curriculum. The importance and ubiquity of switch-mode powerconverters, however, are matched by their complexity. Students are expected to have developed arigorous understanding of electrical circuits, semiconductor physics, signal processing, controltheory, digital logic, and wave mathematics before being introduced to power electronics.Students at our institution are introduced to fundamental concepts in lectures then they put theminto practice in hands-on labs, which are limited to three-hour-long experiments conducted in astrictly controlled environment due to safety concerns. This leaves little room for exploration andindependent trial-and-error. We have developed LabSim, an out-of-the-box functional softwareimplementation of the switch-mode
experiential learning could result in greater immediate changes, but not sustainedones.Third, we found that not all courses were effective in moving students to a place where theyrecognized CSR as a sociotechnical practice. Students in the social science course tended toprioritize community training as an example of excellent CSR, while many of the engineeringcourses prioritized local hiring. Neither of those areas of practice necessarily involves changingbusiness activities to become more responsive to stakeholders, and each of those areas ofpractice tends to focus on either the social or technical extremes of CSR practice rather thanclearly integrating the two. Educators in all disciplines need to continue countering this dualism,and towards
Paper ID #25464An Interdisciplinary Elective Course to Build Computational Skills for Math-ematical Modeling in Science and EngineeringDr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt, Oklahoma State University Dr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt is an assistant professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Okla- homa State University. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in ChE at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and her B.S. at the University of Oklahoma. She did postdoctoral research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on developing computational models for multiscale tissue physiology and pharmacology
development, possibly because (once again) they are so focused on the technicalrequirements of an engineering education. Next, there are no standardized teaching methodologiesor techniques available to teach creativity within the engineering leadership curriculum, despite awealth of general creativity techniques focused on specific creative activities, such as ideageneration. And finally, there has been little acknowledgement or push from either the professionalinstitutions or industries of the role of creativity in leadership development for engineers; withoutthis external recognition of its importance, it will be more difficult to persuade academicinstitutions to invest in creativity instruction within their engineering curricula.Exploratory
Paper ID #25567Student Views on their Role in Society as an Engineer and Relevant EthicalIssuesDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living- learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and
for engineering classes,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 1999.[21] K. D. Dahm, S. Farrell, and R. P. Ramachandran, “Communication in the Engineering Curriculum: Learning to Write and Writing to Learn,” J. Eng. Educ. Transform., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2015.[22] V. Svihla, “Advances in Design-Based Research in the Learning Sciences,” Front. Learn. Res., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 35–45, 2014.[23] The Design-Based Research Collective, “Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry,” Educ. Res., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 5–8, 2003.[24] J. R. Gomez and V. Svihla, “Building individual accountability through consensus,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 53, no. 1, 2019.[25] J. R. Gomez, V. Svihla
as the thinning of the herd; students areconvinced to leave engineering programs because they cannot manage the academic workload.Attrition studies have concluded that most students that choose not to remain in engineering aredoing well academically and have GPAs similar to those students who stay in engineeringcourses [2,3]. These studies refer to outdated curriculum and a misunderstanding of howstudents prefer to learn [4, 5, 6].Project-based team learning is an essential practice used to modernize engineering curricula andhas been shown as a decisive factor in retention of students in STEM fields [1]. Working inteams brings along its own set of problems, however, studies by Oakley et al., indicate that thequality of learning is improved
] Wing[14] connects computational thinking to engineering thinking by arguing that computationalthinking is the overlap between engineering thinking and mathematical thinking. As a result ofthe strong connection between these two types of thinking, and the prevalence of CT andprogramming in engineering in professional practice, we believe that exploring CT is animportant aspect of learning about children’s engineering learning.Purpose of the studyThis study is part of an NSF-funded project that integrates computational thinking in STEMactivities and curriculums both in formal and informal settings. The aim of the project is tocharacterize children’s computational thinking in different learning settings. Consistent with theaim of the project, we
, switches, temperature measurement, DCmotors, piezo speakers, etc. Understanding microcontrollers, an important component ofelectrical engineering, introduces students to the world of digital control and all the possibilitiesof enhancing their future disciplines.Experimental ProcedureAs part of the curriculum at the University of Florida, engineering majors that are not seeking adegree in electrical engineering are required to take a course that broadly covers the differentelements of electrical engineering. Because of the number of students that must take this course,the class enrollments can be excessively large. As a result of the high enrollment a single set ofcore content-recorded lectures have been created and are available to all students
Paper ID #25899Board 46: The Mentoring Network of K-5 Educators and Engineering Re-searchers in an RETMs. Gayle Nelson Evans, University of Florida Gayle Evans is a Lecturer and doctoral candidate in Curriculum & Instruction, Science Education in the School of Teaching and Learning at the University of Florida. She is science coordinator for the UFTeach undergraduate secondary STEM teacher preparation program and previously worked as a high school science teacher. Her research interests include mentoring relationships and program development in STEM teacher preparation and professional development.Dr. Kent J. Crippen
veteran undergraduates in engineering.Theresa Green, Utah State University Theresa Green is a graduate student at Utah State University pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education. Her research interests include K-12 STEM integration and improving diversity and inclusion in engineer- ing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 1 An Inquiry into the Use of Intercoder Reliability Measures in Qualitative ResearchWhen compared to quantitative approaches, qualitative approaches are relatively newer to theengineering education research community (Borrego, Douglas, & Amelink, 2009). As thecommunity
research. Possible research questions might include:RQ1. What are core computational thinking skills in the context of engineering?RQ2. How to integrate computing in engineering curriculum so as to help engineeringstudents learn computational thinking skills?RQ3. How do engineering students learn computational thinking skills through theeffective engagement in instructional activities?RQ4. What should we endeavor to promote computational thinking for non-CSengineering majors?II. Computational Thinking in Engineering1. Computational Thinking (CT)Computing is an innate capacity of human beings. The term Computational Thinking(CT) has been used in the educational context for quite a long time (Dijkstra, 1976).But the concept has become popular in
teaching and student service processes. Although an employer was namedas a first customer, students’ recommendations on curriculum improvement, campus layout, andfacilities utilization demonstrated that students considered themselves as customers as well.Francis4 in his study of lean implementation in Canadian universities pointed out strongprospects for new research programs related to Lean in higher education. The universitiespotential in producing rigorous research should be leveraged to promote the lean adoption as asystem in HEI.Although some authors believe that in the recent years it has become easier to use Leanmethodology for non-experts in the field9, most of the studies highlight the importance ofpersonnel training and expert’s
://www.arduino.cc/) that are programmed with the Arduino IDE(Integrated Design Environment) for user-friendly interfaces. Commonly these boards are usedwith conductive paint that is applied with a brush to create an artistic drawing resulting in acircuit that reacts to human touch to trigger a user-specified sound or other actions. The team hascreated a sample design and used it at outreach activities, demonstrating that the Touch Boardswill be manageable for new learners under our students’ mentoring. The authors met with theFSF clients in Summer 2018 and have hosted the clients on campus to work with our studentsthree times in Spring 2019, with a few more meetings scheduled. The project will provide novelavenues of expression for the autistic clients and
,light sensors and LED dot matrix screens to easily realize face recognition, speechrecognition and so on. But there are different kinds of such systems with less systematic de-sign for school students and insufficient well-designed curriculum systems, which make it aheadache for schools to pick. Therefore, it is imperative to develop a convenient and practicalAI teaching systemsto carry out AI education in primary and secondary schools. To this end, this paper develops an AI teaching system for primary and secondary studentsunder iSTREAM (intelligence for Sciences, Technology, Robotics, Engineering, Arts, andManagement) Educational structure, where parallel intelligence theory and ACP framework[3]-[7] are applied. In this system, typical AI
details the integration of Poll Everywhere into an engineering classroom whichallowed students to integrate their smartphones into the classroom discussion to provide instantfeedback to the instructor on their knowledge of a topic. Students in the classroom answeredtrue/false, multiple choice and free response questions created by the instructor before class or inreal time. Each response was sent to the instructor in the form of a text message that couldappear on a PowerPoint slide or the computer screen. The study saw an increase in studentmotivation and participation, as well as a more informed and confident instructor. This wasparticularly valuable due to diverse student body in the classroom, many of whom were reluctantto participate in hand
Paper ID #26223Factors Contributing to the Problem-Solving Heuristics of Civil EngineeringStudentsMr. Sean Lyle Gestson, Oregon State University Sean Gestson is a recent graduate from the University of Portland where he studied Civil Engineering with a focus in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. He is currently conducting Engineering Education research while pursuing a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include problem solving, decision making, and engineering curriculum development.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an
nature, engineering and teaching both require problem solving, and integrating the topicsand practice of engineering research with the extant curriculum in a STEM classroom also requirescreativity and innovation. One explanation for the benefit of cognitively-diverse teams oncomplex, creative tasks is the cognitive diversity hypothesis [13,18,19]. The cognitive diversityhypothesis posits that dissimilarity in team makeup (with regard to task-related attributes)discourages groupthink and encourages positive member disagreement, debate, and discussion, aswell as introducing differing attitudes, perspectives, and knowledge structures [18-23]. Similarly,the information processing perspective provides an additional framework to explain
a new Engineering Leadership Program to enable students to bridge the gap between traditional engineer- ing education and what they will really experience in industry. With a background in both engineering education and design thinking, her research focuses on how Latina/Latino students develop an identity as an engineer, methods for enhancing student motivation, and methods for involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Dr. Ines Basalo, University of Miami Dr. Basalo is an Assistant Professor in Practice in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Uni- versity of Miami. Prior to joining the University of Miami in 2014, she worked as an adjunct professor at
hold an undergraduate degree in a STEM field and may not even befamiliar with the acronym. This preliminary study evaluates the impact of an After SchoolSTEM service learning course on undergraduate preservice teachers (PSTs). This course wasdesigned with the broad goal to engage undergraduates who are thinking about becomingteachers (going on to a credential program after graduation) in a service learning course in whichthey engage in a pre-credential field experience. As part of this experience, undergraduates learnabout STEM integration in teaching and STEM based activities, and then teach those activities toelementary students in local after school programs. The main research questions for this studyinclude: A) How did the service learning
conflict of interest forms and their curriculum vitaeto help the PI and co-PI evaluate the richness of their professional network and contributions,respectively.Following the survey, an individual structured interview with the PI and co-PI occurred todetermine the specific needs of each ASSERT Fellow, providing validation or perhapschallenging our a priori observations of risk inhibitors at Boise State that prevent germinatingbold ideas. By studying the ASSERT Fellows, we were able to look at what may inhibit themfrom taking risks—personal attributes and beliefs, and the structural and cultural barriers withintheir academic unit, the university, and in their academic field.During our individual structured interviews with the ASSERT Fellows, we
the Analog Discovery Board helped them learn. An increase of studentsexpressing interest in graduate programs and research was also noted [6].Expanding on the LiaB and Mobile Studio concept, we wanted to investigate the feasibility ofimplementing a similar structure at West Virginia University. What difficulties must beovercome with integrating into existing infrastructure? What resources are best situated for theuse of the TA? What effects does this method have on student learning outcomes? How dostudents’ respond to this approach?WVU LiaB SetupThe setup chosen for this pilot investigation included: Digilent Analog Discovery 2 Board, BNCAdapter Board, BNC Oscilloscope x1/x10 Probes (Pair), Shielded USB cable, and WaveForms2015 software [14
Paper ID #27115Using An Engineering Analysis Tool for Department AdministrationDr. Hugh Jack P.E., Western Carolina University Dr. Jack is the Cass Ballenger Distinguished Professor of Engineering and Department Head of the School of Engineering and Technology within Western Carolina University. His interests include robotics, automation, and product design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Using An Engineering Analysis Tool for Department AdministrationAbstractThe paper describes a basic application created using Matlab to assist in academic scheduling oftechnical programs. The work
evaluate the fate of pesticides in drinking water treatment plants, and to develop biomimetic membranes for desalination. Her current interests include undergraduate engineering research and education. Dr. Marincel Payne is co-leading an Undergraduate Research Community to support students learning through research, undergraduate re- search to remove stormwater pollutants via engineered treatment wetlands, development of courses and research related to appropriate technology with strong emphasis on social sustainability, and frameworks for integrating open-ended problems through students’ curricula.Dr. Irene M.B. Reizman, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Irene M.B. Reizman is an Assistant Professor in the Department
methods for involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University, Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her doctorate in aerospace engineering at Georgia Tech in spring, 2014. Prior to attending Georgia Tech, Alexandra received a bachelor’s degree in aerospace engineering from MIT (2007) and a master’s degree in systems engineering from the University of Virginia (2010). Alexandra comes to FIU after completing a
of courses throughout the program,across all engineering majors.The co-curricular initiatives to support entrepreneurship are usually open and occur incollaborative spaces, in which people have the chance to do networking everyday. In thesespaces people come to develop and receive help to materialize an idea. They are rather informalspaces, where informal language is used and relationships are horizontal. The characteristics thatthese co-curricular initiatives adopt, and how they interact with the curriculum, allow us toidentify schools where these structures are less empowered, that is to say, with sporadic activitiesand little coordination with the program core curriculum. For example, UAI is still working onhaving their co-curricular
(3259-Other Chemicals and 3344-Semiconductor) and in 2015, constituted 24.6% of the region’s total employment [1, 2]. Guidedby the overarching research question (RQ) “To what extent do curriculum content, employerneeds, and student experiences align within an advanced manufacturing educational pathway,”this study’s goals are to 1) investigate the role AM program pathways have in meeting the needsof employers and new professionals who are employed in the region; 2) expand the research baseand curriculum content recommendations for entrepreneur and intrapreneur education; 3) buildregional capacity for AM program assessment and improvement by replicating, refining, anddisseminating study approaches through further research, annual meetings with
nano educational labs, as well as mentoring students in their senior capstone projects. His current projects include indus- try integration in the curriculum, undergraduate professional development, and entrepreneurial minded learning in the classroom.Amena Shermadou, Ohio State University Amena Shermadou is an Engineering Education graduate student at The Ohio State University. She received her Bachelors and Masters in Biomedical Engineering from Wright State University, in Day- ton, Ohio. Her experience with teaching first-year engineering students has led to research interests in curriculum development, student empowerment and the development of holistic engineers through the collaboration with engineering
ideasuniversity students develop and teach the curriculum. 4. Give reasons for your ideasThis study took place in a socioeconomically, racially, 5. Discuss many different ideasand linguistically diverse fourth-grade classroom. Of the20 participating students, 11 were female, 9 were male, Figure 1. Groupwork norms.11 were White, and 9 were People of Color. Thecurriculum was designed by two researchers to scaffold collaborative groupwork and decisionmaking. The instruction was provided by an undergraduate Data Science major and the firstauthor, a graduate student in engineering education. The scaffolds include a set of groupworknorms (Figure 1), adapted from Morris [16] and a decision matrix (Figure 2) developed by theauthors.Figure
radically new applications, i.e., PV-on-everything.But getting there requires an educated citizenry empowered to utilize and create sustainableenergy solutions. To this end, QESST, an Engineering Research Center for Quantum Energyand Sustainable Solar Technologies sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the U.S.Department of Energy, program aims to advance PV science, technology and education througha Research Experience for Teachers (RET) program.The QESST RET program is focused on furthering innovations in solar energy engineering byadvancing PV science and technology. We are also committed to promoting solar energyeducation by (a) developing an extensive set of K-12 curriculum materials to promote solarenergy and PV engineering