subsequently apply this knowledge to write a detailed researchreport and create a business plan to commercialize their research. At the end of the summer, thestudents compete in the EngiPreneurship (engineering entrepreneurship) competition where theypresent their business plans to seasoned judges from JMI, the Office of Intellectual Property andCommercialization, Domi Station, and Tallahassee professionals. At the start and end of theprogram, students rank their ability and motivation to pursue careers in STEM disciplines andare ranked by their graduate student mentors. The combined foci of research, development, andentrepreneurship have shown to increase student engagement.IntroductionThe Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st
objectives and an assignment for participants. There were also 5 sessionsduring Fall 2013. Breakout groups within each session promoted interactions among subsets ofthe participants; these were critical for encouraging broad participation, with each breakoutgroup reporting back to the full VCP afterward. Pre-planned topics included (1) Introduction tothe Circuits VCP, (2) Overview of Research-based Instructional Approaches, (3) LearningObjectives and Bloom’s Taxonomy, (4) Student Motivation, (5) Teams, and (6) & (7) Makingthe Classroom More Interactive. The topics for sessions (8) and (9) were developed by our VCPcommunity during preceding weeks: (8) Simulation and Hands-On Learning, Assessing Impact;(9) Great Ideas that Flopped. In addition to
provide participants a meaningful research experience and enrichment activities to increase thelikelihood that participants will attend graduate school in engineering/science. This model targetsthree cohorts from which data is collected. Each data source provides unique information thatcontributes to a comprehensive analysis of the impact and experiences of program participantsand to an understanding of the academic trends of all SURE program applicants. The pre- andpost-program surveys, focus group session and interviews with participants include a series ofquestions about students’ research interests, and participants’ perceived impact of SURE onresearch skills and planned graduate school attendance. The faculty advisor survey includesquestions
Lecturer and Research Consoritum REEFE participants with Sending and Receiving Schools Assistant Professor at Coordinator ● Planning consortium activities, including introduction meeting UTK (PI) and MACH training throughout experience ● Main contact for program evaluation ● Overseeing GA for program responsibilities ● Responsible for pursuing sustainability plan of program The REEFE Research Coordinator is responsible for the overall coordination of all
ECEN planning California State 4 University, Los CA Male Hispanic 2020 ISEN Angeles Texas A&M ISEN, 5 TX Female Asian 2019 University ECEN Texas A&M Black/ Prognostic 6 University-Corpus TX Male African 2020 ISEN and Process
address whether they were satisfied with their scores on the second exam and to list strategiesthey had used to prepare for the exam that they considered “effective.” As in Journal 2, we askedwhich specific strategies they employ when not comprehending a concept or idea and whichspecific strategies they planned to draw on for preparing for the third exam. In addition, studentswere asked to explain how, if at all, they had applied what they learned from our interventions(the class workshop and materials on metacognitive and study skill practice), and to explain theiranswers. Finally, students were asked to list strategies that they had learned from ourinterventions that they intended on using in future semesters. Responses to journal prompts
, Florida to pursue a master’s degree in the Construction Management program at Florida International University. During her Master’s program, she worked as a Graduate Research Assistant at Moss School of Construction Management, researching var- ious topics related to sustainability in third world countries, robotic implementation in the construction industry and aiding STEM majors to improve their professional skills.Prof. Shahin Vassigh, Florida International University Shahin has a Master of Architecture, Master of Urban Planning and Bachelors of Science in Civil En- gineering from University at Buffalo, the State University of New York. She is currently an Associate Professor at the Department of Architecture at
academic advisor toenroll. Through the class assignments, the students are asked to do items that are helpful for theirsuccess as an engineering student. The purposes of the class are to: Graduate the student in engineering, Develop the student professionally with subjects not taught in the classroom, and Send the graduated student directly to graduate school full-time.The class is built on the “Guaranteed 4.0 Plan” by Donna O. Johnson.5 This system has anexcellent time management plan and teaches the students “how to learn” and how to earn andmaintain a straight “A” average. Other topics include: resumes, elevator speeches, how to work acareer fair, portfolios, the 4+1 plan, graduate school, research, career plans for 10 years
program was awarded to WCU in January 2022. It isvalued at $1,495,416. The program is expected to provide scholarships and project funding tothirty-six students over its planned six-year duration. This paper outlines the program plan anddetails of activities and success metrics for the applied interventions in spring and fall 2023.2. Program ObjectivesMotivated by the financial needs of WCU’s student population along with the commercialclimate and employment needs of the surrounding region, the program takes advantage of thehost department’s strengths in project-based learning (PBL) and engagement with local industryto help foster those dimensions of the entrepreneurial mindset which are skills-based, and thusmore malleable than qualities that
coursefit the constraints of the first semester engineering course load and this course has enabledengineering students that place into precalculus to complete an on-time degree plan withouttaking summer courses. The corequisite course has been approved by the university curriculumcommittee and is a regular offering at the institution.The initial offering of the corequisite course occurred during the COVID pandemic necessitatingthe use of additional instructional technology. There was also an increase in low stakesassessments to encourage students to engage in the material. The added credits also increased theregularity of student interacting with calculus. Since the implementation of this pilot course,there have been several similar changes in
4 2 2 0 3.25environments, and an ability to identify and useappropriate technical literature can be rated as,Instructor Comments:The composite score exceeds the target scorethat is set at 3.00 on the scale of 4. Hence the Number of Responses: 8course met the specified criteria and no action isneeded at this time. Table 4: Continuous Improvement Plan for NSF-ATE PLC Module 1-10, 2-10, 3-3, and 3-4Semester Impetus for Change Action and Impact By WhomSpring 1. Modularization of 1. PLC Course was divided in to four modules Faculty2012
-relatedexperiments and course materials into the engineering curriculum, with a focus on artificial organs. Sev-eral modules are being developed and integrated throughout Rowan’s engineering curriculum, into themultidisciplinary freshman engineering course, core engineering courses, and senior electives. The mod-ules will be highly transferrable to other traditional engineering programs such as chemical, mechanicaland electrical as well as biomedical engineering programs. Our evaluation plan will examine specificlearning outcomes in core engineering areas as well as effect on retention, student attitudes, and careerchoices. This paper presents descriptions of the proposed and completed modules, and results of our as-sessment of learning outcomes to
flexibility,creativity, and adaptive problem solving skills29. The goal of our research is to fill this gap withnew evidence-based instructional resources. Before outlining our plan to meet this goal, weprovide a brief summary of the importance of bio-inspired design in design innovation and a sur-vey of existing undergraduate engineering curricula that teach biomimicry.1.1 The Importance of Bio-inspired Design for Design Innovation Innovative engineering design and simulations are essential to creating new and better prod-ucts and industries, and are important for the US to maintain and sustain its global economicleadership. "Design Quality" is the main factor that differentiates one competing product fromanother. Toyota, Apple, and Samsung are
administrators of the 13 HBCUs: The collaboration is leading to increasedsharing of curriculum, shared recruitment and retention strategies, cooperative exploration anduse of internal and external resources, and plans for collaborating on future funding and resourceallocation. As of June 2015, the collaboration had produced, piloted, and internally distributed 64curriculum modules and/or labs that focus on experiential hands-on learning using the AnalogDiscovery board (ADB) in engineering classes: This material represented six major contentdomains (electrical engineering, computer systems engineering, mechanical engineering, civilengineering, computer science, industrial management engineering) This effort was supportedand is being sustained through
attend social events, serve as academic advisors, meet withadvisees regularly, and serve as the primary conduit for Scholars into the projects. Scholars whohave completed the program and are juniors or seniors are asked to serve as peer mentors; for thecohort under study, the Peer mentors were selected from a group of high-achieving juniors/seniorssuch as those in leadership positions. Peer mentors receive a modest annual stipend and are askedto meet twice per quarter with their assigned mentee(s), respond to an end of quarter survey, andto attend social events. Each Scholar will also be assigned an early-career professional mentor whois a recent alum working at a local engineering company. We are planning for this at the startingof the second
received sufficient training to prepare more advancedlearning modules. It is imperative to strengthen the STEM PST education and build long-termpartnerships between high schools and UH to stimulate high school students’ interest in STEM. In 2023, University of Houston (UH) in Houston, Texas was awarded an NSF ResearchExperience for Preservice Teachers (RE-PST) site grant titled “Industries of the Future ResearchExperience for Preservice Teachers in STEM Settings.” The goal of the Research Experience forPreservice Teachers (RE-PST) project is to provide summer research opportunities for highschool preservice STEM teachers to engage in IotF research. The project plans to host 10 high school preservice teachers each summer to participate
the course LMS, meet with the instructor to discuss the approach to the course, student discuss the approach to the course, student challenges and issues and plan for observed lessons. challenges and issues and plan for observed lessons. Section B: Flipped Classroom Observation Section B: Classroom Observation Tool Tool This tool includes observation items in areas This tool includes observation items in eight major areas: Lesson Organization, Content related to instructor-student interactions and Knowledge & Relevance
stakeholders called IDEA Teams (Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, andAccess). Professional development sessions focus on engineering project implementation andcreating equitable and inclusive STEM environments. As outcomes of the initial 10-day trainingsession, members of these teams develop action research for equity projects (AREPs) in theirhome schools with the purpose of creating more equitable and inclusive STEM environments.Additionally, they plan for the implementation of informal STEM-enrichment clubs in theirschool settings. Networked Improvement Community (NIC) meetings were held virtually eachmonth throughout the first school year to allow IDEA Teams to discuss their progress onimplementation of their AREPs and STEM clubs. In addition to the
lesson plans. Figure 1. Summer PD program’s first-week CS/CT content course schedule.2.1.2. Course 2The second-week course was held at a local school district conference center. The course wastaught by four different CS teachers—a college professor, a high school teacher, a middle schoolteacher, and an elementary school teacher. Presentations were arranged so each instructor had achance to talk about teaching the concepts of loops, variables, conditionals, and functions at theirrespective grade level, allowing teachers to understand curricular progressions across the K-12grade span.An outline of the course schedule can be found below in Figure 2. Daily reflections werecompleted online at the end of each day and were graded for completion
smaller assignments. In all three collaborations lesson plans were implementedusing the BSCS 5E instructional model, which was aligned to the engineering design process.Instruments were developed to assess knowledge in collaborations 1 (engineering designprocess) and 3 (computational thinking), while in collaboration 2, knowledge was assessed withquestions from the fundamentals of engineering exam and a science content assessment.Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) was also used in all 3collaborations to assess teamwork across the collaborations. Finally, each student wrote areflection on their experiences, which was used to qualitatively assess the project impact. Theresults from the first full semester of
committee on ”survey of the state of the practice on traffic responsive plan selection control.” He is also a member of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Traffic Signal Systems committee, Artificial Intel- ligence and Advanced Computing Applications committee, and the joint subcommittee on Intersection. In addition, he is currently a chair on a task group on Agent-based modeling and simulation as part of the TRB SimSub committee. He also serves as a CEE faculty senator at Virginia Tech. Dr. Abbas is a recipient of the Oak Ridge National Lab Associated Universities (ORAU) Ralf E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement Award and the G. V. Loganathan Faculty Achievement Award for Excellence in Civil Engineering Education. He
they are working towarddegree completion.Program ManagementThis one-of-a-kind scholarship program has a complex structure and requires carefulcoordination. Because the program continues to evolve and develop, we created a checklist toensure all key tasks are correctly completed throughout the year (see Appendix A). The checklistcomponents include information on marketing and recruitment, communications, student supportservices, event coordination, and program evaluation and assessment activities; and it is crucialfor replicating and improving program management. In some aspects, the working checklistbecomes a reflective journal for the current year. While there were aspects we planned out beforeimplementation, some facets of the program are
) provides an opportunityfor vertical integration across courses within CCEM curriculum. The goal of introducingsustainability concepts is two-fold: to enhance undergraduate students’ interest in andunderstanding of sustainability by engaging them in real-world sustainability projects; and toprovide students with necessary knowledge for advancing a career in sustainability withinCCEM. The PBL framework is developed and implemented at "Arizona State University" between alower-division construction management course, Construction Materials, Methods andEquipment (CON252) and an upper-division/graduate cross-disciplinary course between civilengineering course, sustainability, and planning, Urban Infrastructure Anatomy and SustainableDevelopment (CEE
advocacy-network paradigm,with special attention upon the quality of the relationships and the mentoring activities.Survey InstrumentAn online 35-item survey was developed for this study to gather opinions on the quality of thementoring relationship; the mentoring received; the career development, sponsorship, andcoaching activities engaged in; as well as the quantity of contact (Fowler, 2009; Sue & Ritter,2012). The survey was based upon prior interviews in which participants were asked to share thementoring and advocacy-networking paradigm activities planned in their mentoring matches.The survey was closed-ended with a mix of factual, categorical response options (Yes/No) andopinion, continuous response options (Likert-scales). The survey
% 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 2014 2015 2016 Figure 4: Percent of REU participants from underrepresented groups in engineering (women, Hispanic, African American)Long Term Assessment of the ProgramThe REU program was and continues to be evaluated in a number of ways: online pre-REU andpost-REU surveys were conducted to assess the expectations of the students, their opinions andbeliefs about engineering, graduate school and research and their level of satisfaction withdifferent aspects of the program. This provides short-term data on student satisfaction with theprogram organization, as well as any changes in their opinions and plans immediately uponcompletion of the program. Yet, one of the
schools as the selected applicants,and a few even participated in the program twice. Forty percent of the participants were NativeAmericans and 56% were females. Since the program, teachers have attended approximately 25conferences, several with their students. Program deliverables included a research poster and twoSTEM lesson plans for their classroom – one with indigenous culture embedded into STEMconcepts, and the other based their university research. Additionally, participants received $1500toward classroom supplies to support the RET lesson plans. Outcomes include increased teacherconfidence in performing research, improved laboratory skills, and greater understanding ofSTEM pedagogical development specifically geared toward Native American
reflect onperformance early in the course would improve student outcomes. In particular, we examinedcounterfactual thoughts, thoughts about “what might have been.” These thoughts contribute tocausal reasoning and play an important role in making plans for the future. Additionally, weexamined behavioral intentions, specific plans for future actions in the course, which researchhas also shown improves student outcomes.After the first exam in a large-enrollment class taken by first-year engineering majors, 290students were randomly assigned to either generate counterfactuals about what they personallycould have done differently that would have resulting in doing better on the exam (vs. describetheir actual performance) and to either generate
Academic Programs in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan.Her primary responsibility in that role was to assure the delivery of a curriculum that addressed college-wide educational objectives to prepare students for 21st century careers. In this role Dr. Meadows led the planning, implementation and assessment of the College of Engineering first year program and targeted curriculum development projects. This led to her development as an educational researcher and she now conducts interdisciplinary research at the intersection of social psychology and engineering education, with specific emphasis on the influence of gender stereotypes in student teams.Dr. Laura Kasson Fiss, Michigan Technological
Paper ID #11309Exploring Military Veteran Students’ Pathways in Engineering EducationDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and
productdesign, planning, fabrication, assembly, and testing. They constitute a core body of knowledgethat all graduating engineers and technologists in manufacturing related fields should master.Focusing on the learning outcomes makes it easier for other interested institutions to implement Page 26.252.3the resulting model because instead of force-fitting a new curriculum into their programs, theycan simply map their outcomes to the MILL model outcomes. This is accomplished by usingonly those courses that are most relevant to their program outcomes. The adopting institutionsimply maps the MILL course-level learning outcomes to its institutional program