member of ASEE for over 30 years, Dr. John K. Estell was elected in 2016 as a Fellow of ASEE in recognition of the breadth, richness, and quality of his contributions to the betterment of engineering education. Estell currently serves as chair of ASEE’s IT Committee; he previously served on the ASEE Board of Directors as the Vice President of Professional Interest Councils and as the Chair of Professional Interest Council III. He has held multiple ASEE leadership positions within the First-Year Programs (FPD) and Computers in Education (CoED) divisions, and with the Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation, Interdivisional Town Hall Planning Committee, ASEE Active, and the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and
research projects designed to increase women’s participation in post-secondary com- puting programs. This includes working with faculty and staff from a variety of collegiate computing ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #36431 programs to facilitate their local implementation of evidence-based recruitment and retention strategies and translating these successes into resources accessible to post-secondary computing programs on a na- tionwide scale. She also engages in project management and strategic planning for the Extension Services Program. Prior to joining NCWIT, Jamie
Maryland, and Penn State [1]. Kansas Universityoffers a professional short course for helicopters. Purdue University and Arizona State haveoffered a helicopter course as recently as 2012. These institutions have developed plans of studyto support a complex subject such as helicopter aerodynamics.It is expected to offer the course to undergraduates who have fulfilled key mechanical andaerospace prerequisites. The prerequisites include: introduction to kinematics, machineelements, introduction to dynamic systems and controls, introduction to fluid mechanics, andintroduction to aerodynamics. These prerequisites have their own prerequisites, such as physics,calculus, and mechanics of solids. These subjects will have introduced the concepts
planning and product design.Based on this review, we developed our survey as follows: • The existing surveys primarily targeted CXOs. Our survey targeted plant technical managers. As the focus of our project is on Industry 4.0 tools and technologies, we anticipate that we can learn more about what is happening on the plant floor if we gather data where “the rubber meets the road.” • In surveying managers about the technologies they are using, we followed Frank et al’s conceptual framework, which provides a useful taxonomy of Industry 4.0 technologies. However, Frank et al.’s sample consisted of Brazilian companies in construction and machinery which may be more traditional and less high-tech than U.S
Center for Neurotechnology has beenoperating since 2012 with summer cohorts ranging in size from two to seven teachers. Theprogram accepts middle and high school STEM teachers (grades six through twelve) from localpublic and independent schools. Most often, science teachers apply to the program from life andphysical sciences disciplines, but several teachers representing computer science andmathematics disciplines have also participated. Teachers receive a stipend for participation in theseven-week program. For additional details on program design, see [17]. Note that the RETprogram in 2020 and the planned program for 2021 have been adapted to be a fully remoteexperience given the constraints imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.The RET program
sustainability programs in eachcountry and by comparing sustainability efforts in developed countries with those in adeveloping country. Of primary importance throughout each program was providing the studentsone-on-one interactions with researchers in each country and allowing them to continue thoserelationships as they completed research projects back in the U.S.This paper reviews the process of establishing and developing an international research programand the key elements needed to make it successful. It then discusses the actual researchexperiences in our program, the work products developed, and the benefits realized by thestudents. The key topics discussed include program planning, logistics, program execution,assessment, and lessons
tostrengthen instructors' skills through intensive and practical exercises in learning-centeredteaching. Mixing opportunities for small and large group interaction, the ISW program engagesparticipants in: ● planning and delivering 10-minute lessons ● developing participatory instructional techniques ● listening actively ● learning and teaching collaboratively ● modelling adult learning principles ● generating effective feedback and discussionThe ISW was first developed in British Columbia, Canada in 1979 as a response to requests forprofessional development programming for instructors of the newly created colleges. The ISWhas since grown and expanded across Canada as well as into the United States and many othercountries
, 2016 A Case for Incorporating Preconstruction Cost Estimating in Construction Engineering and Management ProgramsThe need to effectively manage costs during the construction phase of a project to meet budgetconstraints is widely understood by both practitioners and academics. Most, if not all,Construction Engineering and Management undergraduate and graduate programs require thatstudents complete construction cost estimating courses as part of their core curriculum.However, the value of estimating the owner’s planning, design, and procurement costs during thepreconstruction period is not typically included in the Construction Engineering andManagement curriculum. Preconstruction costs are usually defined as all work required
tenure at ETSU, he has authored several papers, taught numerous courses, and presented at professional meetings. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Graduate Program Review and Lessons Learned Mohammad Moin Uddin and Keith Johnson East Tennessee State UniversityAbstractThe Department of Engineering, Engineering Technology and Surveying at East Tennessee StateUniversity offers a graduate program – MS in Engineering Technology. The program has twoconcentrations – Engineering Technology and Entrepreneurial Leadership. The EngineeringTechnology concentration is for students who plan to become, or are now, involved insupervising or
and how they need to frame their academic problem, ask for help, evaluateoptions, and decide for their academic path project.The authors identified two important courses to intervene: UNIV 1301 Learning Frameworksand MECE 1101 Intro to Mechanical Engineering. These two courses teach a variety ofimportant topics, and both traditionally had project elements of technical innovation (MECE1101) and career path planning (UNIV 1301) that required to be formalized into proper projects.For this purpose, the Challenge Based Instruction (CBI) approach (Fuentes et al., 2008;Bransford et al., 1999; Freeman et al., 2016) was chosen to guide the steps of the parallelprojects. CBI promotes engagement when properly implemented, and this is critical
and retain women in thecomputing fields. In July 2017, the National Science Foundation (NSF) Directorate for Computerand Information Science and Engineering (CISE) began a pilot effort for broadeningparticipation in computing (BPC) to encourage department level engagement. In 2019, theComputing Research Association (CRA), with the support of CISE, initiated the BPCnetResource Portal (BPCnet.org) to support computing departments in the process of developingdepartment BPC plans. This paper describes the efforts of the Department of Computer Scienceand Engineering at the University of South Florida to develop a BPC plan and implement effortstowards increasing the percentage of women enrolled in, and graduating from, our fourundergraduate
students from underrepresented groups (URGs) at community collegeswho have the opportunity to transfer to engineering programs. We are specifically investigatinghow their experiences in community college influence their plans for future education andcareers. While the diversity of 4-year universities has remained stagnant, the diversity ofcommunity college student populations is actually increasing. Therefore, community collegesrepresent a potential source of talent for future engineers from diverse backgrounds. We arecurrently in the first year of data collection where we have piloted the study at one of the datacollection sites. Five students from traditionally underrepresented groups in engineering havebeen interviewed. We use a narrative
existing Director of the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ODEI)also directly supports this role. The SEAS Diversity Liaisons committee meets monthly withboth the Associate Dean for DEI and the Director of the ODEI to exchange information, sharebest practices, and assess and plan events, policies, and action. Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, andAccess together are one of three major priorities of the new strategic plan SEAS has formed [7].Current SEAS-wide efforts include establishing new faculty training on DEI issues, new supportmechanisms for students, and creating feedback/incentive/assessment mechanisms for faculty onDEI issues. Part of this is a SEAS-wide effort to ensure diversity in the portraits displayedthroughout the SEAS complex
State University. QMRA III is a one-and-a-half-week training program designed for advanced graduate students, post-doctoral fellows and earlycareer professionals to assimilate scientific data and implement computer programs towardsbuilding a risk assessment for assuring safety and health goals. Each cohort of QMRA IIIconsists of engineering, biological and social scientists with the goal of cross training. As part ofthe evaluation plan of the program, students were asked to construct a box-and-arrow diagramconveying a risk management plan involving the full range of biologic, economic, social,political, and cultural factors that impact risk during a pathogen exposure. Additionally, experts,professors and career professionals who were also the
ISO 9000 standards, evolution andimportance of ISO 9000 standards, the basic structure of ISO 9000, and the seven qualitymanagement principles that the ISO 9000 series are based on. At the completion of this learningmodule, students should be able to (a) describe what ISO 9000 series standards are and why it isimportant in both industries and service sectors; (b) describe the differences of the ISO 90001987, 1994, 2000, 2008, and 2015 versions and the key changes and the content structure of ISO9000:2015; and (c) understand and discuss the seven quality management principles and howthey are related to ISO 9000.2) Mid-level: This module will cover the major sections of ISO 9001:2015 including context ofthe organization, leadership, planning
students. Among the 12 participants (ten in-service teachers and two pre-serviceteachers), 11 were from under-represented groups (92%), and five were female (42%). Duringthe training period, the teachers took part in capsulated technical sessions (metrology,conventional machining, computer aided drafting/machining, and additive manufacturing),complementary lab practice, field tours, research seminars, and guided research projects. Thedeliverables from the program included an implementation lesson/lab plan, as well asdissemination of newly acquired knowledge at an annual teacher summit. The participants alsosummarized their studies and shared their posters with other research students, teachers fromdifferent RET, and REU programs on campus
recruitmore female students to the STEM fields by showing them the emerging and multidisciplinaryaspects.Our collaboration with the local high school started in Fall 2014 by offering their students a year-long robotics workshop. Our objective is to utilize the robotics workshop to introduce STEMconcepts to high school students, and encourage them to be interested in an engineering andscience career. A sequence of workshop topics were given to introduce the fundamentals ofrobotics science and the basic components of a robotics system, including hardware, software,programming, sensors, and control. The students would gain intensive experience working withthe robots. In addition to introducing the fundamentals, we planned to prepare the students withthe
planning based on the analysis. The second prong focused onrecruitment and hiring practices at OU with training for all search and departmentchairs, implicit bias training for Deans, and the dissemination of family-friendlyinformation. The third prong of the project involved faculty retention and professionaldevelopment initiatives including new faculty orientation, a mentoring program, andprofessional development workshops. The fourth and final prong of the proposalincluded initiatives surrounding dissemination, especially to the region’s 4-year and 2-year institutions.The WISE@OU program was housed with the Dean’s office of College of Arts andSciences, and worked closely with the School of Engineering and Computer Science.In 2016, after a no
particular in support of the data-driven and self-driven management of large-scale deployments of IoT and smart city infrastruc- ture and services, Wireless Vehicular Networks (VANETs), cooperation and spectrum access etiquette in cognitive radio networks, and management and planning of software defined networks (SDN). He is an ABET Program Evaluator (PEV) with the Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC). He served on many academic program design, review and planning efforts. He serves on editorial boards of multiple journals including IEEE Communications Letter and IEEE Network Magazine. He also served as chair, co-chair, and technical program committee member of multiple international conferences including IEEE VTC
paper describes a recently awarded project comprising the design andimplementation of a Sustainability Engineering (SE) Minor at UPRM. We propose a posterpresentation to discuss our SE Minor plan and collect data about people’s perceptions ofsustainability in engineering.1. IntroductionAddressing "Sustainability" is an overarching challenge for the 21st century, requiring engineersto play a critical role. In the US, undergraduate degree programs that directly attend tosustainability are of two types: (1) interdisciplinary programs that do not grant engineering degreesand (2) environmental engineering programs that are vital but do not entirely address the holisticnotion of sustainability. However, based on our reading of "Strengthening
● Eight hours of office hours were provided. Prospective applicants could bring questions, come to just listen, or bring draft proposals for feedback ● The majority of awarded projects were to those who attended office hours (some of them came several times) ● Office hours were both on-campus or on Zoom, with one evening option ● For those who could not attend office hours, 1:1 meetings were offeredProposal Template1. Project Lead: Name, role (undergraduate student, graduate student, postdoc, staff), department2. Project Personnel: Name, role (undergraduate student, graduate student, postdoc, staff, faculty), department for each person3. Brief Description and Implementation Plan: Include
mechanical engineering students andthree business students. Early project work (year one and two) has been documented in previouspublications [1 – 3]. Reference [2] presents a detailed summary of work completed for years oneand two. This work included design and prototyping of various column guards, the design andfabrication of an impact tester, stiffness testing and benchmark testing. The current paperpresents the final phase of the project which involved a group of four mechanical engineeringstudents collaborating with a group of three business students. The engineering students wereresponsible for the final design and test validation while the business students focused on themarketing and business plan as well as customer interaction. The groups
lectures & those learnt from previous courses, especially from math courses. 3. Visualize solutions, Discuss the solution steps, alternative approaches, expected results, results & evaluation plan and evaluation plan. Using flow diagram, sketches, etc. are strongly encouraged. Reflect on the plan before proceed (break point #1). 4. Solve the problem Follow the planned solution steps. Do not skip steps! 5. Evaluate the results Follow the evaluation plan. Discuss the results with others (breakpoint #2). Re-visit the goal and constraints if necessary 6. Report methods & Write down detailed step-by-step solution following the
Penn State’s 2016-2020 University-wide Strategic Plan clearly highlightsdiversity as one of its core foundations, the College of Engineering 2020-2025 Strategic Planreaffirmed and clarified this commitment by making one of its unit objectives the integration ofethics, inclusivity, and sustainability into undergraduate programs throughout the college. In theAerospace Engineering Department, senior undergraduate capstone courses offer idealconditions for exploring Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) issues since these classes areteam-based experiential learning environments intended to mirror the engineering workplace.While Penn State’s year-long Aerospace Engineering capstone courses have historically includeda unit on DEI presented at the
importance of lessening thebarrier of location and socioeconomics is important to continue to provide equal opportunity inSTEM.Educational System:Informal learning environments serve as supplemental classrooms for students across the globe.The types of supplemental programs have a diversity in focus interest and demographics. Thecontent is generally more applied and practically focused. The types of program directlyinfluence interest in STEM careers and boost self-efficacy in STEM based content. [4]The classroom education system has a curriculum dictated by state and federal educationalstandards such as Common Core. This leaves less time and flexibility to teach subjects outside ofthe planned semester. While students learn STEM in the classroom
learning objectivesand activities associated with an entrepreneurial mindset were previously described in [8].Throughout a capstone project, students must collaborate with diverse individuals in a teamenvironment, which makes it also an important venue for teaching and assessing teamwork. Themost recent ABET criteria for engineering programs explains that a team “consists of more thanone person working toward a common goal and should include individuals of diversebackgrounds, skills, or perspectives” [9]. The Student Outcome 5 states that students will have“an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create acollaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” [9
qualified studentsfrom historically underrepresented groups pursuing engineering degrees. MEP also provides afoundational support system and programs that encourage students to find solutions to technicaland social challenges. In addition, the college has had an active Women in Engineering, or WiE,program since 2011. Both programs have focused on foundational support systems and events.They have been highly successful at increasing retention and graduation rates of underrepresentedstudents. The percentage of women and underrepresented minorities has increased. However, therehad also been a lack of broader cultural change in the college. Based on this context andprecipitating events, a Diversity and Inclusion Town Hall was planned for the College
includingbiomechanics, rehabilitation engineering, bionanomaterials and biomedical imaging, the firstyear of the Bioengineering Experience for Science Teachers (BEST) Program provided in-depthparticipant-tailored curricular mentoring via weekly workshops that focused on principles ofeffective planning, instruction, and assessment which will be directly connected to teachers’classroom curriculum. In addition to exposure to research in bioengineering labs, City PublicHigh School teachers from diverse schools across the district also translated their experience intocurriculum unit lesson plans being implemented the following academic year. 1. IntroductionIt has been well established that there is a shortage of STEM professionals [1]. While there are anumber of
students “work as an engineer,” the courseinstructors took a backward design approach to redesign this course. First, learning outcomesfor the course were redefined to highlight problem-solving skills, which are essentialoutcomes according to the ABET criteria. Second, a comprehensive assessment plan wascreated to measure student progress in each of the learning outcomes. Rubrics-based gradingfocuses on assessing five dimensions of student work: the solution’s efficacy, quality oftechnical writing, oral communication, completion of prototypes, and testing plans and results.Finally, the newly developed learning outcomes and assessment plan were aligned withlearning activities in the course, including design, prototyping, testing, as well as
of our engineeringcollege’s plan for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), we submitted brainstormed ideas forimplementation to our dean’s office. And third, after reviewing reports from student focusgroups conducted in 2020/21, we evaluated progress and made recommendations for next steps;in this context the clarity and urgency of the student feedback is both motivational and difficultto ignore. The common theme in each of three elements is seeking to bridge the valley of neglectthat so often divides scholarly work about DEI from concrete changes that benefit students,employers, and the broader community.IntroductionTo broaden participation, the United States needs to engage the “missing millions” [1] ofAmericans who are currently