doing, like 'How is your PhD going? When are you going to be done?" No. It's like, "Oh, okay. You're here. Are you planning to have kids? They're the ones asking where my relationship situation is, [what] I'm planning moving forward. If I'm planning to have kids, because that's what they care more than if I'm happy. Several participants also described the "Why do you need to do this?" phenomenon wherethey are bombarded with comments that question their decision to pursue their doctorate. Jessicashared: Yeah, the whole idea of, "Why do you need to do this?"… my family, my mom's like, "People who graduate from Cal Tech make a lot of money, so why don't you just do that and live with [your
Portfolium reflections that I completed were very useful in monitoring my research and learning progress. Particularly during my training with Typhoon HIL, I was able to document specific stages in my skills development with the software. Also, other tours and visits helped me connect those experiences to research and learning objectives."Additionally, students learned how to create a marketable LinkedIn page; therefore, with ashowcase purpose, students were able to support their LinkedIn skills with specific skills listed.Another student stated, “I feel that the Portfolium reflections that I completed as an REU were a great way to expose and market myself to the engineering industry.”The program plans to continue
rather than asking their own questions. a. Do what they are told vs. plan and execute on their own. b. See the role of small tasks in the bigger picture.These challenges were not un-expected and were used as teaching moments to discussprofessional skills. To improve communication, students were allowed to determine the meansof communication that they felt most comfortable using and they settled on a free program calledSlack. The instructors focused on teaching students to write messages with specific objectivesand questions, providing a timeline for a response, directing the question to a person rather than agroup, and following up in a kind but timely manner.To improve individual ownership for tasks, team sizes were reduce to 2
, technology focused, standards driven disciplines, such as radiology, arepresented. A learning activity and a lifelong learning focused post activity survey are discussed.BackgroundFor the purposes of this paper, lifelong learning may be thought of as a personal plan forattaining additional competences in terms of knowledge, skills, and abilities throughout one’scareer and where these competences may be obtained through both formal and informal study.One approach to lifelong learning could be that the person would set their own goals anddetermine the needed competences, acquire access to needed materials, and monitor their ownprogress toward attaining these competences, and potentially modify these goals or set new goalsas they progress throughout
value of combining teams of diverse majorsand engaging them in a project with design and engineering components. Students in these cross-disciplinary teams learn how to work together, how to combine engineering and science principles inproblem solving and they gain the confidence and leadership opportunities they will need to solveproblems when they leave UHD.II. CurriculumSeveral years ago the CUAS developed curriculum in support of a new Minor in Sustainability. Often aminor in sustainability is limited to specific programs or specific students such as those in anenvironmental engineering, biology or urban planning. Because the courses require numerous pre-requisites within the majors, these minors are for all practical purposes out of
DevelopmentGoals. In 2015, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution for 2030 that included SustainableDevelopment Goals (SDGs). These SDGs have prompted changes to the engineering field to solvethese broad issues by increasing the capabilities and capacity of engineering through theinvolvement of young, student populations. It also prompts a change in engineering education tofocus more on sustainability in the curriculum [18].One final solution is the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Strategic Plan. The NSF hassupported multiple engineering education programs, such as Engineering Research Centers(ERCs) as well as the Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU). The main goal of theseprograms is to support research opportunities for students in
engineering practices, primarily focusing on team-basedactivities to promote professional engineering communication, along with helping students createa qualification plan to develop their undergraduate and professional goals in engineering. TheTRUE Capstone projects focus on preparing students for professional engineering problems byincorporating industry partners into the project decision process in order to identify real-worldproblems and solutions for the Capstone teams.In accordance with the RED ideology, a group of students, mentored by an engineeringeducation researcher, decided to apply Participatory Action Research (PAR) to study the role ofnew changes in the department. In this paper, we present the investigation led by one of
students enjoyed and highly valued their experience. Teachers were supportiveand recommended expanding the program to other schools.We adapted a college-level lab experience to make it more accessible to high school students andenhanced the campus tour to provide them with a holistic view of university life. We have foundthat the key takeaway from this initiative is the ease and success of the endeavor. Our programrepresents a new contribution to pre-college engineering education by providing high schoolstudents with hands-on exposure to engineering concepts and a glimpse into life as collegestudents. Our future plans include making this an annual event, expanding it to other schools andstudent communities, and improving non-lab activities to
skills.The PRA-TTSI team will primarily collaborate with four local high schools. Additionally, theprogram will be promoted through regional robot competitions and the Annual Science Fair heldin the County. The PRA-TTSI team aims to enroll ten students into the program during the 3rdyear of the grant period. Furthermore, the recruitment efforts of the PRA-TTSI program willspecifically target women, low-income individuals, and traditionally underrepresentedminorities, as outlined in the detailed plan provided in Table 6.Project TimelineThe departments of admissions, financial aid, academic support services, as well as theengineering and technology department will collaborate to ensure compliance with the NSF-ATErequirements for the program. The
and Human Resources (EHR) and the Division of Human Resource Development (HRD)called for increased accessibility to and diversity of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) fields and STEM education to include marginalized and underrepresented people1. In the NSF2022-2026 Strategic Plan, Strategic Goal 1 aims to broaden the participation of the "Missing Millions" orunder-served, underrepresented, and marginalized populations to fully participate in STEM2. Furthermore,the Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering (CEOSE) is charged by the UnitedStates Congress to advise NSF to increase the full participation of women, historically underrepresentedracial and ethnic populations, and neurodiverse individuals
seminars provided them with new information about career fieldsor topics in their career or helped them learn about something they knew nothing about.Comments across the years about these seminars included: ● “Helped clarify my plans for the future.” ● “It was really helpful to see professors who went through similar struggles and took time to get into their field. They gave advice that meant a lot as well.” ● “They introduced interesting new concepts that are beneficial to my career.” ● “Being able to create connections with people outside of my major. In the pumpkin demo, we were able to interact with our presenter and learn some cool stuff at the same time.” Students who indicated that the various seminars were useful
development of new STEM majors, particularly in emerging fields such asengineering, computer science, and information technology, emerges as imperative for fosteringSTEM growth at Keiser University. Addressing these challenges head-on is paramount tocultivating a more inclusive and supportive environment that empowers all students to pursue andpersist in STEM disciplines.As it is clear from tables 3 and 4, the major drawback are the retention and graduation rates forboth STEM and non-STEM majors. . In order to address the issue, a comprehensive mentoringplan will be the developed in the coming year.The proposed mentoring plan utilizes the mentors (a) To serve in an academic support role inwhich they will provide one-to-one or very small group
studies should be done to compare students’ performanceduring several semesters with and without the use of GAI tools, particularly isolating differentcourse assessment components where the student’s performance metrics were most influenced byGAI use. Also, as ethical concerns surrounding GAI persist, future studies should delve deeperinto the issues of AI-assisted plagiarism, algorithmic bias, transparency, equity, data privacy, andsecurity in engineering education learning and instruction.References[1] “What is Instructional Design? | ATD.” Accessed: Jan. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.td.org/talent-development-glossary-terms/what-is-instructional-design[2] “MagicSchool.ai - AI for teachers - lesson planning and more!” Accessed
can bring to a project 13. I appreciate the value that individuals with different strengths bring to a team 14. I recognize that people with different backgrounds from my own might have better ideas than I do 15. I am willing to learn from others who have different areas of expertise 16. I recognize the importance of other fields even if I don’t know much about them 17. I am willing to update my plans in response to new information Factor 3: Interest (In) 18. I tend to get involved in a variety of activities 19. I enjoy being involved in a variety of activities 20. I participate in a wide range of hobbies Factor 4: Altruism (Al) 21. The idea of tackling society’s biggest problems does not motivate me (reverse
(Student Learning Outcomes) using abachelor's and master's ACCE accredited Construction Management program based in the NewEngland region. However, the authors had to exclude the ABET evaluation due to time constraintsand a lack of data from the selected university. They plan to include it as a future expansion of thisresearch, with collaborative opportunities from other universities.The goal of the paper is to create a framework for XR (extended reality) that can be utilized byeducators in AEC (architecture, engineering, and construction) institutions to implement XR-basedactivities. These activities can assist in evaluating the student learning outcomes (SLOs) necessaryfor ACCE accreditation. The XR-SLO framework will provide educators with a
historical example, create or selectlearning objectives and design exercises to help students identify inequities created byinfrastructure, understand the historical context of that infrastructure, and plan for solutions thataddress the remediation of infrastructure inequities. As the framework is being developed, theauthors are testing its effectiveness and adaptability by creating lessons based on case studies.The framework as well as the lessons created will be available through the CIT-E Canvas page toall interested instructors.IntroductionThe Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E, pronounced “city”) is acommunity of practice (CoP) for those interested in supporting and improving the scholarship ofinfrastructure education
or “street race and gender,” the race and gender that society assigns to an individual inmundane, everyday societal interactions in describing participants as Black and non-Black andman and woman [9]. Three participants were Black; five were non-Black. Two participants weremen; six were women.Data Collection and AnalysisToward the end of the second year of the project (the first year was a planning year), weconducted open-ended, semi-structured interviews with project team members who each servedon at least one of the six teams. We attempted to capture a variety of team member experiencesand perspectives, including those from practitioners outside of academia. The full interviewprotocol contained 19 questions. The four interview questions we
criteria for success and constraints on materials, time, or cost. 3-5 ETS1-2: Generate and compare multiple possible solutions to a problem based on 13 how well each is likely to meet the criteria and constraints of the problem. 3-5 ETS1-3: Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and failure 22 points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that can be improved MS ETS1-1: Define the criteria and constraints of a design problem with sufficient 22 precision to ensure a successful solution taking into account relevant scientific principles taking into account potential impacts on people and the natural environment that may limit possible
andpromising trends in education is the “edutainment” concept, which combineseducational content with entertaining activities so, the participants learn while havingfun.The program proved its flexibility as it was adapted to various locations, number ofparticipants, and time intervals. The paper will present the continuation of the program,the new results, and the plans for future expansion of the program to reach a broaderrange of participants.IntroductionExtensive evidence supports the effectiveness of instructing engineering students inspatial visualization skills, leading to improved outcomes. Research, spanning from theearly 1990s onwards, has consistently shown that practicing and training in spatialvisualization enhances performance in
) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Digital Construction, 3) BIM and VDC, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Construction Education, and 6) Sustainability.Dr. Sandeep Langar, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Sandeep Langar is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Construction Science in College of Architecture, Construction, and Planning at The University of Texas at San Antonio. He received his Ph.D. in Environmental Design and Planning from the CoDr. Tulio Sulbaran, The University of Texas at San Antonio He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineer from Georgia Institute of Technology with concentration in Construction Management with a minor in Computer Engineering and strong statistical background. He
student in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. Her master’s research focuses on disability accommodations in engineering classrooms and will produce a research-backed facilitation for faculty to navigate relationships with their disabled students. She plans to complete her PhD research in biomedical acoustic applications. She has a B.S. in Integrated Engineering & Humanities from Lehigh University.Dr. Karina Ivette Vielma, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Karina I. Vielma is a first-generation college student who dreamed big. As the eldest of five children, Dr. Vielma became very resourceful, attributing her skills to growing up in poverty. Her parents had high expectations for
investigationalways reveals that the builders violated the approved guidelines."They don’t always build according to the approved plan, especially when it is a three-story building. There are times residential buildings are converted to six- or seven-storyshopping complexes by unscrupulous builders," the former General Manager said.CorruptionCorruption is another major factor responsible for ceaseless building collapse incidences;like compromise, this also takes place at different stages of building and from differentplayers in the building construction process. Another building developer somehowjustified the compromise. He said that for the building developers to maximize profit, theysometimes take loans from banks in a bid to assist the landlord in
at 50, 75, and 100%, where theinterrupt routine method produce latency over time in operating the motor. This experimentprovided a consideration for how a student should measure motor position if they plan to operatefor a long duration of time.MAEP Lesson PlanThe MAEP facilitates a hands-on learning experience in an introductory mechatronics labcourse. Through a series of labs designed for each motor type, students gain familiarity with themotors' functionalities and applications, empowering them to select the most suitable motor for amechatronics system. A first lab focuses on the BDC motor, where students compare differentdrive modes to operate a motor. Next, they explore operating a RC servo motor with feedback.Finally, a lab operating a
of the datagathering and analysis process. The collaborative team-based research approach proved effectivein systematically sifting through the extensive responses, narrowing it to essential topics. Theirwork also extended to extracting quotes that captured the student’s experiences, concerns, andsentiments regarding the department’s operations and responses to incidents that they planned toshare with the department faculty.Results & Discussion:Research findings were categorized into three overarching themes that aligned with the questionprompts: student expectations (Prompt 1), challenges with current climate (Prompt 2), andgeneral impact on students (both Prompt 1 & 2). For each main theme, researchers thenidentified sub-themes as
credit hoursbased on their desired workload. Many students enroll in the course for multiple semesters tocontinue their project work, and in doing so, can fulfill a general education “global challenges4”requirement and/or a major-specific technical elective. The learning outcomes for the coursesequence include, but are not limited to: project planning, application of knowledge frommultiple disciplines, problem recognition and design processes, sustainability, leadership,teamwork, communication, application of humanitarian ethics, cultural awareness, and globalperspectives. The learning outcomes are intentionally inclusive of the seven ABET CriterionThree standard student outcomes5. As part of the program, students are regularly presenting
Rehabilitation Act Independence ◦ Familial support networks ◦ Self-advocacy Institutional barriers ◦ Inaccessible material ◦ Under-trained instructors ◦ Lack of staff/dedicated personnel ◦ Poor representationTo begin our project, we reviewed the literature to understand the problem better. A 2020survey conducted by the Office of Special Education Programs in the Department of Educationfound 23% of responding students with disabilities reported planned enrollment in highereducation [2] compared to a study conducted in 2021 which found that 38% of the generalpopulation of 18–24-year-olds were enrolled [3
-testdemonstrates that inexperienced students still passed at nearly the same rate as students with priorexperience. The high withdraw rate suggests that engineering students that enter a first-yearprogramming course without having completed an advanced computer science course in highschool may be at a significant disadvantage to students that have had this opportunity. In addition,although nearly seventy percent of students attending public high schools in the state of Michiganhave access to at least one computer science course, it needs to be better understood as to whymore students planning to pursue engineering in college are not enrolling in these courses.BackgroundComputer science education has been a topic of discussion since the mid twentieth
positions. Dr. Kinney has significant experience in using technology to improve business practices, organizational change management, strategic planning, process improvement, and grant writing and evaluation. Prior to West Shore Community College, Dr. Kinney was the Dean for Business and Technology at Bay College in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #40983Prof. Scott A. Kuhl, Michigan Technological University Scott Kuhl is an Associate Professor of Computer Science and an Adjunct Associate Professor of Cognitive & Learning Sciences at Michigan
staff, and lead engaging STEM focused activities. LLC Mentors are compensated with a free bed in the residence hall. The role requires 15hrs/week see Table 3. Table 3: STEM LLC Mentor Responsibilities 15 hours/week Responsibilities 2 hrs/wk Attend the LLC House Course weekly (course schedule permitting). 5 hrs/wk Hold weekly mentoring hours. 2 hrs/wk Plan, advertise, and implement one STEM-related activity per month. 1 hr/wk Communicate regularly with the LLC student community through platforms such as the LLC Canvas page, GetInvolved, GroupMe, bulletin boards, email, flyers 5 hrs/wk Complete other LLC-related tasks
, industry skills are taught in senior-level capstoneclasses [5] and a compelling effort within engineering education is to reduce the mismatchbetween industry needs and student preparedness [1], [2]. Engineering students will be bettertrained to enter industry if more industry skills are taught starting in the first year of anundergraduate degree rather than the traditional senior-level focus to increase student’s fluencyin their professional skills. Students feel more prepared to enter the engineering industry if theyhave been taught both the technical and professional skills throughout their entire undergraduatedegree plan [2]. Therefore, it is important to study professional skills in engineering educationprograms; the earlier in the degree plan