analysis of the students’ responses about the experience. Thegoal was to find main ideas and to be able to form groups of ideas that many of the answersencompassed to analyze all the feedback received by the students, identifying the positiveexperiences, the skills gained during the development of the activities, and the challenges that thestudents encountered when working with unified courses of the two careers. Students alsoprovided suggestions on possible improvements for the combined educational module.The learning module characteristicsThe students worked in multidisciplinary groups for four weeks, during which they learneddefinitions and identified centroids, moments of inertia, and internal forces in trusses. Typically,students met for two
www.slayte.comOutreach Projects: Towards a Structured Curricular Activity for Chemical Engineering StudentsOutreach Projects: Towards a Structured Curricular Activity for Chemical EngineeringStudentsAbstractPromotion of STEM careers in K-12 schools is essential for the sustainable progress of the world.College students from engineering careers can provide a unique contribution to this effort. Theirexperience is like the K-12 school environment. However, they have advanced knowledge andskills of their critical role in society. They can offer a realistic model for K-12 students to guidetheir career choice and to become motivated for STEM college education. In addition, collegestudents benefit from these experiences by
engineering design process; importance of mathematics,chemistry and computers in engineering; engineering mechanics; data analysis; publicsafety; ethics; professional licensure; and career searches. Content varied from material thatwould be included in freshmen engineering courses to material that introduced advanced(upper-level) engineering courses. The portion of the SBP program involving industryprofessionals as guest speakers consisted of three panel discussions and three stand-alonepresentations. The three panel discussions invited guests from different career stages asfollows: (a) early career professionals, (b) a recent winning senior design team fromComputer Science in TAMUK’s COE, and (c) seasoned engineers. Each panel had four tofive
this early-age exposure. A 2007 studyindicates that the “shut up and learn” approach to teaching, while widely accepted, is notnecessarily effective. In this study [8], a survey of 2,500 pupils indicates that the two mostcommon uses of class time are copying from a board or book and listening to the teacher talk forextended periods of time; whereas the two least common uses of class time are studying real-world applications and learning through experience. Scholars have observed that shifts towardshands-on and individually-engaging activities often radically change students’ perceptions oftheir place in STEM fields and their plans for future education and career paths.Many educators in STEM suggest that the best way to introduce very young
practices.Students’ learning experiences, including benefits, challenges, and lessons learned are discussedin the paper, presenting different points of view from different disciplines.Relevance of multidisciplinary teaching for student career goals and value for their professionaldevelopment are discussed in the paper. The authors provide suggestions for improvements andadvice to instructors and peers for improving multidisciplinary learning experiences at thecollege level.IntroductionMultidisciplinary collaborations are important for several reasons. First, it improves learningand student engagement. As stated by Drake and Reid, after reviewing numerous studies,“interdisciplinary approaches can lead to increased student engagement and motivation
Compliance Specialist in Atlanta, GA. Specifically, she worked in public drinking water compliance and regulations, regularly leading audits and inspections. Alisha also previously served as a 6th and 7th grade mathematics teacher. Her current career interests include identi- fying and integrating real-world problems in STEM learning and increasing diversity and representation in the STEM field.Mr. Alain Mota, Southern Methodist University Alain Mota is the STEM Development and Implementation Coordinator at RME and a Program Manager at the Caruth Institute for Engineering Education. In this role, he works across schools supporting the research and implementation goals of several projects at the unit and the institute. As
academia and motivations for shifting careers. This analysis used a constant comparativeapproach to explore emerging themes about the EIF's decisions to pursue an instructional facultyposition at their current institutions [15]. A codebook was developed based on emergent themesrelated to the personal and professional motivational factors of each EIF as they pursued theircurrent position. For this research question, two researchers (who did not serve as interviewers)established the codebook and conducted the analysis. The researchers coded three interviewstogether to ensure consistent interpretation of the codebook, calculating inter-rater reliability inNVivo to ensure consistency above 90%. The remaining interview transcripts were
show students the beauty in the physics andengineering concepts they are laboring to learn. Due to this neglect, many engineering studentscomplete their engineering courses with the ability to solve complex engineering problems but nodesire to further explore the topics they have learned. In fact, in some cases STEM students leavetheir classes feeling that the topics that they learn about are unrelated to the real world andfrivolous. Because of this emotional response it is becoming common to see students graduatingfrom university with degrees in STEM but no plans to pursue a career in a STEM field[1].Although the Mechanical Engineering curriculum at the University of Colorado has a significantemphasis on design, all the formal design
studies and careers in the engineering field.Keywords : STEM; pre-college; extracurricular learning experiences; engineeringidentityIntroduction In recent years, engineering identity has become an important perspective forunderstanding how to retain engineering talents. Prior studies have shown that thehigher the engineering identity of students, the more likely they are to continue to studyengineering majors and engage in related jobs [1]. Generally, choosing and pursuing engineering majors is a prerequisite for studentsto enter the engineering field. However, due to the absence of engineering-relatedcourses in primary and secondary schools, most students have no real exposure toengineering experiences before entering university, which
mechanisms, metrics, policy, and amelioration; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development for nontraditional data. Her NSF CAREER award studies master’s-level departure from the engineering doctorate as a mechanism of attrition. Catherine earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Gabriella M Sallai Gabriella Sallai is a PhD candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University. Her work characterizes engineering graduate students’ experiences within graduate school. Gaby earned a Bachelor’s degree in
an important predictor of engineering career choices (Cass, Hazari, Cribbs, Sadler,& Sonnert, 2011; Godwin, Potvin, Hazari, & Lock, 2016). More broadly, there is an extensivebody of research tying secondary and postsecondary students’ identity development to theirinterest, persistence, and success in STEM academic and career pathways, especially forindividuals from groups traditionally underrepresented in STEM like females and students ofcolor (Calabrese Barton, Kang, Tan, O’Neill, & Brecklin, 2013; Carlone & Johnson, 2007;Chemers et al., 2011; Gushue, Scanlan, Pantzer, & Clarke, 2006; Kim, Sinatra, & Seyranian,2018).In terms of student support structures, participation in both general and math-focused summerbridge
- gineering and STEM Education at the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Borrego is Senior Associaate Editor for Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. She previously served as Deputy Editor for Journal of Engineering Education, a Program Director at the National Science Foundation, on the board of the American Society for Engineering Education, and as an associate dean and director of in- terdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstand- ing publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All of Dr
emphasizesadvising as a teaching and learning process.At our institution, undergraduate advising is mainly conducted by faculty advisors. Theseadvisors initially meet with matriculating advisees at new student orientation in the summer andthen once a semester thereafter to discuss courses and career planning. While advising isconsidered a component of teaching as a part of the promotion and tenure process at ourinstitution, historically the quality of advising as a student learning experience is not evaluated.Methods commonly used to assess teaching quality are not conducted regularly or at all foradvising. A thoughtfully crafted teaching philosophy is essential in a dossier, however there isno expectation that it include an advising philosophy. This is
means recruiting students into MS programs can be especiallydifficult. Students have many barriers to overcome but understanding these barriers, how tonegate them, and receiving institutional support early on in an undergraduate’s career puts MSdegrees on the table as an option for many underrepresented students. The SEnS GPS programexplores all realms of the MS level experience. This paper will focus on MS student recruitmentstrategy development and supporting students in their decision-making process.FrameworkA simple search makes it apparent there have been few comprehensive pre-decision mentoringand recruitment strategies developed for MS programs. A review of available academic researchreveals barriers to pursuing an MS program are
Paper ID #37229GPA Patterns of Black Mechanical Engineering Students(Work in Progress)Jessica Manning Jessica Manning is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. She is also a Graduate Administrative Assistant for the Bioengineering Department and assists with advising students throughout their academic careers. Her primary research focuses on women and minorities in multiple engineering disciplines. She earned her BS from North Carolina State University, Raleigh, and her MS from Clemson University, Clemson, both in Mechanical Engineering.Catherine Mobley (Dr
activities, including entrepreneurship competitions, have been conducted onuniversity campuses to cultivate innovative and entrepreneurial engineering talents.Entrepreneurship competitions, as one of the most widely promoted activities ofentrepreneurship education in China, are receiving more attention and support fromthe government, society, universities, and educational administrative departments. TheMinistry of Education has held many official entrepreneurship competitions, such asthe Internet + Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competition and the NationalInnovation Plan. These competitions are intended to improve students’ overallinnovation and entrepreneurship skills and encourage them to pursue careers astechnology-based
innovations in workforce development at educational and career transitions. The context of her research emphasizes three primary areas specifically focusing on two-year college and secondary STEM and career education, educational innovations, and the middle skill workforce. Kris is or has served as Principal Investigator, Co-Principal Investigator, or Senior Personnel numerous federal grants including a current National Science Foundation CAREER grant. Kris has also led development of digital learning tools to designed expand technician education capacity through virtual reality tools, advanced e-learning modules, and iBooks.Maegan HinsonBradley J. Putman (Professor) © American Society for Engineering
professor, she brings three overarching objectives to the learning environment that originate from the belief that teaching is an invitation to inspire, encourage, and impact lives. Her students have received national recognition under her tutelage as a result of her efforts. She carefully advises students toward making conscious decisions about their studies that will ultimately impact their careers. Horsey has made impactful change to the construction management department since becoming interim department chair in June 2020. She was also instrumental in the transition of all degree programs and certificates to online modality during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. She is the founder and creator of the KSU Women in
related fields. Most of these programs graduate studentswho aim to start their careers in management positions that typically require years of previousexperience. Many students pursue a bachelor’s degree in these programs to acquire knowledgeand skills that lead to attractive management-level employment opportunities post-graduation invarious construction industry sectors. In most cases, a résumé is submitted as the first steptoward gaining employment when students begin their job search in the industry. This studypresents the results of a qualitative content analysis of 204 student résumés collected from theAssociated Schools of Construction (ASC) Region 1 student competition and identifies seven ofthe most common categories listed in the
to explore various career paths to access to professional networks that would haveotherwise been unattainable. In particular, minoritized students gain critical mastery experiencesthrough engineering internships, which then increases their engineering self-efficacy andsignificantly guides their future engineering career decisions [1]–[3]. However, internshipexperiences are not equally accessed by all undergraduate engineering students [4], as it is firmlyestablished that minoritized students may encounter institutional barriers to career resources andbe stymied in their professional careers by structural inequities, leading to lower senses ofbelonging and uncertain professional identities [5]–[7]. In particular, within engineering,first
create a partnership with the College of Natural Sciences to develop and deliver bias and inclusion workshops and training across the colleges for students, staff, and faculty. She continues to be active in service to the UT community working with peer and professional mentoring programs. She presents to numerous groups on a variety of leadership, inclusion, and career-focused topics. A member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN) since 2006, Ana completed a three-year appointment to the WEPAN Board of Directors as Communications Director. Ana received the Eyes of Texas Award in 2011, the University’s Outstanding Staff Award in 2012, and the Cockrell School of Engineering Staff Excellence Award. After
virtual scavenger image hunt in orientation and game nights every Wednesday. During the ten weeks, we also organized a half-hour daily check-in and check-out in the morning and afternoon respectively, through which students got ample opportunities to speak in a group setting about their own accomplishments and challenges for the day as well as their plans for the next day. Moreover, a PhD pathways panel and several professional development seminars on Graduate School and the research process were successfully organized to motivate students to pursue a research career. To facilitate communication, our site adopted multiple software tools (slack, google calendar, zoom, and moodle). An independent evaluator evaluated our
Paper ID #37992Collateral Damage: Investigating the Impacts of COVID onSTEM Professionals with Caregiving ResponsibilitiesKelli Paul Dr. Kelli Paul is a postdoctoral researcher at the Center for Research on Learning and Technology at Indiana University where her research focuses on the development of STEM interests, identity, and career aspirations in children and adolescents.Jungsun Kim (Research Scientist)Amanda Diekman (Professor)Allison Godwin (Associate Professor) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and of Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. She is also the
Academy in 2020. The goals of the Cyber Academy are to engage AF JROTC cadets in learning cybersecurity skills and becoming more aware of careers in cybersecurity by connecting high school JROTC cadets with dedicated faculty, mentors, and the wider cybersecurity field and Air Force through an intense summer course. This pilot was hosted at one institution (Mississippi State University) and was designed to teach a college-level cybersecurity course to 25 AF JROTC cadets in high school. In 2021, the Cyber Academy moved to a distributed model taught at five institutions. In total, the Academy was designed to reach 100 AF JROTC cadets, 20 cadets at each host institu- tion receiving very similar core
-Director of the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program, and since 2021 the Apollo Program Professor of Astronautics at MIT.Reza S Rahaman (Industry Co-Director, Gordon Engineering LeadershipProgram) Reza Rahaman is the Bernard M Gordon Industry Co-Director and Senior Lecturer for the MIT Technical Leadership and Communication Programs - the Undergraduate Practice Opportunities Program (UPOP), the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program (GEL), the Graduate Engineering Leadership Program (GradEL), and the School of Engineering Communication Lab. Dr. Rahaman returned to MIT in 2018 after a 29 year career in the Consumer Packaged Goods, Pharmaceuticals, and Agricultural Chemical Industries
, intrusiveadvising, regular progress reports from instructors, and peer and faculty mentoring. Co-curricular support includes community-building activities, a minimum of two mandatory themeseminars based on evidence-based best practices, and two required "choice" activities, includingparticipation in career fairs, industry information sessions, student clubs, K-12 outreach,undergraduate research, and study abroad. The College of Engineering's network of existingsupport programs is being leveraged in tandem with strategically planned activities to providethe cohorts with academic, financial, career development, and personal support. Explicitlyproviding CREATE scholars with the resources that are part of the hidden curriculum [6] willgive them additional
grant work because it enables people like you to reach your potential and to do good work in your field, whatever that looks like for you!Gerry Caskey Mr. Caskey is the Instrumentation Instructor at LDCC Ruston Campus with over 30 years industry experience. As the Principal Investigator for the NSF funded grant ”Project Complete”, he is passionate about introducing Instrumentation as a career pathway for the next generation.Michael K. Swanbom (Distinguished Lecturer)Matthew Brady Johnson Matthew is a Ph.D. student in industrial-organizational psychology whose research foci includes motivation, personality, team innovation, leadership, and team climate. He serves as a project manager for AROS consulting, a firm that
students understand how to use reflective practices toshape their future choices based on examination of current experiences. It also requires a change infaculty mindset, from viewing e-portfolios as a collection of artifacts, to viewing e-portfolios asdevelopmental tools that drive student growth in classrooms. Story-based reasoning and reflection,provides the essential link between an entrepreneurial mindset and a technology skillset.Our university, the Rochester Institute of Technology, has begun implementation of vertical integration ofe-portfolio practices through modifications to a first-year course for all students, to second- and fourth-year engineering-content courses, and to a third-year career orientation course. We present
, discusses the potential causes of the high DFW rate including the switchto online learning, and proposes potential changes for future sections of the introductory course. IntroductionThe literature1 states that, as an instructor, one of the most important times to interact withincoming freshman students is during the first weeks of course attendance. During this time,instructors introduce the concepts and careers available in chemical engineering and encouragestudents to progress through graduation. During an analysis of Fall 2020 engineering courses, asection of the chemical engineering introductory course was flagged as having a high withdrawaland failure rate (DFW) or a high number of students receiving
, fluid dynamics and bio-transport, with a focus on bio-fluid dynamics (vascular blood flow) and on front propagation both in biological tissue (avascular-tumor dynamics) and in reacting gaseous mixtures (flame propagation). He has developed computational algorithms and software for simulation and analysis of flame propagation, including an iPhone/iPad application (the Level-Set app). Dr. Aldredge received a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering and French at Carnegie-Mellon University and his Master’s and PhD degrees in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Princeton University. He completed postdoctoral fellowships at UC San Diego and Caltech prior to arriving at UC Davis to begin his teaching career