wasorganized.Results of the Roundtable DiscussionAs described earlier, six issues pertaining to establishing a center for teaching and learning werediscussed by the groups. Responses of the participants are compiled here.1. Developing support for a teaching and learning centerA variety of ideas regarding how to support such a center were discussed, and the group agreedthat before establishing a teaching and learning center, a critical mass of support was required.Perhaps most important is finding an individual leader willing to forward the idea of creating acenter, organize meetings, compile materials, and seek further support for the development of acenter.Furthermore, when putting together plans to develop a center, it is essential that a sponsor be
nolonger specified, and we felt that our large general education requirement could be turned from aweakness into a strength. We began developing program educational objectives and anassessment plan throughout the spring of 1999. The assessment plan was implemented in the fallof 1999. The request for evaluation was submitted to ABET in January 2000, the self-study waswritten during Spring 2000, and the self-study was submitted to ABET in July 2000. The visitfrom ABET evaluators occurred early September 2000.This paper will describe our program in detail, the preparations made for the evaluation byABET, and the preliminary results of the visit.II. The Engineering Physics Program at Southeast Missouri State UniversityThe Engineering Physics
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department(EECE) faculty felt it would be best to do a complete evaluation of the mission and educationalobjectives of the programs. This could involve some changes in existing data gathering andanalysis processes. Our long term plan is to have a comprehensive review of the programeducational objectives on a six year cycle.The next activity is the reevaluation of the processes by which the program outcomes aredetermined and results evaluated. Inherent in this will be a review of current program outcomesfor each program. The plan is to finish this activity in time to allow at least three years prior tothe next general review. This would allow for data regarding any new outcomes to be gatheredand analyzed.A key goal
SME’s Manufacturing Education Plan: Phase I Report. TheDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offered an ABET accreditedManufacturing Engineering program, but did not grant a degree in Manufacturing Engineering.Direct presentations by national SME officers to the Governor of Utah, near the beginning of thegrant period, increased statewide awareness of the manufacturing program at USU. The 14competency gaps were addressed as part of an extensive curriculum reformation. Six newmanufacturing courses were developed and taught. Manufacturing applications were developedand initiated in several core mechanical engineering courses. A unique and comprehensivecurriculum assessment process was developed and implemented. Industrial and student
requirements, we developed an experimental course that fully integratesinstruction in both history and materials science. Titled “Materials in the Modern World,” thecourse was offered in the Spring of 2000. This paper describes the development of the course,its advantages and disadvantages, and our plans to use what we learned to offer similar coursesin the future.I. IntroductionHumanities instruction has often been an afterthought in engineering technology education.While required by accreditation agencies, humanities courses typically are taught by facultyoutside of engineering technology programs and are not integrated with engineering courses.Some schools have sought to deal with this situation by offering courses in the history oftechnology or
how to draw a plan,section, elevation and axonometric. Page 22.823.2In this paper, quantitative spatial reasoning test results and qualitative data of students‘perception of a model project will be presented. This study is a follow-up to the author‘s studyof the use of visual aids in classrooms that are not supplemented with a laboratory component forhands-on learning.Background:Spatial reasoning is ―the mental manipulation of objects and their parts in 2D and 3D space.‖1 Ithas also been defined as concerning the locations of objects, their shapers, their relations to eachother, and the paths they take as they move.2 Research has shown
22.841.5between the end of spring 2009 semester and the beginning of the summer 2009 session. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2010, American Society for Engineering Education 136Morning sessions were mostly devoted to studying math either in groups or individually usingMyMathTest10, an online system developed by Pearson Education for developing mathplacement tests and short math refresher programs. Note that the first week of the program hadmore workshops related to resources and skills needed for college success. Many of theworkshops planned for the second week
Institute. Current efforts in sustainable knowledge transfer are focused in the planning, design, and construction of a Polytechnic school in rural East Africa (Sam, Tanzania). The project is a collaboration of the people of Sam (Headed by the Catholic Diocese), Cal Poly SLO (headed by Baltimore), NGO (the Mbesese Initiative), and industry (Arup Los Angeles).Dr. Allen C. Estes, California Polytechnic State University Allen C. Estes is a professor and Head for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Poly- technic State University in San Luis Obispo. Until Jan. 2007, Estes was the Director of the Civil En- gineering program at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA). He is a registered Professional Engineer in
of transitioning students from a traditional engineering program into anengineering education doctorate program. The purpose of this project is to ease this transitionthrough the development of a formal orientation for an Engineering Education department; theADDIE model for training design was used. The first step was a thorough analysis of thedepartment, student requirements, tasks, personnel, and knowledge, skills & attitudes (KSA)required by a doctorate student in engineering education. Then, we developed learning objectivesand a plan of instruction that would optimize the learning, retention, and transfer of theinformation introduced during the orientation. Next, we developed the physical elements of theorientation program, which was
homework, and attended one extra hour of study sessioneach week. The SEP program seeks to intervene earlier in the semester, and is available to allstudents.Another early intervention technique in a calculus course is described by Koch2. Students whoperformed poorly on the first exam in Calculus I were given the option of switching into a half-term, 2-credit hour intensive pre-calculus course, before retaking Calculus I the following term.The goal of the SEP program is to retain the students in the course, and for them to make thenecessary corrections to be successful.Lavelle3 describes an intervention program after the first Calculus exam in which students meetwith an academic advisor, develop an action plan, and then have a follow-up meeting
management. There are also functional gapsbetween working units of the organization. If we superimpose the management gaps ontop of the functional gaps, we find that companies are made up of small operationalislands that refuse to communicate with one another for fear that giving up informationmay strengthen their opponents. The project manager’s responsibility is to get theseislands to communicate cross-functionally toward common goals and objectives5 . Page 25.184.4 Figure-1 An Overview of Management and Functional Gaps5Researchers have identified failures of projects in the 1980s as quantitative, mainly dueto: Ineffective planning
studies.IntroductionEngineering as a profession struggles to retain a robust and diverse workforce. Research inengineering education has shown that students who enter engineering programs do not alwayspersist in earning engineering degrees and even in their senior year are unsure of pathwaysforward 1, 2. Furthermore, even those students that complete their engineering degrees do notalways remain in engineering fields. Developing an understanding of how graduates make earlycareer choices can lead to strategies for supporting choices to remain in engineering professionsincluding both workforce and graduate school choices.Much of the existing research on engineering career choices has focused on undergraduates’intended career plans as they are graduating. For example
AC 2012-3871: THE ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYLEADERSHIP ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM: PREPARING ENGINEER-ING, MATH, AND SCIENCE STUDENTS FOR LEADERSHIP SUCCESSDr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Aseess- ment and professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her publications on assessment, portfolios, and engineering and professional communication have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, and the European Journal of Engineering Education. She is also Co-founder of the Rose-Hulman Leadership
a Lesson Plan Table 1. Online TBL Training Course FrameworkDuring the informative sessions (part 1 through 4 in Table 1), trainees will learn about TBL frominstructor’s presentation recordings and video clips excerpted from an actual classroom thatdemonstrate best practices of TBL strategies. They will check their understanding in each partthrough an online quiz that they can retake as many times as needed until achieving apredetermined level of success in order to move on to the next. The trainees will also have anopportunity to design or modify their own course with TBL by working on a lesson plan as afinal outcome of the training.Instructional Design
Page 25.1150.3minimums and dress in business casual attire on a daily basis. Partnering with industry andworking engineers is something IRE prides itself on. Because of this the students are held to thesame standard as working engineers in an engineering environment. This gives all students thechance to practice engineering. Students at IRE are required to do the same type of writing as traditional students, but arealso required, over the course of their four semesters, to write four technical documents, abusiness plan, and several personal improvement plans. The final design deliverable for each project is a technical document that is writtenthroughout a semester about the projects that students have been working on. Each member
private sector expectations. Exhibit 3 Expectation for Cost / Budget Analysis Cost / budget analysis - I am expected to estimate, analyze, or prepare cost information for operating or project budgets. Public Sector Private Sector Statistical significance Always or frequently 44% 30% Sectors not different Seldom or never 56% 70%Organizations that involve engineering and technical personnel in business planning andapplication of financial analysis tools should have methods that are clearly understood
necessary to understand forces and limited engineeringprinciples.Instruction in the program was based on cognitive principles of active and collaborative learning,and, in addition to the technical skills, students were exposed to technical writing strategies andcommunication skills. The assessment plan included pre/post surveys, student and instructorjournals, and an exit skills test. A longevity follow-up study is planned for the spring 2001semester.Results were overwhelmingly positive from the program’s administrators, instructors, andstudents, and tips for generalization of the program with recommendations for improvement areincluded.I. What is the Joy of Engineering Program About?The pilot program for The Joy of Engineering Summer Program was
year, and 4) continuedcommunication with campers through e-mail or phone. The program targets 5th, 6th and 7th gradegirls and features a tiered-mentoring process that is designed to match campers with high schoolstudents, college students, and college faculty who excel in science, mathematics and/orengineering. The mentors work in both camps and continue their mentoring activities throughoutthe following school year. The Central South Summer Camp evaluation plan, which includesqualitative and quantitative measures, will be used to assess program effectiveness and to helpdetermine if girls who participate in this program have developed a sustained interest in math,science or engineering.Introduction It is commonly accepted that we need
lieu of providing another service,say ancillary services, because they are able to choose the type of service they’ll provide tomaximize profit in a competitive market.The importance of these considerations will intensify the need for power system plans andresource schedules that incorporate the best engineering and financial principles and practices.Both scheduling and planning require the integration of engineering knowledge about thephysical characteristics of the generators and financial knowledge about the financial tools thatcan be used to aid in power production and delivery. For example, if a company acquires a leaseof a generator for a period of time, it will probably reduce the risk if the company also shorts aforward contract for
, theseprofessional skills are taught on-the-job by mentoring, “stand and deliver” instruction,correspondence, computer-based instruction, etc. Such internal training may require severalmonths of a new engineer’s first year on the job.In a recent course in Engineering Professional Responsibility, student teams were assigned asemester research project in which they were tasked to 1) Analyze their own four-yearcurriculum in comparison to other Universities, 2) Determine the preferred set ofknowledge/skills/abilities at the entry level for the job they plan to seek, and 3) Plan thesupplemental education (through seminars, short courses, certificate courses, etc) required to“bridge the gap.” In researching for this project, student teams were encouraged to
Session 2647 Closing the Loop: The Difference between Making Improvements and Continuous Improvement Gregory Neff, Susan Scachitti, and Mohammad Zahraee Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, IndianaAbstractCriteria1 published by the Technology Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology TAC of ABET are continually changing. In preparing for a TACof ABET accreditation visit, many engineering technology faculty and administrators are hardpressed to distinguish between a list of useful improvement initiatives and a continuousimprovement plan. This
design project.The Departments of Chemical and Industrial Engineering received an NSF Instructional andLaboratory Improvement grant that was implemented between July 1995 and December 1997.The hardware and software provide engineering course support for engineering science as wellas design applications for both engineering disciplines. The departmental faculty consideredcontinued maintenance and operation of the computer lab, and chose to work with InformationServices (campus level oversight) in the development of this lab. Information Services isresponsible for the operation and maintenance of the lab. In addition, Information Servicesprovided part of the match money for the grant proposal.Laboratory DevelopmentThe laboratory was planned and
some students recently employed in EDG/CAD/CAM positions include: 1) planning,selecting and applying computer/automated systems for manufacturing or processing;2) designing computer and automated systems machines, and equipment used in manufacturingor processing; 3) research and development leading to the creation of new or improved computerand/or automated equipment or processes; 4) developing common computer-related databases tobe shared by engineering design, factory automation, and manufacturing planning functions; and5) product design and development. PROBLEMS AND ISSUESThere appears to be a reduction of EDG/drafting/design visualization courses available nationallyin grades 7-12. Also, spatial related
3MET 494G/598D Waste Minimization and Prevention 3MET 4XX Material and Energy Balan in Manufacturing Processes 3MET 4XX Energy 3MET 4XX Environmental Ethics and Regulations 3MET 4XX Environmental Site Planning for Industries 3Students with environmental emphasis option would substitute Manufacturing and theEnvironment course (MET 4XX) and Waste minimization and Prevention (MET494G/598D) for MET 344 and MET 346 respectively. In order to maintain the total 128semester credit hours, they would use the remaining four of the proposed courses as
on their own during the week and then meet on Fridayto present their weekly progress report. These weekly meetings enable the students to get an ideaabout all of the project areas. Some students determined last year that there was an area ofsoftware development in which they were not interested. Others found new areas of interest. Some field trips to local firms to determine career opportunities are planned. Once studentsget involved with their project, they are usually anxious to see it to conclusion and are notthrilled about having too many speakers or field trips.Reporting Requirements: Each team presents a ten minute oral report each week which gives abrief overview of accomplishments of the past week and plans for the next week
phases of planning,programming, schematic design, design development, construction documents, bidding, andconstruction administration. Additional phases may also be included such as site evaluation,interior design and post-occupancy services. Each phase has a particular set of issues andprocedures, but all involve a design and decision making component.During the planning phase goals are developed and a schedule is established. Programmingdetermines the specific requirements of the project itself. Schematic design involves consideringalternative design options and establishing a preliminary approach. The design developmentphase refines the schematic design. In the construction document phase specifications anddrawings are produced that document
theinformation about the students who took the course in Fall 2022 and Fall 2023.Table 1. Information about Students Who Took the Course in Fall 2022 and Fall 2023. Senior Junior Sophomore Total Fall 2022 17 13 2 32 Fall 2023 15 8 3 26The course description states [5] that Provided in each fall semester, the objectives of the course are to understand the fundamental mechanisms and principles of airport planning and development, airport finance management, airport marketing and communication, and governmental and public relations.The course was initially designed in an in
Institutes of Health, and the Paso del Norte Health Foundation have funded his research on older adults. The US Army Research Laboratory has funded Dr. Pennathur’s research on workload assessment. Dr. Pennathur has also been recently awarded two grants from the National Science Foundation in Engineering Education. In one of the grants, he is modeling how engineering faculty plan for their instruction. In a second grant, he is developing a model for institutional transformation in engineering which balances access and excellence. Dr. Pennathur is the author/co-author of over 100 publications in industrial engineering and human factors engineering. He is on the editorial board of the International Journal of Industrial
-April 2008 and April 2017 - present). Dr. Yaprak also served as an ABET IEEE/ETAC Commissioner (July 2012-July 2017). Dr. Yaprak also serves on the ABET Board of Delegates (November 2019-November 2025). Dr. Yaprak served as a Program Director at the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Division of Undergraduate Education, Feb 2015 to Feb 2017. In that role, she was responsible for planning and budgeting for science in engineering education; managing the awards process; marketing the program; working with other NSF programs, federal agencies and organizations; advising and assisting the division’s director in long-range planning; and reviewing research, education and infrastructure proposals.Mr. Mark A Jager, Wayne State
elements of deliberate practice are: (1) motivation, (2) intentional plan ofpractice, (3) repetition, and (4) timely feedback. We assign homework to provide students withrepetitive, intentionally designed practice opportunities, but ensuring that students receive timely,effective feedback is resource-intensive and does not scale well to large classes. In addition, ourexperience with traditional homework grading suggests that many students do not even viewdetailed feedback when it is provided. One solution to both problems is for students to grade theirown homework assignments.Direct evidence of effectiveness of student-grading for learning is scant, but suggests thatself-grading is more effective than peer-grading for achieving learning objectives