AC 2011-1047: WORK-IN-PROGRESS: COLLABORATIVE AND REFLEC-TIVE LEARNING IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMSNeelam Soundarajan, Ohio State University Dr. Soundarajan is a faculty member in the Computer Sc. & Eng. Dept. at Ohio State. His interests include topics in Software Engineering and Engineering Education. Page 22.1700.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Work-in-Progress: Collaborative and Reflective Learning in Engineering ProgramsAbstractThe importance of well developed team-working skills as well as reflective or metacognitive skillsamong engineering
use of texts and reference materials(Bhaskar & Simon, 1977; Jonassen, Strobel, & Lee, 2006). The purpose of the presentdescriptive and correlational study is to begin to document that behavior by explicitly examiningstudents’ use of text materials when problem solving. Problem solving, whether by students or professionals in the field, often requires multipleskill sets. With this mind, consider the two following engineering problems: (1) A cylindrical rod of single crystal nickel with a radius of 2 cm yields when a tensile force of 17.47 kN is applied along its length. This force is being applied in the [001] direction. Slip occurs on the (111) plane in the [ 01] direction. What is the critical resolved
Page 22.263.11from American Society of Engineering Education: http://www.asee.org/member-resources/groups/divisionsAstin, A. W., Vogelgesang, L. J., Misa, K., Anderson, J., Denson, N., Jayakumar, U., et al. (2006). Understandingthe effects of service-learning: A study of students and faculty. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education ResearchInstitute at UCLA.Astin, A., Vogelgesang, L., Ikeda, E., & Yee, J. (2000). How service learning affects students. UCLA. LA: HigherEducation Research Institute.Beering, S. C. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators. Arlington, VA: National Science Board.Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1997). Women's ways of knowing: Thedevelopment of self, voice and mind
AC 2011-2471: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CHALLENGE-BASED INSTRUCTION IN ENGINEERING GRAPHICSSeokyoung Ahn, University of Texas - Pan American Dr. Seokyoung Ahn is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Derpartment at the Univer- sity of Texas - Pan American (UTPA), in Edinburg, TX. His current research interests are in the areas of biomedical application of powder injection molding, nonlinear filtering algorithm, model-based nonlinear control, and engineering education.Robert A. Freeman, University of Texas, Pan American Dr. Robert A. Freeman has been on the faculty of The University of Texas System for over 25 years and is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Mechanical
AC 2011-417: IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENT OF CASE STUD-IES IN A FRESHMAN ENGINEERING PROGRAMJames E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom.Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Ralston is currently professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals and an As- sociate in the Chemical Engineering Department at the University of Louisville. As
AC 2011-2394: IMPLEMENTATION OF DIFFERENTIATED ACTIVE-CONSTRUCTIVEINTERACTIVE ACTIVITIES IN AN ENGINEERING CLASSROOMMuhsin Menekse, Arizona State University Muhsin Menekse is pursuing a doctoral degree (PhD) in the Science Education program at Arizona State University concurrently with a MA degree in Measurement, Statistics and Methodological Studies. He had research experiences in the areas of conceptual change of nave ideas about science, argumentation in computer supported learning environments, and video game design to support students’ understanding of Newtonian mechanics. Muhsin is currently working under the supervision of Dr. Michelene Chi to develop and implement a classroom-based methodology with
AC 2011-2149: INTERSECTING CULTURAL IMAGES: TRANSFORMA-TIVE GLOBAL RESEARCH EXPERIENCES FOR UNDERREPRESENTEDENGINEERING STUDENTSYating Chang, Purdue University, West Lafayette Chang started her professional career as the Study Abroad Director at Western Kentucky University from 2001-2006, where she drove a 3X increase in overseas educational experiences, working with a predom- inately local/in-state student population that does not have a natural inclination for study abroad (many being the first in their family to attend college). This work experience has become her focus and engage- ment of under-represented population in Education Abroad, focusing on students in science and engineer- ing disciplines. Her main
AC 2011-231: DETERMINING IMPACT OF A COURSE ON TEACHINGIN ENGINEERINGRobert J. Gustafson, Ohio State University Robert J. Gustafson, P.E., PhD, is Honda Professor for Engineering Education and Director of the Engi- neering Education Innovation Center in the College of Engineering and a Professor of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering at The Ohio State University. He has previously served at Ohio State as As- sociate Dean for Undergraduate Education and Student Services (1999-2008) and Department Chair of Food Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department (1987-1999). After being awarded his PhD. Degree from Michigan State in 1974, he joined the faculty of the Agricultural Engineering Department at
AC 2011-585: DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION AND ACTIVE LEARN-ING ENVIRONMENTSJohn Marshall, University of Southern Maine John Marshall received his Ph.D. from Texas A&M University and is the Departmental Internship Co- ordinator at the University of Southern Maine. His areas of specialization include Power and Energy Processing, Applied Process Control Engineering, Automation, Fluid Power, and Facility Planning. Page 22.500.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Differentiated Instruction and Active Learning EnvironmentsThe
words that they are citizens of the world as well as citizens of a particular country. An ability to exhibit a global mindset includes an understanding and avoidance of ethnocentrism, the idea that one’s own culture is superior to all other cultures. An ability to exhibit a global mindset is a state of mind that provides a positive disposition to be successful in a global environment8, 17, 25, 26, 27. Engineers who exhibit a global mindset are “able to place technology in a global context, recognize the multidisciplinary and multicultural approaches to problem solving…and achieve a greater understanding of diversity”6. Each engineer should also comprehend the international dimensions of his/her major field of study28
AC 2011-2091: EXPLODING PIPELINES: MYTHOLOGICAL METAPHORSSTRUCTURING DIVERSITY-ORIENTED ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRESEARCH AGENDASAlice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Alice L. Pawley is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a Ph.D. minor in Women’s Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is Co-PI and Research Director of Purdue University’s ADVANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist
22.742.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Generalizing the Particular:Rethinking the Role of the Case Study in Building Technology Courses Page 22.742.2 In many ways my argument is best made as a tale of two textbooks (and for this audience Iwill assume well-known textbooks) in the development of two different building systemscourses that were started in a nine lecture-hours per week trial by fire in the summer of 2003.The first text is Norbert Lechner’s Heating, Cooling, Lighting (HCL), at last now moreconfidently subtitled in its third edition, Sustainable Design Methods for Architects.1 Secondwe have the quintessential all-systems tome, Mechanical and
work, but it was this experience and it is further design experience that I will have as an engineer that will help me understand that you have to incorporate all these other factors into my design.Andrew also discussed how the experiences of having his solutions rejected helped him learn theimportance of starting with the humans in mind. I’ve had…complete ideas scrapped because they didn’t meet the end goal. And so it’s kind of like working jointly, and I think from my experiences, in order for it to be successful, an in-depth knowledge of your user has to come first so that you can make sure you’re designing to their specifications. But as I’ve learned and had different solutions rejected, I’ve
as a time series requires that certain limitation be kept in mind. Over time,there are changes in occupational classifications – for example, in 1997 and 1998 electrical andelectronic engineers were considered a single sub discipline, but in 1999 and thereafter they weretreated separately. The surveys designed to collect employment data may be treated differentlyby employers, who may classify employees in the same occupation differently. Finally, the OESdata are collected as averages across time periods, a methodology that may not reveal suddenchanges very quickly. The Bureau of Labor Statistics acknowledges the limitations of the data inthe OES, and suggests that conclusions drawn from survey data be viewed with caution. With
AC 2011-2210: DEVELOPMENT OF EDGD WEBSITE AUTOMATED LEARN-ING AND ASSESSMENT RESOURCESAmanda Varricchio, Daniel Webster College Amanda Varricchio is a recent graduate of Daniel Webster College with a Bachelor’s Degree in mechanical engineering. She was honored for her academic achievement by being named to the Presidents List and has severed as captain of the softball team for the past two seasons. She is currently employed by Pratt & Whitney Aircraft as an associate test engineer.Theodore J. Branoff, North Carolina State University Dr. Branoff is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mathematics, Science and Technology Edu- cation at North Carolina State University. A member of ASEE since 1987, he has
targetcourse, and John Leonard analyses student data for the College of Engineering; WendyNewstetter and Sneha Veerdagoudar Harrell do research in cognition and learning; andJanet Murray, the project manager, is a professor of digital media. Most of the studentswho have worked on the project, including Calvin Ashmore, the lead programmer andsystem designer, have been drawn from Georgia Tech’s graduate program in DigitalMedia.MaterialsInTEL Toolkit.The InTEL software was developed to support students’ capacity to learn the process ofstatics problem solving and develop more expert like habits of mind (Nasir, XXXX) overthe course of the semester. The problems developed within the toolkit reflect the GeorgiaInstitute of Technology Statics course syllabus
AC 2011-875: LESSONS MISSED: WHERE IS THE LEARNING ABOUTTEACHING IN STUDY ABROAD?David Jan Cowan, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. Cowan is the Director of and an Associate Professor in the Architectural Technology Program within the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). He teaches courses in residential and commercial construction, facilities management, building systems and interior design. His research interests lie in the areas of disaster reconstruction, BIM (Build- ing Information Modeling), visualization, sustainable community and construction practices, international service learning and energy simulation. He is a
that engineers and designers address may alsorequire a wide variety of design approaches.However, students and educators may benefit from acknowledging and exploring some of thesedifferent conceptions in order to have a better appreciation for what an engineering mindsetlooks like, particularly when collaborating with multiple disciplines who may have differentideas of what a design process should look like.As educators of human-centered design, it is also important for us to consider what makes ahuman-centered approach different from other approaches, to draw contrasts and bettercommunicate the approach to students. Sanders5,6 describes user-centered designers as “us(ing)research-led approaches with an expert mind-set to collect, analyze, and
AC 2011-1543: DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS IN INTRODUCTION TO THER-MODYNAMICS COURSETeodora Rutar, Seattle University Teodora Rutar Shuman is a Paccar Associate Professor at Seattle University, Department of Mechanical Engineering. She received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Belgrade University, Yugoslavia, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Washington. She pursues research in electro-mechanical systems for sustainable processing of microalgae. email: teodora@seattleu.eduGregory Mason, Seattle University Page 22.434.1 c American Society for Engineering
AC 2011-315: MODAL ENGAGEMENTS IN PRECOLLEGE ENGINEER-ING: TRACKING MATH AND SCIENCE CONCEPTS ACROSS SYMBOLS,SKETCHES, SOFTWARE, SILICONE AND WOODMitchell J. Nathan, University of Wisconsin-Madison Mitchell J. Nathan, BSEE, PhD, is professor of Educational Psychology, with affiliate appointments in Curriculum & Instruction and Psychology at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, and a faculty fel- low at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research (WCER) and the Center on Education and Work. Dr. Nathan studies the cognitive, embodied, and social processes involved in STEM reasoning, learn- ing and teaching, especially in mathematics and engineering classrooms and in laboratory settings, using both quantitative
AC 2011-193: CULTIVATING INNOVATIVE TALENTS OF MINERAL PRO-CESSING ENGINEERING BASED ON THE ADVANTAGE OF NATIONALKEY DISCIPLINEYUEMIN ZHAO, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining & Technology,Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116 Yue-Min Zhao (1961 -), male, Ph.D., Professor, Vice-President of China University of Mining and Tech- nology . Page 22.407.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Cultivating Innovative Talents of Mineral Processing Engineering Based on the Advantage of National Key Discipline Yuemin Zhao, Youjun Tao
AC 2011-1282: REDESIGN OF FRESHMAN ELECTRICAL ENGINEER-ING COURSES FOR IMPROVED MOTIVATION AND EARLY INTRO-DUCTION OF DESIGNPhillip Wong, Portland State University, ECE Department Phillip Wong received his M.S. degree in electrical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. He is an adjunct instructor and Lab Coordinator for the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Portland State University.Melinda Holtzman, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Portland State University Melinda Holtzman received her PhD from the University of Nevada, Reno. She is a Senior Instructor in the ECE department at PSU.Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University, ECE department Branimir Pejcinovic received his
turningand twisting, knows exactly where the water is; and a stunt pilot knowing where the ground isduring his maneuvers. The concept inventory will be examining the spatial visualization branchof the hierarchy only, as identified by the asterisk.The ability to visualize objects and situations in one’s mind, and to manipulate those images, is acognitive skill vital to many career fields, especially those requiring work with graphical images.By one estimate, there are at least 84 different careers for which spatial skills play an importantrole [12]. Spatial ability is an essential skill for Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM) fields. Spatial abilities have been widely studied and are known to befundamental to higher-level thinking
AC 2011-2287: HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AS NOVICE DESIGNERSNathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nathan Mentzer is an assistant profession in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Kyungsuk Park, Utah State University
for which they are training, they should be able to get credit for their coop education without having to pay the tuition fees. The university's contribution in this situation is nil. ● The interaction of materials and processes to develop new technologies and products. Page 22.1426.15 ● The benefits achieved through the various semester projects in other engineering classes was invaluable to my experience as an engineer. The position I fell into as a co-op completely changed my mind, in a positive way, towards finding what exactly I wanted to be doing
, social, and mathematical phenomena.Engineering: Ability to keep in mind parameters of the project while creating aUnderstanding solution.ConstraintsEngineering: Generate an idea for testing based on knowledge of what might workCreating (from math or physics, for example, or even other things that exist - aHypotheses bridge in your neighborhood, something found in nature or even experience).Engineering: Figure out what must be done at certain time points in order to meet aProject deadline.ManagementEngineering: Use Use of computer aided tools for creating and modeling the project.of Software forDesign
architecture from the University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee and University of Washington. Van Den Wymelenberg opened the IDL-Boise in 2004 for the University of Idaho and has successfully secured/completed grants for the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance, United States Environment Protection Agency, Idaho Power Company, the Lighting Research Center, and the New Buildings Institute. As part of the Pacific Northwest Integrated Design Lab Network Van Den Wymelenberg has consulted on over 450 new construction and major renovation projects with architects and engineers regarding daylight and energy in buildings since 2000.Ery Djunaedy, University of Idaho Integrated Design Lab - Boise Ery Djunaedy, PhD is a Research Scientist
authorscontacted the office of International Science and Engineering (OISE) at NSF. The OISE supportsprograms to expand and enhance leading edge international research and education opportunitiesfor U.S. scientists and engineers, especially at the early career stage. It specifically works to build Page 22.1264.3and strengthen effective institutional partnerships throughout the global science and engineeringresearch and education community, and it supports international collaborations in NSF's nationalpriority research areas 1.While keeping this objective in mind, a proposal was submitted to NSF office of InternationalScience and Engineering for holding
pedagogyin all of my teaching. Maybe I can create a bit of anti-entropy. I encourage others among us toalso consider the idea. 1 National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenges of Engineering, http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/2 Tobin Hart, Opening the Contemplative Mind in the Classroom, Journal of Transformative Education Vol. 2 No. 1,January 20043 Arthur Zajonc, “Contemplative and Transformative Pedagogy,” Kosmo Journal, Vol. V, No.1, Fall/Winter 20064 Jon Kabatt Zinn, “Education as if It Really Mattered: The Unification of Knowing through ContemplativePractice”, Conference on Contemplative Practices and Education: Making Peace in Ourselves and in the World,Teachers College
Concepts – “Open the mind”In engineering disciplines, the students’ ability to comprehend engineering principles cansuccessfully be obtained by manually solving a series of multiple engineering problems ofprogressive difficulty as most engineering textbooks are formatted. The results of thismathematical approach in engineering education seem to be straightforward, maybe evenobvious.In architectural programs, however, this most effective teaching methodology of structuralengineering principles seems to need some additional pedagogical consideration or “treats” tomake the students more attracted, motivated and remain focused. To wake up the architecturalstudents out of the inactive mode in structures courses, the gap between the two