and/or enhance their chances for facultyjob opportunities in higher education. With the current outsourcing of industrial research, thenumber of job opportunities in corporate and government research laboratories has diminishedgreatly. Thus, those students obtaining a Ph.D. in engineering increasingly look to academia forpositions. There are also others who are interested in teaching engineering in corporate settings,as well as those who are interested in pursuing educational research in engineering and science.While the sample population of prospective employers is very small in this survey, it is apparentthat employers view all the four graduate programs as useful. In the next section, we providemore details of our proposed
. Giddlings, and J. C. McRobbie, “Evolution and Validation Form of an Instrument For Assessing Science Laboratory Classroom Environments”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), pp.399-422, 1995.2) M. Barak and Y. Doppelt, “Promoting Creative Thinking Within Technology Education”, Paper presented at the International Workshop for Scholars in Technology Education, WOCATE, George Washington University, Washington DC, September 1998.3) N. D. Perkins, Technology Meets Constructivism: Do They Make a Marriage?, T. M. Duffy & H. D. Jonassen Eds., “Constructivism and Technology of Instruction: A Conversation”, ;;.45-55, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992.4) S. Waks, “Lateral Thinking and Technology Education”, Journal of Science
Layne Professor of Mechanical Engineering at WKU, and primarily teaches in the dynamicsystems and instrumentation areas. His industrial experience includes positions at Michelin Research and OakRidge National Laboratory, as well as extensive professional practice in regional design and manufacturing firms.He can often be found with his four children in his home machine shop building steam engines and repairing jeeps. Page 10.20.6“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”
2004. There is a lack of funds forresources to support innovative approaches for teaching engineering classes, such ascomputer simulation software or up-to-date laboratory equipment and instruments. The EEfaculty cannot afford to participate in professional development opportunities as thesetypically would require travel out of the country and high registration costs. Students cannotafford to purchase engineering textbooks, and the department library has very few books orjournal titles. The burden of maintaining the programs at the Faculty of Engineering is quitesubstantial; it would be pointless making other demands such as suggestions to engage themin outreach to motivate children to study science. The current consuming burden
their classroom desk. UFPME experiments wereconducted on folding tables and chairs in a large loading dock. The authors recommend thatwhen conducting these experiments with greater than 25 students, a few Laboratory Assistants berecruited to help set up and facilitate the 30 to 40-minute experiments.1. Charged up on ElectrophoresisActivities associated with the Charged Up On Electrophoresis experiment span four contactsessions, but only two need to be dedicated solely to this topic. The first is an introductorylecture that reviews basic knowledge, industrial applications, and teaches the students importantequations and procedures. At this first contact meeting, a preassignment and experimentalprocedure is handed out; the preassignment is due
designed to be mobile. A typical application will consist of two units, one atWSU and one that can be brought into the K-12 classroom. By linking the two via the Internetwe can provide real-time audio and visual between the two sites. Thus a teacher and their classcould have a virtual face-to-face interaction with the faculty member at WSU, similar to what wasdone in co-TEACH. A more exciting application of this technology will be to bring the K-12students into the faculty member’s research laboratory to let them see activities and equipmentthat would not be accessible to them at their school. We also wish to obtain better follow-up on student attitudes concerning engineering aftertheir teachers have been participants in our program. We are
use of detection, signalingand suppression systems. The course laboratory has both software and hardware. LabVIEWcomputer software is being used to develop new standalone software projects, and newproject designs that interact with hardware.Many of the fire alarm system class students are often fire and safety personnel that work invarious related professions. Additionally, the class students have varied technical experiencelevel and background in academics. The LabVIEW software is being used to develop alaboratory that is suitable for a class with students that have different backgrounds.Newly developed laboratory exercises are used to acquaint the safety and fire students withLabVIEW and fire alarm systems.Original LabVIEW exercises have
Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationThis paper explains how these concepts can be introduced by improving undergraduate coursesand laboratories through the development of exciting, visually-appealing experiments. The useof visually-appealing materials has been shown to motivate and captivate students in biology andchemical engineering settings.4-9 Additionally, some elements of bioseparation (adsorption, ion-exchange, and chromatography) are difficult to teach in a lecture-based format, as these are rate-based, time-dependent processes.10 These experiments will improve instruction in this difficultarea by employing a range of colorful proteins with different biophysical
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”A technology-based business incubator (ETSU Innovation Laboratory) was established at EastTennessee State University in 2002 as a component of the university’s strategic vision andmission. It is the intent of this paper to review steps taken by ETSU that made the creation of abusiness incubator on our campus a reality and that this information may serve as a mini-casestudy for others wishing to pursue a similar path. Elements achieving the establishment of abusiness incubator include defining strategic intent (senior administration buy-in), establishing auniversity research foundation, risk mitigation procedures, marketing the incubator, utilization ofthe incubator as a teaching tool and
stepthem through the process, there is the Brief Tutor, which condenses the core information intofewer steps. Finally, there is the Self-Guide that presents all of the information contained in theTutor in the form of static web pages.Figure 3. The LabWrite Tutor.Notice in Figure 1 in the upper right corner that in addition to having a special site for students,there are also tabs for lab instructors and (at larger universities and colleges) for professorssupervising multi-section lab courses. These additional portions of the LabWrite site are inrecognition that the professors and instructors designing and running the labs are a criticalcomponent to a successful laboratory experience for the student. LabWrite is not meant to be a“self-teaching
directional controlvalves (widely used, controls fluids).After the PLC overview, we proceeded to the programming software. The best methodfor teaching the software is via lab activities that require the students to develop ladderlogic programs designed to control a process. The six laboratory activities that weutilized are the: Industrial start cycle with an automated stop function; Conveyor systemwith indicating lights; Timing six sequential outputs; Automated palletized materialhandling system; Computerized parking garage; and the Vehicle intersection traffic lightcontroller. Page 10.1030.6 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering
. Photos ofsome available facilities are shown in Figure 3. Since the facilities are shared by all departmentsin the engineering college, we may find that some heavily used facilities will need to beduplicated within the department. To engage students in the active learning components, many of these activities will be taughtby a faculty member. A detailed faculty teaching load analysis has been conducted with themodel of 60 students in lecture sections and 30 students in practicum or clinic courses. It hasbeen shown that faculty teaching loads will not increase if graduate teaching assistants are usedfor 1/3 of the practicum or clinic meetings to run laboratories. Faculty would be present duringmore open-ended activities of product dissection
member from the previous group working with a given system helped explain the system operation to the new group; hence, students helped teach each other. Each team was required to submit a laboratory report after the completion of each unit process activity. • The students regrouped as a class for the next session, in which they were introduced to the fundamentals of air stripping before designing, operating, and analyzing the pilot- scale packed aeration tower. • For the final class period, each team presented a poster on a different unit process to members of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Professional Advisory Committee (CEEPAC).Based of the findings of the 2004 educational assessment, the
, laboratory courses have strengthened this knowledge by allowing hands-onapplication. This tradition is further strengthened by teaching simulation techniques to thestudents. This Analyze/Simulate/Experiment philosophy allows students better catch theirmistakes as they are less likely to make the same mistake in all phases. The associations may beindicated as shown below. re Co pa m m pa Co
and Jim Sajewski for their assistance, andthe students from MEEN 360.AuthorsDr. Richard B. Griffin has been at Texas A&M University for 27 years. He has taught a varietyof materials related courses. His research interests are corrosion and engineering education. Hehas participated in the National Educators Workshop for more than a decade.Dr. Terry S. Creasy has been at Texas A&M University for four years. He teaches materialsrelated courses in materials science. His research interests are in equal channel angular extrusionof short fiber/thermoplastic composites and shape changing polymer matrix composites.References1 Griffin, Richard, Terry Creasy, and Jeremy Weinstein, “Laboratory Activity Using Rapid Prototyping and Casting
environments • Utilizing emerging technologies such as muscle wires, air muscles, micro- and nano- controllersInitially ONU technology and engineering student body was chosen as the main target audiencesince the focus areas were mechatronics and robotics. However, art majors and minors did showstrong interest during promotional activities. They were subsequently recruited. Students who arenot in the honors program were also allowed to register depending on the number of availableseats within fifteen seat capacity limit of the Honors Program.This paper elaborates on the HONR 218 – Animatronics course through its description,objectives, curriculum, and delivery structure including laboratory assignments. Examples ofstudent work are also
; EnvironmentalEngineering. He coordinates and teaches for the First-Year Engineering Program. Dr. Demel earned hisB.S.M.E. at the University of Nebraska (1965) and his Ph.D. (1973) in Metallurgy from Iowa State. Hewas the institutional Principal Investigator for the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition 92–03.RICHARD J. FREULERRichard J. Freuler is Associate Director of the Aeronautical &Astronautical Research Laboratory at OhioState. He also coordinates the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors. Dr. Freuler earned his BS inAeronautical Engineering (1974), his BS in Computer Science (1974), his MS in Aeronautical Engineering(1974), and his PhD in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering (1991), all from Ohio State.KATHLEEN A. HARPERKathleen A. Harper is a
-basedcontrollers such as LabVIEW. This set-up can also be used by graduate students to investigatesecond-order-type effects. This hardware has been effective in enhancing student understandingand retention of control system theory.IntroductionThe teaching of control systems is enhanced by supplementing the lecture material withlaboratory activity. The laboratory activity should reinforce the theory presented in class byproviding a platform in which the theory can be applied. This paper summarizes a series oflaboratory activities dealing with a closed-loop, position control system that utilizes dual DC-solenoids as the drivers, and PC as the controller. This work is an update of a similar positioncontrol system that utilized a single DC solenoid and an op
160 students,distributed across eight studio sections, this course can require upwards of 30 hours a week forpreparation, actual studio time, and subsequent grading.Experimental MethodsThis required junior-level class introduces students to the practical issues of measurementequipment, measurement methods, and data analysis. Students attend a lecture and a laboratorysession each week, usually completing ten laboratory projects over the course of a semester.Working in teams of two, students prepare written reports to document each project, and thesereports are evaluated by teaching assistants.For this course, the Webb Program coordinator delivers one lecture each term, describing theappropriate editor settings for page design and display
together to attend a Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Educationworkshop may also work to the favor of being selected since the workshop organizersmay be more interested in faculty from institutions where a strong interest in theworkshop exists.One example of how cooperation between faculty members in the different disciplineshas helped untenured faculty develop their teaching at UPJ resulted from the staggerednature in which the new faculty were hired. Limited funds are available each year forlaboratory equipment. New faculty members, however, have been able to purchase newequipment for their laboratory through
design experience, based on knowledge and skills one at an advanced level acquired in earlier coursework. 6. Workspaces and laboratories that support and Criterion 6. Classrooms, labs, and equipment encourage hands-on learning of product and system must be adequate to accomplish program building skills, disciplinary knowledge, and objectives, foster faculty-student interaction, teamwork abilities encourage student professional development 7. Learning experiences that support the acquisition Not addressed of technical knowledge as well as the professional knowledge, skills, and values that support product and system building competencies 8. Teaching
great success using LEGO robotics to teach the basics ofengineering to freshman engineering students. The LEGO kits provide a technological mediumfor hands-on learning of engineering design and problem solving without requiring college-levelknowledge of mathematics or the sciences. Supported by a grant from the UCCS Teaching andLearning Center, we have together designed and implemented a new freshman course Introduc-tion to Robotics. We co-developed this course, and co-teach it. It has an on-line course reader,an on-line integrated set of laboratory exercises (with pre-lab assignments), and a comprehensivefinal design project where students must generalize from their lecture and lab experiences to usetechnology to solve a design problem.Why
Experience course (EE/ME 001) is offered during theSpring semester as a follow-on to ENGR 2: Graphical Communication (CAD). EE/ME 001consists of a 1-hour weekly lecture and a 2.75-hour laboratory session. There is a single lecturesection for all students and several labs sections (capped at 20 students each). Both ECE and MEfaculty and staff are closely involved with this course ensuring a balanced, interdisciplinaryflavor. Teaching assistants from both departments mentor students during the laboratory portionof the course.Lecture Component The once a week, one hour lecture component focuses on topics related to theengineering profession, engineering design, electrical-mechanical systems, and wireless sensorsnetworks (Table 1
have a basis for evaluating the quality of the contribution. In contrast,professional review committees are able to rely on peer review of proposals and journalpublications when evaluating the quality of a faculty member’s contributions in technicalresearch. For faculty who invest time and effort to develop learning objects because they feel itis “the right thing to do”, it would be pleasant to have a mechanism for broad dissemination andpeer review of these contributions. This is one step to increase the respect for teaching asresearch and research on learning in engineering programs.The Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching (MERLOT,www.merlot.org) is a database of educational resources, primarily for post-secondary
that the equipment is permanentlyinstalled in their spaces. In most universities, however, large lecture halls are shared by anumber of professors teaching a variety of courses. Leaving laboratory equipment in thesespaces is not practical or feasible. Most modern lecture halls, however, have computerizedaudio-visual projection equipment permanently installed. These sensors are small enough to fitinto a pocket or briefcase making them as easy and convenient to carry into the lecture hall as apiece of chalk.Another reason computer-based sensors have not been widely used during lectures lies in thelearning curve associated with most new software and trying to conduct a meaningful andsuccessful demonstration within the lecture time frame. Clark
assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education in the College of Engineering atVirginia Tech. She received her Ph.D. in chemical engineering at Carnegie Mellon and her B.S. in chemicalengineering at Tulane University.RICHARD M. GOFF is an associate professor and assistant department head of the Engineering EducationDepartment in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech. He is also the Director of the Frith FreshmanEngineering Design Laboratory and the Faculty Advisor of the VT Mini Baja Team. He is actively involved inbringing joy and adventure to the educational process and is the recipient of numerous University teaching awards.VINOD K. LOHANI is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia
, collaborative camaraderie as well asequipment and laboratory conduct policies may be foreign. Just locating simpleresources can be challenging. Overall, the new faculty member must acclimate quickly inorder to effectively communicate with fellow faculty and administrators on a daily basis.In this paper, the authors will discuss some of the unexpected experiences encountered attheir institutions with regard to teaching and research, then provide suggested courses ofaction on how to prevail.IntroductionThe common challenge facing almost every new faculty member is to get tenure. A newfaculty member is expected to teach at or above their institution’s average, do researchabove their institution’s average, and perform some level of service. Although
assignments, develop instructional units (on subjects related to theseassignments), and practice teaching them using the project method.The course is given in the departmental laboratory of technology. It consists of three modularparts. The first part includes lectures and laboratories. The lectures consider pedagogicalaspects of experiential learning and subjects related to systems and control design. Thelaboratory activities include the following: (1) assembling sensor systems and implementingfeedback control processes; (2) computer aided design and producing machine parts; and (3)programming robot manipulations. The second part of the course focuses on roboticsprojects. The third part of the course is students' practice in teaching robotics to
for Engineering Educationand structural pieces. By 1984, LEGO set up a partnership with the Media Laboratory at MIT.LEGO launched a computer control product in 1986, and computer controlled robots quicklyfollowed.The LEGO Mindstorm kits have been used to teach a variety of robotic techniques in highschools and universities. The United States Military Academy uses the same product “to teachfundamental computer programming concepts and introduce the concept of autonomousvehicles”3, and to introduce students to computer simulation.4 The US Naval Academy usesreconfigurable kits (such as the LEGO kit) to provide students with an introduction to robotics,emphasizing open-ended solutions.5 Competitions have been created to allow students todevelop
Tanyel is a professor of engineering at Geneva College. He teaches upper level electrical engineering andbiomedical engineering courses. Prior to Geneva College, Dr. Tanyel taught at Dordt College, Sioux Center, IAfrom Aug. 1995 to Aug. 2003. Prior to 1995, he was at Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA where he worked for the 4Enhanced Educational Experience for Engineering Students (E ) project, setting up and teaching laboratory andhands-on computer experiments for engineering freshmen and sophomores. For one semester, he was also a visitingprofessor at the United Arab Emirates University in Al-Ain, UAE where he helped set up an innovative introductoryengineering curriculum. Dr