University Page 11.1422.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 VaNTH Observation System Component AssessmentAbstract- Since 1999, the VaNTH Observation System (VOS), a direct classroom observationsystem, has been used to collect data about classroom activities within bioengineering courses.Two components of the VOS, the Classroom Interaction Observation and the Global Ratings,specifically collect data about whether observed courses contain elements of the “How PeopleLearn” (HPL) framework, as set forth in the National Research Council publication How PeopleLearn: Mind, Brain, Experience, and School.1 VOS observers use
NNCS Leadership Symposium: Adding a Leadership Component to Science EducationAbstractThe NSF Navy Civilian Service (NNCS) program is now in itssecond year of operation and has embarked on a course to add asignificant leadership training component for participatingstudents. This paper will describe the nature and history of NNCS,the rational for the leadership component, and a description of thesymposium itself. Also included will be a programmatic overviewfrom the perspective of its origins in ONR’s workforcedevelopment programs.NNCS has the following main three goals:• To identify and fully develop a diverse group of science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) professionalswith advanced
2006-736: KAMIKAZE: INVESTIGATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATERVEHICLE FOR COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND UNDERGRADUATEEDUCATION AND TRAININGBrian Howell, Western Carolina University Dr. Howell is the Program Director for Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Western Carolina UniversityStephen Wood, Florida Tech Dr. Wood is an Assistant Professor in Ocean Engineering at the Department of Marine and Environmental Systems Page 11.853.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 KAMIKAZE: INVESTIGATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE FOR COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND UNDERGRADUATE
education research by examining the ISEE model. We also describe the successesand challenges experienced as we near completion of the second of three cycles, andimplications for future community building efforts. One finding is that community at the locallevel is crucial. While expanding the national community of engineering education researchersis important, scholars who are new to the field need a community of like-minded colleagues withwhom they can give and receive feedback on works-in-progress. We also found that engineeringfaculty tend to have difficulty with particular aspects of educational research, such as navigatinga new disciplinary language, utilizing qualitative research methodologies, and analyzingqualitative data. We found that
on module design, to Jairam Eswara for providing the exam data from theoriginal curriculum, to Itty ‘James’ Samuel for his work implementing the tutorials, to Ragu Vijaykumarfor his work implementing the simulation, and to Professor Robert Linsenmeier of NorthwesternUniversity for his valuable insights on module design.References1. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Eds: Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking,R.R.. National Academy Press (Washington; 1999).2. Gunter H.E., Bonventre, J.V., D’Avila M.A., Sadeghpour S., Vijaykumar R. (2003), “EducationInnovation in Physiology” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference. Nashville, TN, June 22-25, 2003.3. Henrickson S.E., Gunter H.E
2006-2523: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE / ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNChristopher Jarrett, Georgia Institute of Technology Chris Jarrett is Associate Director and Associate Professor of the Architecture Program at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He teaches courses on architecture and ecology, eco-tectonics, and graduate design studios addressing a range of contemporary green topics. Page 11.594.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Environmental Science / Environmental DesignAbstractEnvironmental science has formed the central part of ecological discourse in architecture. It hasbeen the
2006-1392: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF CRITICAL THINKING INSTRUCTIONUPON THE PREPARATION OF FRESHMAN STUDENTS TO PURSUEADVANCED DEGREES IN ENGINEERINGAnnette Donawa, Morgan State University/CAMRA Annette Mallory Donawa is currently working on her Ph.D. in Higher Education and Administration at Morgan State University. Within the NASA-sponsored Center of Advanced Microwave Research and Applications (CAMRA), she assists the Director, Dr. Carl White, with strategic planning, in addition to staff and project management. Her engineering education research is focused on assessing the impact of teaching critical thinking to African American engineering students. The goal is to prepare and motivate
2006-1605: INCORPORATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE DESIGN EXPERIENCEIN THE INTEGRATED ENGINEERING PROJECT DESIGN MODELJose Guevara, University of Puerto Rico Dr. Guevara is an associate professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, he is leading the work to make improvements to the capstone course and helping also in the improvements to the curriculum. He has also work as a structural consultant for a wide variety of projects including commercial, residential, industrial, transportation, marine facilities as well as the tren urbano.Ismael Pagan-Trinidad, University of Puerto Rico-MayaguezDidier Valdes-Diaz, University of Puerto Rico-MayaguezEileen Pesantes, University of Puerto Rico
highly motivating: instructorenthusiasm, demonstrated relevance through examples, instructor organization,appropriateness of difficulty level, active student participation, variety of instructionalmethods, instructor interest in students and their learning, and the use of real, concreteexamples23. Alternatively, McKeachie suggests guiding students toward developingspecific learning goals for a given course and requiring that they track their progresstoward these goals as a means of motivation24. By remaining mindful of these relativelystraightforward ways in which students may be motivated, instructors can be betterequipped to promote positive efficacy.ConclusionsBoth first-year engineering students enrolled in an honors program and those not
2006-730: USING WIRELESS TABLET PERSONAL COMPUTERS TO EXTENDENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CLASSROOMS AND ENHANCE LEARNINGLisa Jones, Southwest Tennessee Community College Lisa G. Jones is currently Assistant Professor in Electrical Engineering Technology at Southwest Tennessee Community College in Memphis, Tennessee. She joined Southwest in 2002 after 20 years of working as a design engineer and project manager in the electronics industry including Bell Labs, AT&T, Truevision, and Thomson Consumer Electronics. Ms. Jones earned her BSEE degree from Memphis State University in 1980 and her MSEE degree from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1981.James M. Northern, Southwest Tennessee Community
Carnot’sfascination with steam power led to statements of the second law grounded in heat engines, while Page 11.1003.6subsequent statements by Clausius became more abstract due to a quest for parsimony andelegance. It also supported students’ critical reading of the textbook’s presentation of entropyanalogies, discussed below.AnalysisWe collected a variety of evidence of student engagement with the ideas of Foucault. First, therewas the pre-assessment in which students shared what came to mind when presented with theidea of “power” and “knowledge.” Second, the students completed a reflective essay on theFoucault reading they were assigned. Third, students
, Richard. Performance Studies: An Introduction. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 2002.14. Wenger, Etienne. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.15. National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington: The National Academy Press, 2004.16. Wertsch, James, V. Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Appproach to Mediated Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.17. Lave, J. & Wenger, Etienne. Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.18. Lave, J. “Situating learning in communities of practice.” In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, &
2006-928: A SOLID-STATE MATERIALS AND DEVICES COURSE FORSOPHOMORE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTSLihong (Heidi) Jiao, Grand Valley State University Lihong (Heidi) Jiao, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the Padnos College of Engineering and Computing at Grand Valley State University. She received her B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. from Nankai University, China and Ph.D in Electrical Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University. Her interests include semiconductor device fabrication, nanotechnologies and fiber optics. Page 11.120.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 An
2006-1337: IMPLEMENTATION OF A PROBLEM-FINDING ANDPROBLEM-SOLVING ORIENTED ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT COURSE IN ALARGE CLASSNobuyuki Kitashoji, Kanazawa Institute of Technology Dr.Eng., Assistant Professor Practical Engineering Education Program Nobuyuki Kitashoji is an assistant professor of the Division of Practical Engineering Education Program at the Kanazawa Institute of Technology in Japan. He has been engaged in the problem-finding and problem-solving oriented engineering experiment course since 1999, endeavoring to improve a learning environment and textbooks so that students will be able to flexibly apply an experiment to deal with problems in any field. He has experience in research in
2006-61: LEARNING FROM THE ENEMY: EDUCATIONAL METHODS OFPRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT COLLEGESPhillip Wankat, Purdue University Phil Wankat is the Clifton L. Lovell Distinguished Professor in Chemical Engineering and Engineering Education at Purdue University. He earned his BSChE from Purdue, his Ph.D. from Princeton University and an MSED from Purdue University. His technical research is in separation processes and he is interested in improving teaching and learning in engineering education. Page 11.874.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Learning From “The Enemy:” Educational Methods of
markets • ‘leading edge’ reputation in science, technology, ICT and businessWith these points in mind, the following two case examples of international engineering educationare described. In both cases, bilateral foci on educational quality, equivalence, transferability ofacademic credit, differences in academic culture and financial matters were all of high importance.However, the considerable and lengthy effort expended in the assurance and continuingmaintenance of these factors has not been described in this paper except where pertinent to theengineering educational theme.The SHU-TARC Articulation PartnershipThe Sheffield Hallam University, UK (SHU) - Tunku Abdul Rahman College, Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia (TARC) articulation partnership
engineering students and the number ofstudents involved was small. In the case of the SAE team from our university, it involved threestudents, one advisor, and a non student pilot. Recently it was reported in a local news paper thata professor in University of Dayton had introduced the concept of model plane building tofreshman engineering students1. But no further information was forthcoming. In the above cases, the time line for building and flying a plane ranged from 10 hours to months.Based on our course curriculum, it was decided that 4-5 hours per team could be allotted for thisproject. With this in mind, the criterion for this event was: • Building and flying the plane should be completed in less than 5 hours. • Every student on a team
fundamental concepts such as heat and temperature, all the learning in the class ispurely memorization, which does not lead to problem solving ability required by anengineer. Page 11.578.6References[1] National Research Council, Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics,Engineering, and Technology (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 1999).[2] Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J.,Lauffer, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S.M., Wood, W.B., "Scientific teaching." Science, 304(5670): 521-522(2004).[3] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience
undertaken with this in mind. Idaho State University may not be a good examplebecause of its small present size, but at our institution we do not cover many of the topicstaken up in the summer institute. These topics include nonproliferation, material controland accountancy, international norms of nuclear safety, nuclear law, transportation, andothers. Even where we do cover certain of these topics, the coverage is not extensive andgenerally not from an international perspective.However, even if one concedes that there is a need for WNU to fulfill a role in the globalmission of nuclear engineering education, the summer institute is only a first step. Tosucceed of course, WNU must go beyond the summer institute, and with the broadinvolvement of the
typically slide shows, structural drawings, skeletalmodels showing the framing scheme, plus any props required to convey the structural principalsbehind their designs to the reviewers. Students were required to keep the knowledge of theiraudience in mind, again reinforcing the concept of clear and concise communication and areminder to use simple terms to describe complex engineering principles. Three practicingengineers of with various structural expertise plus both instructors presided as the jury for thestudent presentations. Projects were reviewed for technical merit as well as architecturalsensitivity – how well was the architectural intent preserved. Most design solutions expressedthe structure to reinforce the architectural space so
2006-1656: EXPERIENCES WITH GROUP WORK AT THE UNIVERSITY OFMARYLANDAdel Shirmohammadi, University of Maryland-College Park Adel Shirmohammadi is Professor in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering at the University of Maryland. He joined the university in 1986 and is a Fellow of ASABE.Arthur Johnson, University of Maryland-College Park Arthur T. Johnson is Professor in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering at the University of Maryland. He came to the university in 1975, and is a Fellow of ASEE, AIMBE, BMES, AIHA, and ASABE. Page 11.617.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006
either replied “no”, or were undecided changed their minds afterseeing what they could achieve in 2 hours. Of special interest was the bridge building session asmost students enjoyed an environment of competition while learning how to build a strong trussstructure. This unique interaction involving design, production and structural construction wasseen to develop the student’s interest in the technical fields, and the interaction with facultyprovided them with further understanding of the needs in this important area. As a result of thisinteraction, program attendees are given the opportunity to develop an understanding of the goalsand needs within the technical professions of engineering and technology.References. 1. Illinois Department of
. He has specific program management experience in numerous arenas, from retail store rollout and low-income housing to large industrial and infrastructure projects. Stephen holds a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (Construction Engineering and Management) from the Georgia Institute of Technology, an M.S. in Civil Engineering (Construction Engineering and Project Management) from the University of Texas at Austin, and a B.S. in Architectural Engineering, also from the University of Texas at Austin. He is currently employed as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Technology at Texas State University in San Marcos, Texas
2006-142: THE PARALLEL CURRICULUM MODEL: UNDERSTANDINGENGINEERING EDUCATIONAL INNOVATIONS TO OPTIMIZE STUDENTLEARNINGYvonne Ng, College of St. Catherine Yvonne Ng, M.S.M.E., teaches computer science and engineering for non-majors at the College of St. Catherine. Educated as a mechanical and aerospace engineer, she worked in industry as an automation design engineer and contract programmer. She made computer science a more appealing topic for her all-women undergraduate student body by presenting this technically valuable course in a more comprehensive manner. She is currently working with the college’s AS and AAS program to create pathways for students to enter technical colleges and engineering
disciplines.The primary objective is to awaken the curiosity and interest of young minds to these excitingdisciplines and hopefully to inspire and provide them with the incentive to pursue studies inthese areas. “Proceedings of the 2006 Mid-Atlantic Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education” 5GraphicsFaraday Flashlight NO Battery NO Light Bulb Faraday Flashlight Illumination vs. Time 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 Foot-Candles 30.0
2006-2390: TRANSFORMING COLLEGE TEACHING COURSES INTOAUTHENTIC EXPERIENCES: LEARNING THROUGH DIVERSITYSandra Courter, University of Wisconsin-Madison Sandra Shaw Courter teaches technical communication courses in the College of Engineering. As director of the Engineering Learning Center, she also coordinates professional development experiences for graduate students, staff, and faculty. She has been involved with several NSF proposal. First, as a member of the management team for the NSF Center for Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), Courter is responsible with a multi-disciplinary team for developing and teaching a course for graduate students on teaching science and
2006-158: INTERACTIVE SYLLABUS AND BLOOM’S TAXONOMYMysore Narayanan, Miami University Page 11.811.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Interactive Syllabus and Bloom’s Taxonomy Mysore Narayanan, Miami University, Ohio.AbstractThe author is of the opinion that an effective assessment rubric based on theprinciples of Bloom’s Taxonomy can help the learning process by generating aconstructive dialogue between the instructor and the learner. The author alsofavors the development of a set of course material content that includes aninteractive syllabus, as opposed to a traditional syllabus. Such a system has beensuggested by Clifford O. Young Sr
2006-1042: DEVELOPING AN ENGINEERING EDUCATION RESEARCHCOMMUNITY OF PRACTICE THROUGH A STRUCTURED WORKSHOPCURRICULUMMaura Borrego, Virginia Tech MAURA BORREGO is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Dr. Borrego holds an M.S. and Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University. Her current research interests center around interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering education, including studies of the collaborative relationships between engineers and education researchers and how engineering faculty learn educational research methods.Ruth Streveler, Colorado School of Mines RUTH A. STREVELER is the Director of the Center for Engineering Education
2006-631: A GLOBAL COLLABORATION TO TEACH GLOBAL PRODUCTDEVELOPMENT: FACULTY PERSPECTIVESJongwon Kim, Seoul National UniversityDong Mok Kim, Seoul National UniversityStefano Consiglio, Technical University of BerlinSemih Severengiz, Technical University of BerlinGuenther Seliger, Technical University of BerlinLalit Patil, University of MichiganDebasish Dutta, University of Michigan Page 11.46.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Global Collaboration to Teach Global Product Development: Faculty perspectives1 IntroductionIn this age of globalization and diversification, it is important that our engineering studentsunderstand how to
plane,” Produced by WGBH Boston, (2003).19. Macaulay, David, The New Way Things Work, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1998.20. Fountain, H., editor, The New York Times Circuits: how electronic things work, New York : St. Martin's Press, New York, 2001.21. Brain, Marshall, editor, How Stuff Works, Hungry Minds Press, New York, 2001.22. How Stuff Works Website, HSW Media Network, http://www.howstuffworks.com/.23. Byars, N.A., “Technology Literacy Classes: The State of the Art,” J. Engineering Education, Jan. 1998, pp. 53-61.24. Ollis, D. “Installing a Technology Literacy Course: Trials and Tribulations”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, June, 2004, UT.25