 Figure 6: Diagram of collision detection algorithm.The collision detection algorithm has to locate the plane intersection point where thebrick’s surface exists and to determine if the intersection point is within the four cornersof the brick’s side. The
Alternative high school weatherization of homes, and environmental and economic analysis of project(s). Mohawk, MI 49950 Grades: 10-128 Melvindale High School Randy Thomas: Number of Students: 37 Cyber Cards: Design and build a hybrid or Michigan Tech large urban city Physics, Chemistry Minority: 13 fuel cell vehicle & Public high school (Gr.9-12) Women: 10 NSF - ITEST
AC 2011-554: ELECTRIC ENERGY AND POWER EDUCATIONAL PRO-GRAMS DEVELOPMENT SYMPOSIUMS. Hossein Mousavinezhad, T. E. Schlesinger, Michael R. Lightner, Mark J. Smith, Langis Roy, Barry J. Sulli-van, S. S. (Mani) Venkata, and Anthony Kuh, Idaho State University (first, corresponding author) BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION S. Hossein Mousavinezhad, Ph.D. Professor and Chair, Department of Electrical Engineering and Com- puter Science, Idaho State University Dr. Mousavinezhad is an active member of IEEE and ASEE having chaired sessions in national and regional conferences. He is an ABET Program Evaluator (PEV) for Elec- trical Engineering and Computer Engineering. He was General Chair of the IEEE 2009 International Elec- tro
Policy (COSEPUP), 2007.3. Bochis, C., Hsia, S., Johnson, P., Boykin, K., Wood, S., Bowen, L, and Whitaker, K. “Integrated EngineeringMath-Based Summer Bridge Program for Student Retention”, Proceedings of the 2007 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.4. Fletcher, S. L., Newell, D.C., Newton, L.D., and Anderson-Rowland, M. “The WISE Summer Bridge Program:Assessing Student Attrition, Retention, and Program Effectiveness”, Proceedings of the American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2001.5. Varde, K. S. “Effects of Pre-Freshman Program for Minority Students in Engineering”, Proceedings of the 2004American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
potential for widespreadapplication.Bibliography[1] MIDFIELD, "Multiple-Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development", 2011.[2] Ohland, M., M. Camacho, R. Layton, R. Long, S. Lord, and M. Wasburn, "How we measure success makes a difference: Eight-semester persistence and graduation rates for female and male engineering students", 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14, 2009 - June 17, 2009, Austin, TX, United states: American Society for Engineering Education, 2009, pp. BOEING.[3] Ohland, M.W., S.D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R.A. Layton," Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs", Journal of Engineering
, University of Texas, Arlington Dr. Peterson is Sr. Associate Dean of Engineering for Academic Affairs at U. Texas Arlington College of Engineering, and is Professor of Computer Science and Engineering. Her Ph.D. is in medical computer science from U. Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Research interests are in artificial intelligence, engineering education and medical computer science. She is a member of the UT Arlington Academy of Distinguished Teachers.James Sells, San Jacinto College Central Campus Professor James Sells teaches mathematics at San Jacinto College (SJC) in Pasadena, Texas (a suburb or Houston). He has a B. S. degree in Mathematics, an M. S. in Mathematics, and an M. S. in Petroleum Engineering, all
Genencor, a Danisco Division, where she developed a metabolic flux model for an enzyme production process. Additionally, after her postdoctoral research at the ETH-Zurich, she obtained a Science and Diplomacy Fellowship from the American As- sociation for the Advancement of Science to spend a year working in the U. S. Agency for International Development providing technical expertise to the Child Health Research Project which promoted research targeting the reduction of child mortality in third world countries. She has 19 publications and 2 patents, has received over $1MM in grants since joining SJSU. She currently serves on the Executive Committee of the ACS Biochemical Technology Division and on the advisory board of
instructor, would be gearedtowards relevant technical and nontechnical issues that had a bearing on the case. In this secondsession, all seven groups that made up the class contributed to the discussion. In the thirdsession, an invited speaker, a practitioner, would address the class, focusing on real issues andconcerns that only practitioners could address. During the final fifteen minutes of the thirdsession, the instructor would summarize the case pointing in the direction of: lesson(s) learned,discrepancies, if any, and how the presented case would relate to and/ or supplement theknowledge students have been exposed to in previous courses.Getting off to a good start is vital, so the first class session was an ideal opportunity to be clearabout
operations lab experiments and provides instruction for the virtualbioreactor. Dr. David Hackleman developed CBEE 416 and served as the Linus PaulingEngineer for 5 years. The authors are indebted to numerous practicing engineers for sharingtheir time and experiences with students. Finally, several faculty members sponsor seniorprojects, committing resources and knowledge.References1. Feisel, L. D. and A. J. Rosa. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. J. Eng. Educ., 94, 121–130.2. Wankat, P.C. and F.S. Oreovicz. (1993). Teaching engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.3. ABET Website, http://www.abet.org/, retrieved Jan. 2011.4. Dutson, A., R. Todd, S. Magleby, and C. Sorensen. 1997. A Review of Literature